BrooklynBulls wrote:I didn't say anyone did try to downplay the outburst. I am saying that the lack of knowledge of what went on there (and what you're saying happened is pretty much unconfirmed and not widespread knowledge) has caused Noah to get off way more lightly than he would have otherwise. Its not that he's somehow protected from scorn, its just difficult to pin down whether what Noah said is somehow redeemable or just awful(Donovan said that whatever the argument was, Noah just wants to win. Noah has the image of a winner, so perhaps that reputation, combined with this team's propensity for losing, has insulated him).
Edit b/c of your edit: I'm just openly wondering why people ARENT more angry at Noah. TB#1 I think mistakenly thought that the m-fer quote was in print, and I myself became much more negative towards Noah until I learned that he was mistaken.
I don't think the level of detail reported would have mattered. Fans and media were subconsciously (and consciously) itching for something to go off on. The team's extension of Noah's suspension was the catalyst for that. And you can't contemporaneously scold Noah while you are ripping the team for its response to what he did. It would weaken the basis for the outrage. So what Noah did goes largely ignored.
Fans and media weren't saying "we don't really know all the facts so maybe we should just trust the organization's judgment on this one." The details of what Noah said would have been swept away in the flood of vitriol that washed over the vets, Boylan and Paxson. All reports were that it was an angry, profane outburst - they just didn't provide the precise language used. And despite the fact that it was angry and profane, it didn't matter.
This is an example of a time when the devil is not in the details. This was the sports-fan, sports-media equivalent of mass hysteria and mob mentality.


















