Image ImageImage Image

Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas

Moderators: HomoSapien, GimmeDat, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, RedBulls23, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN

User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 72,002
And1: 37,442
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#201 » by DuckIII » Sat Apr 5, 2025 4:01 pm

Infinity2152 wrote:
Ice Man wrote:
DuckIII wrote:What are you guys even debating anymore? The Bulls are clearly building around Giddey, Coby and Buzelis. And I don’t really even see anyone who doesn’t want them to do that.


Well, fair enough. I was just talking out loud, getting myself adjusted to the new reality. :wink: Because as you know, that's not how we thought until quite recently.



Not allowed to express yourself freely. I'm seeing more and more frequently petty discussions trying to tell people what they can and can't talk about in here. Don't worry bro, I support your freedom of speech.


This is rich. :lol:
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 72,002
And1: 37,442
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#202 » by DuckIII » Sat Apr 5, 2025 4:03 pm

Infinity2152 wrote:
DuckIII wrote:Alright, I'll do this again.

Infinity2152 wrote:I don't think some know what build through the draft means. We have like 3 young lottery players starting. The point of building through the draft is to have 4-5 talented young players.


Straw man. Or strawman! No one in the history of the world has every seed "the reason to rebuild through the draft is to have 4-5 talented players." The reason to rebuild through the draft is because it is a unique opportunity to get a legitimate franchise player. Or even more than one.

This importance of this distinction to illustrating your latest in a constant flow of intellectually dishonest recharacteraizations of points actually made follows:

Coby White (25), #7 pick and he's young. Patrick Williams (23) #4 pick and he's young. Josh Giddey (22). Matas Buzelis (20) #11 pick. You might not like Pat, but he's clearly a high pick. Other Bulls draft picks on the team, Dalen Terry, Julian Phillips, Ayo Dosunmu, most of the team is very young players and recent draft picks. Literally half the team has been drafted in the last 4-5 years. And we're adding a lottery pick this year.


Yes. Your straw man that the Bulls "built through the draft" is on full display. When people talk about rebuilding through the draft, they are not talking about having a bunch of mid and late lottery picks, late first round picks, and second round picks that aren't superstar talents. No one - no one at all - wants to be young just to be young. They want to be young as a path to get elite talent. The whole roster could be 19 years old and it would not mean anything to whether or not the Bulls have properly used the draft under AK to build the way people actually advocate that it be done rather than the made up reasons you create and then knock down.

You're not talking about building through the draft.


When I'm actually talking about that, it is. But we aren't doing a tank-based draft rebuild. We just happen to have draft picks that we've used when the clock started ticking on our selection.

We already have a ton of recently drafted players. They're obsessed with the only way to get a superstar is through the draft.


Straw man, one of your favorites. That fans who advocate draft based rebuilds believe its "the only way to get a superstar." Its about likelihoods, not certainties, which has been pointed out to you maybe a hundred times and yet - straw man. As always.

Most of them wanted to trade our young talent Giddey and Coby, to "build through the draft", ie, replacing young players with younger players.


Giddey had some haters early on. But I don't see a board where "most" want to trade Giddey and Coby. Though for me its certainly an option depending on what the trade offers are and what they expect to be paid. But again, these are sliding scale issues not absolutes so, straw man.

You can't build anything if you don't want to pay the players you drafted. Nothing but complaints about all their contracts (Giddey, Coby, Pat) but you want to build thru the draft, lol.


So, I don't want to build through the draft. I did want to, but AK already blew that opportunity years ago and now we find ourselves in a different situation. So not really a straw man, just a lie about about someone's opinion.

And yes you can build by not paying your young players. Often times paying your young players is a crippling mistake. Not sure how crippling it will be, put hard to say Pat's contract doesn't like like a hell of a mistake today. You have to acquire, and then pay, the right players. And if you don't have the right players, you need to let the wrong ones go and keep searching.

Want to get rid of Terry and Phillips too, literally want to build thru the draft by getting rid of our recent draftees.


Again, the fate of late first round and second round picks like these guys have nothing to do with what people are actually talking about when talking about building through the draft. Building through the draft means positioning yourself to get very, very high picks.

Then after AK gets rid of all young drafted players, he doesn't believe in building through the draft. Even though he keeps giving our young draft picks contracts.


I'm not sure how many times you can use this same straw man in the same post, but this is not what building through the draft means except in the fake definition you've given it to burn down your straw man.

Little doubt when he was hired, it was to turn the Bulls into an immediate contender around Zach. Which is pretty tough. No way he makes the moves he makes if the organization wanted to "build through the draft" and tank at that point with Lavine.


How'd you crack that mystery? Was it because he publicly told us he intended to rebuild as fast as possible, never see the lottery again, and then immediately started doing just that his very first full year on the job?

I can do this with every transparently intellectually dishonest post you write. That I often chose to do so with a one liner is because doing this instead is time consuming, boring, and won't change anything about the same tired old sad sack crap you write on this subject every day.


First of all, you're not refuting ish. You're throwing passive aggressive cracks and implying, no stating directly, I'm being dishonest. Not about to continue discussing with you, because you're the type of dude who slaps somebody and hides their hand, talking about "What did I do?". Don't know if you're trying to get me banned responding to your weak ass cracks, but I PROMISE YOU you don't want this. Live your life, got me getting heated early on a Saturday morning. Really don't care if you like my opinions or not, I'm not here to talk to you. You will NEVER tell me what to say or talk about.


And you're a moderator talking like this? Wow. Can't block, so I'll just ignore.


Oh, when I actually illustrate plainly what you are doing you pick up your ball. I never, ever would have guessed it.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
cocktailswith_2short
Head Coach
Posts: 7,017
And1: 521
Joined: May 25, 2002
     

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#203 » by cocktailswith_2short » Sat Apr 5, 2025 4:09 pm

The core switched from Zach/demar/vuc to Coby /Giddey/Matas in less than a calendar year . For good or bad it's exciting for a bulls fan . I have so much more optimism and less anxiety than I did when the season began .
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 72,002
And1: 37,442
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#204 » by DuckIII » Sat Apr 5, 2025 4:16 pm

cocktailswith_2short wrote:The core switched from Zach/demar/vuc to Coby /Giddey/Matas in less than a calendar year . For good or bad it's exciting for a bulls fan . I have so much more optimism and less anxiety than I did when the season began .


Its definitely good. They fit together to form pieces of a logical modern roster and their contracts, as of today, are all extremely reasonable. We are in much better shape today than when the season began. Its not even close.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,872
And1: 1,009
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#205 » by Infinity2152 » Sat Apr 5, 2025 4:26 pm

DuckIII wrote:
Infinity2152 wrote:
DuckIII wrote:Alright, I'll do this again.



Straw man. Or strawman! No one in the history of the world has every seed "the reason to rebuild through the draft is to have 4-5 talented players." The reason to rebuild through the draft is because it is a unique opportunity to get a legitimate franchise player. Or even more than one.

This importance of this distinction to illustrating your latest in a constant flow of intellectually dishonest recharacteraizations of points actually made follows:



Yes. Your straw man that the Bulls "built through the draft" is on full display. When people talk about rebuilding through the draft, they are not talking about having a bunch of mid and late lottery picks, late first round picks, and second round picks that aren't superstar talents. No one - no one at all - wants to be young just to be young. They want to be young as a path to get elite talent. The whole roster could be 19 years old and it would not mean anything to whether or not the Bulls have properly used the draft under AK to build the way people actually advocate that it be done rather than the made up reasons you create and then knock down.



When I'm actually talking about that, it is. But we aren't doing a tank-based draft rebuild. We just happen to have draft picks that we've used when the clock started ticking on our selection.



Straw man, one of your favorites. That fans who advocate draft based rebuilds believe its "the only way to get a superstar." Its about likelihoods, not certainties, which has been pointed out to you maybe a hundred times and yet - straw man. As always.



Giddey had some haters early on. But I don't see a board where "most" want to trade Giddey and Coby. Though for me its certainly an option depending on what the trade offers are and what they expect to be paid. But again, these are sliding scale issues not absolutes so, straw man.



So, I don't want to build through the draft. I did want to, but AK already blew that opportunity years ago and now we find ourselves in a different situation. So not really a straw man, just a lie about about someone's opinion.

And yes you can build by not paying your young players. Often times paying your young players is a crippling mistake. Not sure how crippling it will be, put hard to say Pat's contract doesn't like like a hell of a mistake today. You have to acquire, and then pay, the right players. And if you don't have the right players, you need to let the wrong ones go and keep searching.



Again, the fate of late first round and second round picks like these guys have nothing to do with what people are actually talking about when talking about building through the draft. Building through the draft means positioning yourself to get very, very high picks.



I'm not sure how many times you can use this same straw man in the same post, but this is not what building through the draft means except in the fake definition you've given it to burn down your straw man.



How'd you crack that mystery? Was it because he publicly told us he intended to rebuild as fast as possible, never see the lottery again, and then immediately started doing just that his very first full year on the job?

I can do this with every transparently intellectually dishonest post you write. That I often chose to do so with a one liner is because doing this instead is time consuming, boring, and won't change anything about the same tired old sad sack crap you write on this subject every day.


First of all, you're not refuting ish. You're throwing passive aggressive cracks and implying, no stating directly, I'm being dishonest. Not about to continue discussing with you, because you're the type of dude who slaps somebody and hides their hand, talking about "What did I do?". Don't know if you're trying to get me banned responding to your weak ass cracks, but I PROMISE YOU you don't want this. Live your life, got me getting heated early on a Saturday morning. Really don't care if you like my opinions or not, I'm not here to talk to you. You will NEVER tell me what to say or talk about.


And you're a moderator talking like this? Wow. Can't block, so I'll just ignore.


Oh, when I actually illustrate plainly what you are doing you pick up your ball. I never, ever would have guessed it.


Let's start with the negative terms in your conversation. Since you want to be Sheldon Cooper trying to crack.

Straw man: Negative connotation Used repeatedly, like a ridiculous amount of times. 7 times, to be exact. In one post.
Intellectually Dishonest: Negative connotation, personal insult
"The made up reasons you created" negative connotation, personal insult
"Straw man, another of your favorites" negative connotation
"Which has been pointed to you a hundred times": negative connotation, implies stupidity, personal insult
Then called a straw man directly: personal insult
"lie about somebody's opinion" personal insult
"Don't know how many times you can use the same straw man argument in the same post" Negative connotation, personal comment
Fake definition: negative connotation, implies lying or deception
"How'd you crack that mystery?": just another slick crack
Transparently intellectually dishonest: Personal insult
Same tired old crap: Final insult


Let's add your last slick comment. "Now you pick up your ball. I never, ever would have guessed it."

That's in one post. Notice something about all of those cracks? None of them refer to basketball. Now are you going to keep talking basketball with someone who comes at you like that? You're a mod, I can't come at you like that.
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 72,002
And1: 37,442
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#206 » by DuckIII » Sat Apr 5, 2025 4:41 pm

This is very easy, infinity. Stop being intellectually dishonest with your characterizations of what is being argued, and I won’t write posts illustrating what you’re doing.

Also, the last refuge of the internet dude who got caught (subject matter irrelevant): rail about “free speech.”

So you understand, I’m a retired moderator and have never ever edited anything you have ever written or taken any action against you or any of your freely expressed, albeit transparently disingenuous, thoughts. Nor will I.

But I will, if I’m bored enough, illustrate the falsity or your arguments. And maybe even do so sarcastically. I have low tolerance for deliberately misrepresented debate.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,872
And1: 1,009
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#207 » by Infinity2152 » Sat Apr 5, 2025 4:57 pm

DuckIII wrote:This is very easy, infinity. Stop being intellectually dishonest with your characterizations of what is being argued, and I won’t write posts illustrating what you’re doing.

Also, the last refuge of the internet dude who got caught (subject matter irrelevant): rail about “free speech.”

So you understand, I’m a retired moderator and have never ever edited anything you have ever written or taken any action against you or any of your freely expressed, albeit transparently disingenuous, thoughts. Nor will I.

But I will, if I’m bored enough, illustrate the falsity or your arguments. And maybe even do so sarcastically. I have low tolerance for deliberately misrepresented debate.



Okay good, then let's keep it personal.
First of all, you're being intellectually dishonest by acting like you don't see how many negative ways you came at me, even though they've been pointed out to you.

Second, because someone believes something different than you does not make them dishonest or a liar. You are not the final arbiter of truth.

Third, you think it's impressive to use phrases like "transparently disingenuous" while insulting people, it's not. It doesn't help your argument, and insulting people only impedes discussion. Which I'm sure you know, there's no way you're stupid enough to think insulting someone is the way to have a discussion or helps you get your point across.

Fourth, you started this whole discussion with your unnecessary straw man comment. You can't do all that and then act like you're trying to talk logically and respectfully about basketball.

Your last comment about the "same old tired crap you post every day" show your true feelings and motivations. Don't even know you or care about you at all, so I'm not trying to engage with a back and forth with somebody who clearly has some personal opinion about me. I'd rather talk to people about basketball in here.

And bro, I live on the South Side, Wild Hundreds. You want to meet up and talk, we can talk about free speech. I'm just not trying to get banned talking to you, you come up as moderator and I can't block you. You don't like me, now that I know who you are, I don't like you and I'm not going back and forth with you to gain absolutely nothing. So you can post some slick crap and have the last word, done talking with you.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,721
And1: 30,909
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#208 » by HomoSapien » Sat Apr 5, 2025 5:07 pm

Hi all, let's move away from the personal stuff and get back to the topic at hand. Thank you.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
ShouldaPaidBG
Pro Prospect
Posts: 941
And1: 574
Joined: Dec 08, 2021

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#209 » by ShouldaPaidBG » Sat Apr 5, 2025 5:10 pm

Chi town wrote:
ShouldaPaidBG wrote:
DuckIII wrote:
Did you enjoy Adam and Stacey’s discussion last night about the rumor of the Bulls trading for Sabonis this summer?


I truly would never tune in again if they got another ground bound center


Sabonis is the exact opposite player we need at C.

Our offense actually looks best when Collins is out there because the ball moves better and we get more easy buckets due to better D with Collins protecting the rim.

NO SABONIS.


Smith is good too. Both are more than good enough for 24 minutes apiece, which would keep both fresh. I just want to dump Vuc and roll with them.

We can be extremely exciting next season with them + Ayo and Lonzo back + this year's pick + Vuc gone
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,943
And1: 9,309
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#210 » by Chi town » Sat Apr 5, 2025 5:24 pm

ShouldaPaidBG wrote:
Chi town wrote:
ShouldaPaidBG wrote:
I truly would never tune in again if they got another ground bound center


Sabonis is the exact opposite player we need at C.

Our offense actually looks best when Collins is out there because the ball moves better and we get more easy buckets due to better D with Collins protecting the rim.

NO SABONIS.


Smith is good too. Both are more than good enough for 24 minutes apiece, which would keep both fresh. I just want to dump Vuc and roll with them.

We can be extremely exciting next season with them + Ayo and Lonzo back + this year's pick + Vuc gone



Sadly I see no way they trade Vuc or anyone who would want him without an asset attached.

Vuc has said he wants to return.

AK is such an idiot I wouldn’t be surprised if he extended him again.
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,872
And1: 1,009
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#211 » by Infinity2152 » Sat Apr 5, 2025 5:37 pm

HomoSapien wrote:Hi all, let's move away from the personal stuff and get back to the topic at hand. Thank you.


Thank you, and my apologies. What happened to the optimism about our rookie? Let's get hyped! This is supposed to be this great draft and we're going to have a lottery pick. No matter where we finish, that means we could pick anywhere in the lottery. We're talking about building around Coby, Giddey, Matas, we're building around them and our lottery pick rookie too. We could still end up with Ace Bailey or Dylan Harper or even Cooper Flagg. We could end up with VJ and he's Dwayne Wade 2.0. If we draft a rookie capable of starting year 1, that's a team that can win a lot of games now.

When we look at building contenders and paying our players contracts, a lot of the time we focus on remaining under the cap or tax. In reality, most contenders are far into the tax. Paying Coby $25-$30 mill and Giddey $30 mill doesn't stop us from getting more stars, they're the third, fourth, fifth highest paid players on most contenders. One of the reasons I'm in favor of a center upgrade now instead of later. We still have a cheap year of Coby, Matas is still on his rookie deal. Can we go over the cap to re-sign Coby summer 2026?
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,546
And1: 6,768
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#212 » by Dresden » Sat Apr 5, 2025 5:57 pm

cocktailswith_2short wrote:The core switched from Zach/demar/vuc to Coby /Giddey/Matas in less than a calendar year . For good or bad it's exciting for a bulls fan . I have so much more optimism and less anxiety than I did when the season began .


After losing interest in the Bulls a year or two ago, I'm starting to follow them again because they finally seem to have some direction and a young core that you can get excited about.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,318
And1: 11,949
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#213 » by WindyCityBorn » Sat Apr 5, 2025 6:07 pm

Dresden wrote:
cocktailswith_2short wrote:The core switched from Zach/demar/vuc to Coby /Giddey/Matas in less than a calendar year . For good or bad it's exciting for a bulls fan . I have so much more optimism and less anxiety than I did when the season began .


After losing interest in the Bulls a year or two ago, I'm starting to follow them again because they finally seem to have some direction and a young core that you can get excited about.


Agreed. We went from despair to reason for optimism way faster than anyone could have anticipated. Still a long way to go, but we aren’t starting from scratch. We have a nice young trio to build with.
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
RealGM
Posts: 10,505
And1: 7,837
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#214 » by NecessaryEvil » Sat Apr 5, 2025 6:16 pm

Ayooooooo, my bro's! Infinity and Duck

Image
jStuNNa
Head Coach
Posts: 6,256
And1: 562
Joined: Nov 29, 2003
Location: Joliet, IL

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#215 » by jStuNNa » Sat Apr 5, 2025 6:25 pm

DuckIII wrote:
cocktailswith_2short wrote:The core switched from Zach/demar/vuc to Coby /Giddey/Matas in less than a calendar year . For good or bad it's exciting for a bulls fan . I have so much more optimism and less anxiety than I did when the season began .


Its definitely good. They fit together to form pieces of a logical modern roster and their contracts, as of today, are all extremely reasonable. We are in much better shape today than when the season began. Its not even close.


If they can keep Giddey's next contract reasonable, they're really in a great spot. They have a young team now that's setup perfectly to insert a true #1 option and quickly become a contender.

Too bad AD is so injury prone. He'd be the perfect target right now.
User avatar
CROBulls
Rookie
Posts: 1,083
And1: 729
Joined: Jan 11, 2022
 

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#216 » by CROBulls » Sat Apr 5, 2025 6:27 pm

DuckIII wrote:
coldfish wrote:Its my hope that AK doesn't panic and cash it all in on another fake star like Vucevic.


Did you enjoy Adam and Stacey’s discussion last night about the rumor of the Bulls trading for Sabonis this summer?

It's like aquiring Vuc once again. :lol: Goddamn this franchise.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,318
And1: 11,949
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#217 » by WindyCityBorn » Sat Apr 5, 2025 6:50 pm

jStuNNa wrote:
DuckIII wrote:
cocktailswith_2short wrote:The core switched from Zach/demar/vuc to Coby /Giddey/Matas in less than a calendar year . For good or bad it's exciting for a bulls fan . I have so much more optimism and less anxiety than I did when the season began .


Its definitely good. They fit together to form pieces of a logical modern roster and their contracts, as of today, are all extremely reasonable. We are in much better shape today than when the season began. Its not even close.


If they can keep Giddey's next contract reasonable, they're really in a great spot. They have a young team now that's setup perfectly to insert a true #1 option and quickly become a contender.

Too bad AD is so injury prone. He'd be the perfect target right now.


Why would guy 10 years older than our core be a perfect target?
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,318
And1: 11,949
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#218 » by WindyCityBorn » Sat Apr 5, 2025 6:51 pm

CROBulls wrote:
DuckIII wrote:
coldfish wrote:Its my hope that AK doesn't panic and cash it all in on another fake star like Vucevic.


Did you enjoy Adam and Stacey’s discussion last night about the rumor of the Bulls trading for Sabonis this summer?

It's like aquiring Vuc once again. :lol: Goddamn this franchise.


We better not do any garbage like that. He is literally a young Vuc.
waffle
RealGM
Posts: 11,355
And1: 1,776
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#219 » by waffle » Sat Apr 5, 2025 7:09 pm

Realistically do you see this franchise signing BOTH Cody and Giddey to huge multi year deals?

Sorry, but I dont
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,794
And1: 10,154
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Building around Coby-Giddey-Matas 

Post#220 » by League Circles » Sat Apr 5, 2025 7:09 pm

Any chance that Coby-Giddey-Matas could be the core (or at least 3 of 5 starters) on a contender is IMO 100% reliant on very strong defenders at the remaining two starting spots. At least 1 of which also need to the a good shooter, and at least one of which can attack the basket as a lob or slashing threat. IMO it could work, but that's the only way. No chance if it's guys like Collins and Huerter in those spots.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear

Return to Chicago Bulls