dougthonus wrote:TheStig wrote:Doug, I think the difference here is that this will hopefully be an isolated incident. I'm not saying we're at the bottom. But I don't think this type of black swan event will lead to a long protracted recession. I think with it's nature, it will be shorter.
There are lots of reasons to think this isn't true though.
Unemployment is real. Many (most) of those people are now in critical financial condition and will not be spending the same way. With lack of spending, you will also see business pick up slower and companies slow to hire back in many cases. Tons of companies are expect just to go under.
There are all kinds of structural problems that these issues cause, because companies are heavily leveraged to enhance earnings and aren't built to survive a long time with abnormal cash flows. There are whole industries that may not bounce back for years.
If we were to bounce back with everyone working and unemployment back down to 2-3% when we stop social distancing then I'd agree with you that a quick bounce back would be possible, but I think while this event wasn't caused by structural problems, it has created very real structural problems.
Pumping trillions of dollars into the economy may help but also causes different long term problems that we'll have to cope with down the road. The response to this pandemic has been unlike anything we've ever seen. It is highly unlikely, IMO, to end up being a V-shaped recovery for companies and earnings. Market prices, who knows, but again, market prices were at very high levels relative to fundamentals prior to coronavirus news.
Doug, I understand and agree that is true today. What I'm trying to say is that after the virus situation is resolved, then in the coming months after, hiring and the economy will start to pick up. I think businesses and consumers want to get back to normal.













