Image ImageImage Image

GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

User avatar
MikeDC
Analyst
Posts: 3,201
And1: 2,012
Joined: Jan 23, 2002
Location: DC Area

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#161 » by MikeDC » Wed Oct 15, 2025 4:15 pm

drosestruts wrote:Can Noa play center?

Anthony Davis was 6'10", 222 lbs, with a 7'5" wingspan and 9'0" standing reach coming out of college

Noa is 6'11", 204 lbs, 7'1" wingspan and 9'1" standing reach

Chet Holgren was 7'0". 195 lbs, 7'6" wingspan and 9'6" standing reach


I'd guess he evolves to that, but it's probably not until 4-5 years down the road. And even then, it's not necessarily the case that we want him playing center full time. But it's nice to have the option for some of the time.

To me, getting a somewhat realistic center prospect is probably our most obvious need (beyond just the generic point that we need stars).
drosestruts
General Manager
Posts: 9,185
And1: 4,304
Joined: Apr 05, 2012
 

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#162 » by drosestruts » Wed Oct 15, 2025 5:31 pm

MikeDC wrote:
drosestruts wrote:Can Noa play center?

Anthony Davis was 6'10", 222 lbs, with a 7'5" wingspan and 9'0" standing reach coming out of college

Noa is 6'11", 204 lbs, 7'1" wingspan and 9'1" standing reach

Chet Holgren was 7'0". 195 lbs, 7'6" wingspan and 9'6" standing reach


I'd guess he evolves to that, but it's probably not until 4-5 years down the road. And even then, it's not necessarily the case that we want him playing center full time. But it's nice to have the option for some of the time.

To me, getting a somewhat realistic center prospect is probably our most obvious need (beyond just the generic point that we need stars).


I would still cut Vuc and sign Kai Jones (currently playing in Turkey) today if I were magically the GM.

I really dislike watching Vuc, but still try not to be a hater, but he honestly serves no purpose. He's not helping us in the short-term, at his age there is no long-term, and he's not going to return anything of value in a trade.

There's no point to him being here.

I realize he's not blocking minutes for anyone with a big upside (Collins and Smith seem to be what they are), but he doesn't play the style the team wants to play.
User avatar
MikeDC
Analyst
Posts: 3,201
And1: 2,012
Joined: Jan 23, 2002
Location: DC Area

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#163 » by MikeDC » Wed Oct 15, 2025 7:34 pm

drosestruts wrote:
MikeDC wrote:
drosestruts wrote:Can Noa play center?

Anthony Davis was 6'10", 222 lbs, with a 7'5" wingspan and 9'0" standing reach coming out of college

Noa is 6'11", 204 lbs, 7'1" wingspan and 9'1" standing reach

Chet Holgren was 7'0". 195 lbs, 7'6" wingspan and 9'6" standing reach


I'd guess he evolves to that, but it's probably not until 4-5 years down the road. And even then, it's not necessarily the case that we want him playing center full time. But it's nice to have the option for some of the time.

To me, getting a somewhat realistic center prospect is probably our most obvious need (beyond just the generic point that we need stars).


I would still cut Vuc and sign Kai Jones (currently playing in Turkey) today if I were magically the GM.

I really dislike watching Vuc, but still try not to be a hater, but he honestly serves no purpose. He's not helping us in the short-term, at his age there is no long-term, and he's not going to return anything of value in a trade.

There's no point to him being here.

I realize he's not blocking minutes for anyone with a big upside (Collins and Smith seem to be what they are), but he doesn't play the style the team wants to play.


Respectfully, common sense left the discussion about Vuc a while ago.

If I were running things, I wouldn't have given up as they did to get him and I would have re-traded him and definitely not resigned him.

But he is on the team and they're trying to win games, so yeah.

It's a mistake for people to let their dislike of the team's direction and goals to seep into their understanding of reality. But that's what fans do.

In this case that means:

1. Vuc is not a great player, but he's probably still a slightly better player than Collins overall, and he's earned the right to start until he's clearly outplayed. Which nobody has done. Leave off the hyperbole, and he's got his uses. It's also just not true that he doesn't play the style the team wants to play. What they want to play isn't just "run", it's also "pass", and "feed transition" and "space the floor". I can't believe I have to defend this guy who I very much don't like, but the Bulls will miss his shooting, his ability to get a rebound and throw a good pass to start the play, his ability to move the ball pretty quickly, and Giddey will miss having a competent big to throw it to, because he generated more assists throwing to Vuc than to anyone else.

All that doesn't mean he's great or even that I want him on the team, but if you are a team trying to win games, which the Bulls definitely are, cutting Vuc to add Kai Jones isn't even in the universe of what they're considering.

2. If you want to look at the small sample size of the post all-star break last season and say Collins is great, well, the Bulls still had a higher Net +/- per 100 possessions with Vuc than they did with Collins over the same period.

3. Collins needs to demonstrate he can shoot somewhat competently and not be a TO and Foul machine. He's a better defender than Vuc, but people just don't want to hear, regardless of the evidence, that Vuc's defense, while below average, isn't WORST IN TEH LEAGUE LOLZ. There are plenty of guys that are worse, and for the regular season, it just doesn't matter too much.

4. Smith is a quintessential tease, especially if you watch superficially. You watch a game thread and people are acting like he's the second coming and going into histrionics a bout why he isn't playing and then you look and you see a sub 30% three point shooter who's chasing blocks and rebounds and pretty consistently out of position to do the right thing on defense. Maybe in a couple more years he'll be passable, but it's not as if Donovan is the only coach that's decided he's a bit player.

The right move for the Bulls is to play Vuc, and if the best we can do is get a couple seconds at the deadline, then trade him for that. I'd also be looking at getting pick(s) by trading him for longer salary because the Bulls don't have much to work with in free agency anyway.

That is the single most obvious point, I think. The best move they have in the long-run here is to collect a pick by getting some team out of the tax. Vuc by being a $20M expiring contract, is there best means to do that.

If they just cut him, they absolutely are shooting themselves in the foot, because they no longer have the opportunity to do this. It'd be, pardon my French, **** stupid.
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,774
And1: 7,014
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#164 » by GoBlue72391 » Wed Oct 15, 2025 7:37 pm

Ice Man wrote:
Stratmaster wrote:FWIW the Bulls are -25 in the first quarter of their 4 preseason games and -33 in the first 8 minutes. To me, those are the only meaningful minutes in pre-season games.

Turns out other teams run fast too.

I guess Coby will help?


Good point, Strat. And yes Coby will help, but obviously he's not going to be enough by himself to overcome that sort of gap. Obviously, Vuc either needs to show or be benched. That would help a lot, too.

Vuc has "addition by subtraction" written all over him.
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,774
And1: 7,014
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#165 » by GoBlue72391 » Wed Oct 15, 2025 7:44 pm

Bulliever2020 wrote:
coldfish wrote:
Muzbar wrote:


If any other team had a year 2 21 year old playing like Buzelis is, the fanbase would be hyping him to no end. They would be polishing his hall of fame statue.
27 points per 36
56%fg
39%3p
71%ts
88%ft

Bulls fans are so jaded at this point they are like . . . meh.



I just don't agree with this at all. Please point me to these posts where people are "meh" on him. I'd say the majority of posts I see about him here refer to him as a future star and a guy who will be the best player on the team sooner rather than later.

I agree. I'm as high on him as possible and the fanbase as a whole is super high on him. I don't think I've ever seen anyone be negative about him since he left Billy's doghouse during the second half of last season. In fact, I'm not even sure I've seen anyone be neutral or "meh" on him either.

it's just that, as a whole, we're actually being semi-grounded with our young stud for the first time ever. This is a good thing, all the Pat is the next Kawhi BS was delusional and nauseating and the Essengue is Giannis thing that was going on for a little bit was too.

We're all super high on Matas, we're just not anointing him the next Larry Bird or whatever, and that's a good thing.
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,774
And1: 7,014
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#166 » by GoBlue72391 » Wed Oct 15, 2025 7:48 pm

drosestruts wrote:Can Noa play center?

Anthony Davis was 6'10", 222 lbs, with a 7'5" wingspan and 9'0" standing reach coming out of college

Noa is 6'11", 204 lbs, 7'1" wingspan and 9'1" standing reach

Chet Holgren was 7'0". 195 lbs, 7'6" wingspan and 9'6" standing reach

I've been saying since we drafted him that he's far more likely to settle in as a C/PF than a SF/PF like a lot of people are thinking/hoping.

This guy has modern switchable/versatile rim running stretch big written all over him, once he bulks up some.

He's not going to be Giannis, he's going to be something like Jarrett Allen with a decent jumper.
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 25,626
And1: 6,498
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#167 » by Indomitable » Wed Oct 15, 2025 8:14 pm

KissedByaRose1 wrote:I hate us more than anyone but that was a damn encouraging preseason game against the 2nd best team in the NBA. Matas has it boys! If he can just get to 40% on his open 3s and develop his playmaking we have a legit guy who can be a top two player on a title team.

Awesome to see Giddey stayed in shape this offseason also. I'm excited to watch Bulls basketball this season and even though the record will be very similar it will actually be something we can get excited about in a real way.

If you put Walker Kessler on this team I still think we'd be a 9/10 seed but going into next season i think we'd have a real shot at top 6. Lets hope Billy teaches these guys the right habits early.

Anybody on Utah is not worth the headache
:banghead:
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,506
And1: 9,135
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#168 » by Chi town » Wed Oct 15, 2025 8:42 pm

GoBlue72391 wrote:
Ice Man wrote:
Stratmaster wrote:FWIW the Bulls are -25 in the first quarter of their 4 preseason games and -33 in the first 8 minutes. To me, those are the only meaningful minutes in pre-season games.

Turns out other teams run fast too.

I guess Coby will help?


Good point, Strat. And yes Coby will help, but obviously he's not going to be enough by himself to overcome that sort of gap. Obviously, Vuc either needs to show or be benched. That would help a lot, too.

Vuc has "addition by subtraction" written all over him.


More like multiplication by DNPs.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,506
And1: 9,135
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#169 » by Chi town » Wed Oct 15, 2025 8:45 pm

GoBlue72391 wrote:
drosestruts wrote:Can Noa play center?

Anthony Davis was 6'10", 222 lbs, with a 7'5" wingspan and 9'0" standing reach coming out of college

Noa is 6'11", 204 lbs, 7'1" wingspan and 9'1" standing reach

Chet Holgren was 7'0". 195 lbs, 7'6" wingspan and 9'6" standing reach

I've been saying since we drafted him that he's far more likely to settle in as a C/PF than a SF/PF like a lot of people are thinking/hoping.

This guy has modern switchable/versatile rim running stretch big written all over him, once he bulks up some.

He's not going to be Giannis, he's going to be something like Jarrett Allen with a decent jumper.


A big like Chet is his comp IMO.

I see him as a hybrid Tayshaun Prince / Chet.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,506
And1: 9,135
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#170 » by Chi town » Wed Oct 15, 2025 8:50 pm

Very encouraging game from Giddey.

- 3-7 from 3 and much more ready to shoot and even creates two looks off the dribble

- 8-8 FTs.

I said down the stretch last season…
Shoot 5 3s per game and 6 FTs and he will be an efficient triple double threat every night.

Giddey and Buz will greatly benefit from the spacing Coby will provide too.
madvillian
RealGM
Posts: 22,208
And1: 9,242
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Brooklyn

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#171 » by madvillian » Wed Oct 15, 2025 8:52 pm

Chi town wrote:Very encouraging game from Giddey.

- 3-7 from 3 and much more ready to shoot and even creates two looks off the dribble

- 8-8 FTs.

I said down the stretch last season…
Shoot 5 3s per game and 6 FTs and he will be an efficient triple double threat every night.

Giddey and Buz will greatly benefit from the spacing Coby will provide too.


Giddey is not going to be a problem this year imo. He'll be an avg starter or maybe slightly better. If we had 4 more of those guys would be much better off. I'm worried that Okoro just sucks playing with no gravity (or little) and we'd be better off starting Pat, at least if White isn't ready to go for a couple week. Pat at least is a legit shooting threat. Okoro is not.
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.


I'll go ahead and make a sig bet that Mikal is better by RPM this year than Zach.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,678
And1: 37,996
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#172 » by coldfish » Wed Oct 15, 2025 10:15 pm

Bulliever2020 wrote:
coldfish wrote:
Muzbar wrote:


If any other team had a year 2 21 year old playing like Buzelis is, the fanbase would be hyping him to no end. They would be polishing his hall of fame statue.
27 points per 36
56%fg
39%3p
71%ts
88%ft

Bulls fans are so jaded at this point they are like . . . meh.



I just don't agree with this at all. Please point me to these posts where people are "meh" on him. I'd say the majority of posts I see about him here refer to him as a future star and a guy who will be the best player on the team sooner rather than later.


Show me the threads and threads talking about him being a top 20 player soon or something. What I see on the Bulls board falls under the "rational" category. Most fanbases would have a lot of "rational" plaudits mixed in with over the top hype. "Can Matas be a top 5 player?" Etc.

IMO, we are abnormally subdued on him.
meekrab
RealGM
Posts: 13,962
And1: 10,626
Joined: Dec 15, 2014

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#173 » by meekrab » Wed Oct 15, 2025 10:55 pm

drosestruts wrote:Can Noa play center?

Anthony Davis was 6'10", 222 lbs, with a 7'5" wingspan and 9'0" standing reach coming out of college

Noa is 6'11", 204 lbs, 7'1" wingspan and 9'1" standing reach

Chet Holgren was 7'0". 195 lbs, 7'6" wingspan and 9'6" standing reach

Anthony Davis gets injured all the **** time partially because he was forced to play center.
Bulliever2020
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,360
And1: 2,623
Joined: Jul 13, 2018
       

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#174 » by Bulliever2020 » Wed Oct 15, 2025 10:57 pm

coldfish wrote:
Bulliever2020 wrote:
coldfish wrote:
If any other team had a year 2 21 year old playing like Buzelis is, the fanbase would be hyping him to no end. They would be polishing his hall of fame statue.
27 points per 36
56%fg
39%3p
71%ts
88%ft

Bulls fans are so jaded at this point they are like . . . meh.



I just don't agree with this at all. Please point me to these posts where people are "meh" on him. I'd say the majority of posts I see about him here refer to him as a future star and a guy who will be the best player on the team sooner rather than later.


Show me the threads and threads talking about him being a top 20 player soon or something. What I see on the Bulls board falls under the "rational" category. Most fanbases would have a lot of "rational" plaudits mixed in with over the top hype. "Can Matas be a top 5 player?" Etc.

IMO, we are abnormally subdued on him.


Now you're moving the goalposts. You said the fanbase is "meh" on him. That is the part I thoroughly disagree with. In 1 minute of searching I found these...
Maybe Bulls fans are being more rational about him rather than making ridiculously too early predictions like Pat is going to be Kawhi or Essengue will be Giannis but I don't think that's anything to get upset about. The people who doubt Matas and his huge potential are few and far between here.

madvillian wrote:Matas is a star. I've seen enough, preseason or not.


DASMACKDOWN wrote:
Matas Buzelis wrote:“I always think of it like this: If somebody has done it, I can do it too. If nobody has done it, I'm going to be the first one to do it,”


https://www.bleachernation.com/bulls/2025/09/29/bulls-matas-buzelis-quote/

When I heard it live, the first person I thought about was Derrick Rose. I believe that statement is Matas version of Derricks' why cant I be the MVP.

But in terms of personalities, Matas is more Joakim Noah than Derrick in terms of how he expresses himself.

We havent had a young guy like this in a long time. And I am here for all of it.


Chi town wrote:
DuckIII wrote:
Jstock12 wrote:
Read on Twitter


That list is gonna keep changing.


Yep. In three years I think it will be…

Castle
Buz
Risacher
Holland
Reed


ghostinthepost1 wrote:Great interview with Matas, it really does feel like he considers himself as the face of the franchise.

All-star season incoming!

PlayinTourney4Lyfe
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,404
And1: 11,199
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#175 » by MrSparkle » Wed Oct 15, 2025 11:29 pm

I feel OK about predicting Matas will be the best of the class. I like Castle, but Matas has exceptional handles and moves for 6’10. Don’t think Risacher will be as good.
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 25,626
And1: 6,498
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#176 » by Indomitable » Wed Oct 15, 2025 11:46 pm

coldfish wrote:
Bulliever2020 wrote:
coldfish wrote:
If any other team had a year 2 21 year old playing like Buzelis is, the fanbase would be hyping him to no end. They would be polishing his hall of fame statue.
27 points per 36
56%fg
39%3p
71%ts
88%ft

Bulls fans are so jaded at this point they are like . . . meh.



I just don't agree with this at all. Please point me to these posts where people are "meh" on him. I'd say the majority of posts I see about him here refer to him as a future star and a guy who will be the best player on the team sooner rather than later.


Show me the threads and threads talking about him being a top 20 player soon or something. What I see on the Bulls board falls under the "rational" category. Most fanbases would have a lot of "rational" plaudits mixed in with over the top hype. "Can Matas be a top 5 player?" Etc.

IMO, we are abnormally subdued on him.

We are broken.

AKME and the Reinsdorfs have sucked the hope out of us.

I am good because I saw the 6 ring team and my fandom was for from that.
:banghead:
Muzbar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 2,898
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#177 » by Muzbar » Thu Oct 16, 2025 12:07 am

coldfish wrote:
Bulliever2020 wrote:
coldfish wrote:
If any other team had a year 2 21 year old playing like Buzelis is, the fanbase would be hyping him to no end. They would be polishing his hall of fame statue.
27 points per 36
56%fg
39%3p
71%ts
88%ft

Bulls fans are so jaded at this point they are like . . . meh.



I just don't agree with this at all. Please point me to these posts where people are "meh" on him. I'd say the majority of posts I see about him here refer to him as a future star and a guy who will be the best player on the team sooner rather than later.


Show me the threads and threads talking about him being a top 20 player soon or something. What I see on the Bulls board falls under the "rational" category. Most fanbases would have a lot of "rational" plaudits mixed in with over the top hype. "Can Matas be a top 5 player?" Etc.

IMO, we are abnormally subdued on him.

I think there's been plenty of hype around Matas. I think that maybe there is a 'tiny' bit too much hype in fact, and I'm saying this as a massive fan of Majin Buzelis.

What I mean by that is, I feel some are over-hyping him to a point where if he starts out a little slow or hits a rough patch I think some may turn on him due to their lofty expectations.

I have high hopes for Matas, but it's his second season, he's still growing and learning the NBA game, he'll be part of teams game plans.

I think even the most pessimistic of posters that were down on him before he was even drafted have come around on him, I think the Matas hype train is fine.
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. :kissmybutt:
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,404
And1: 11,199
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#178 » by MrSparkle » Thu Oct 16, 2025 1:10 am

Muzbar wrote:
coldfish wrote:
Bulliever2020 wrote:
I just don't agree with this at all. Please point me to these posts where people are "meh" on him. I'd say the majority of posts I see about him here refer to him as a future star and a guy who will be the best player on the team sooner rather than later.


Show me the threads and threads talking about him being a top 20 player soon or something. What I see on the Bulls board falls under the "rational" category. Most fanbases would have a lot of "rational" plaudits mixed in with over the top hype. "Can Matas be a top 5 player?" Etc.

IMO, we are abnormally subdued on him.

I think there's been plenty of hype around Matas. I think that maybe there is a 'tiny' bit too much hype in fact, and I'm saying this as a massive fan of Majin Buzelis.

What I mean by that is, I feel some are over-hyping him to a point where if he starts out a little slow or hits a rough patch I think some may turn on him due to their lofty expectations.

I have high hopes for Matas, but it's his second season, he's still growing and learning the NBA game, he'll be part of teams game plans.

I think even the most pessimistic of posters that were down on him before he was even drafted have come around on him, I think the Matas hype train is fine.


It’s a tough climb becoming a legit all-star, who gets the toughest defensive schemes every night…

But stats are stats. His low-min. preseason numbers are very strong; 40% 3P. His rebounds and turnovers need to improve, but once he settles into the season, I’m not seeing any glaring flaws that would limit his ASG potential. His handles and IQ are really good, and the Ignite shooting percentages seemed lower than his skillset.

Honestly, he should’ve gone top-5. I’m still surprised he dropped to 11. Cody Williams, Salaun? Holland can become a dog, but I spent an hour browsing these guys in real games and realized they had all kinds of red flags, whereas Matas was just getting iced in terrible Ignite system ball (while Ron got the green-light to be Westbrook while airballing half his jump-shots and throwing errant passes - very bizarre coaching decision).

I’m also still wondering if teams will continue drafting NCAA bench projects with top-5 picks. Reed seems like he can still put it together, but obviously he’s not where you would’ve wanted your #3 to be.

Anyway, I don’t see Matas making it this year, but if his trajectory continues, y3/2027 is a longshot but reasonable bet I think. I don’t see Risacher and Sarr making it.
Muzbar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 2,898
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#179 » by Muzbar » Thu Oct 16, 2025 1:29 am

MrSparkle wrote:
Muzbar wrote:
coldfish wrote:
Show me the threads and threads talking about him being a top 20 player soon or something. What I see on the Bulls board falls under the "rational" category. Most fanbases would have a lot of "rational" plaudits mixed in with over the top hype. "Can Matas be a top 5 player?" Etc.

IMO, we are abnormally subdued on him.

I think there's been plenty of hype around Matas. I think that maybe there is a 'tiny' bit too much hype in fact, and I'm saying this as a massive fan of Majin Buzelis.

What I mean by that is, I feel some are over-hyping him to a point where if he starts out a little slow or hits a rough patch I think some may turn on him due to their lofty expectations.

I have high hopes for Matas, but it's his second season, he's still growing and learning the NBA game, he'll be part of teams game plans.

I think even the most pessimistic of posters that were down on him before he was even drafted have come around on him, I think the Matas hype train is fine.


It’s a tough climb becoming a legit all-star, who gets the toughest defensive schemes every night…

But stats are stats. His low-min. preseason numbers are very strong; 40% 3P. His rebounds and turnovers need to improve, but once he settles into the season, I’m not seeing any glaring flaws that would limit his ASG potential. His handles and IQ are really good, and the Ignite shooting percentages seemed lower than his skillset.

Honestly, he should’ve gone top-5. I’m still surprised he dropped to 11. Cody Williams, Salaun? Holland can become a dog, but I spent an hour browsing these guys in real games and realized they had all kinds of red flags, whereas Matas was just getting iced in terrible Ignite system ball (while Ron got the green-light to be Westbrook while airballing half his jump-shots and throwing errant passes - very bizarre coaching decision).

I’m also still wondering if teams will continue drafting NCAA bench projects with top-5 picks. Reed seems like he can still put it together, but obviously he’s not where you would’ve wanted your #3 to be.

Anyway, I don’t see Matas making it this year, but if his trajectory continues, y3/2027 is a longshot but reasonable bet I think. I don’t see Risacher and Sarr making it.

I'm not saying Matas won't be an All-star, but it's a big jump to get that recognition, especially if your team isn't a winning team.

I agree he should have been top 5, I was extremely shocked when the Pistons took Holland at 5 (I thought he'd be the one to fall to the Bulls), I was shocked when he continued to fall and then fully expected the Jazz to pick Matas right before the Bulls, breaking my heart... but, we all know what happened instead.

Matas won't be making the All-star game this season, I'd even argue he probably won't next season either, not because I don't think he'll be good, but there's a lot of forwards that are already All-stars and will get voted in purely on popularity.

The sky's the limit for Matas, and he seems to have the correct mindset to go with it. I haven't been this excited about a Bulls player since Derrick Rose.
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. :kissmybutt:
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,404
And1: 11,199
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: GT: Bulls @ Nuggets - 8 CT 

Post#180 » by MrSparkle » Thu Oct 16, 2025 3:13 am

Muzbar wrote:
MrSparkle wrote:
Muzbar wrote:I think there's been plenty of hype around Matas. I think that maybe there is a 'tiny' bit too much hype in fact, and I'm saying this as a massive fan of Majin Buzelis.

What I mean by that is, I feel some are over-hyping him to a point where if he starts out a little slow or hits a rough patch I think some may turn on him due to their lofty expectations.

I have high hopes for Matas, but it's his second season, he's still growing and learning the NBA game, he'll be part of teams game plans.

I think even the most pessimistic of posters that were down on him before he was even drafted have come around on him, I think the Matas hype train is fine.


It’s a tough climb becoming a legit all-star, who gets the toughest defensive schemes every night…

But stats are stats. His low-min. preseason numbers are very strong; 40% 3P. His rebounds and turnovers need to improve, but once he settles into the season, I’m not seeing any glaring flaws that would limit his ASG potential. His handles and IQ are really good, and the Ignite shooting percentages seemed lower than his skillset.

Honestly, he should’ve gone top-5. I’m still surprised he dropped to 11. Cody Williams, Salaun? Holland can become a dog, but I spent an hour browsing these guys in real games and realized they had all kinds of red flags, whereas Matas was just getting iced in terrible Ignite system ball (while Ron got the green-light to be Westbrook while airballing half his jump-shots and throwing errant passes - very bizarre coaching decision).

I’m also still wondering if teams will continue drafting NCAA bench projects with top-5 picks. Reed seems like he can still put it together, but obviously he’s not where you would’ve wanted your #3 to be.

Anyway, I don’t see Matas making it this year, but if his trajectory continues, y3/2027 is a longshot but reasonable bet I think. I don’t see Risacher and Sarr making it.

I'm not saying Matas won't be an All-star, but it's a big jump to get that recognition, especially if your team isn't a winning team.

I agree he should have been top 5, I was extremely shocked when the Pistons took Holland at 5 (I thought he'd be the one to fall to the Bulls), I was shocked when he continued to fall and then fully expected the Jazz to pick Matas right before the Bulls, breaking my heart... but, we all know what happened instead.

Matas won't be making the All-star game this season, I'd even argue he probably won't next season either, not because I don't think he'll be good, but there's a lot of forwards that are already All-stars and will get voted in purely on popularity.

The sky's the limit for Matas, and he seems to have the correct mindset to go with it. I haven't been this excited about a Bulls player since Derrick Rose.


Yeah, maybe a jump. The forward landscape in East is kind of weaker than ever now though, esp. with the injuries and last gen aging out.

1. Giannis

2. Tatum * once he’s back, assuming he doesn’t decline much from the injury

3. Mobley

4. Jaylen * usually been classified as a SG

5. Pascal

6. Franz

7. Paolo

Then somewhere to round it out, it’ll be Jalen J., Barnes, and then it gets more murky and open with Mikal, OG, Wiggins, Miles.

So with injuries, Matas could have a fringe shot at the 5th Forward ASG spot this February, if he were to go bananas. It would be a stunning longshot.

I do feel like Vuc and the Bulls’ record as a result of Vuc is going to hamper that.

Return to Chicago Bulls