I believe Okoro and Pat Will would’ve been the two players that showcase their talent had there been an NCAA Tournament. They just play winning basketball.
We have Kawhi, and Cleveland has Jimmy.
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
R3AL1TY wrote:
The numbers for him should come down to earth as far as the 3 pt shooting, but I expect him to still be good in the paint. The Cavs made a good pick like the Bulls.
fleet wrote:cjbulls wrote:fleet wrote:Are we done trading down?
Trade down looks like a great play still. Poku looks like a good prospect
yeah, if he turns out to be a 34-36% shooter that will be good enough for him to be a 3nD threat and he will get paid. I think Pat will be in that percentage range in his first season.cjbulls wrote:R3AL1TY wrote:
The numbers for him should come down to earth as far as the 3 pt shooting, but I expect him to still be good in the paint. The Cavs made a good pick like the Bulls.
He doesn't seem like he is going to turn into a great shooter, but you can see that's what he worked at this offseason. He's very comfortable hanging at the 3pt line and looking to pull the trigger which is very different from his college tape.
MrFortune3 wrote:TheStig wrote:MrFortune3 wrote:
They picked the cheaper guy at the time and Brogdon was less of a PG than Bledsoe even though both are combo players.
I mean he wanted to be there and took a small discount on an extension. Brogdan could have done the same. But Bledsoe was the more integral player on the Bucks. Brogdan was a 3 and d guy.
I wouldn't say he was more integral. He was more of a PG and better as a defender but Brogdon was more of a crucial piece for their offense.
DuckIII wrote:Watching some Knicks highlights. Toppin’s athleticism looks unremarkable when he’s on an NBA floor. He might still turn out to be a fine pro, but I always suspected his athleticism was overrated. And it was.
DuckIII wrote:Watching some Knicks highlights. Toppin’s athleticism looks unremarkable when he’s on an NBA floor. He might still turn out to be a fine pro, but I always suspected his athleticism was overrated. And it was.
TheStig wrote:MrFortune3 wrote:TheStig wrote:I mean he wanted to be there and took a small discount on an extension. Brogdan could have done the same. But Bledsoe was the more integral player on the Bucks. Brogdan was a 3 and d guy.
I wouldn't say he was more integral. He was more of a PG and better as a defender but Brogdon was more of a crucial piece for their offense.
I stand by my statement. He was clearly a more important player to them in that role. He wasn't going to get to have a bigger role playing behind those 3.
GimmeDat wrote:DuckIII wrote:Watching some Knicks highlights. Toppin’s athleticism looks unremarkable when he’s on an NBA floor. He might still turn out to be a fine pro, but I always suspected his athleticism was overrated. And it was.
Dude can really jump, fun dunker, and he moves pretty fluidly down the court, but his laterally movement was always pretty unconvincing, his reach is poor, and he has a weird combo of high center of gravity/lack of strength that makes him get bulled inside a little.
I think he'll be fine too but there were certainly people glossing over some flaws pre-draft.
Unknown wrote:Dwarves laugh when they run because the grass tickles their balls.