Image ImageImage Image

Buy Low Candidate?

Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6

jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,040
And1: 3,462
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#21 » by jnrjr79 » Fri May 30, 2025 7:59 pm

MissileMike wrote:
jnrjr79 wrote:
League Circles wrote:Crazy story. Absolutely preposterous context of allegations but still might be true. But yeah he'll have lowered value now to N.O. or a trade recipient, fair or not.


If there's anything to this, I think the question is whether the Pellies cut him, rather than whether his trade value has taken a hit. Zion is radioactive now and that's probably not going to change unless teams start investigating and concluding this is all being fabricated.



Pretty strong response from Zion's team:

Statement: “We take these allegations with the utmost seriousness, and we unequivocally deny them. The allegations contained in the complaint are categorically false and reckless. This is the plaintiff’s third set of attorneys. This appears to be an attempt to exploit a professional athlete driven by a financial motive rather than any legitimate grievance.

Mr. Williamson and the plaintiff never dated, but did maintain a consensual, casual relationship that began more than six years ago, when he was 18 years old. That relationship ended years ago. At no point during or immediately after that relationship did the plaintiff raise any concerns. Only after the friendship ended did she begin demanding millions of dollars.

Mr. Williamson reported the plaintiff’s extortion attempts to law enforcement. We understand that an arrest warrant was issued in connection with that report, and we are prepared to provide the court with documentation that supports these facts.

Mr. Williamson also intends to file counterclaims and seek significant damages for this defamatory lawsuit. While these allegations are false, we recognize the seriousness of the claims and welcome the opportunity to prove the truth in court. We are confident that the legal process will expose the truth and fully vindicate Mr. Williamson.”


The thing that catches my eye here is "her third set of attorneys." That would be pretty revealing, IMO.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 17,715
And1: 8,619
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#22 » by Dan Z » Fri May 30, 2025 8:01 pm

HomoSapien wrote:
othawhitemeat wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:
I wonder if either side would be open to a Coby-Reed deal.

Houston to me, would have to throw in a sweetener. Maybe their 10th and we throw in our 2nd rounder?


I mean if Reed and 10 was available for Coby, I'm packing his bags and I'm one of the few people here that think people are underrating Coby. Even 10 by itself for Coby is something I would do.


There's no reason for Houston to trade Reed and the 10th for Coby. Yes, Coby is the better player right now, but Reed still has potential and he's on his rookie deal. Houston is a good team with or without Reed and can continue to develop him.

Coby would add scoring to their team, but in a year they'd have to re-sign him. FVV too (he currently has a team option for next year). I'm not sure about the rest of the salaries on their team.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,129
And1: 9,836
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#23 » by League Circles » Fri May 30, 2025 8:10 pm

jnrjr79 wrote:
League Circles wrote:
jnrjr79 wrote:
If there's anything to this, I think the question is whether the Pellies cut him, rather than whether his trade value has taken a hit. Zion is radioactive now and that's probably not going to change unless teams start investigating and concluding this is all being fabricated.



If anything I think this makes it more likely he stays with NO long term. IMO the overwhelming likelihood is that it can never be conclusively determined how true or false the allegations are. Worth noting there is no criminal complaint, and the civil suit claims that the woman was repeatedly raped across several years and in several states. To me that's highly, highly eyebrow raising to say the least.


I obviously have no direct knowledge of it, but based on the news reports, I do not find anything "eyebrow raising" about it. It seems like a perfectly "normal" violent/abusive relationship fact pattern. But if she does not pursue criminal prosecution and just pursues the civil suit, I do sometimes find that scenario less credible.

There aren't criminal charges yet, but I don't think we know whether or not she has contacted law enforcement. And an investigation may result from the civil suit, so then you'd be monitoring to see whether she cooperates.

New Orleans could cut him right now, AFAIK, because he didn't hit the games-played threshold to guarantee his contract. It'll be interesting to see what they do.

There's nothing remotely normal about getting raped numerous times over a span of years and across multiple states, and deciding that only the money (civil) aspect is important to the alleged victim years later, while the public safety element (criminal) is of no concern. We would 100% have heard if there was a criminal complaint.

Extremely eyebrow raising that, allegedly, the woman didn't contact law enforcement (or if she did they declined to investigate or press charges), but Zion immediately did AND an arrest warrant dor extortion has been issued.

Again, nothing is definitive, but this is not normal and should not be acceptable in society (to sue for millions in the lower legal threshold in a civil case while not even contacting L.E. or having them pursue a criminal case IMO).
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 7,806
And1: 2,297
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#24 » by ChettheJet » Fri May 30, 2025 8:59 pm

I've advocated for the buy low path, finding guys that the Bulls had rated high in whatever year they were in the draft, even if they were out ofreach and look at the limited NBA sample they've shown and form an opinion as to are they held back by more win now players or was the draft evaluation wrong.

One problem is so many teams have excess at the 2, 3 and 4 and the Bulls have an abundance at the 1 and 2. Lonzo can play next to Giddey, White or Huerter so how many guards can they look at?

They need to decide if Matas is a 3 or 4 so they can make a list of who they might want at the other slot. Right now I see them keeping Coby for this year to see what he does. People dismiss Huerter as just an expiring when I see somebody who can shoot, takes care of the ball, has a high BB IQ. puts in the effort on defense and I'd extend or resign to mesh nicely next to Giddey long term. I'd like to see what Tre Jones and his people are thinking because he's a small pure PG are there any teams that are really in need with any money to spend. The Bulls could be a solid option for him. I like those two guys because they aren't kids, they don't need to grow into an NBA body or learn the pro game like a lot of other younger buy low guys.

One thing that makes me want to throttle a lot of Bulls fans is the beyond pessimism to surrender that no Bulls players are ever looked at as being capable of improving. While at the same time anybody on another team who has done much is always looked at to blossom to stardom once they get more playing in CHI.

Prime with that is Patrick Williams, I'd like to see him spend a healthy off season NOT working out with Demar DeRozan and working on his game and not hero worshiping because he doesn't need to learn how to look for Demar in his mid range spot anymore. I'd like to see him spend more time in Chicago working with the coaches who know what role he is expected to fill.

That said I'm more than ready to move on from Dalen Terry. Besides hustle and speed you really can't identify any part of the game he really stands out in. Not a consistent shooter, ball handler, still commits silly fouls. You gave him a shot, didn't work out don't keep going down the same path
User avatar
Red Larrivee
RealGM
Posts: 42,016
And1: 18,813
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#25 » by Red Larrivee » Fri May 30, 2025 9:30 pm

So on top of having to wonder if he legitimately likes playing basketball these days, you also have to wonder whether Zion is an abuser.

And people still want him?
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 17,715
And1: 8,619
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#26 » by Dan Z » Fri May 30, 2025 9:34 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:So on top of having to wonder if he legitimately likes playing basketball these days, you also have to wonder whether Zion is an abuser.

And people still want him?


I think it's more that people are hoping for a miracle to get this team out of the position they're in (not a playoff team, play-in or 1st round at best, etc).

For the record I never had interest in trading for him.
Muzbar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,911
And1: 2,574
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#27 » by Muzbar » Fri May 30, 2025 10:07 pm

My number 1 buy low candidate is still Benedict Mathurin, but his last 2 games he's played very well for the Pacers. Either way, he may not want to be relegated to a bench role and may want a change of scenery.
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. :kissmybutt:
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 28,467
And1: 8,617
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#28 » by Chi town » Fri May 30, 2025 10:31 pm

League Circles wrote:
jnrjr79 wrote:
League Circles wrote:

If anything I think this makes it more likely he stays with NO long term. IMO the overwhelming likelihood is that it can never be conclusively determined how true or false the allegations are. Worth noting there is no criminal complaint, and the civil suit claims that the woman was repeatedly raped across several years and in several states. To me that's highly, highly eyebrow raising to say the least.


I obviously have no direct knowledge of it, but based on the news reports, I do not find anything "eyebrow raising" about it. It seems like a perfectly "normal" violent/abusive relationship fact pattern. But if she does not pursue criminal prosecution and just pursues the civil suit, I do sometimes find that scenario less credible.

There aren't criminal charges yet, but I don't think we know whether or not she has contacted law enforcement. And an investigation may result from the civil suit, so then you'd be monitoring to see whether she cooperates.

New Orleans could cut him right now, AFAIK, because he didn't hit the games-played threshold to guarantee his contract. It'll be interesting to see what they do.

There's nothing remotely normal about getting raped numerous times over a span of years and across multiple states, and deciding that only the money (civil) aspect is important to the alleged victim years later, while the public safety element (criminal) is of no concern. We would 100% have heard if there was a criminal complaint.

Extremely eyebrow raising that, allegedly, the woman didn't contact law enforcement (or if she did they declined to investigate or press charges), but Zion immediately did AND an arrest warrant dor extortion has been issued.

Again, nothing is definitive, but this is not normal and should not be acceptable in society (to sue for millions in the lower legal threshold in a civil case while not even contacting L.E. or having them pursue a criminal case IMO).


Exactly this feels very similar to the Terrence Shannon case that was completely false and a shake down.

What needs to happen is the people that are reporting these claims that prove to be false need to do time. Nothing seems to happen to them whereas the accused proven innocent takes a major hit in public perception and can cost them big money. Zion going to take a pay cut when it’s all said and done. It also has to drain them emotionally and I’m sure that doesn’t help their performance on the court.

Now, if true Zion should absolutely be behind bars but like you said there was nothing even reported as criminal now years later as civil for money.
User avatar
Axl Rose
Head Coach
Posts: 6,811
And1: 4,062
Joined: Jul 03, 2013
Location: Superunknown

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#29 » by Axl Rose » Fri May 30, 2025 10:55 pm

Dan Z wrote:
Red Larrivee wrote:So on top of having to wonder if he legitimately likes playing basketball these days, you also have to wonder whether Zion is an abuser.

And people still want him?


I think it's more that people are hoping for a miracle to get this team out of the position they're in (not a playoff team, play-in or 1st round at best, etc).

For the record I never had interest in trading for him.


The miracle would be Zion playing more than 35 games.
I don't do the dishes, I throw them in the crib
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,557
And1: 833
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#30 » by Almost Retired » Sun Jun 1, 2025 12:23 pm

If I were AK I would call Brooklyn and see if they would swap #12 and #45 for their #19 and #26. Unless they plan to package some of their picks this year to make a run at Giannis they have too many picks to work into their roster in one year. At #19 I'd grab Rasheer Fleming for the "4" and the best remaining Center with #26. Wolf, Beringer, Raynaud, Kalbrenner, and Zikarsky should be available there.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,017
And1: 9,132
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#31 » by Jcool0 » Sun Jun 1, 2025 1:51 pm

Almost Retired wrote:If I were AK I would call Brooklyn and see if they would swap #12 and #45 for their #19 and #26. Unless they plan to package some of their picks this year to make a run at Giannis they have too many picks to work into their roster in one year. At #19 I'd grab Rasheer Fleming for the "4" and the best remaining Center with #26. Wolf, Beringer, Raynaud, Kalbrenner, and Zikarsky should be available there.


I don't understand people who want to trade back. You will be lucky if 19 & 26 become rotational players for Chicago. Let alone anything meaningful. Remember Dalen Terry was taken 18th and he is barely hanging on in the NBA.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 26,519
And1: 8,782
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#32 » by sco » Sun Jun 1, 2025 1:54 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
Almost Retired wrote:If I were AK I would call Brooklyn and see if they would swap #12 and #45 for their #19 and #26. Unless they plan to package some of their picks this year to make a run at Giannis they have too many picks to work into their roster in one year. At #19 I'd grab Rasheer Fleming for the "4" and the best remaining Center with #26. Wolf, Beringer, Raynaud, Kalbrenner, and Zikarsky should be available there.


I don't understand people who want to trade back. You will be lucky if 19 & 26 become rotational players for Chicago. Let alone anything meaningful. Remember Dalen Terry was taken 18th and he is barely hanging on in the NBA.

I get it this year. Nobody below 4 seems much more than a role player, but it feels like you can get the same quality guy at 26 as you can at 12.
:clap:
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,019
And1: 36,201
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#33 » by DuckIII » Sun Jun 1, 2025 2:01 pm

jnrjr79 wrote:
MissileMike wrote:
jnrjr79 wrote:
If there's anything to this, I think the question is whether the Pellies cut him, rather than whether his trade value has taken a hit. Zion is radioactive now and that's probably not going to change unless teams start investigating and concluding this is all being fabricated.



Pretty strong response from Zion's team:

Statement: “We take these allegations with the utmost seriousness, and we unequivocally deny them. The allegations contained in the complaint are categorically false and reckless. This is the plaintiff’s third set of attorneys. This appears to be an attempt to exploit a professional athlete driven by a financial motive rather than any legitimate grievance.

Mr. Williamson and the plaintiff never dated, but did maintain a consensual, casual relationship that began more than six years ago, when he was 18 years old. That relationship ended years ago. At no point during or immediately after that relationship did the plaintiff raise any concerns. Only after the friendship ended did she begin demanding millions of dollars.

Mr. Williamson reported the plaintiff’s extortion attempts to law enforcement. We understand that an arrest warrant was issued in connection with that report, and we are prepared to provide the court with documentation that supports these facts.

Mr. Williamson also intends to file counterclaims and seek significant damages for this defamatory lawsuit. While these allegations are false, we recognize the seriousness of the claims and welcome the opportunity to prove the truth in court. We are confident that the legal process will expose the truth and fully vindicate Mr. Williamson.”


The thing that catches my eye here is "her third set of attorneys." That would be pretty revealing, IMO.


Always a bad sign. I wrote the following shortly after reading the first article I saw about it and the more I have read since the less credible I find it.

To put it kindly, at first blush this lawsuit doesn’t smell right. She alleges she dated him for 5 years starting in 2018, stopped seeing him in 2023, but he raped her twice in 2020. So she’s suing him for rapes that allegedly occurred 5 years ago, and 3 years before their relationship ended. Tough case is an understatement.

With that basic structure she is beginning her PR position from very deep hole. She’ll have to have some serious evidence to back it up. Otherwise it looks like a bitter ex-girlfriend who never got a legal hook in him to keep getting money, and is using the lawsuit as a replacement.

We’ll see. Sometimes these things look one way and go another. I think it’s a bit of a red flag that in the complaint they go out of their way to say that after both alleged rapes he either destroyed her phone or took it away. Seems a preemptive way of saying it’s Zion’s Fault there will be zero record of her ever telling anyone about it.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,019
And1: 36,201
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#34 » by DuckIII » Sun Jun 1, 2025 2:05 pm

sco wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Almost Retired wrote:If I were AK I would call Brooklyn and see if they would swap #12 and #45 for their #19 and #26. Unless they plan to package some of their picks this year to make a run at Giannis they have too many picks to work into their roster in one year. At #19 I'd grab Rasheer Fleming for the "4" and the best remaining Center with #26. Wolf, Beringer, Raynaud, Kalbrenner, and Zikarsky should be available there.


I don't understand people who want to trade back. You will be lucky if 19 & 26 become rotational players for Chicago. Let alone anything meaningful. Remember Dalen Terry was taken 18th and he is barely hanging on in the NBA.

I get it this year. Nobody below 4 seems much more than a role player, but it feels like you can get the same quality guy at 26 as you can at 12.


That’s basically never true and isn’t true this year either. It’s of course possible to get a better or equal guy at 19 or 26 that you can get at 12 but it’s extremely unlikely due to the fact that you have to pick the right guy.

I think it’s an absolutely terrible idea in general, and especially in our situation where we have zero franchise players. We have to maximize the potential of our draft swings every time and that means, using statistical likelihoods, drafting as high as possible.

I consider it to be such a bad idea that the only reason I believe it’s even possible is because Mr. “You can win titles with 9 good players” is our GM.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,023
And1: 11,720
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#35 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Jun 1, 2025 2:15 pm

CROBulls wrote:Zion, after rape charges. Get that man to Chicago.


I hope you are joking.
User avatar
RSP83
Head Coach
Posts: 7,099
And1: 4,145
Joined: Sep 14, 2010
 

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#36 » by RSP83 » Sun Jun 1, 2025 5:55 pm

rosenthall wrote:I'm interested in Jaime Jacquez's availability. He got banished from the Heat's rotation this year, and I'm not sure why. But he looked like he had a path to being a quality starter his rookie year. Looking at the Heat roster, I find it difficult to find a trade that makes sense, so I'm not sure he's all that attainable for us.

I think we really have to hope that Portland makes a leap this year so their pick becomes a more valuable trade piece.


I also like Jacquez. But also be careful with Heat players. They usually flop after they move to another team.
User avatar
CROBulls
Pro Prospect
Posts: 950
And1: 632
Joined: Jan 11, 2022
 

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#37 » by CROBulls » Sun Jun 1, 2025 6:06 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
CROBulls wrote:Zion, after rape charges. Get that man to Chicago.


I hope you are joking.

Never being more serious.
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,557
And1: 833
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#38 » by Almost Retired » Sun Jun 1, 2025 6:10 pm

DuckIII wrote:
sco wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
I don't understand people who want to trade back. You will be lucky if 19 & 26 become rotational players for Chicago. Let alone anything meaningful. Remember Dalen Terry was taken 18th and he is barely hanging on in the NBA.

I get it this year. Nobody below 4 seems much more than a role player, but it feels like you can get the same quality guy at 26 as you can at 12.


That’s basically never true and isn’t true this year either. It’s of course possible to get a better or equal guy at 19 or 26 that you can get at 12 but it’s extremely unlikely due to the fact that you have to pick the right guy.

I think it’s an absolutely terrible idea in general, and especially in our situation where we have zero franchise players. We have to maximize the potential of our draft swings every time and that means, using statistical likelihoods, drafting as high as possible.

I consider it to be such a bad idea that the only reason I believe it’s even possible is because Mr. “You can win titles with 9 good players” is our GM.


OK. So who would you draft at #12 that you guarantee will be better than Rasheer Fleming who we can probably get with the 19th pick? And Fleming fills a position of great need, a "4" with a freakish wingspan that can defend 4 positions and kill you with corner "3s" ?
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,017
And1: 9,132
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#39 » by Jcool0 » Sun Jun 1, 2025 6:31 pm

Almost Retired wrote:
DuckIII wrote:
sco wrote:I get it this year. Nobody below 4 seems much more than a role player, but it feels like you can get the same quality guy at 26 as you can at 12.


That’s basically never true and isn’t true this year either. It’s of course possible to get a better or equal guy at 19 or 26 that you can get at 12 but it’s extremely unlikely due to the fact that you have to pick the right guy.

I think it’s an absolutely terrible idea in general, and especially in our situation where we have zero franchise players. We have to maximize the potential of our draft swings every time and that means, using statistical likelihoods, drafting as high as possible.

I consider it to be such a bad idea that the only reason I believe it’s even possible is because Mr. “You can win titles with 9 good players” is our GM.


OK. So who would you draft at #12 that you guarantee will be better than Rasheer Fleming who we can probably get with the 19th pick? And Fleming fills a position of great need, a "4" with a freakish wingspan that can defend 4 positions and kill you with corner "3s" ?


Asa Newell
Egor Demin
Noa Essengue
Collin Murray-Boyles
Kasparas Jakucionis
Derik Queen
The Box Office
Starter
Posts: 2,494
And1: 1,442
Joined: Jun 14, 2016

Re: Buy Low Candidate? 

Post#40 » by The Box Office » Sun Jun 1, 2025 6:36 pm

Reed Sheppard.
Manthurin.
What about Ja Morant?

Please do not trade for Zion. Absolutely not. He's awful.

Return to Chicago Bulls