Image ImageImage Image

Around The NBA

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

User avatar
CjayC
RealGM
Posts: 11,549
And1: 1,174
Joined: Mar 02, 2005
Location: Hoiball
   

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1841 » by CjayC » Fri Dec 18, 2020 4:49 am

fleet wrote:
cjbulls wrote:
fleet wrote:Are we done trading down?


Trade down looks like a great play still. Poku looks like a good prospect

Image


Yeah so far haven't been sold. I think he can become a good enough shooter(Despite that 2nd game he had), but I don't really see the lateral quickness so even if he becomes a superior ballhandler "for his size", I don't see how he'll leverage it. I guess hopefully using the handle to create better looks to get his shot off? Looked like a giraffe out there at times with the ball. Defensively it's probably going to be the biggest issue.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,436
And1: 9,103
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1842 » by Chi town » Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:03 am

Random thoughts...

Harden and House for Simmons, Filler and picks... Simmons fits well w Cousins and Wall.

Culver has improved. He’s an intriguing 2 way playmaker and won’t be getting enough opportunity in MIN w Edwards KAT and Rubio and Russell. His shot has improved a lot.

Bane can play play and will help MEM quite a bit.

LaMelo will hit his wall during the season but he’s way past his brother at this same point when Lonzo was getting started.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,436
And1: 9,103
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1843 » by Chi town » Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:05 am

R3AL1TY wrote:Cole Anthony has been quietly playing good. Lamelo Ball is showing more offense tonight.


He’s a great fit for what the Magic need.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,436
And1: 9,103
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1844 » by Chi town » Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:08 am

PlayerUp wrote:People naturally assumed the draft would be bad because of the lack of athletic/flashy players but turns out this draft seems really loaded with potential solid 2 way skilled players. Kinda its own unique draft.


Seems that way. I think things being cut short hurt the view of the players but actually helped them develop.

A lot can change in real games. I also think no fans helps younger players too. Once fans are back it’s a different deal.
User avatar
R3AL1TY
General Manager
Posts: 8,167
And1: 2,358
Joined: May 17, 2015
   

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1845 » by R3AL1TY » Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:38 am

Chi town wrote:
PlayerUp wrote:People naturally assumed the draft would be bad because of the lack of athletic/flashy players but turns out this draft seems really loaded with potential solid 2 way skilled players. Kinda its own unique draft.


Seems that way. I think things being cut short hurt the view of the players but actually helped them develop.

A lot can change in real games. I also think no fans helps younger players too. Once fans are back it’s a different deal.
Good point. We even saw in the bubble how having no fans elevated certain players' games or made them played with more confidence.
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1846 » by TheStig » Fri Dec 18, 2020 6:00 am

MrFortune3 wrote:
TheStig wrote:
MrFortune3 wrote:
I wouldn't say he was more integral. He was more of a PG and better as a defender but Brogdon was more of a crucial piece for their offense.

I stand by my statement. He was clearly a more important player to them in that role. He wasn't going to get to have a bigger role playing behind those 3.


We'll have to disagree on that but I respect your opinion.

You can disagree but they signed one to a long term deal and declined to match an offer sheet on the other. Which do you think they thought was more integral?
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 18,994
And1: 3,622
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1847 » by MGB8 » Fri Dec 18, 2020 3:28 pm

Chi town wrote:Random thoughts...

Harden and House for Simmons, Filler and picks... Simmons fits well w Cousins and Wall.

Culver has improved. He’s an intriguing 2 way playmaker and won’t be getting enough opportunity in MIN w Edwards KAT and Rubio and Russell. His shot has improved a lot.

Bane can play play and will help MEM quite a bit.

LaMelo will hit his wall during the season but he’s way past his brother at this same point when Lonzo was getting started.


Like with Coby, it's a little early to say that Culver's improved - but he's had two good games in a row and it certainly looks that way. He was one of my favorites in last year's draft and I was surprised at how bad he was offensively last season. Unlike most of Minnesota's players, he was a huge "winning" player in college and his basketball IQ and all-around skills could make him into a winning, 2-way wing in the NBA - but only if he shoots / scores well enough to not be a massive liability on offense.

I also agree that Bane looks like he belongs in the NBA. Likely another late gem for Memphis along the lines of Dillon Brooks who will be a legit contributor as a rookie.

As for LaMelo... not just way beyond where his brother started - he looks like a future top 10 player, to me. At least if he can shoot the way he did last night. His defense isn't as bad as advertised (that was always an effort issue), and neither does the form on his shot (may also be an effort and emotional maturity thing) - but his footspeed with the ball, vision and passing accuracy and quickness absolutely look like they translate.
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 18,994
And1: 3,622
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1848 » by MGB8 » Fri Dec 18, 2020 3:35 pm

Chi town wrote:Random thoughts...

Harden and House for Simmons, Filler and picks... Simmons fits well w Cousins and Wall.

Culver has improved. He’s an intriguing 2 way playmaker and won’t be getting enough opportunity in MIN w Edwards KAT and Rubio and Russell. His shot has improved a lot.

Bane can play play and will help MEM quite a bit.

LaMelo will hit his wall during the season but he’s way past his brother at this same point when Lonzo was getting started.



The one thing I don't agree on is Simmons fitting well with Cousins and Wall. I think it's an awful fit because Simmons simply can't shoot. Cousins, while he can shoot, needs space that Simmons would bring, and Simmons is duplicative with Wall. If they make a deal for Simmons and change, my opinion would be that their best bet would be to flip Simmons to a 3rd team and get back someone who fits better - maybe to the Clippers for Paul George.

The best 2 team Harden trade, IMO, is Harden + House to New Orleans for Ingram, Jaxson Hayes, NAW, Kira Lewis, and the Jrue-Holiday picks. That creates a dangerous, likely immediately contention level Pelicans team:

1: Harden, Ball
2: Bledsoe, Reddick, Thornwell
3: House, Hart
4: Zion, Meli, Gabriel
5: Adams, Hernangomez

Meanwhile, Houston is left with a competitive roster and regains draft capital:

1: Wall, Lewis
2: Gordon, NAW, McLemore
3: Ingram, Tate, Nwaba
4: (Wood), Tucker, Caboclo, G.Green
5: Wood, Cousins, Hayes
Ice Man
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 26,979
And1: 16,014
Joined: Apr 19, 2011

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1849 » by Ice Man » Fri Dec 18, 2020 3:43 pm

The Orlando Magic broadcast showed this statistic last night. Teams ranked by percentage of returning-player minutes -

1) Indiana - 98%
2) Chicago - 89%
3) Charlotte - 84%
4) Orlando - 84%

Etc.

Their argument was that teams with high numbers might get off to good starts in the season because of continuity. Hmmm, maybe. I do think the stat helps to explain why the Bulls looked so much better than OKC the other night. Our guys looked as if they knew each other, whereas OKC's did not.

As a side note, Detroit was last on the list, at 24%.
cjbulls
Analyst
Posts: 3,584
And1: 1,301
Joined: Jun 26, 2018

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1850 » by cjbulls » Fri Dec 18, 2020 4:00 pm

Ice Man wrote:The Orlando Magic broadcast showed this statistic last night. Teams ranked by percentage of returning-player minutes -

1) Indiana - 98%
2) Chicago - 89%
3) Charlotte - 84%
4) Orlando - 84%

Etc.

Their argument was that teams with high numbers might get off to good starts in the season because of continuity. Hmmm, maybe. I do think the stat helps to explain why the Bulls looked so much better than OKC the other night. Our guys looked as if they knew each other, whereas OKC's did not.

As a side note, Detroit was last on the list, at 24%.


I saw that list too and just laughed. The team with the new FO and among the most to fix of any team in the league, yet they're at the top of the league in retained minutes.

A new coach and new system will pull significant amounts of that continuity. For example, in game 1, the Rockets looked like a team that had played together for years while the Bulls looked like they just thrown together in a pickup game.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,391
And1: 9,201
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1851 » by sco » Fri Dec 18, 2020 4:12 pm

cjbulls wrote:
Ice Man wrote:The Orlando Magic broadcast showed this statistic last night. Teams ranked by percentage of returning-player minutes -

1) Indiana - 98%
2) Chicago - 89%
3) Charlotte - 84%
4) Orlando - 84%

Etc.

Their argument was that teams with high numbers might get off to good starts in the season because of continuity. Hmmm, maybe. I do think the stat helps to explain why the Bulls looked so much better than OKC the other night. Our guys looked as if they knew each other, whereas OKC's did not.

As a side note, Detroit was last on the list, at 24%.


I saw that list too and just laughed. The team with the new FO and among the most to fix of any team in the league, yet they're at the top of the league in retained minutes.

A new coach and new system will pull significant amounts of that continuity. For example, in game 1, the Rockets looked like a team that had played together for years while the Bulls looked like they just thrown together in a pickup game.

IMO, it means little. We lost 2-3 FA's...that's all we had. It also doesn't mean we didn't try to trade guys, but their value was low. Also, we were the 2nd youngest team in the league. Are we the youngest this season? Probably not because we signed Temple. We've got to have one of the, if not the, youngest starting line-up.
:clap:
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,436
And1: 9,103
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1852 » by Chi town » Fri Dec 18, 2020 4:17 pm

MGB8 wrote:
Chi town wrote:Random thoughts...

Harden and House for Simmons, Filler and picks... Simmons fits well w Cousins and Wall.

Culver has improved. He’s an intriguing 2 way playmaker and won’t be getting enough opportunity in MIN w Edwards KAT and Rubio and Russell. His shot has improved a lot.

Bane can play play and will help MEM quite a bit.

LaMelo will hit his wall during the season but he’s way past his brother at this same point when Lonzo was getting started.


Like with Coby, it's a little early to say that Culver's improved - but he's had two good games in a row and it certainly looks that way. He was one of my favorites in last year's draft and I was surprised at how bad he was offensively last season. Unlike most of Minnesota's players, he was a huge "winning" player in college and his basketball IQ and all-around skills could make him into a winning, 2-way wing in the NBA - but only if he shoots / scores well enough to not be a massive liability on offense.

I also agree that Bane looks like he belongs in the NBA. Likely another late gem for Memphis along the lines of Dillon Brooks who will be a legit contributor as a rookie.

As for LaMelo... not just way beyond where his brother started - he looks like a future top 10 player, to me. At least if he can shoot the way he did last night. His defense isn't as bad as advertised (that was always an effort issue), and neither does the form on his shot (may also be an effort and emotional maturity thing) - but his footspeed with the ball, vision and passing accuracy and quickness absolutely look like they translate.


I liked Culver at the draft too because our obvious need for a 2 way wing. I believe in his D and his playmaking. He could grow into a great fit here but only if he can shoot it. If he can he won’t be going anywhere. MIN needs his D and passing too.

I don’t see Melo as a top 10 player. Don’t believe in his shot. Once teams game plan for him it will a different story. His passing is special tho
cjbulls
Analyst
Posts: 3,584
And1: 1,301
Joined: Jun 26, 2018

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1853 » by cjbulls » Fri Dec 18, 2020 4:31 pm

sco wrote:
cjbulls wrote:
Ice Man wrote:The Orlando Magic broadcast showed this statistic last night. Teams ranked by percentage of returning-player minutes -

1) Indiana - 98%
2) Chicago - 89%
3) Charlotte - 84%
4) Orlando - 84%

Etc.

Their argument was that teams with high numbers might get off to good starts in the season because of continuity. Hmmm, maybe. I do think the stat helps to explain why the Bulls looked so much better than OKC the other night. Our guys looked as if they knew each other, whereas OKC's did not.

As a side note, Detroit was last on the list, at 24%.


I saw that list too and just laughed. The team with the new FO and among the most to fix of any team in the league, yet they're at the top of the league in retained minutes.

A new coach and new system will pull significant amounts of that continuity. For example, in game 1, the Rockets looked like a team that had played together for years while the Bulls looked like they just thrown together in a pickup game.

IMO, it means little. We lost 2-3 FA's...that's all we had. It also doesn't mean we didn't try to trade guys, but their value was low. Also, we were the 2nd youngest team in the league. Are we the youngest this season? Probably not because we signed Temple. We've got to have one of the, if not the, youngest starting line-up.


I think they were the youngest roster by minutes last year. Temple might throw that off just a bit this year.

I disagree our players had low value. We chose to keep players and overvalue is a more accurate description, the same thing GarPax got knocked for.
cjbulls
Analyst
Posts: 3,584
And1: 1,301
Joined: Jun 26, 2018

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1854 » by cjbulls » Fri Dec 18, 2020 4:38 pm

Chi town wrote:I don’t see Melo as a top 10 player. Don’t believe in his shot. Once teams game plan for him it will a different story. His passing is special tho


The fact teams are already needing to gameplan for him at age 19, game 3 says a lot in its own right.
ZOMG
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,434
And1: 3,269
Joined: Dec 31, 2013

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1855 » by ZOMG » Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:09 pm

cjbulls wrote:
Chi town wrote:I don’t see Melo as a top 10 player. Don’t believe in his shot. Once teams game plan for him it will a different story. His passing is special tho


The fact teams are already needing to gameplan for him at age 19, game 3 says a lot in its own right.


I've watched all his games and I haven't seen any gameplanning.
cjbulls
Analyst
Posts: 3,584
And1: 1,301
Joined: Jun 26, 2018

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1856 » by cjbulls » Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:31 pm

ZOMG wrote:
cjbulls wrote:
Chi town wrote:I don’t see Melo as a top 10 player. Don’t believe in his shot. Once teams game plan for him it will a different story. His passing is special tho


The fact teams are already needing to gameplan for him at age 19, game 3 says a lot in its own right.


I've watched all his games and I haven't seen any gameplanning.


So what's the big gameplan, sag off him? Orlando was doing that. He shot over them. Play him for the pass? He just finished himself instead.

We have had players somewhat like him, Rondo, Kidd and Ben Simmons come to mind. I don't remember any gameplans that neutralized them.
ZOMG
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,434
And1: 3,269
Joined: Dec 31, 2013

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1857 » by ZOMG » Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:41 pm

cjbulls wrote:
ZOMG wrote:
cjbulls wrote:
The fact teams are already needing to gameplan for him at age 19, game 3 says a lot in its own right.


I've watched all his games and I haven't seen any gameplanning.


So what's the big gameplan, sag off him? Orlando was doing that. He shot over them. Play him for the pass? He just finished himself instead.

We have had players somewhat like him, Rondo, Kidd and Ben Simmons come to mind. I don't remember any gameplans that neutralized them.


The way to defend him is ALWAYS to sag off. One OK shooting game against Orlando scrubs doesn't change that.

That's not much of a game plan. It's just the other team recognizing that you're so bad at something you do that they don't have to pay attention to that part of your game.
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1858 » by TheSuzerain » Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:43 pm

Chi town wrote:Simmons fits well w Cousins and Wall.


Wait what?
User avatar
R3AL1TY
General Manager
Posts: 8,167
And1: 2,358
Joined: May 17, 2015
   

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1859 » by R3AL1TY » Fri Dec 18, 2020 6:15 pm

If Deandre Hunter can sustain his current level of play or close to it, the Hawks are definitely making the playoffs. Their extra depth need to build chemistry first though.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,436
And1: 9,103
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Around The NBA 

Post#1860 » by Chi town » Fri Dec 18, 2020 6:22 pm

R3AL1TY wrote:If Deandre Hunter can sustain his current level of play or close to it, the Hawks are definitely making the playoffs. Their extra depth need to build chemistry first though.


His 3 ball looks real. He looks to have made big strides.

Return to Chicago Bulls