Image ImageImage Image

Coronavirus

AkelaLoneWolf
RealGM
Posts: 18,126
And1: 13,654
Joined: Apr 09, 2008

Re: Coronavirus 

Post#1961 » by AkelaLoneWolf » Sat Apr 4, 2020 7:52 pm

transplant wrote:
Mech Engineer wrote:
transplant wrote:My brother-in-law tested positive. He's 83 years old. He had been hospitalized for back/leg problems and was then sent to a rehab center where the test was taken. He was transferred back to the hospital with pneumonia and is on a ventilator. It doesn't look good.

**** just got real for me. My sister (his wife) got tested on Wednesday, but we won't know til next week (I guess the new quick tests are still on the shelf...****).

I wish I could find someone who I could hold responsible so I could kick the **** out of him. Instead, I'm just going to swallow this **** hard.


It is tough when you can't even visit them. Did he catch it in the hospital he was being treated at?

Most likely he caught it at the rehab center.

Thanks to everyone for your kind wishes. I just got off the phone with one of my other sisters who told me that my brother-in-law was able to take a break from the ventilator and speak to his wife on the phone for 8 minutes. That may not sound like a big deal, but it completely changes my mental picture of their reality. Obviously, the situation is still very serious, but not as dire as I had imagined.

glad to hear that its great news!!
but a bit puzzled, they extubated and then intubated him back again..generally they don't do that given the contamination and aerosolization of the virus as well as trauma to the airway. or was he on bipap?
"We're the middle children of history. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our great war is a spiritual war. Our great depression is our lives." - Tyler Durden in Fight Club.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,404
And1: 30,478
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Coronavirus 

Post#1962 » by HomoSapien » Sat Apr 4, 2020 8:02 pm

So we finally had groceries delivered over Instacart yesterday. It was actually a great experience. We ordered about 40 different items (bill was around $250 total) and got basically everything we asked for or acceptable alternatives instead. My experience using the app was great. I've heard stories about people waiting for their orders and having it canceled last minute, but that wasn't our experience. I placed my order around 3PM yesterday and had everything delivered to me by 5:30.

All the food was brought to our garage and we set up a folding table to disinfect items before bringing them in the house like that video suggested. I basically soaked a rag with Lysol and wiped everything down, while my wife would transport clean items back inside the house. We also had filled a giant plastic bowl with warm soapy water and let all our fruit and vegetables soak in there while we dealt with the rest of the stuff. The entire thing took us about 40-45 minutes. It was tiring, but we felt like it was worth it to have that piece of mind and while you're busy doing it it's not like you're thinking about how time-consuming it is, you're just thinking about getting it all cleaned. We also ordered enough groceries where we'll be pretty well-stocked for at least a couple of months. There was a lot of debate about whether this is worth it or not. For us it absolutely was. Again if you're buying in bigger quantities you're only going to have clean like this one every month or two.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
transplant
RealGM
Posts: 11,734
And1: 3,419
Joined: Aug 16, 2001
Location: state of perpetual confusion
       

Re: Coronavirus 

Post#1963 » by transplant » Sat Apr 4, 2020 8:02 pm

dougthonus wrote:
transplant wrote:My brother-in-law tested positive. He's 83 years old. He had been hospitalized for back/leg problems and was then sent to a rehab center where the test was taken. He was transferred back to the hospital with pneumonia and is on a ventilator. It doesn't look good.

**** just got real for me. My sister (his wife) got tested on Wednesday, but we won't know til next week (I guess the new quick tests are still on the shelf...****).

I wish I could find someone who I could hold responsible so I could kick the **** out of him. Instead, I'm just going to swallow this **** hard.


Good luck to your brother-in-law, I hope he's able to recover.

My friend's dad was also ~83 (I know in his mid-80s) and got this and went on a ventilator, and he just got taken off a couple days ago and looks like he will pull through. I know every case is different, and I know this isn't good, but keep up hope.

Thanks, Doug. Hope to hear that your friends dad makes it all the way through.
Until the actual truth is more important to you than what you believe, you will never recognize the truth.

- Blatantly stolen from truebluefan
Nikola
Pro Prospect
Posts: 786
And1: 333
Joined: Nov 24, 2013

Re: Coronavirus 

Post#1964 » by Nikola » Sat Apr 4, 2020 8:20 pm

nitetrain8603 wrote:
BigUps wrote:
coldfish wrote:
Super fantastic well done video. Of particular note was the idea that we test everyone and give the people with immunity a certificate that allows them freedom of movement.


Great idea. Will take awhile to do this though.

I don't know why, but I just had a vision in my head after reading this about Coronavirus parties. You know, to mimi Chickenpox parties for kids. Getting "clearance" will be sought after.


From a physical health perspective, it makes sense. But in reality, I think that's a lot harder to pull off. First of all, there are psychological ramifications of doing such. In addition to that, the "non-cleared" people still need to get groceries and essentials. You're opening the risk up if anything.

This is a weird time, a sad time; people need to be patient, however. People have to let desires go at a time like this. Oh, it's a nice day out, it's about to be summertime, etc. I get it, but no, stay at home. Wait until a vaccine is out.

There is not enough time to do this or wait for a vaccine before lock downs cease.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,360
And1: 6,707
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Coronavirus 

Post#1965 » by Dresden » Sat Apr 4, 2020 8:21 pm

AkelaLoneWolf wrote:
Dresden wrote:The Payroll Protection Program had a shaky rollout yesterday. It's a great concept- it gives business with fewer than 500 employees a loan that will turn into a grant that will cover up to 8 weeks of payroll (provided they don't fire anyone in the meantime). Yesterday was the first day you could apply, and a lot of people, myself included, experienced difficulty finding a lender. You have to go through a private lending institution, normally your bank. But Bank of America required you to not only have a business checking account with them, but also a business line of credit, or a credit card. I had the first but not the second. As did many other business owners. So we were automatically deemed ineligible when we went to apply on line. It was very frustrating. I've been with B of A for over 25 years. And there was nobody to turn to- other banks told people to go to where they normally bank, and B of A was not taking any phone calls on the subject, and you couldn't go into a branch to apply or even speak with somebody. It all was run through the website.

Needless to say, there were a lot of pissed off people. The NYT ran a story on it, specifically calling out B of A, as did the Wall Street Journal. Many anecdotes of business owners driving around for hours, from one lender to another, looking for a way to apply. The phone lines of all major banks were jammed beyond capacity. And everyone was worried that the money (349 Billion of it) would run out before they got their applications in. Quite a sh*t show. I emailed my rep in Congress and both senators, as well as the SBA, as I'm sure many others did. Marco Rubio, to his credit, called out B of A on his twitter account, saying that there was nothing in the law they wrote that required anyone to have a credit card with a bank before getting a loan of this type.

In any case, I'm glad to report that all the pressure forced B of A to change it's tune, and this morning I got through on their website and got my application in. It's a huge deal- my 14 employees now don't have to worry about what they are supposed to do for food, rent, bills, etc, at least for the next 2 months. I feel relieved, too, because I was telling them we'd find a way to cover them, and now that burden is gone. IF my loan gets approved. Still a big IF, but I'm hopeful.

if this does work out, I'll give our govt. a big clap on the back- this program is really going to be a lifeline for many businesses and their employees, and allow us to safely shelter in place instead of having to think about trying to sneak in some work here and there to keep ourselves afloat.


Has B of A ever had requirements like those if you had to take loans out for your business. I wonder how much of this was to bend business owners to sign up for products to collect fees etc...


I've only tried to take a loan one other time from B of A, and that wasn't brought up. The ironic thing is, I did have a credit card through them at one time I think, but they sold it off to another company, so now I don't anymore.

I think the banks generally don't want to do this. It's more paperwork for them, they feel they could be held liable if they don't do thorough background checks on who they give loans to, and they aren't making much off of it (just 1%). So any hurdles they can put up to discourage people, they are. I don't quite understand why the govt. isn't just issuing the loans directly, but I guess they maybe aren't set up for that, whereas banks already have the infrastructure in place. But they aren't happy the govt. is foisting this on them, from what I understand.

At the same time, the taxpayers did bail out a lot of banks in 2008, so you'd think they could show a little appreciation and be willing to do their part when the country calls on them for help.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,360
And1: 6,707
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Coronavirus 

Post#1966 » by Dresden » Sat Apr 4, 2020 8:29 pm

Chi town wrote:This is what I’ve been bracing for in less fortunate countries. Sadly, so much for coming too.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/03/americas/guayaquil-ecuador-overwhelmed-coronavirus-intl/index.html


Yeah, things are not going to be good at all if this starts hitting impoverished 3rd world cities, esp. some of the mega cities like Nairobi, Bangkok, Manila, etc. We can see what it does to the health systems of developed nations, it's hard to imagine the impact it could have places that already lack a good health infrastructure.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,924
And1: 19,013
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Coronavirus 

Post#1967 » by dougthonus » Sat Apr 4, 2020 9:27 pm

Continue conversation here:
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1955646

Return to Chicago Bulls