nzahir wrote:How do you guys value Arcidiacono?
Lakers offer Daniels and Talen Horton Tucker. Would you take it?
Yes
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
nzahir wrote:How do you guys value Arcidiacono?
Lakers offer Daniels and Talen Horton Tucker. Would you take it?
nzahir wrote:HomoSapien wrote:nzahir wrote:How do you guys value Arcidiacono?
Lakers offer Daniels and Talen Horton Tucker. Would you take it?
The coaching staff and front office loves him and so does the fanbase. Statistically, he doesn't bring much to the table. The saying "his contributions don't show up in the box score" is an overused cliche but in this case, it actually holds some truth. I don't think they'd have interest in Daniels, so this would be completely dependent on how they view Horton Tucker as a prospect. I always saw him as a sleeper in the draft, so I'd be kind of intrigued, but I think the Bulls probably pass on this without much hesitation.
Fair enough
But I do see the value in him
He can be a backup pg. Hit the 3, play-make a little. And give good effort on D
He reminds me of Caruso a bit in terms of being underrated. Caruso is a better defensive guy and a better secondary ball-handler. While Ryan is better on offense overall: Better shooter and ballhandler.

sco wrote:nzahir wrote:HomoSapien wrote:
The coaching staff and front office loves him and so does the fanbase. Statistically, he doesn't bring much to the table. The saying "his contributions don't show up in the box score" is an overused cliche but in this case, it actually holds some truth. I don't think they'd have interest in Daniels, so this would be completely dependent on how they view Horton Tucker as a prospect. I always saw him as a sleeper in the draft, so I'd be kind of intrigued, but I think the Bulls probably pass on this without much hesitation.
Fair enough
But I do see the value in him
He can be a backup pg. Hit the 3, play-make a little. And give good effort on D
He reminds me of Caruso a bit in terms of being underrated. Caruso is a better defensive guy and a better secondary ball-handler. While Ryan is better on offense overall: Better shooter and ballhandler.
How about deal for Dunn?

BowlRips wrote:Julius Randle and Allonzo Trier for Lauri Markkenan and Feliciano?
GimmeDat wrote:I'm taking THT in an instant for Arci. That would be awesome.
Herrdoktor33 wrote:Underrated players I'd trade for:
-J. Brunson
-M.Kleber
-L.Nance Jr
-J. Clarkson
-R. Gay
-M.Morris
-A.Burcs

Dan Z wrote:GimmeDat wrote:I'm taking THT in an instant for Arci. That would be awesome.
Have you seen THT play? I looked him up, but don't know much about him.
BowlRips wrote:Julius Randle and Allonzo Trier for Lauri Markkenan and Feliciano?

Rose2Boozer wrote:A nice little damaged goods trade.
The Bulls send Porter Jr. and Kornet to the Blazers for Bazemore and Nurkic.

Swish1906 wrote:Herrdoktor33 wrote:Underrated players I'd trade for:
-J. Brunson
-M.Kleber
-L.Nance Jr
-J. Clarkson
-R. Gay
-M.Morris
-A.Burcs
Yeah not happening. Brunsons contract of 1.5m until 2022 is a steal and one of the factors they are able to offer a max contract to a star WITH Luka, KP and a bunch of great role player allready on the team.
Same goes with Kleber. Incredible underrated and his contract is again steal. Great versatile defender, great shotblocker and now also shooting 38% from downtown...
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
HomoSapien wrote:Swish1906 wrote:Herrdoktor33 wrote:Underrated players I'd trade for:
-J. Brunson
-M.Kleber
-L.Nance Jr
-J. Clarkson
-R. Gay
-M.Morris
-A.Burcs
Yeah not happening. Brunsons contract of 1.5m until 2022 is a steal and one of the factors they are able to offer a max contract to a star WITH Luka, KP and a bunch of great role player allready on the team.
Same goes with Kleber. Incredible underrated and his contract is again steal. Great versatile defender, great shotblocker and now also shooting 38% from downtown...
Why are Brunson's minutes down this year? Seems like he's playing pretty well and being young, they'd prioritize his development. Is it just because there's so many guards on the roster?
ChettheJet wrote:One of the trade partners that I like to look at are teams that fire their coach. Obviously they're losing, if the GM is got a contract and is staying he's going to look to start dealing veterans to get picks, prospects or at least shorter or smaller contracts and start looking at the draft.BowlRips wrote:Julius Randle and Allonzo Trier for Lauri Markkenan and Feliciano?
This fits with that notion.
It's not that the Knicks actually want a PF in return, they look really short at the SF position so if they wanted Otto Porter jr I'd do that eve if it meant having to look for a second trade. But at this point I've got to really consider trading Lauri. Unless he goes on a real tear and starts to average 20-10 he's not looking like the answer or as though he's worth any kind of extension. What's most troubling is there's no real reason why he can't develop into the player they thought he would be when he was drafted. It just seems to be in his head and that's harder to fix than finding post moves.
Randle is basically an expiring contract, don't have to pick up his option unless he looks like a great fit with the core group. The big benefit would be getting rid of Felicio without having to give up a pick or extra player.
At this point I rather keep Dunn and look to trade Arcidiacono if anybody wanted him. As a mater of fact I wish they would take a 7 or 10 game stretch and start Valentine at the 3, Dunn next to Lavine and have Satoransky, Young and White come off the bench just to see how it works out.