Image ImageImage Image

NBA Trade Thread #11

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,458
And1: 9,143
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1921 » by Dan Z » Sun Mar 16, 2025 9:55 am

pipfan wrote:Wondering what value Ayo would have? Jones seems like a keeper, and we still have Coby, Huerter, Ball, Giddy in the backcourt


Ayo has had a bad season and is currently out for the season. I bet his value isn't that high.

Do you have any trade ideas?
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,428
And1: 4,297
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1922 » by pipfan » Sun Mar 16, 2025 10:49 am

Dan Z wrote:
pipfan wrote:Wondering what value Ayo would have? Jones seems like a keeper, and we still have Coby, Huerter, Ball, Giddy in the backcourt


Ayo has had a bad season and is currently out for the season. I bet his value isn't that high.

Do you have any trade ideas?

Wondering if BRK would absorb him and give us one of their late 1sts? They have 4 1sts and a high second, and could use NBA players.
He could start with Cam Thomas, and defend the better guard
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,132
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1923 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 16, 2025 6:49 pm

Infinity2152 wrote:Celtics are over the second apron, they can't aggregate contracts anyway, to my knowledge. They are going to have to be very methodical clearing cap. Any deal would be way more complicated than the simple one proposed. Again, I was more interested in what guys think of Jaylen Brown as a number 1. Tatum is 5th in the league in usage and Brown is 14th. I actually really like Jaylen Brown, that's why I proposed it. I think he's worth it as a number 1 and he could take another step and improve his numbers with more usage, similar to James Harden. We'd still have Ball, Matas, Giddey, Smith, Collins. If Giddey and Matas can be number 2's or 3's, that's a damn solid young team. I could care less about making the Celtics better, lmao!


Brown is not a #1 by any stretch of the imagination. He is worse offensive player than Zach.
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,599
And1: 948
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1924 » by Infinity2152 » Sun Mar 16, 2025 8:30 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
Infinity2152 wrote:Celtics are over the second apron, they can't aggregate contracts anyway, to my knowledge. They are going to have to be very methodical clearing cap. Any deal would be way more complicated than the simple one proposed. Again, I was more interested in what guys think of Jaylen Brown as a number 1. Tatum is 5th in the league in usage and Brown is 14th. I actually really like Jaylen Brown, that's why I proposed it. I think he's worth it as a number 1 and he could take another step and improve his numbers with more usage, similar to James Harden. We'd still have Ball, Matas, Giddey, Smith, Collins. If Giddey and Matas can be number 2's or 3's, that's a damn solid young team. I could care less about making the Celtics better, lmao!


Brown is not a #1 by any stretch of the imagination. He is worse offensive player than Zach.


Zach is good enough offensively to be a number 1, so that's not saying anything. There are few players in the league who can score efficiently away from the basket like Zach. Few players who can shoot 3's and dunk/finish like Zach. Purely opinion Jaylen can't be a number 1, he's putting up 23, 6 and 4 as a second option and is a good defender. What does a number 1 need to average? Number 1's don't always run the offense, Shaq, Tim Duncan were #1's. Kobe and Mike didn't run their offenses much of the time. He's never been a number 1, so he'd play differently. Don't know how anybody could determine how he would play in that role, especially without considering the team around him. Is Tatum a number 1? He's not much different than Brown in what he does on the court. Didn't Brown win Finals MVP?

Maybe we should define number 1. There are 30 teams in the league. Is Jaylen Brown top 30 or no?
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,458
And1: 9,143
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1925 » by Dan Z » Sun Mar 16, 2025 9:26 pm

pipfan wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
pipfan wrote:Wondering what value Ayo would have? Jones seems like a keeper, and we still have Coby, Huerter, Ball, Giddy in the backcourt


Ayo has had a bad season and is currently out for the season. I bet his value isn't that high.

Do you have any trade ideas?

Wondering if BRK would absorb him and give us one of their late 1sts? They have 4 1sts and a high second, and could use NBA players.
He could start with Cam Thomas, and defend the better guard


That's not a bad idea. Are you thinking the 21st or 26th pick?

The issue with that is would the Nets be interested? They might get a guard at #5 and feel like their rebuild will take some time, so paying Ayo in a year might not appeal to them.

I like Ayo, but have mixed thoughts about keeping him.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,132
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1926 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 16, 2025 9:43 pm

Infinity2152 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
Infinity2152 wrote:Celtics are over the second apron, they can't aggregate contracts anyway, to my knowledge. They are going to have to be very methodical clearing cap. Any deal would be way more complicated than the simple one proposed. Again, I was more interested in what guys think of Jaylen Brown as a number 1. Tatum is 5th in the league in usage and Brown is 14th. I actually really like Jaylen Brown, that's why I proposed it. I think he's worth it as a number 1 and he could take another step and improve his numbers with more usage, similar to James Harden. We'd still have Ball, Matas, Giddey, Smith, Collins. If Giddey and Matas can be number 2's or 3's, that's a damn solid young team. I could care less about making the Celtics better, lmao!


Brown is not a #1 by any stretch of the imagination. He is worse offensive player than Zach.


Zach is good enough offensively to be a number 1, so that's not saying anything. There are few players in the league who can score efficiently away from the basket like Zach. Few players who can shoot 3's and dunk/finish like Zach. Purely opinion Jaylen can't be a number 1, he's putting up 23, 6 and 4 as a second option and is a good defender. What does a number 1 need to average? Number 1's don't always run the offense, Shaq, Tim Duncan were #1's. Kobe and Mike didn't run their offenses much of the time. He's never been a number 1, so he'd play differently. Don't know how anybody could determine how he would play in that role, especially without considering the team around him. Is Tatum a number 1? He's not much different than Brown in what he does on the court. Didn't Brown win Finals MVP?

Maybe we should define number 1. There are 30 teams in the league. Is Jaylen Brown top 30 or no?


I thought when talk #1 we mean a #1 option on a serious championship contender. Not just the #1 option in any team 1 through 30. So basically around a top 10 player. Which is where Tatum is. I always thought Zach would great #2 for contender, but we never came close to getting a #1 except for DeRozan’s first 2 seasons here.
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,599
And1: 948
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1927 » by Infinity2152 » Sun Mar 16, 2025 10:00 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
Infinity2152 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
Brown is not a #1 by any stretch of the imagination. He is worse offensive player than Zach.


Zach is good enough offensively to be a number 1, so that's not saying anything. There are few players in the league who can score efficiently away from the basket like Zach. Few players who can shoot 3's and dunk/finish like Zach. Purely opinion Jaylen can't be a number 1, he's putting up 23, 6 and 4 as a second option and is a good defender. What does a number 1 need to average? Number 1's don't always run the offense, Shaq, Tim Duncan were #1's. Kobe and Mike didn't run their offenses much of the time. He's never been a number 1, so he'd play differently. Don't know how anybody could determine how he would play in that role, especially without considering the team around him. Is Tatum a number 1? He's not much different than Brown in what he does on the court. Didn't Brown win Finals MVP?

Maybe we should define number 1. There are 30 teams in the league. Is Jaylen Brown top 30 or no?


I thought when talk #1 we mean a #1 option on a serious championship contender. Not just the #1 option in any team 1 through 30. So basically around a top 10 player. Which is where Tatum is. I always thought Zach would great #2 for contender, but we never came close to getting a #1 except for DeRozan’s first 2 seasons here.


Got you. Yeah, with 30 teams and All Stars pairing up, most teams won't have what you consider number 1's. Most of the top 10 are impossible to get, so you have to go get the next tier and hope one cracks that top 10. Like the Cavs did with Donovan Mitchell. Pretty sure he wasn't considered top 10 when they got him and probably not now. Don't know who you consider top 10, but what top 10 player can we actually get? We have to field a team, and the goal in the NBA is to win games. Championship is the end goal, but the 82 games and playoff rounds before the Finals are important too. There's honor in building a competitive team that plays well, even if they're not top 3. 90% of the league won't be top 3.

Don't think we're immediate conference Finals contenders around Brown. I do believe you should constantly work to get your team better and you'll be all right. Only one team can win each year, and some of these contenders like OKC and the Cavs aren't going anywhere. Brown's one of the smartest guys in the league, I do think with an uptick in usage and responsibility, he could elevate. But a core of Giddey, Brown, Matas looks like something you could build a great team around. Some people believe wholeheartedly in build through the draft. Well, our young players include White (pick 7), Williams (pick 4), Matas (pick 11, projected higher) and Giddey (pick 6), Dalen Terry (pick 18), plus our high pick this draft. Maybe that guy's our number 1 ( a top 10 in the league player), but if he's not, we need to pursue all options to get better.

Good to have the discussion though. Was wondering what people thought about Brown's potential. I'm also a huge Giddey fan and think he could help bring the best out of Brown.
leo921
Senior
Posts: 736
And1: 251
Joined: Jun 27, 2015
     

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1928 » by leo921 » Mon Mar 17, 2025 1:56 am

White/Williams for Issac/KCP

Get off Williams long term money and get something for White.

Issac/Matas would be a great active 3/4 combo. Would rather have an active Issac signed long term for 15m per (with injury outs on his contract) then a no motor Williams for 18m per. KCP would be a solid vet who can help the young players.

For the Magic White is the SG they need, someone who can shoot and make plays for others. Suggs/White is a good
backcourt, and White can play off Paulo/Franz and make things easier for them. Williams would be the cost of getting
White, but he does fit in off the bench as 3/4 who can hit 3s and play solid D.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,305
And1: 9,159
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1929 » by sco » Mon Mar 17, 2025 12:36 pm

leo921 wrote:White/Williams for Issac/KCP

Get off Williams long term money and get something for White.

Issac/Matas would be a great active 3/4 combo. Would rather have an active Issac signed long term for 15m per (with injury outs on his contract) then a no motor Williams for 18m per. KCP would be a solid vet who can help the young players.

For the Magic White is the SG they need, someone who can shoot and make plays for others. Suggs/White is a good
backcourt, and White can play off Paulo/Franz and make things easier for them. Williams would be the cost of getting
White, but he does fit in off the bench as 3/4 who can hit 3s and play solid D.

I like Isaac, but he's such an injury risk, doesn't seem worth it. If I'm trading White to ORL, I want 2 1sts back. With his current trend, his trade value should go up. If you swap Ball and Ayo into that deal, it might work for me, and then we might be able to keep Jones. Then at least we're staying flat injury risk wise.
:clap:
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,282
And1: 9,274
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1930 » by Jcool0 » Mon Mar 17, 2025 2:48 pm

If the Bulls got Jaylen Brown, it wold be similar to what happened with Vuc. You would see the name and think GREAT Bulls are back and 5 games in would be hmm we are 1-4 what is happening?!
User avatar
Andi Obst
General Manager
Posts: 9,452
And1: 6,812
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
Location: Germany

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1931 » by Andi Obst » Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:06 pm

Jcool0 wrote:If the Bulls got Jaylen Brown, it wold be similar to what happened with Vuc. You would see the name and think GREAT Bulls are back and 5 games in would be hmm we are 1-4 what is happening?!


100% agree.

Brown is very good, far better than Vuc has ever been, but he's never been the most efficient player on offense, he is good but not great on defense and he has a massive contract. I know he won Finals MVP (he shouldn't have), but I absolutely don't believe in him as the best player on a contender. He's in the perfect situation in Boston.
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,599
And1: 948
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1932 » by Infinity2152 » Mon Mar 17, 2025 5:48 pm

The alternative? WindyCity mentioned best player on a contender should be a top 10 player. I'd go even further and say most of the true contenders usually have a top 5 player (Lebron, Steph, Giannis, Jokic) for the last bunch of years. There are 30 teams and some of those teams may have 2 top 10 players. What is the rest of the league supposed to do? Quit? Only sign cheap players because you can't get a top 10 player? Some of these guys stay in the top 10 10-15 years. There are maybe 3-4 guys in the league that would make a team an automatic contender. Even those guys need a strong team around them, imagine the Bucks with Giannis as the only star. How many max players have Lebron and Steph played with?

When one of those top 10 players (like Luka) becomes available, think you have a much better chance getting him having a Anthony Davis/Jaylen Brown/Dame Lillard level player to include in the trade, as opposed to a bunch of Vucevic/Pat Williams/Coby White contracts and players. And you still need those number 2's on the squad anyway to win. Tatum doesn't win a ring as a number 1 without the expensive contracts of Holiday, Porzingas, Horford, Brown. They're $50 mill over the tax.

It's the "Is it easier to go from 6th in the conference to second or to go from 15th in the conference to second by hopefully sucking long enough and drafting high and well long enough to get a top 10 player in the draft" argument. Would Ball, Brown, Giddey, Matas, Center be an exciting lineup with potential, with one max contract and one $25-$30 mill contract? Much better than it is now, a team we could be proud to watch, while we keep trying to get that top 5 player? Maybe end up putting a top 10 player next to Brown. Celtics show that you can win without a top 5 player, but you need to have those Jaylen Brown/Jrue Holiday players around them and they usually get max or near max. Jaylen getting super-max would be my biggest argument against him, rather than any of the other facts mentioned. Chicago is rich and it's a huge market, we focus on money over winning way too much, imo.

Assuming your goal was to build the team without hoping for draft luck, who would you pick? Assume you care more about the general fans and not the purists and you plan to win as many games as you can every year. Think if the Bulls are winning 46-55 games a year, most Bulls fans would be extremely happy, even if we're not "legit" contenders. Booker? Zion? Jokic?

Last question: Did anybody think Donovan Mitchell was a number 1 on a contender before he went to Cleveland? Please be honest.
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 21,043
And1: 15,440
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1933 » by kodo » Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:30 pm

Infinity2152 wrote:
Last question: Did anybody think Donovan Mitchell was a number 1 on a contender before he went to Cleveland? Please be honest.


Donovan Mitchell at age 24 carried (I mean carried, not just a contributor) his team to a 59 win season (weighted to 82 games) with Bogdanovic & Jordan Clarkson as his best offensive teammates. For a kid the same age as Coby, yeah I think top tier stardom was definitely on track.

Brown is a contributor to a championship team, which is great. But selling the farm for him would be like trading for Klay Thompson or Andrew Wiggins based on them winning a title in 2022. There was so much hype around those 2 guys which has all disappeared at this point. Brown will be 29 next season, players just don't develop into different players at 30+.

Closer to trading for Mitchell would be trading for Tyrese Maxey or Zion.
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,599
And1: 948
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1934 » by Infinity2152 » Mon Mar 17, 2025 8:22 pm

kodo wrote:
Infinity2152 wrote:
Last question: Did anybody think Donovan Mitchell was a number 1 on a contender before he went to Cleveland? Please be honest.


Donovan Mitchell at age 24 carried (I mean carried, not just a contributor) his team to a 59 win season (weighted to 82 games) with Bogdanovic & Jordan Clarkson as his best offensive teammates. For a kid the same age as Coby, yeah I think top tier stardom was definitely on track.

Brown is a contributor to a championship team, which is great. But selling the farm for him would be like trading for Klay Thompson or Andrew Wiggins based on them winning a title in 2022. There was so much hype around those 2 guys which has all disappeared at this point. Brown will be 29 next season, players just don't develop into different players at 30+.

Closer to trading for Mitchell would be trading for Tyrese Maxey or Zion.


Donovan Mitchell averaged 26, 5 and 4 the season before he was traded. He had been in the league 5 years, his team never a contender. Not an outstanding defender, rebounder or playmaker. He's a great scorer, don't know if that's enough to say number 1 on a contender automatically. He had Mike Conley and Rudy Gay on that team, think he gets to take much more of a vet and leadership role on Cleveland. He also never played with a player at Tatum's level, his usage and stats would probably be significantly lower.

Saying Brown can't get better assumes what we've seen of Brown as a number 2 is the best he would have done as a number 1. Brown just won Finals MVP last season. Mitchell, Maxey and Zion are first options much of the time too, always for Zion. And I'm qualifying Brown being great with him being on court with a great playmaker while being the number 1 option, not by himself. Same way Malone doesn't look as good without Stockton.

Here's the thing. So what if Brown can't instantly make us a title contender with no other changes to the roster? Who can? Adding Klay Thompson or Andrew Wiggins at 29 would certainly make this team much better. They'd bring a ton of winning habits, playoff experience, solid play to a young team. Then keep making moves to get better. We could maybe get Zion this summer, I'm good off that. If somebody can come up with a reasonable trade to get Maxey or some player you think better than Brown, I'm all ears.

Most of the people saying Brown can't be a number 1 are the same people who were saying Giddey can't be an NBA starter, and the proof is OKC benched him for two of the several hundred games he played there. He's never going to be able to shoot or defend. This summer, Lavine was so bad, it's going to cost us a pick to move him. Vuc is so bad, nobody will trade for him, let alone give up picks. He's one of the worst three point shooters in the league. This was just a month or so ago, lmao! Everybody can have an opinion, though. So much pessimism in here. :) :) :)
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,305
And1: 9,159
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1935 » by sco » Mon Mar 17, 2025 8:30 pm

Infinity2152 wrote:
kodo wrote:
Infinity2152 wrote:
Last question: Did anybody think Donovan Mitchell was a number 1 on a contender before he went to Cleveland? Please be honest.


Donovan Mitchell at age 24 carried (I mean carried, not just a contributor) his team to a 59 win season (weighted to 82 games) with Bogdanovic & Jordan Clarkson as his best offensive teammates. For a kid the same age as Coby, yeah I think top tier stardom was definitely on track.

Brown is a contributor to a championship team, which is great. But selling the farm for him would be like trading for Klay Thompson or Andrew Wiggins based on them winning a title in 2022. There was so much hype around those 2 guys which has all disappeared at this point. Brown will be 29 next season, players just don't develop into different players at 30+.

Closer to trading for Mitchell would be trading for Tyrese Maxey or Zion.


Donovan Mitchell averaged 26, 5 and 4 the season before he was traded. He had been in the league 5 years, his team never a contender. Not an outstanding defender, rebounder or playmaker. He's a great scorer, don't know if that's enough to say number 1 on a contender automatically. He had Mike Conley and Rudy Gay on that team, think he gets to take much more of a vet and leadership role on Cleveland. He also never played with a player at Tatum's level, his usage and stats would probably be significantly lower.

Saying Brown can't get better assumes what we've seen of Brown as a number 2 is the best he would have done as a number 1. Brown just won Finals MVP last season. Mitchell, Maxey and Zion are first options much of the time too, always for Zion. And I'm qualifying Brown being great with him being on court with a great playmaker while being the number 1 option, not by himself. Same way Malone doesn't look as good without Stockton.

Here's the thing. So what if Brown can't instantly make us a title contender with no other changes to the roster? Who can? Adding Klay Thompson or Andrew Wiggins at 29 would certainly make this team much better. They'd bring a ton of winning habits, playoff experience, solid play to a young team. Then keep making moves to get better. We could maybe get Zion this summer, I'm good off that. If somebody can come up with a reasonable trade to get Maxey or some player you think better than Brown, I'm all ears.

I think you hit the nail on the head in terms of our situation. Are there any top say 15 guys who are under 30 that are "gettable"? And, following on with that, are they "gettable" while leaving enough of our key guys to field a contender?

I think the answer is, probably not, but teams do some wacky sh*t in the offseason for unforseeable reasons. If AK has a strategy (debatable) it's to have a team that is good enough that adding a star via an "all-in" sort of trade takes us to that level. Problem is that I think we are a year away at best for that kind of trade to make sense.
:clap:
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,599
And1: 948
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1936 » by Infinity2152 » Mon Mar 17, 2025 8:55 pm

sco wrote:
Infinity2152 wrote:
kodo wrote:
Donovan Mitchell at age 24 carried (I mean carried, not just a contributor) his team to a 59 win season (weighted to 82 games) with Bogdanovic & Jordan Clarkson as his best offensive teammates. For a kid the same age as Coby, yeah I think top tier stardom was definitely on track.

Brown is a contributor to a championship team, which is great. But selling the farm for him would be like trading for Klay Thompson or Andrew Wiggins based on them winning a title in 2022. There was so much hype around those 2 guys which has all disappeared at this point. Brown will be 29 next season, players just don't develop into different players at 30+.

Closer to trading for Mitchell would be trading for Tyrese Maxey or Zion.


Donovan Mitchell averaged 26, 5 and 4 the season before he was traded. He had been in the league 5 years, his team never a contender. Not an outstanding defender, rebounder or playmaker. He's a great scorer, don't know if that's enough to say number 1 on a contender automatically. He had Mike Conley and Rudy Gay on that team, think he gets to take much more of a vet and leadership role on Cleveland. He also never played with a player at Tatum's level, his usage and stats would probably be significantly lower.

Saying Brown can't get better assumes what we've seen of Brown as a number 2 is the best he would have done as a number 1. Brown just won Finals MVP last season. Mitchell, Maxey and Zion are first options much of the time too, always for Zion. And I'm qualifying Brown being great with him being on court with a great playmaker while being the number 1 option, not by himself. Same way Malone doesn't look as good without Stockton.

Here's the thing. So what if Brown can't instantly make us a title contender with no other changes to the roster? Who can? Adding Klay Thompson or Andrew Wiggins at 29 would certainly make this team much better. They'd bring a ton of winning habits, playoff experience, solid play to a young team. Then keep making moves to get better. We could maybe get Zion this summer, I'm good off that. If somebody can come up with a reasonable trade to get Maxey or some player you think better than Brown, I'm all ears.

I think you hit the nail on the head in terms of our situation. Are there any top say 15 guys who are under 30 that are "gettable"? And, following on with that, are they "gettable" while leaving enough of our key guys to field a contender?

I think the answer is, probably not, but teams do some wacky sh*t in the offseason for unforseeable reasons. If AK has a strategy (debatable) it's to have a team that is good enough that adding a star via an "all-in" sort of trade takes us to that level. Problem is that I think we are a year away at best for that kind of trade to make sense.


I like this. Bro, I'm a Bulls fan, always have been, always will be. You put on a Bulls uniform and put in work, I'm supporting you over other "equal" players in the league. That's what being a fan to me is, a fanatic, as in fanatically going to support my team as long as they keep trying. The idea of rooting for my team to lose to gimmick the odds, then hope for my team to suck another entire year would ruin sports for me. Sometimes it feels like we're in a Pacers forum, with the criticisms of nearly every Bulls player, the coach, owners and organization. If one of them looked in on this "fan" forum they'd be heart broken. I see team building as a process, and sometimes you can take step 2 before taking step 1 if step 1 isn't available and still get where you need to go.

I can feel the waiting a year. Thing about is, I guess I think about money different than a lot in here. Seems the assumption the Celtics will keep paying that money, even if they don't win this year. When I say they're paying over $200 million in luxury tax penalties this year, and that's before Tatum goes to supermax next year, it's treated like so what. They have not paid two supermaxes at the same time, no team has ever done it. So I think Brown could be available for the right offer, just because of his contract.

Like adding Jaylen Brown would INARGUABLY make us a better team. We could have been arguing over whether the contract was too much, etc. We're arguing over he can't instantly make this team a contender as number 1. Who could? And who could know that? Nobody's ever seen him playing number 1 with Giddey constantly feeding him. How many people want the Bulls to actually be a better team next year? I'm curious. Because even if he doesn't become MJ or whoever people think he needs to be for us to get him, I promise I'd be proud to watch those guys play and root for them every game.
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,706
And1: 9,263
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1937 » by Dez » Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:07 pm

Jcool0 wrote:If the Bulls got Jaylen Brown, it wold be similar to what happened with Vuc. You would see the name and think GREAT Bulls are back and 5 games in would be hmm we are 1-4 what is happening?!


How is that even remotely close?

Brown is a young player at the beginning of his prime with a Finals MVP compared to Vucevic who led the Magic nowhere and was in his 30s.

Moot point anyway because we don't have the assets for Brown.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,282
And1: 9,274
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1938 » by Jcool0 » Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:09 am

Dez wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:If the Bulls got Jaylen Brown, it wold be similar to what happened with Vuc. You would see the name and think GREAT Bulls are back and 5 games in would be hmm we are 1-4 what is happening?!


How is that even remotely close?

Brown is a young player at the beginning of his prime with a Finals MVP compared to Vucevic who led the Magic nowhere and was in his 30s.

Moot point anyway because we don't have the assets for Brown.


Both would be players fans would know of without really knowing there games. Both aren't as good as there acolyads would suggest. Brown will be 29 next season & Vuc was 30 when acquired by Chicago.
2weekswithpay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,372
And1: 2,518
Joined: Dec 22, 2020
     

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1939 » by 2weekswithpay » Tue Mar 18, 2025 2:07 am

Comparing Brown to Vucevic doesn't make much sense. Brown right now is better than peak Vuc and is the more valuable player archetype. Two-way > Inefficient hub center with average at best defense.

With that said I don't think Brown's game scales up primarily because of his current ability as a playmaker and his improved but still limited handle. While he doesn't have his own team, he does have opportunities to be the first option when Tatum isn't in the game. Two years of data before the current Celtics team. An 8 point drop off on offense for Brown when compared to Tatum. At 28 right now I don't think he makes a significant jump.

I didn't use the current Celtics because they have so much talent that they can be competitive with both Tatum and Brown not playing in the regular season.

Image
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,599
And1: 948
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#1940 » by Infinity2152 » Tue Mar 18, 2025 2:20 am

I'm wondering if there's something people are seeing with Jaylen Brown. He got on the team one year before Tatum and didn't start that year. They started together the next.

Tatum's averaged 35 minutes played to Brown's 30 so let's average it out.

Career per 36:
Brown 22.3 pts, 6.3 rbs, 3.1 assts. Fg 48%, 3pt 36%, eFg% 54%, TS% 57% 1.2 steals, .4 blocks
Tatum 24.6 pts, 7.6 rbs, 4.0 assts. Fg 46%, 3pt 37%, eFG 53%, TS 58% 1.1 steals, .7 blocks

Tatum gets slightly more usage. They play different positions, Tatum's playing PF so there's a bigger talent drop off when he gets off the court than Brown, who play's guard/SF. That's going to affect on/off numbers like plus/minus. Celtics are much deeper at guard than PF.

Their numbers are extremely close on the exact same team for almost the exact same amount of time. Why is Tatum considered a tier above Brown?

People are saying Brown's not a great defender, he was 10th in the DPOY running his first year starting. Did he get way worse than being considered one of the best defenders in the league? Celtis players say he's the player on the Celtics got snubbed from the All Defense team this year. He guards the opposing teams best players most nights, even PG's like SGA. On a team with two guards who DID make the All defensive team.

https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/jaylen-brown-snub-all-nba-defensive-team-celtics/

https://www.si.com/nba/celtics/news/celtics-jaylen-brown-can-prove-all-defensive-worth-in-battle-with-shai-gilgeous-alexander-01jp5hmv5b5q

Return to Chicago Bulls