DuckIII wrote:burlydee wrote:DuckIII wrote:
To be blunt, the short term can suck it. And I’m not limiting that to picking Demin. No matter who we pick it better damn we’ll be based on who we think will end up being the best. Not who will be the best next year or even the year after.
That's easy to say. The reality is that if a guy isn't productive in his 1st year and doesn't have a clear development plan they can easily get lost in the shuffle. You have to have a vision of how a guy gets on the court and what productive thing he does when he gets there or yiu literally end up with Terry. If he shoots 27% from 3, can't defend and is like the 5th best point guard on the team, how does he get on the court?
Terry is irrelevant because he sucks. That’s the only reason he’s not good. Obviously the key to getting on the court is to not suck like Terry. Who still plays by the way.
There is not a single player being discussed at 12 who won’t later start on the Bulls if he develops well. We aren’t good.
Of course there are. We have Giddey and Coby, who panned out as #6 and #7 picks and play point. If a reasonable #12 pick who is also a point (like Demin or several others) develops well (say they become the 8th best player in this draft), they could still easily be inferior to those two forever, and due to lack of complementary skills, never start alongside them.
To be perfectly honest there is no obvious path to be a starter for almost any draftee at 12 - they'll really have to stand out. Obviously they'd have to do so to unseat Coby, Giddey or Matas, but even to unseat Smith (a #10 pick who has developed IMO), Ball (#2 pick who developed), Ayo, Huerter it won't be an easy task. Most of the time a guy has to be near a top 5 player in a draft to be an eventual fixture as a starter, and that's not projected from the 12 spot.