Image ImageImage Image

Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60)

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,133
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#181 » by WindyCityBorn » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:25 am

TheSuzerain wrote:AK is the worst in the league


Because you wanna tank and he doesn’t?
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,133
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#182 » by WindyCityBorn » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:26 am

bad knees wrote:Welcome back, Vuc! 3/60 with 8% raises puts him at about 18.5 M this year, which leaves us room to sign Coby and a starting PG.


Coby is our starting PG. We need a good backup PF/C and high volume 3 point shooting wing.
bad knees
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,836
And1: 2,805
Joined: Jul 09, 2009

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#183 » by bad knees » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:27 am

League Circles wrote:I think Vuc's on/off based stats look worse than they are cause of how awesome Drummond was lol. Vuc was still very solid. He manages to make up for his critical flaw of putrid shot challenging by being very good at defensive rebounds, not fouling, and getting deflections. He's def above average offensively, where he's truly multi skilled.


Speaking of Drummond, has anyone seen anything about whether he opted in or out? Somebody tweeted that Nate Duncan said on a podcast that he opted out, but I have seen nothing further.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,133
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#184 » by WindyCityBorn » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:29 am

Mbrahv0528 wrote:Meh. That's how I would describe this move. They are already punting on the season imo.

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app


Not signing would be punting on the season. Explain how we are better without him next season? We don’t get any extra cap space by letting him walk.
chefo
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,285
And1: 2,427
Joined: Apr 29, 2009

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#185 » by chefo » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:29 am

I keep seeing that Vuc is a 3rd option who has had to give up soooo much... which is odd, given that he's been getting more scoring opportunities / touches than either DD or Zach. 3rd year in a row.

Vuc is NOT a third option. Vuc is the one of the Bulls' 3 first option players. Let that sink in for a second. He just no longer produces on O like a first option. And... he's only getting older... and, they extended him for 3 more years at 20 per.

Yeah, that'll work just wonderful. The market for non-D playing C's who're declining already is just 'uuuuge these days.

BTW, Vuc is entering the age where even HOF centers start to see their productivity fall off a cliff. Look'm up. Bigs don't age well into their mid-to-late 30s. Food for thought.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,133
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#186 » by WindyCityBorn » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:30 am

nomorezorro wrote:i'm kind of shocked at how many people are citing raw stats in favor of vucevic, not just because we've also seen him put up a much worse season in 2021-22, but also because my problem with vucevic is something that i think is glaringly obvious if you spent any amount of time watching the bulls over the past 2.5 years, even if it's not obvious in his individual statistics.

the derozan/lavine/vucevic trio is less than the sum of its parts. that's the problem. there's no multiplier effect from having those three "stars" on the court at the same time, and therefore we have not seen the benefit you might expect from having nikola vucevic on the court as our third best scoring option. (this is borne out by lineup stats. on a team with a +1.3 net rating last season, the three-man lineup of demar/vucevic/lavine had a -0.4 net rating. vucevic/lavine had a -0.2 net rating; derozan/vucevic had a -0.4 net rating.)

spinning vucevic into alternate assets was the easiest path toward trying something different with this team. now, barring an unexpectedly big move or some improbably good modestly priced free agency additions, we're stuck making another run with this thing that doesn't work.


You can spin him into anything if you don’t re-sign him.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,133
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#187 » by WindyCityBorn » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:33 am

bad knees wrote:With little trade interest in Lavine, the tear it down option fizzled away, to the extent it ever existed. We are running it back, which has always been the best option in my view. This is a good first step. The next is to sign a starting PG, using either the MLE or the DPE that we get for Lonzo. Try to recreate the good play that we saw post All Star break last season.

I bet that Coby will go into the waiting game. The Bulls will offer him a three year deal starting at 13 M, which is just over the MLE. He will go looking for something better and likely not find it. But it will take a while.


Why are people so sure we get an exemption for Lonzo? And how much would it be? Probably not enough to sign a good starter.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,133
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#188 » by WindyCityBorn » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:41 am

PJSteven22 wrote:And the people sitting here loving this deal are going to be wondering why we’re 34-48 at the end of the year. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.


At least we have out draft pick. Not signing him would lead to an even worse record.
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#189 » by TheStig » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:42 am

dougthonus wrote:
TheStig wrote:Say what? Vuc played 25 more games, had a higher per, averaged more rebounds and they shot a very similar efficency. And Vuc's Vorp was much higher and winshare and bpm too. Vuc was better. Now I'd rather have Franz than any of them and Carter has abetter deal but Vuc is better than Wendell Carter. And this is on a team with 2 wings that forget about him.


Everything you named is based on counting stats. Impact stats are all the regressed +/- stuff. Vuc was one of the worst impact stat guys on the team for each of the past two seasons, ie, we always play bad when he plays.

like vorp and bpm and winshare?
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#190 » by TheStig » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:42 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
bad knees wrote:With little trade interest in Lavine, the tear it down option fizzled away, to the extent it ever existed. We are running it back, which has always been the best option in my view. This is a good first step. The next is to sign a starting PG, using either the MLE or the DPE that we get for Lonzo. Try to recreate the good play that we saw post All Star break last season.

I bet that Coby will go into the waiting game. The Bulls will offer him a three year deal starting at 13 M, which is just over the MLE. He will go looking for something better and likely not find it. But it will take a while.


Why are people so sure we get an exemption for Lonzo? And how much would it be? Probably not enough to sign a good starter.

Even if we get one, we're not going into the LT to use it.
bad knees
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,836
And1: 2,805
Joined: Jul 09, 2009

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#191 » by bad knees » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:43 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
bad knees wrote:With little trade interest in Lavine, the tear it down option fizzled away, to the extent it ever existed. We are running it back, which has always been the best option in my view. This is a good first step. The next is to sign a starting PG, using either the MLE or the DPE that we get for Lonzo. Try to recreate the good play that we saw post All Star break last season.

I bet that Coby will go into the waiting game. The Bulls will offer him a three year deal starting at 13 M, which is just over the MLE. He will go looking for something better and likely not find it. But it will take a while.


Why are people so sure we get an exemption for Lonzo? And how much would it be? Probably not enough to sign a good starter.


The Bulls will get a DPE if they can convince the league that Lonzo is out for the season. If they get the DPE, it will be half of Lonzo’s salary for the season - about $10.2 M. Here are the details.

http://cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q25
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,133
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#192 » by WindyCityBorn » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:44 am

MrSparkle wrote:Other aspect of this… cap is making a sizable 10% jump from $123m to 136m.

Anyway, AK is pretty straight-forward in his press conferences. He said Vuc’s a big part of this process. I don’t think he signed him to trade him tomorrow.

Meanwhile his subtle disappointment in Zach was more apparent. I think the asking price is high, but a deal will get done. After the FA dust settles, there will be 2-4 teams left, looking to buy.


It makes no sense to keep Vuc/DeRozan duo and trade Zach for assets. If you trade Zach it should be a complete rebuild.
MissileMike
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,478
And1: 1,283
Joined: Feb 25, 2002

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#193 » by MissileMike » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:51 am

TheStig wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
TheStig wrote:Say what? Vuc played 25 more games, had a higher per, averaged more rebounds and they shot a very similar efficency. And Vuc's Vorp was much higher and winshare and bpm too. Vuc was better. Now I'd rather have Franz than any of them and Carter has abetter deal but Vuc is better than Wendell Carter. And this is on a team with 2 wings that forget about him.


Everything you named is based on counting stats. Impact stats are all the regressed +/- stuff. Vuc was one of the worst impact stat guys on the team for each of the past two seasons, ie, we always play bad when he plays.

like vorp and bpm and winshare?


Yeah I agree that Vuc is better than WCJ, but that's not really setting the bar very high and he's definitely worse than WCJ+Wagner+Pick... This signing seems like a net neutral to me.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,808
And1: 18,876
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#194 » by dougthonus » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:51 am

TheStig wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
TheStig wrote:Say what? Vuc played 25 more games, had a higher per, averaged more rebounds and they shot a very similar efficency. And Vuc's Vorp was much higher and winshare and bpm too. Vuc was better. Now I'd rather have Franz than any of them and Carter has abetter deal but Vuc is better than Wendell Carter. And this is on a team with 2 wings that forget about him.


Everything you named is based on counting stats. Impact stats are all the regressed +/- stuff. Vuc was one of the worst impact stat guys on the team for each of the past two seasons, ie, we always play bad when he plays.

like vorp and bpm and winshare?


Yes?
User avatar
ThisGuyFawkes
Analyst
Posts: 3,691
And1: 1,990
Joined: Jan 30, 2008
Location: Where the sugar cane grows taller than the God we once believed in
   

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#195 » by ThisGuyFawkes » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:52 am

I love it. I love Vuc, and don't really understand the hate. Anyone expecting him to be a defensive rim protector had unrealistic expectations. He's never been that in his career. He needs to be paired up with the NBA-ready version of Julian Phillips (or taller DJJ). An athletic PF who can switch, help rebound, and protect the rim.

Vuc is an excellent offensive hub. He always seems to find the cutter for easy shots, but this team hardly ever has anyone cutting. Vuc can play inside with finesse or bully smaller guys. He can shoot at the 3 at a decent clip. He can rebound.

Basically I think he's definitely worth this deal, but he's never been paired with the proper front-court mate and his vision/passing could be better utilized with a heavier motion offense.

He's also extremely dependable and doesn't miss games. I'll take an above average center that plays 30+ mpg with 82 games in a season versus a center that's a tier above him but misses half the season.

Footnote: I'm a Vuc apologist so take this with a grain of salt.
Bandit King
Analyst
Posts: 3,498
And1: 1,178
Joined: Oct 14, 2012
       

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#196 » by Bandit King » Thu Jun 29, 2023 2:08 am

Go europax!!
Chicago Bulls Basketball - The Continuity
Daxel
Sophomore
Posts: 198
And1: 165
Joined: May 06, 2018
     

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#197 » by Daxel » Thu Jun 29, 2023 2:16 am

Welcome back Vuc!
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#198 » by TheSuzerain » Thu Jun 29, 2023 2:26 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:AK is the worst in the league


Because you wanna tank and he doesn’t?

Because he cashed in all of his assets and created a 10th seed.

That's pretty terrible.
User avatar
Tetlak
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,283
And1: 2,364
Joined: Aug 16, 2010

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#199 » by Tetlak » Thu Jun 29, 2023 2:34 am

dougthonus wrote:
PJSteven22 wrote:A
chitownsports4ever wrote:
what would WCJ Coby and Pat get ?

A better player than Vuc


WCJ is just a better player than Vuc on half the contract, so that seems fair.


This take needs to die. There is not a single thing Wendell is better than Vuc at. You can use any statistic in the world. Wendell also plays 50 games per year on average.
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Shams: Bulls extend Vuc (3/60) 

Post#200 » by TheStig » Thu Jun 29, 2023 2:37 am

dougthonus wrote:
TheStig wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
Everything you named is based on counting stats. Impact stats are all the regressed +/- stuff. Vuc was one of the worst impact stat guys on the team for each of the past two seasons, ie, we always play bad when he plays.

like vorp and bpm and winshare?


Yes?

which vuc did better in.....

Return to Chicago Bulls