2weekswithpay wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:Indomitable wrote:Holiday is a pro. Ayton is trash
Holiday is 35 with 3 years on his contract. Reportedly the Blazers had deals they were looking at with Ayton, but they didn't want to take back any long term money. Jrue had his worst statistical year last year 11 pts/gm, 35% 3pt shooting. He's not likely to get better. Traded a 26 yr old guard 19 pt/gm and added picks to add this older player.
Simons expires next year, like Ayton. They took on an almost 10 yr older player with more years left on his contract for Simons. Gave up picks to do it. That's a win now move. Then pay your vet center off, lose him for nothing so your young guys can play. That's a rebuilding move. What do they gain dumping Ayton, other than a roster spot? They have to pay him anyway and injuries happen. He's better than any center they have other than Clingan right now and expiring. So are they trying to win now, or tank? Or just ride the middle? How did either of these trades improve the Blazers long term?
It's extreme to buy out a $35 mill expiring guy because you don't want to take on longer contracts. When you just took on a longer $35 mill contract of a declining 35 yr old for a smaller expiring.
Ayton had the worst on/off splits of anyone in the Blazers rotation. All the winning the Blazers accomplished last season was largely because of their young players. Ayton and Simons don't fit the current direction of the team and were moved. If the Blazers save so money in buying out Ayton, they might have the MLE for trades or going after free agents.
Yeah they never wanted Ayton, they took on Ayton's contract to get Jrue Holiday, Toumani Camara, a 1st round pick and 2 pick swaps. Holiday himself was traded for 2 more picks. They couldn't care less about Ayton as a basketball asset, he was the price for getting 5 picks/swaps + one of the best defenders in the league.