biggestbullsfan wrote:
Had big issues with his offensive coaching staff after Arthur Smith left which was a big reason he was fired.
Moderators: HomoSapien, Payt10, Ice Man, AshyLarrysDiaper, Tommy Udo 6 , coldfish, kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Michael Jackson, RedBulls23
biggestbullsfan wrote:
panthermark wrote:Bulliever2020 wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:
No, this is silly. Flus should have called it with 32 left, but if he was going to go hurry-up, then there obviously needs to be a drop-dead point on the clock (15 secs, 12 secs, whatever) where he calls the timeout and resets to ensure they can run 2 plays.
this exactly. And also as soon as Flus saw Caleb was changing the play, any halfway decent coach could calculate easily in his head at that point that it was going to take too long, and should have immediately called the timeout. Do literally anything but what he did in that moment.
What seems to be getting missed is:
WHY THE HELL WAS THE QB CHANGING THE PLAY?!?!?!
Almost Retired wrote:TheSuzerain wrote:I'd draft Mason Graham if he's on the board In round 1.
I like Graham too. But we need a legit Left Tackle. I'd draft Will Campbell. Offensive tackles are harder to come by which is why they go so high in the draft and cost so much to resign. Draft Campbell if he's on the board. Use the 2nd round picks for an EDGE and a O-Guard. Use cap money to get some additional veteran O-Line help. Draft either a Safety or a TE with the 3rd rounder. I love Gunnar Helm of Texas at TE but he'll go earlier in the 2nd round. You can have all the great receivers and tight ends you want but they do you no good if Caleb is getting crushed within 1.5 seconds of taking the snap due to his two Offensive tackles whiffing on their blocks. As much as Eberflus crapped in his pants at the end of that Lions game we really lost the game by giving up that sack at the end. It was inexcusable. A total breakdown of the O-Line protection.

jnrjr79 wrote:panthermark wrote:Bulliever2020 wrote:
this exactly. And also as soon as Flus saw Caleb was changing the play, any halfway decent coach could calculate easily in his head at that point that it was going to take too long, and should have immediately called the timeout. Do literally anything but what he did in that moment.
What seems to be getting missed is:
WHY THE HELL WAS THE QB CHANGING THE PLAY?!?!?!
This is not being missed and has been widely reported. When Flus failed to take a timeout and the offense failed to get up to the line and set with enough time to run 2 plays, Caleb changed the play because he had to. Whatever they had drawn up was not a TD-seeking play. Once there was only enough time to run one, Caleb changed it to something that could result in a TD. I’m sure Caleb just calling TO himself to preserve two plays would have been a wildly better choice, but he admitted he felt whether to call a TO was a decision for the HC.
I would note that Caleb feeling empowered to change the play in response to an end-of-game emergency but not feeling empowered to call a timeout is ultimately a coaching issue.
The one thing I don’t understand is why it took so long for the players to get set to run the play. This, though, is at least also partially on coaching (though perhaps minimally Eberflus himself, depending on his level of involvement in hurry-up preparation).
molepharmer wrote:fwiw - According to today's Austin Mock's model at The Athletic, he has 7 teams finishing at 5-12, Raiders at 4-13 and Giants at 3-14. If that would actually play out, I'd assume the Bears tough schedule would move them to the back of the line at pick #9. Basically all 5 of the current 3 win teams get to 5 wins, Jags win 3 to get to 5 and Bears win 1 to get to 5.
A betting site (WSN ???) also has the Bears finishing with the 9th worst record (based on over/under numbers).
At #9 Bears probably can't get the best O-lineman (if that's their priority) nor D-lineman, but should be able to get the second (or third) best. I could see them moving back to get more draft capital if they're not certain they can get a difference maker at around #9.
chitownsports4ever wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:panthermark wrote:What seems to be getting missed is:
WHY THE HELL WAS THE QB CHANGING THE PLAY?!?!?!
This is not being missed and has been widely reported. When Flus failed to take a timeout and the offense failed to get up to the line and set with enough time to run 2 plays, Caleb changed the play because he had to. Whatever they had drawn up was not a TD-seeking play. Once there was only enough time to run one, Caleb changed it to something that could result in a TD. I’m sure Caleb just calling TO himself to preserve two plays would have been a wildly better choice, but he admitted he felt whether to call a TO was a decision for the HC.
I would note that Caleb feeling empowered to change the play in response to an end-of-game emergency but not feeling empowered to call a timeout is ultimately a coaching issue.
The one thing I don’t understand is why it took so long for the players to get set to run the play. This, though, is at least also partially on coaching (though perhaps minimally Eberflus himself, depending on his level of involvement in hurry-up preparation).
Thats because there is a lack of leadership on the sideline and on the field and the rest is just spin .
They were taking so long to line up because they were pouting because Caleb had took yet another late game sack. In the video the Oline is picking him at the 28 second mark and then you see Caleb signal to the rest to come in at the 26 second mark but he was sacked so why are they still that far down field when the clock is still running ?
They will gladly lay it all at Eberflus feet but they are all at fault for that mess.
They could also move up for a gamebreakermolepharmer wrote:fwiw - According to today's Austin Mock's model at The Athletic, he has 7 teams finishing at 5-12, Raiders at 4-13 and Giants at 3-14. If that would actually play out, I'd assume the Bears tough schedule would move them to the back of the line at pick #9. Basically all 5 of the current 3 win teams get to 5 wins, Jags win 3 to get to 5 and Bears win 1 to get to 5.
A betting site (WSN ???) also has the Bears finishing with the 9th worst record (based on over/under numbers).
At #9 Bears probably can't get the best O-lineman (if that's their priority) nor D-lineman, but should be able to get the second (or third) best. I could see them moving back to get more draft capital if they're not certain they can get a difference maker at around #9.
dice wrote:Bulliever2020 wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:
No, this is silly. Flus should have called it with 32 left, but if he was going to go hurry-up, then there obviously needs to be a drop-dead point on the clock (15 secs, 12 secs, whatever) where he calls the timeout and resets to ensure they can run 2 plays.
this exactly. And also as soon as Flus saw Caleb was changing the play, any halfway decent coach could calculate easily in his head at that point that it was going to take too long, and should have immediately called the timeout. Do literally anything but what he did in that moment.
too little time to call TO when caleb began changing play
TheSuzerain wrote:What do we think of Belichek? It intrigues me just because he'd transform the whole operation.
chitownsports4ever wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:panthermark wrote:What seems to be getting missed is:
WHY THE HELL WAS THE QB CHANGING THE PLAY?!?!?!
This is not being missed and has been widely reported. When Flus failed to take a timeout and the offense failed to get up to the line and set with enough time to run 2 plays, Caleb changed the play because he had to. Whatever they had drawn up was not a TD-seeking play. Once there was only enough time to run one, Caleb changed it to something that could result in a TD. I’m sure Caleb just calling TO himself to preserve two plays would have been a wildly better choice, but he admitted he felt whether to call a TO was a decision for the HC.
I would note that Caleb feeling empowered to change the play in response to an end-of-game emergency but not feeling empowered to call a timeout is ultimately a coaching issue.
The one thing I don’t understand is why it took so long for the players to get set to run the play. This, though, is at least also partially on coaching (though perhaps minimally Eberflus himself, depending on his level of involvement in hurry-up preparation).
Thats because there is a lack of leadership on the sideline and on the field and the rest is just spin .
They were taking so long to line up because they were pouting because Caleb had took yet another late game sack. In the video the Oline is picking him at the 28 second mark and then you see Caleb signal to the rest to come in at the 26 second mark but he was sacked so why are they still that far down field when the clock is still running ?
They will gladly lay it all at Eberflus feet but they are all at fault for that mess.