HomoSapien wrote:I mean, you can't help but be happy for Hutchison. If he busts out, then we need to find out why he was unable to do that here. If the Bulls believed in him enough to give him a promise on draft night, then they also need to put in the right infrastructure to develop talent. If that's an institutional failure, then we need to know that.
Normally I would say this is correct, but we basically changed everything about the institution that attempted to develop Hutch anyway. New coaches, trainers, front office ,etc... There isn't a lot of value in figuring out what went wrong with people whom are no longer here.
This year, Hutch started the season with COVID and was out for quite awhile because of it. There wasn't much time to work with the new staff or do anything else to earn his role. I'm not sure there is nothing to really dig into in the short time he was with the new staff due to circumstances.
One other thing I'd add is that sometimes it just takes a guy a couple destinations and changes in life to take things as seriously as they need to. Also, the most likely scenario is that despite a good game, Hutch actually just isn't very good and this is just a flash in the pan.
At any rate, we should perpetually evaluate our managerial effectiveness in things like player development, scouting, etc, the org should always be doing those things, so regardless of Hutch, we should know if we're failing people and why. Sometimes if we fail people it may be acceptable (ie, the circumstances required to maximize one person's success require a change in culture you feel hurts the whole).