HoopsterJones wrote:Melo with Gasol in NY is still not good enough to make the Finals.
I doubt it's good enough to get home court advantage in the 1st round. Might not be relevant to his decision though.
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
HoopsterJones wrote:Melo with Gasol in NY is still not good enough to make the Finals.

bearadonisdna wrote:rose kirk(vet min)
Butler snell
Melo McDermott
Taj Bairstow
Noah sMITH
VS
ROSE KIRK
Stphenson MDJ
Butler McDermott
Taj Mirotic
Noah Smith
Which is the better roster?
gf2020hotmail wrote:Is Pau Gasol really going to take the tax payer exemption to get a sixth seed with the Knicks? Just can't see it happening.
I am hoping this is like Cleveland trying to figure a way to get Bosh so Lebron would stay.


inescape wrote:I'm still optimistic and here is why.
If Melo was sold on the idea of rebuilding the Knicks next year into a serious contender he would have simply chosen to opt in to his contract this year, why?
1. He would have made the maximum amount of money for this upcoming season.
2. He would have maintained maximum flexibility for next season if the plan failed.
3. If it worked out and the Knicks did sign a key player or two he then gets his super max contract, essentially giving him a 6 year 153 million deal (counting this upcoming season).
Why opt out now, take less money this year, and risk the Knicks striking out next year and being left as a loser until you're 35 years old? It makes zero sense. The only reason I can think of is the risk of injury this upcoming year, but really, even with a torn ACL he probably still gets the max.
He opted out because he wants to leave. If NY doesn't get a commitment tonight I think he is gone. He will take the weekend to ensure his family is onboard and then commit to Chicago. Don't you think if his wife and kid were dead set on staying in NY right now he would have simply opted in?
HeavyC wrote:WinCity wrote:HeavyC wrote:I'm still trying to wrap my head around the Knicks going out to LA. Isn't it pretty cut and dry from their standpoint? "Hi Carmelo, here's the 5 year maximum offer". Why does that require flying across the country? I'd think a 10 minute conference call would just about do it. And then of course, since this is only about the money, Carmelo would accept it and this would all be over.
That doesn't seem to be the case. They are still trying to sell him on signing for less money or some kind of rebuilding plan. I do not believe this is as cut and dry as some of the reporters are leading everyone to believe.
This guy
Got it. Accepting a 5 year deal worth over a hundred million dollars all hinges on playing with a 38 year old forward on the decline.

IndianPlaya17 wrote:Do it on the Bulls!
[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/484780330692259840[/tweet]
\punkmodafunk wrote:Reports said that Melo wanted Taj if he signed for the Bulls, there's no sense about thinking of trading him.
He knows how much he can get, it's up to him. He either has Taj on the core, just like he wants, or he's dumb to ask for Taj and 20M$.
It's really on him: Taj + 16M$ or no Taj and 20M$.

sporadiclee wrote:IndianPlaya17 wrote:Do it on the Bulls!
[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/484780330692259840[/tweet]
This can't be good.
Hahn wrote:lol this is starting to sound alot like 2010, when Lebron and Bosh were talking about teaming up together and people were assuming they were coming to the Bulls.
fleet wrote:inescape wrote:I'm still optimistic and here is why.
If Melo was sold on the idea of rebuilding the Knicks next year into a serious contender he would have simply chosen to opt in to his contract this year, why?
1. He would have made the maximum amount of money for this upcoming season.
2. He would have maintained maximum flexibility for next season if the plan failed.
3. If it worked out and the Knicks did sign a key player or two he then gets his super max contract, essentially giving him a 6 year 153 million deal (counting this upcoming season).
Why opt out now, take less money this year, and risk the Knicks striking out next year and being left as a loser until you're 35 years old? It makes zero sense. The only reason I can think of is the risk of injury this upcoming year, but really, even with a torn ACL he probably still gets the max.
He opted out because he wants to leave. If NY doesn't get a commitment tonight I think he is gone. He will take the weekend to ensure his family is onboard and then commit to Chicago. Don't you think if his wife and kid were dead set on staying in NY right now he would have simply opted in?
Melo's getting older. Smart of him to lock up his long turn super max deal this summer before risking that his body starts breaking down. Or just a regular injury. If you listen to some, that has already begun to happen some.
BR0D1E86 wrote:HeavyC wrote:WinCity wrote:
This guy
Got it. Accepting a 5 year deal worth over a hundred million dollars all hinges on playing with a 38 year old forward on the decline.
He's 33. Other than that I agree with your general premise.
kyrv wrote:HoopsterJones wrote:Melo with Gasol in NY is still not good enough to make the Finals. Best chance is to land a star in next year's free agent pool which may be dried up before then (Love, Aldridge). Which again is NY's pitch. They can offer the most money, and are selling him on waiting another year when the Knicks have cap space.
I think they are pretending they can get Westbrook and/or Durant.

inescape wrote:fleet wrote:inescape wrote:I'm still optimistic and here is why.
If Melo was sold on the idea of rebuilding the Knicks next year into a serious contender he would have simply chosen to opt in to his contract this year, why?
1. He would have made the maximum amount of money for this upcoming season.
2. He would have maintained maximum flexibility for next season if the plan failed.
3. If it worked out and the Knicks did sign a key player or two he then gets his super max contract, essentially giving him a 6 year 153 million deal (counting this upcoming season).
Why opt out now, take less money this year, and risk the Knicks striking out next year and being left as a loser until you're 35 years old? It makes zero sense. The only reason I can think of is the risk of injury this upcoming year, but really, even with a torn ACL he probably still gets the max.
He opted out because he wants to leave. If NY doesn't get a commitment tonight I think he is gone. He will take the weekend to ensure his family is onboard and then commit to Chicago. Don't you think if his wife and kid were dead set on staying in NY right now he would have simply opted in?
Melo's getting older. Smart of him to lock up his long term super max deal this summer before risking that his body starts breaking down. Or just a regular injury. If you listen to some, that has already begun to happen some.
Well if he is that concerned about dropping off in talent this year then maybe we don't want to sign him at all. What I do know is he won't be getting that extra 23 million dollars the year he is 36 years old.
Rerisen wrote:Cowbulls wrote:I feel like when Melo interviews with Phil it will be a lot like Mr. Cheezle's talks. There will be tea and he will talk about how refreshing it is to walk barefoot through a grass field.
Maybe some Yoga? Phil kinda letting himself go.

Polynice4Pippen wrote:gf2020hotmail wrote:Is Pau Gasol really going to take the tax payer exemption to get a sixth seed with the Knicks? Just can't see it happening.
I am hoping this is like Cleveland trying to figure a way to get Bosh so Lebron would stay.
Especially when OKC is begging him to join them. Spurs too.
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using RealGM Forums mobile app