kulaz3000 wrote:It's becoming a little tiresome reading these snarky opposing remarks, responding to posters with differing views on said players on these boards. I strongly suggest you all take it down a notch.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, ESPECIALLY when it comes to projecting how a player will turn out, something that no one on here has as a definitive and correct answer on, so to then make snarky remarks about how one posters knows less than the other, or one view is less valuable than the other, is utterly redundant.
None of this is warning worthy, however, you should all be held to a higher standard and a reminder that a little respect to your fellow posters goes a long way.
The idea that similar rookie stats imply similar career outcomes should be called out, especially when those stats are nothing unique like 10 pts, 4 reb, etc. Projections are one thing, but faulty reasoning for the projection is another. Although I would argue there should always be a challenge allowed for comparing rookies to hall of famers. I know the guy who posted that D Rose’ 2nd year stats were close to Coby’s 2nd year stats didn’t receive the protection of the mods.
This should be a discussion board where views can be challenged. If they didn’t want them reviewed, why post them at all?
Re-read what kulaz wrote, you completely missed the concerns he was bringing up. Backseat moderating, go to PM with questions and comments please ~fleet