JimmyJammer wrote:Red Larrivee wrote:JohnnyTapwater wrote:I can see why people don't like MPJ. If you think he's a PF, then he's pretty weak in comparison.
He's a SF that will offer position versatility.
Position versatility depends on your ability to guard.
I'm not sure I'd want a 6'11 player who doesn't move great laterally to defend a quicker and smaller position.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Porter is definitely faster and more athletic than Doncic, so I wonder how that would work with the latter as a SF or SG? As it stands, I wonder if there is actually a position that Doncic can defend in the NBA. So, you would not draft Doncic either because of that?
Doncic is better defensively than Porter. Neither has the great lateral quickness like Mikal Bridges, but I've seen Doncic play good team defense and be in the right places. His awareness is respectable, but you're not going to leave him on an island.
Porter doesn't move his feet well to me and he's too upright in stance. He has a similar issue as LaVine in that he gets caught watching the ball a lot and loses his man.
I don't think either player lacks a position to defend. I just think Porter's flaws are so much easier to hide at PF than SF. Someone brought up Mirotic and Mirotic is definitely not a SF. In fact, the lineups with him at SF usually weren't good for his career. He's had better luck at the 4.
I don't expect either of these players to anchor a defense or something. I'm just looking at what fits best in terms of executing team defense.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk