TheFinishSniper wrote:Chi town wrote:AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
Wouldn't surprise me at all.
The quotes I've read from Eversley and Udoka over the years suggest a strong preference for tough, two-way players. So does Philly's roster.
Yep.
Pax's fetish when he started GM career. Too bad ceiling of those teams and prospects is at best 2nd round exit. I really hope AK can distinguish those kind of prospects and talent of those teams with finding rare gems between them.
Pax always liked specialists. Ben Gordon scores, Ben Wallace / Chandler plays defense, Korver shoots, Duhon brings the ball up, Boozer posts, etc. It was one of the biggest failings of his tenure, IMHO. Luol Deng and Butler might have been the only two way players that he had.
Toronto is an example of a team that likes two way players and they have done fine with it. You still need a star level player or two to be truly competitive regardless but having two way players is a good thing.
Pretty much everyone currently on the roster is in trouble by this criteria. All of them have significant concerns on one side of the court (Wendell - offense, Lauri - defense, Coby - defense, Lavine - defense). Its actually a pretty good example of how building a team of non-two way players frequently fails. There are too many holes to fill.