Image ImageImage Image

NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22.

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

New poll, re-voting allowed

Young
27
16%
Carter
42
25%
Porter
75
44%
Bridges
15
9%
Knox
6
4%
Sexton
5
3%
 
Total votes: 170

_txchilibowl_
Veteran
Posts: 2,527
And1: 2,726
Joined: Aug 17, 2017
     

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2181 » by _txchilibowl_ » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:20 pm

taj2133 wrote:
Read on Twitter



Could be just a team doing due it's diligence. Organizations like having some background on a guy. Helps with trades and free agency down the road.

Or....this is the Knicks-iest move ever, essentially eating a ton of dead money for a player they just thought to meet the day before.

Tough choice.
BahamaBull
General Manager
Posts: 8,303
And1: 2,150
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Bahamas
 

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2182 » by BahamaBull » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:22 pm

Bamba and Lauri would be sick!!!

I just hope Lavine takes the next step...
#242
User avatar
Jahensle
Veteran
Posts: 2,688
And1: 378
Joined: Nov 24, 2009
Location: Rio Grande Valley, TX
     

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2183 » by Jahensle » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:23 pm

_txchilibowl_ wrote:
taj2133 wrote:
Read on Twitter



Could be just a team doing due it's diligence. Organizations like having some background on a guy. Helps with trades and free agency down the road.

Or....this is the Knicks-iest move ever, essentially eating a ton of dead money for a player they just thought to meet the day before.

Tough choice.



Good thing is, our 7th pick is a bit more valuable than 9th as the Grizzlies and snag Carter/Porter/Young there.
User avatar
23-7
Veteran
Posts: 2,806
And1: 466
Joined: Apr 04, 2007

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2184 » by 23-7 » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:23 pm

Ralphb07 wrote:Want to clear up the speculation here. KC Johnson had a story today saying the Bulls could be looking to move up for Bamba. That's what BA stands for. I've heard it and I'm 100% sure Holv and Tyrus have heard the same. I also see Porter if got the okay from the Bulls doctors as someone they hold in high regard. Now with all this said unless Tyrus, Holv or I (which none of us do) talks directly to Gar, Paxson or Michael Reinsdorf take all of this with a big grain of salt.


How much is Doug Collins helping?
VolumePoster
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,085
And1: 2,068
Joined: Oct 02, 2009

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2185 » by VolumePoster » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:23 pm

If it's mainstream media that the Bulls are trying to move up, perhaps this NYK stuff is a leak from Memphis to drive up the cost. I get the whole alien nation/unicorn duo thing between Bamba and Kristaps...but they'd have nothing at wing. Bubkis.
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,337
And1: 10,485
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2186 » by nomorezorro » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:25 pm

samwana wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=19

Sent from my SM-G920F using RealGM mobile app


this is the first time the bulls twitter account has ever mentioned bagley #tinfoil
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
madvillian
RealGM
Posts: 22,596
And1: 9,477
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Brooklyn

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2187 » by madvillian » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:25 pm

NecessaryEvil wrote:
madvillian wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
Ba-MWagon

8-)


12/20 against air really isn't that impressive IMO. Anybody that thinks Mo Bamba is a stretch big is going to be deeply disappointed when he's averaging 1 per game and making .3 come December.


what about the 16-20? 12-20 isn't impressive? over 50 percent for a 7"1 guy billed as defensive only?

lmao


I think you are ignorant about how well NBA level players shoot against air. Remember the infamous Gilbert Arenas one handed video? Dude I watched Nik Stauskas hit like 110/114 against air and set the UM record for most threes made in practice in 5 minutes.

His career NBA % from 3?

35%.

Projection sure. In a few years maybe he'd be like Boogie, taking about 5 a game and making about 35%.

But Boogie, who was infinitely more talented offensively than Bamba at the same age, needed 5 years to get there.
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.


I'll go ahead and make a sig bet that Mikal is better by RPM this year than Zach.
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
RealGM
Posts: 10,424
And1: 7,794
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2188 » by NecessaryEvil » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:26 pm

madvillian wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
madvillian wrote:
12/20 against air really isn't that impressive IMO. Anybody that thinks Mo Bamba is a stretch big is going to be deeply disappointed when he's averaging 1 per game and making .3 come December.


what about the 16-20? 12-20 isn't impressive? over 50 percent for a 7"1 guy billed as defensive only?

lmao


I think you are ignorant about how good NBA level players shoot against air. Remember the infamous Gilbert Arenas one handed video? Dude I watched Nik Stauskas hit like 110/114 against air and set the UM record for most threes made in practice in 5 minutes.

His career NBA % from 3?

35%.

Projection sure. In a few years maybe he'd be like Boogie, taking about 5 a game and making about 35%.

But Boogie, who was infinitely more talented offensively than Bamba at the same age, needed 5 years to get there.


cool story bro. i posted one small excerpt and you're writing essays.
da pmp
Senior
Posts: 636
And1: 169
Joined: Jun 23, 2012

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2189 » by da pmp » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:27 pm

Dresden wrote:
da pmp wrote:Lol Bagley @2 , Sac is literally the dumbest organization in sports today. Let’s hope one of other top 6 takes MPJ and they automatically take the 2nd dumbest organization.

I’m having a hard time understanding why anyone on earth would take Bagley over Bamba and Doncic


Because Bagley is a much better scorer than Bamba is, and probably a better rebounder, too. All Bamba really has going for him is his shot blocking, and he wasn't even the best in the country at that, despite his ungodly reach. JJJ blocked more per minute than Bamba did.

Whereas Bagley had one of the best freshman seasons of all time in the ACC. He's 6'11" and has a motor that doesn't stop. He's much more nba ready than Bamba is to boot. He will be a terror on the offensive glass, and will get to the free throw line a ton. His size, combined with his energy, his agility, and his ability to put the ball in the basket makes him one of the more sure things in this draft.


I like Bagley but he isn't the prospect Bamba is. It's a virtual certainty Bamba will be better because his reach is unreal, faster and more athletic than Gorbert. DPOY candidate by year 3. I would take Doncic,Bamba, and JJJ over him WITHOUT HESITATION
MisterRoy
Veteran
Posts: 2,730
And1: 1,063
Joined: Jun 19, 2011
     

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2190 » by MisterRoy » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:27 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:
Evil_Headband wrote:Knicks couldn't fit Parsons under the cap, right?


They would have enough room if Kanter and O'Quinn opt out.

Otherwise a Lee/Thomas for Parsons deal would save Memphis a little over $5 million today.

Didn't Kanter just say he isn't making his decision until after the draft? He is holding the Knicks hostage. Hahaha.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
User avatar
Darius Miles Davis
Veteran
Posts: 2,618
And1: 452
Joined: Apr 02, 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2191 » by Darius Miles Davis » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:28 pm

Knicks have no cap room to absorb Parsons’ contract. How are they going to convince Griz to trade picks?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"Uh...we've always like ET. ET has big hands. His mother has big hands."
aguifs
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,095
And1: 1,582
Joined: Jul 14, 2009
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
       

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2192 » by aguifs » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:28 pm

I hope the FO don't screw up again! I'll be pissed if NY moves up
#FIREAKME #BOYCOTTABULL #REINSDORKSELLTHEFRANCHISE
User avatar
Axolotl
Starter
Posts: 2,349
And1: 2,282
Joined: Feb 05, 2018
Location: The Vasty Deep

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2193 » by Axolotl » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:28 pm

At this point it's easier to list the top draftees the Bulls have not been rumoured to target after the lottery.

The complete list I think is as follows:

DeAndre Ayton
Jaren Jackson Junior

So they are probably targeting JJJ :D
From the basketball's perspective, travel is a nice pause from being pounded to the floor.
User avatar
Red Larrivee
RealGM
Posts: 42,460
And1: 19,411
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2194 » by Red Larrivee » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:29 pm

MisterRoy wrote:
Red Larrivee wrote:
Evil_Headband wrote:Knicks couldn't fit Parsons under the cap, right?


They would have enough room if Kanter and O'Quinn opt out.

Otherwise a Lee/Thomas for Parsons deal would save Memphis a little over $5 million today.

Didn't Kanter just say he isn't making his decision until after the draft? He is holding the Knicks hostage. Hahaha.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


It wouldn't matter anyway. If the Knicks are trying to absorb the entire salary without sending anything back, it wouldn't be legal until the new year.
bad knees
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,836
And1: 2,805
Joined: Jul 09, 2009

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2195 » by bad knees » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:30 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:
Evil_Headband wrote:Knicks couldn't fit Parsons under the cap, right?


They would have enough room if Kanter and O'Quinn opt out.

Otherwise a Lee/Thomas for Parsons deal would save Memphis a little over $5 million today.


Kanter said two days ago that he will wait until after the draft to decide on his option. I personally think he would be crazy to decline an option worth $18.6 M in the current market for centers, but in any event him delaying the decision eliminates the possibility of a draft day deal based on the possibility of him opting out.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nba/enes-kanter-to-decide-on-player-option-after-draft/ar-AAyOL8c

And the Grizz can't possibly see Courtney Lee and Lance Thomas as a good enough reason to drop from 4 to 9.

Knicks would have to add multiple future first round picks to induce the Grizz to do a deal based on Lee (2/24) and Thomas (8).
User avatar
Benedict Miller
General Manager
Posts: 9,656
And1: 2,082
Joined: Mar 11, 2002
Location: FLY St.
     

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2196 » by Benedict Miller » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:31 pm

This pick has to really count. Can't afford bust.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,476
And1: 9,383
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2197 » by Jcool0 » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:33 pm

Read on Twitter
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,796
And1: 3,991
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2198 » by TheStig » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:33 pm

What the hell can the Knicks offer?
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
RealGM
Posts: 10,424
And1: 7,794
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2199 » by NecessaryEvil » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:33 pm

Looks like Porter is going to fall to #7 now though. So if we can't get Mo with the trade up, I'm still extremely happy.
Peelboy
Starter
Posts: 2,162
And1: 1,105
Joined: Jun 23, 2007

Re: NBA Draft 2018 6.0: Lucky #7 and 22. 

Post#2200 » by Peelboy » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:34 pm

Ralphb07 wrote:Want to clear up the speculation here. KC Johnson had a story today saying the Bulls could be looking to move up for Bamba. That's what BA stands for. I've heard it and I'm 100% sure Holv and Tyrus have heard the same. I also see Porter if got the okay from the Bulls doctors as someone they hold in high regard. Now with all this said unless Tyrus, Holv or I (which none of us do) talks directly to Gar, Paxson or Michael Reinsdorf take all of this with a big grain of salt.

Lynn only q to you, Tyrus, Holv is whether based on what you hear you feel like Bulls are either a)overpaying or b)cheaping out/overvaluing assets?

Return to Chicago Bulls