WT- Nate unlikely to be back (WAIT! + instagram pic pg 81!)
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
xpmar9x
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,502
- And1: 208
- Joined: Feb 18, 2010
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
I'm going to miss Nate. Really wish we would bring him back, but obviously our FO wants to go in a different direct. Although, i'm not going to miss his 0-12 games.... Regardless, they'll be games when we'll be saying, " really wish we had another scoring option" & Robinson will be on Team X getting 15 ppg off the bench.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- Rerisen
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 105,369
- And1: 25,052
- Joined: Nov 23, 2003
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Even if Nate does not get a better than minimum offer does not mean he would choose us again for that price if he gets even any other minimum offers, esp multi-year.
While we can see scenarios for minutes and playing time for Nate even with Kirk here, Nate may see a role elsewhere as bigger and better.
So unless he has absolutely no other suitors beside us, which already happened once seems like so not out of the question, he remains a long shot.
While we can see scenarios for minutes and playing time for Nate even with Kirk here, Nate may see a role elsewhere as bigger and better.
So unless he has absolutely no other suitors beside us, which already happened once seems like so not out of the question, he remains a long shot.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 37,445
- And1: 30,513
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Jared Zwerling @JaredZwerling 3h
League source: "Both [Nate Robinson and Matt Barnes] have notified #Knicks of their interest. They're waiting to see where the Knicks are."
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
RastaBull
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,955
- And1: 2,710
- Joined: Jul 16, 2010
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
HomoSapien wrote:Jared Zwerling @JaredZwerling 3h
League source: "Both [Nate Robinson and Matt Barnes] have notified #Knicks of their interest. They're waiting to see where the Knicks are."
Please Knicks...believe Matt Barnes to be a bigger need! And resign JR Smith!
Doctor Drain wrote:Can a butterfly sing?
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
bad knees
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,836
- And1: 2,805
- Joined: Jul 09, 2009
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
I'd offer Nate a two year deal at the vet minimum, so he could look forward to Hinrich expiring next year and an increased role that did not depend on someone getting injured. Love to have him back.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 37,445
- And1: 30,513
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
If Nate Robinson is going out of his way to tell a team that he's interested in him, it probably means that he doesn't have much or any other options. Hopefully the Bulls haven't told him straight up that they aren't bringing him back under any condition.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- Mr Funk
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,287
- And1: 5,388
- Joined: Jul 18, 2012
- Location: Toronto
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Rerisen wrote:Even if Nate does not get a better than minimum offer does not mean he would choose us again for that price if he gets even any other minimum offers, esp multi-year.
While we can see scenarios for minutes and playing time for Nate even with Kirk here, Nate may see a role elsewhere as bigger and better.
So unless he has absolutely no other suitors beside us, which already happened once seems like so not out of the question, he remains a long shot.


Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- RedBulls23
- Forum Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 38,338
- And1: 21,318
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
- Location: Waiting in Grant Park
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Rerisen wrote:Even if Nate does not get a better than minimum offer does not mean he would choose us again for that price if he gets even any other minimum offers, esp multi-year.
While we can see scenarios for minutes and playing time for Nate even with Kirk here, Nate may see a role elsewhere as bigger and better.
So unless he has absolutely no other suitors beside us, which already happened once seems like so not out of the question, he remains a long shot.
I don't get why the FO wouldn't bring Nate back at the vet minimum, even if it is a multi-year deal. Unless they are really that high on Teauge?
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- blumeany
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,670
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Feb 05, 2003
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Don't see why you *wouldn't* want Nate at the vet minimum. How many games (and playoff games at that) does the guy have to win for your team before you say 'hey, I think he's worth the absolute lowest amount of money we can sign him to'.
Is he a defensive liability? Yes. Does he sometimes take shots that you might not like? Absolutely. But he also proved last season that when we need points, he was there. And if there is a serious problem this team has, it is needing points. You put this guy in that second unit with Hinrich, let Hinrich move the ball around and let Nate get open. You'll no longer have the problem where Rose walks off the court and the Bulls stop scoring.
Is he a defensive liability? Yes. Does he sometimes take shots that you might not like? Absolutely. But he also proved last season that when we need points, he was there. And if there is a serious problem this team has, it is needing points. You put this guy in that second unit with Hinrich, let Hinrich move the ball around and let Nate get open. You'll no longer have the problem where Rose walks off the court and the Bulls stop scoring.
2024: Maybe there's some hope?
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- Mr Funk
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,287
- And1: 5,388
- Joined: Jul 18, 2012
- Location: Toronto
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
RastaBull wrote:Mr Funk wrote:Marc Berman @NYPost_Berman 4h
#Knicks had conversation with agent about Nate Robinson today but told don't count on a Nate The Gr8t Part II
Have the knicks not used there mmle yet? are they connected to any strong rumors of them using it on someone else?
IF nate doesn't get his do and somes with someone for the vet min he should def come back here for 120% of what he made last season
I think we're keeping quiet about Nate for a reason. They want him back, and perhaps they don't want to tip off other teams so they increase their bid.
Nate's agent Aaron Goodwin said Nate would be interested in returning to the Bulls with a reduced role, which is an excellent sign, although knowing Kirk's brittleness, Teague's (and Snell's) greeness, there will absolutely be minutes for him.
And, Thibs wants Nate back. He commented on Nate’s ability to play well at the two with Kirk, and they're essentially both combo guards.
We can give Nate a 20% raise for $1,519,172 next season.

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- TheGOAT23
- Senior
- Posts: 735
- And1: 15
- Joined: Jun 29, 2010
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Of all our bench guys over the last 3 years, he's the one player I wish they'd resign.
The 3rd Dynasty
1st Jordan Memory & Bulls Fan Since : 1985 Dunk Contest

1st Jordan Memory & Bulls Fan Since : 1985 Dunk Contest

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
RastaBull
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,955
- And1: 2,710
- Joined: Jul 16, 2010
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Red-Bulls83 wrote:Rerisen wrote:Even if Nate does not get a better than minimum offer does not mean he would choose us again for that price if he gets even any other minimum offers, esp multi-year.
While we can see scenarios for minutes and playing time for Nate even with Kirk here, Nate may see a role elsewhere as bigger and better.
So unless he has absolutely no other suitors beside us, which already happened once seems like so not out of the question, he remains a long shot.
I don't get why the FO wouldn't bring Nate back at the vet minimum, even if it is a multi-year deal. Unless they are really that high on Teauge?
I thought Rerisen's point was that if Nate is only getting vet min offers, he might still choose vet min with another team over vet min with Bulls...not that the Bulls wouldn't attempt to sign him at the vet min.
Personally, if he's only getting vet min offers I am optimistic he would want to be back with the Bulls. We can actually offer him a bit more than the vet min (with the 20% raise, correct?). He loves Chicago, he loves the guys on this team. He would get less minutes than he would in many other places...but he'd be on a winning team with Championship ambitions and with the frailty of the guy he's competing with (Kirk), he'll likely have stretches with much more regular playing time.
the vet min with a 20% increase...two year deal with a player option on the second year (is that possible when only signing a vet min?). That way, if he feels he's worth more he can opt out, and it could play out that the Bulls (with potentially some actual cap space however limited) might be able to offer him a more deserving contract (if he plays exceptional again that is).
Doctor Drain wrote:Can a butterfly sing?
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- kdapiton
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,994
- And1: 7,459
- Joined: Jan 09, 2013
- Location: Manetheren
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Nate Robinson @nate_robinson 2m
Free agent now ... Lets talk turkey (ray Gibson voice from the movie life) http://instagram.com/p/bRNvljAr7T/
No.....No......NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
we go jim
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- bulls_13
- Junior
- Posts: 464
- And1: 106
- Joined: Feb 22, 2010
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Noooo! Come back Nate!!
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
MalcolmXing
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,779
- And1: 503
- Joined: Jun 27, 2013
- Location: Chicago, Greatest City Ever
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
He's gone, he deserves it tho.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 37,445
- And1: 30,513
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
NOOOOO!
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
cubbiefan009
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,141
- And1: 539
- Joined: Feb 27, 2009
- Location: Chicago, Illinois
- Contact:
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Damn, man. Figured it was inevitable, but I was still holding out hope. Nate, in one season, became one of my favorite Bulls ever.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
kingkirk
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 80,406
- And1: 23,765
- Joined: Jan 24, 2004
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
I don't understand Nate and his twitter / instagram talk.
What's he saying here?
What's he saying here?
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
anrichardson
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 909
- And1: 45
- Joined: Jun 06, 2008
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
I still hold out hope. I believe everything revolves around Howard in a way. If Howard selects Dallas, I can see them making a sign and trade with Mayo. Making a spot for Nate.
To far fetched?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
To far fetched?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 37,445
- And1: 30,513
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
KingCuban wrote:I don't understand Nate and his twitter / instagram talk.
What's he saying here?
He's implying he's going to Turkey.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.












