Image ImageImage Image

2025 Draft prospects - thread 2

Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6

Guru
Analyst
Posts: 3,437
And1: 662
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1981 » by Guru » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:33 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
Guru wrote:I don't think its bad logic to get another passer. But why not Danny Wolf then? He has more strengths than Demin and they share weaknesses.


His passing is only a "strength" because he is a center not because he is that good at it. He is a turnover machine. While his 3PT% is okay for a 7fter his FT% is bad. He is also a bad defender and not particularly athletic.


Demin is a turnover machine as well. His 3Pt % is bad, his FT % is bad.

The point isn't that Wolf is perfect. It's that he is better than Demin
Guru
Analyst
Posts: 3,437
And1: 662
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1982 » by Guru » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:34 pm

Jvaughn wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Guru wrote:I don't think its bad logic to get another passer. But why not Danny Wolf then? He has more strengths than Demin and they share weaknesses.


His passing is only a "strength" because he is a center not because he is that good at it. He is a turnover machine. While his 3PT% is okay for a 7fter his FT% is bad. He is also a bad defender and not particularly athletic.


Yeah I do not understand the allure of Danny Wolf. He's got 2nd rounder that will be overseas in 2 years written all over him.


This is an absurd take. With the staying power of bigs in the NBA Wolf is probably a ten year plus guy
Guru
Analyst
Posts: 3,437
And1: 662
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1983 » by Guru » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:35 pm

Just reading through some scouting stuff...Bumped into Amari Williams. any thoughts on him. Can rebound, block shots and passes well.
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 27,907
And1: 4,511
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1984 » by Jvaughn » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:42 pm

Guru wrote:
Jvaughn wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
His passing is only a "strength" because he is a center not because he is that good at it. He is a turnover machine. While his 3PT% is okay for a 7fter his FT% is bad. He is also a bad defender and not particularly athletic.


Yeah I do not understand the allure of Danny Wolf. He's got 2nd rounder that will be overseas in 2 years written all over him.


This is an absurd take. With the staying power of bigs in the NBA Wolf is probably a ten year plus guy


Poor athlete, turnover heavy, poor defender, not a great shooter. Where exactly do you expect him to excel at the NBA level? We have a center that is way better than him on the roster that struggles to get minutes. Danny Wolf is not about to have a career twice as long as the NBA average.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 14,999
And1: 9,120
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1985 » by Jcool0 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:46 pm

Guru wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Guru wrote:I don't think its bad logic to get another passer. But why not Danny Wolf then? He has more strengths than Demin and they share weaknesses.


His passing is only a "strength" because he is a center not because he is that good at it. He is a turnover machine. While his 3PT% is okay for a 7fter his FT% is bad. He is also a bad defender and not particularly athletic.


Demin is a turnover machine as well. His 3Pt % is bad, his FT % is bad.

The point isn't that Wolf is perfect. It's that he is better than Demin


You dont want your center turning it over 4x a game. So not sure why you are comparing what a PG does to a center. Its not equal.
2weekswithpay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,193
And1: 2,390
Joined: Dec 22, 2020
     

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1986 » by 2weekswithpay » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:02 pm

The Wolf appeal is straightforward IMO. He's 6'10 and can shoot, dribble, and pass. He does this better than most wings in the draft.

His passing is very much a strength, TOs don't negate that. Jakucionis turns the ball over a lot, but he is also a good passer. Cade had more TOs than assists in college, but no one would claim that he was a bad passer. No NBA team is going to run their offense through Wolf, so the TOs aren't that big of an issue. The more players that can shoot, dribble, and pass, the better.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 14,999
And1: 9,120
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1987 » by Jcool0 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:08 pm

2weekswithpay wrote:The Wolf appeal is straightforward IMO. He's 6'10 and can shoot, dribble, and pass. He does this better than most wings in the draft.

His passing is very much a strength, TOs don't negate that. Jakucionis turns the ball over a lot, but he is also a good passer. Cade had more TOs than assists in college, but no one would claim that he was a bad passer. No NBA team is going to run their offense through Wolf, so the TOs aren't that big of an issue. The more players that can shoot, dribble, and pass, the better.


One problem. He does not shoot pass or dribble better then any wing in this draft.
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 27,907
And1: 4,511
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1988 » by Jvaughn » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:09 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
2weekswithpay wrote:The Wolf appeal is straightforward IMO. He's 6'10 and can shoot, dribble, and pass. He does this better than most wings in the draft.

His passing is very much a strength, TOs don't negate that. Jakucionis turns the ball over a lot, but he is also a good passer. Cade had more TOs than assists in college, but no one would claim that he was a bad passer. No NBA team is going to run their offense through Wolf, so the TOs aren't that big of an issue. The more players that can shoot, dribble, and pass, the better.


One problem. He does not shoot pass or dribble better then any wing in this draft.


He MIGHT have a better handle than Ace, but that's Ace's biggest weakness, so.....
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
2weekswithpay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,193
And1: 2,390
Joined: Dec 22, 2020
     

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1989 » by 2weekswithpay » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:12 pm

Read on Twitter


Just lower the usage and don't have Wolf run so many PNRs as the ballhandler.
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 27,907
And1: 4,511
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1990 » by Jvaughn » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:14 pm

2weekswithpay wrote:
Read on Twitter


Just lower the usage and don't have Wolf run so many PNRs as the ballhandler.


Isn't the majority of his offense from PnR as a ball handler? Legitimately asking. I don't have the stats, but from what I recall, I saw quite a bit of the offense starting with this.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
2weekswithpay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,193
And1: 2,390
Joined: Dec 22, 2020
     

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1991 » by 2weekswithpay » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:14 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
2weekswithpay wrote:The Wolf appeal is straightforward IMO. He's 6'10 and can shoot, dribble, and pass. He does this better than most wings in the draft.

His passing is very much a strength, TOs don't negate that. Jakucionis turns the ball over a lot, but he is also a good passer. Cade had more TOs than assists in college, but no one would claim that he was a bad passer. No NBA team is going to run their offense through Wolf, so the TOs aren't that big of an issue. The more players that can shoot, dribble, and pass, the better.


One problem. He does not shoot pass or dribble better then any wing in this draft.


Ace, Carter Bryant, Liam McNeely, Hugo Gonzalez, Drake Powell. Are you claiming that the extremely low usage, Carter Bryant is a better passer and ball handler?
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 14,999
And1: 9,120
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1992 » by Jcool0 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:15 pm

Jvaughn wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
2weekswithpay wrote:The Wolf appeal is straightforward IMO. He's 6'10 and can shoot, dribble, and pass. He does this better than most wings in the draft.

His passing is very much a strength, TOs don't negate that. Jakucionis turns the ball over a lot, but he is also a good passer. Cade had more TOs than assists in college, but no one would claim that he was a bad passer. No NBA team is going to run their offense through Wolf, so the TOs aren't that big of an issue. The more players that can shoot, dribble, and pass, the better.


One problem. He does not shoot pass or dribble better then any wing in this draft.


He MIGHT have a better handle than Ace, but that's Ace's biggest weakness, so.....


If Wolf was a 7ft wing who could do all those things better then most he would be going in the top 5 in this draft not 15-25.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 14,999
And1: 9,120
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1993 » by Jcool0 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:15 pm

2weekswithpay wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
2weekswithpay wrote:The Wolf appeal is straightforward IMO. He's 6'10 and can shoot, dribble, and pass. He does this better than most wings in the draft.

His passing is very much a strength, TOs don't negate that. Jakucionis turns the ball over a lot, but he is also a good passer. Cade had more TOs than assists in college, but no one would claim that he was a bad passer. No NBA team is going to run their offense through Wolf, so the TOs aren't that big of an issue. The more players that can shoot, dribble, and pass, the better.


One problem. He does not shoot pass or dribble better then any wing in this draft.


Ace, Carter Bryant, Liam McNeely, Hugo Gonzalez, Drake Powell. Are you claiming that the extremely low usage, Carter Bryant is a better passer and ball handler?


Then Wolf? 100% Is this is local kid makes good thing?
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,557
And1: 833
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1994 » by Almost Retired » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:18 pm

HomoSapien wrote:I could see Kon Kneuppel being a guy who surprisingly falls a bit. Not sure if he could fall all the way to 12, but he strikes me as a guy that ends up getting overlooked as teams try to hit home runs and make splashier picks.


Kneuppel is a hard pick to predict. I've seen mocks all over the place with him, from #5 or 6 all the way out to the late teens. He's a sharp shooting, high BBIQ glue guy that would be great in the right fit. A perfect Robin to a team that already has their Batman, much like the role he played at Duke next to Flagg. If he were still on the board at #12 AKME would at least have to consider taking him. He's just too good a shooter. And in a league so dependent on the 3 point shot that is always something a team could use.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 14,999
And1: 9,120
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1995 » by Jcool0 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:21 pm

Almost Retired wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:I could see Kon Kneuppel being a guy who surprisingly falls a bit. Not sure if he could fall all the way to 12, but he strikes me as a guy that ends up getting overlooked as teams try to hit home runs and make splashier picks.


Kneuppel is a hard pock to predict. I've seen mocks all over the place with him, from #5 or 6 all the way out to the late teens. He's a sharp shooting, high BBIQ glue guy that would be great in the right fit. A perfect Robin to a team that already has their Batman, much like the role he played at Duke next to Flagg. If he were still on the board at #12 AKME would at least have to consider taking him. He's just too good a shooter. And in a league so dependent on the 3 point shot that is always something a team could use.


If Kon is available at 12... AK better run to turn that card in.
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 27,907
And1: 4,511
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1996 » by Jvaughn » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:23 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
Almost Retired wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:I could see Kon Kneuppel being a guy who surprisingly falls a bit. Not sure if he could fall all the way to 12, but he strikes me as a guy that ends up getting overlooked as teams try to hit home runs and make splashier picks.


Kneuppel is a hard pock to predict. I've seen mocks all over the place with him, from #5 or 6 all the way out to the late teens. He's a sharp shooting, high BBIQ glue guy that would be great in the right fit. A perfect Robin to a team that already has their Batman, much like the role he played at Duke next to Flagg. If he were still on the board at #12 AKME would at least have to consider taking him. He's just too good a shooter. And in a league so dependent on the 3 point shot that is always something a team could use.


If Kon is available at 12... AK better run to turn that card in.


I don't even know how we'd find minutes for him, but that's a problem for tomorrow. A shooter of that caliber opens up a lot for Giddey to operate. He's not my favorite prospect, but you gotta make that pick if he's there.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
Guru
Analyst
Posts: 3,437
And1: 662
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1997 » by Guru » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:24 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
Guru wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
His passing is only a "strength" because he is a center not because he is that good at it. He is a turnover machine. While his 3PT% is okay for a 7fter his FT% is bad. He is also a bad defender and not particularly athletic.


Demin is a turnover machine as well. His 3Pt % is bad, his FT % is bad.

The point isn't that Wolf is perfect. It's that he is better than Demin


You dont want your center turning it over 4x a game. So not sure why you are comparing what a PG does to a center. Its not equal.


You didnt watch much Michigan basketball huh
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 20,570
And1: 15,028
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1998 » by kodo » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:26 pm

Kon would be great at #12. Not the highest upside but it's unlikely he's not an NBA rotation guy.
The biggest knock is that he's been a poor movement & off-the-dribble shooter, but if he was that he wouldn't drop to 12.
I don't think his rim attacking game will work in the NBA, his release is way below the rim and he'll be blocked by guards and wings in the NBA. Ayo or Matas would block his layups to Narnia in practice.

He might be able to do what TJ McConnell did and stop short of the rim and pull up for really high arcing short range jump shots.
2weekswithpay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,193
And1: 2,390
Joined: Dec 22, 2020
     

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1999 » by 2weekswithpay » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:41 pm

Jvaughn wrote:
2weekswithpay wrote:
Read on Twitter


Just lower the usage and don't have Wolf run so many PNRs as the ballhandler.


Isn't the majority of his offense from PnR as a ball handler? Legitimately asking. I don't have the stats, but from what I recall, I saw quite a bit of the offense starting with this.


I wouldn't say the majority, but a good chunk of his offense was as a ball handler in the PNR or on the perimeter. I don't believe he needs to play like this, though. Passing, shooting, and ball handling are scalable skills. Wolf can be the roll man and make short roll passes like other bigs.

User avatar
ImSlower
Head Coach
Posts: 6,229
And1: 7,397
Joined: Jan 06, 2011
Location: STL-ish
   

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#2000 » by ImSlower » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:46 pm

I'd be delighted to get Knueppel, but I'm not sure if I've seen any mock that has him drafted after #8.

Return to Chicago Bulls