Dan Z wrote:2weekswithpay wrote:Dan Z wrote:
Fox is under contract for one more year. If need be the Kings could've re-visited this in the off season. No need to rush if the deal isn't ideal.
Zach's not a bad player and I don't think getting him was a bad idea for the Kings. But with DDR there....that makes it not so good. I also don't think the picks they got were that great.
If the Spurs said no to giving up better stuff then so be it. Fox can continue to be on the Kings the rest of the year.
The Kings got 2 unprotected firsts, 5 seconds plus Lavine. Are you getting a better deal from someone else? The Rockets can but they also seem to have their sights set on Booker/KD since they own the Suns' picks. The fit isn't there with OKC. The Kings would still need another suitor, without that they'd be losing leverage to the Spurs by waiting.
Is the 2027 Spurs pick that great? The Minnesota 2031 might be interesting, but thats 6 years from now.
He'd still have value if they waited in the off season. They also didn't have to trade him to the Spurs. He's under contract.
I remember Damian Lillard saying he wanted to go to Miami, but ended up in Milwaukee, so you never know. However, it's a good idea to ask around the league before making a decision.
Kings fell for the same trap we did. A non-3pt shooting non-defending C is the EZ-pass to NBA mediocrity. The Sabonis trade for Hali absolutely killed them. Ever since then they've been making the same sort of bone-headed moves we have. We all knew Demar was a mistake. The Fox trade wasn't terrible if they really thought they'd be losing him, but the guy they should have moved was Sabonis.


















