Christmas Day GT: Rockets @ Bulls 7pm ESPN

ManualRam · Post #181 » by **ManualRam** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:12 am

kuly1990 wrote:why not play Jimmy more, and Taj instead of Boozer, Taj was playing pretty good offensively, i understand if Boozer is playing good, if he is hitting his shots, but if he is not why not play Taj more than him?

because we need boozer's offense. trying to exploit his matchup with asik is a good move.

aguifs · Post #182 » by **aguifs** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:13 am

Oh my Taj,,, Oh my Noah,,,,Oh my Boollshitzer

ASIK AND DESTROY killing us

JasonFTW · Post #183 » by **JasonFTW** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:14 am

aguifs wrote:Oh my Taj,,, Oh my Noah,,,,Oh my ****

ASIK AND DESTROY killing us

Yup

unknownnewbie · Post #184 » by **unknownnewbie** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:14 am

Rockets shot 60% and outrebounded the Bulls by 8. That's not acceptable.

JasonFTW · Post #185 » by **JasonFTW** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:14 am

Asik showing a little bit of offensive moves

JasonFTW · Post #186 » by **JasonFTW** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:15 am

this really hurts right now

Tenchi Ryu · Post #187 » by **Tenchi Ryu** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:16 am

ESPN you piece of sh%t, won't even spend time analyzing the game during half-time, just spending time sucking Lebron's dick. I knew there was no reason to change from CSN.

bullsnewdynasty · Post #188 » by **bullsnewdynasty** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:16 am

Well you are going to get outrebounded when the other team shoots 60% and you shoot 41%.

Post #189 » by **HomoSapien** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:16 am

The loss of Asik hurts even more because of how non-existent Gibson has been. I always thought that we should've traded Taj and kept Asik --- we always knew that the likelihood of keeping both was slim. Thibs has said repeatedly that they always knew how good Asik was. If that's the case, why did they put themselves in a position to lose him for nothing?

JasonFTW · Post #190 » by **JasonFTW** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:16 am

just so bad

JasonFTW · Post #191 » by **JasonFTW** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:17 am

very painful

ManualRam · Post #192 » by **ManualRam** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:17 am

Tenchi Ryu wrote:ESPN you piece of sh%t, won't even spend time analyzing the game during half-time, just spending time sucking Lebron's dick. I knew there was no reason to change from CSN.

the analysis is simple: bulls are getting their ass kicked. that's all that needed to be said about it.

Bomba Navarro · Post #193 » by **Bomba Navarro** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:17 am

JasonFTW wrote:Asik showing a little bit of offensive moves

On Carlos Boozer. Have you ever tried to post up a cone? I looked like The Dream out there.

ManualRam · Post #194 » by **ManualRam** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:19 am

WatchYouBleed wrote:
JasonFTW wrote:Asik showing a little bit of offensive moves

On Carlos Boozer. Have you ever tried to post up a cone?

lol

asik was scoring on a number of defenders though.

Post #195 » by **fleet** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:19 am

JasonFTW wrote:
aguifs wrote:Oh my Taj,,, Oh my Noah,,,,Oh my ****

ASIK AND DESTROY killing us

Yup

the throwaway backup center that we can relax about letting go for air.

Everybody who made a point this summer of repeatedly calling him that (backup center) should be forced to keep doing so. :wink:

Indomitable · Post #196 » by **Indomitable** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:19 am

HomoSapien wrote:The loss of Asik hurts even more because of how non-existent Gibson has been. I always thought that we should've traded Taj and kept Asik --- we always knew that the likelihood of keeping both was slim. Thibs has said repeatedly that they always knew how good Asik was. If that's the case, why did they put themselves in a position to lose him for nothing?

They overplayed their hand.

malcrk · Post #197 » by **malcrk** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:20 am

HomoSapien wrote:The loss of Asik hurts even more because of how non-existent Gibson has been. I always thought that we should've traded Taj and kept Asik --- we always knew that the likelihood of keeping both was slim. Thibs has said repeatedly that they always knew how good Asik was. If that's the case, why did they put themselves in a position to lose him for nothing?

I don't think that's fair. There were exactly one teams that understood how to screw over teams in the way that Houston did.

I might be really wrong (and I probably am) but I don't think the possibility of a team structuring the contract in the way that Houston did was mentioned outside of maybe one person at some point.

Indomitable · Post #198 » by **Indomitable** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:21 am

malcrk wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:The loss of Asik hurts even more because of how non-existent Gibson has been. I always thought that we should've traded Taj and kept Asik --- we always knew that the likelihood of keeping both was slim. Thibs has said repeatedly that they always knew how good Asik was. If that's the case, why did they put themselves in a position to lose him for nothing?

I don't think that's fair. There were exactly one teams that understood how to screw over teams in the way that Houston did.

I might be really wrong (and I probably am) but I don't think the possibility of a team structuring the contract in the way that Houston did was mentioned outside of maybe one person at some point.

Yeah it is called incompetence

Tenchi Ryu · Post #199 » by **Tenchi Ryu** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:21 am

ManualRam wrote:
Tenchi Ryu wrote:ESPN you piece of sh%t, won't even spend time analyzing the game during half-time, just spending time sucking Lebron's dick. I knew there was no reason to change from CSN.

the analysis is simple: bulls are getting their ass kicked. that's all that needed to be said about it.

Let me hear this being repeated for 15 minutes rather than Jalen Rose and Magic talking about a damn sweater...

Post #200 » by **HomoSapien** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:21 am

malcrk wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:The loss of Asik hurts even more because of how non-existent Gibson has been. I always thought that we should've traded Taj and kept Asik --- we always knew that the likelihood of keeping both was slim. Thibs has said repeatedly that they always knew how good Asik was. If that's the case, why did they put themselves in a position to lose him for nothing?

I don't think that's fair. There were exactly one teams that understood how to screw over teams in the way that Houston did.

I might be really wrong (and I probably am) but I don't think the possibility of a team structuring the contract in the way that Houston did was mentioned outside of maybe one person at some point.

The Bulls shouldn't be blindsided by something like that. They're paying people millions of dollars to know all the rules like the back of their hand to be able to assess every potential situation.