Image ImageImage Image

2018 Draft Thread #6

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

_txchilibowl_
Veteran
Posts: 2,524
And1: 2,717
Joined: Aug 17, 2017
     

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#41 » by _txchilibowl_ » Mon Feb 19, 2018 1:32 pm

ArizonaBullsFan wrote:
_txchilibowl_ wrote:
Dresden wrote:
You might as well say "since 1995" or so, because before then it was a much different game without the one and done's.



1) David Robinson's under-20 season was in 1984

2) Under-20 seasons would include most sophomores and some juniors so the stat includes alot more than one and done players.


Those numbers from Ayton are pretty historic....


Not really. And that 19/10/.650 statement is a complete lie anyway.

Unless you want to ignore the fact that the first 50 or so years of NCAA basketball were played without a shot clock, which completely changed the game more than probably any game rule ever.

I'm pretty sure Robinson, Griffin and Ayton never played in any games that were 7-0 at halftime.

===================================================

But nothing compares to the slowdown efforts perfected by North Carolina legend Dean Smith, whose four corners offense gave the Tar Heels numerous victories but earned them few fans. Smith's teams usually possessed superior talent, and those superior players killed the clock as helpless foes chased the ball and point guards like Phil Ford. The four corners usually appeared at the end of games. But not always.

At the end of the 1979 season, the Tar Heels hit the road to face rival Duke, in a game that set the game of basketball back to about five minutes after Naismith put up the first peach basket. North Carolina had defeated Duke 74-68 earlier in the season. Yet in the rematch in Durham, Smith's troops held the ball. And held the ball. Then held it some more. Duke scored after gaining the tip, surging to a 2-0 lead. The Tar Heels held the ball for the next 11 minutes. The reason? Smith wanted Duke to come out of its 2-3 zone. The Dukies finally deflected a pass but after inbounding the ball, North Carolina held it for two more minutes, before turning it over. Mike Gminski hit a free throw to make it 3-0 with 5:43 remaining.

The Blue Devils added a pair of field goals before the buzzer and went into halftime leading 7-0. North Carolina took two shots in the first half, including a half-courter at the buzzer. Neither hit the rim. The first, by Rich Yonakor, led to the Duke crowd chanting "airball." Basketball historians who specialize in such trivial matters, believe that's the first time a crowd chanted "airball." Considering the Tar Heels entered the game ranked fourth in the nation, it should have also turned into the first game where a crowd chanted "overrated."

http://shawnfury.blogspot.com/2011/01/time-duke-led-unc-7-0-at-halftime.html

===================================================

I bolded game rule above because another non-playing court rule was finally fully changed during the 1960's - I think it's safe to say that it became a different game once the brothers were fully allowed to play. And I don't mean the Van Arsdale brothers...

===================================================

The Loyola University (Chicago) teams of the early 1960s, coached by George Ireland, are thought to be responsible for ushering in a new era of racial equality in the sport by shattering all remaining color barriers in NCAA men's basketball. Beginning in 1961, Loyola broke the longstanding gentlemen's agreement (not to play more than three black players at any given time), putting as many as four black players on the court at every game. For the 1962-63 season, Ireland played four black Loyola starters in every game. That season, Loyola also became the first team in NCAA Division I history to play an all-black lineup, doing so in a game against Wyoming in December 1962.

In 1963, Loyola shocked the nation and changed college basketball forever by starting four black players in the NCAA Tournament, as well as the Championship game. Loyola's stunning 60–58 overtime upset of two-time defending NCAA champion Cincinnati was the crowning achievement in the school's nearly decade-long struggle with racial inequality in men's college basketball, highlighted by the tumultuous events of that year's NCAA Tournament. Loyola's 1963 NCAA title was historic not only for the racial makeup of Loyola's team, but also because Cincinnati started three black players, making seven of the ten starters in the 1963 NCAA Championship game black.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_participation_in_college_basketball

===================================================

And let's just throw out the simple fact that this statement is a complete, bold-faced lie:

Only 3 players under 20 years old in NCAA history have averaged 19 and 10 with a true shooting of 65.0 or better. David Robinson, Blake Griffin and Deandre Ayton.


Bill Walton (DOB 11/5/52)
1971-72:
21.1 Pts
15.5 Reb
.673 TS%
https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/waltobi01.html

Lew Alcindor (DOB 4/16/47)
1966-67:
29.0 Pts
15.5 Reb
.680 TS%
https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/a/abdulka01.html

There certainly could be more players who fit the bill, I just posted the stats of the 2 guys I had no doubt would have done it.

And they might have done it twice, if they had been allowed to play as Freshmen. But just FYI, the year Kareem played for UCLA's Freshman team, he only put up 33.1 points and 21.5 rebounds while shooting 68.3% from the field.

===================================================

P.S. - These numbers games don't mean a whole lot anyway, when you start using strange numbers (like 19 pts/game instead of 20):

1999 NBA season, only 2 players averaged 18+ points, 7+ rebounds, 5+ assists and 1+ steals with an ast/to ratio of 1.75 or better.

Grant Hill - https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/hillgr01.html
Toni Kukoc - https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/k/kukocto01.html

Just sayin'...



Great post. Very informative stuff. Thanks!


But doesn't the point still stand that Ayton is having a season like few others have? Even if he was 1 of 20 players to achieve it I'd still say that qualifies as historic.

Ayton and Bagley are putting up video game numbers out there. That gets hard to overlook at some point.
lostikka_FIN
Sophomore
Posts: 153
And1: 100
Joined: Aug 12, 2017

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#42 » by lostikka_FIN » Mon Feb 19, 2018 1:35 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
DroseReturnChi wrote:
erlim wrote:
Besides the Warriors players, most basketball players have inexplicable bad nights.


I am just curious why these Euro players all have terrible body conditioning from Mitotic to Doncic?
I guess they only care about honing their skills and teamwork they dont even take care of themselves carefully despite being a pro.
This is why there are these stereotypes on Euros which clearly affected LM's stock although he played for Arizona.
That said, I am confident of drafting Euro bigs since guys like Jokic have proven in the big stage but wings should be taken with more caution. Guys like Rubio and Gallinari arent most encouraging product from the Euro region and how better is Doncic as a prospect compared to them is the big question. There's just not enough data to compare since he's not playing for NCAA but I wish he went against Young and Sexton and see how he performs.


Doncic is a SF so he wouldn't be going against those guys head to head. He might run the team, but I don't see him doing it at PG.


Doncic is a guard.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,232
And1: 6,657
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#43 » by Dresden » Mon Feb 19, 2018 3:30 pm

My whole point about the NCAA is that ever since high school players started going directly to the ncaa in significant numbers, and then the one and done era, it's become much easier for young players to thrive because there aren't as many upper classman as there used to be in say, Michael Jordan's era and before. Back then, in was common for players to stay 4 years- in fact it was even unusual when MJ left after his junior year. So a guy like Ayton would be going up against players like Embiid (who would be in his senior year, if I"m not mistaken). Bill Walton, as great as he was in college, played until his eligibility ran out.

Now, the only guys playing their senior years in college are guys who have almost no chance of making the nba. And if you're even a junior, you're either a late bloomer, or also not going to the nba. So the talent pool was just much larger and deeper prior to about 1995 or so (I can't remember exactly when underclassmen starting leaving colleges to go pro in droves).
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,232
And1: 6,657
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#44 » by Dresden » Mon Feb 19, 2018 3:33 pm

And nice history lesson, Arizona. That 4 corners offense of Dean Smith's made for some truly awful basketball. As soon as they would get a decent lead in the second half, the watch was on for when they would go into it and try to shorten the game. The thing was, too, back then players could shoot free throws. I doubt it would work now, because you'd just get fouled and with players shooting in the 60's and 70%'s, it might not be what you want.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,459
And1: 9,144
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#45 » by Dan Z » Mon Feb 19, 2018 4:42 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
Axolotl wrote:
.



Bulls need to swing for the fences with both picks. We need an all-star.


Are you saying that The Bulls should keep both picks rather than trade up?

For me it depends on what a trade would be and who The Bulls trade up to get.

Right now Nbadraft.net has the Bulls picking at #8 and selecting Bamba. Is that the kind of pick you think the team should be making? He seems like a player with high upside, but also one has some risk to him.
User avatar
Red Larrivee
RealGM
Posts: 42,241
And1: 19,085
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#46 » by Red Larrivee » Mon Feb 19, 2018 4:51 pm

I would not be mad at all with Bamba at 8. Talent wise, that's a steal.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
biggestbullsfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,732
And1: 2,275
Joined: Apr 28, 2004
     

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#47 » by biggestbullsfan » Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:12 pm

Read on Twitter


Well i hope the non tankers are happy.
User avatar
Axolotl
Starter
Posts: 2,349
And1: 2,282
Joined: Feb 05, 2018
Location: The Vasty Deep

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#48 » by Axolotl » Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:23 pm

biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


Well i hope the non tankers are happy.


Losing to a tanking team is a double win. Pushes us down, and them up at the same time.
From the basketball's perspective, travel is a nice pause from being pounded to the floor.
biggestbullsfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,732
And1: 2,275
Joined: Apr 28, 2004
     

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#49 » by biggestbullsfan » Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:33 pm

Axolotl wrote:
biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


Well i hope the non tankers are happy.


Losing to a tanking team is a double win. Pushes us down, and them up at the same time.


With a fully healthy team and not shutting guys down, we will be too good to tank. Other teams are active, we are more just playing. Unless we make active decisions, we will climb the ranks more and more.
User avatar
Red Larrivee
RealGM
Posts: 42,241
And1: 19,085
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore

Re: RE: Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#50 » by Red Larrivee » Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:38 pm

biggestbullsfan wrote:
Axolotl wrote:
biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


Well i hope the non tankers are happy.


Losing to a tanking team is a double win. Pushes us down, and them up at the same time.


With a fully healthy team and not shutting guys down, we will be too good to tank. Other teams are active, we are more just playing. Unless we make active decisions, we will climb the ranks more and more.


As long as Dunn, Markkanen, Portis and LaVine are playing, Chicago has a good chance to beat fellow sub-.500 teams.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
PrimzyBulls81
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,933
And1: 1,226
Joined: Feb 09, 2013

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#51 » by PrimzyBulls81 » Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:43 pm

In the end we wont finnish in worst 10 at all.. we will have pick like no.11 and 16.. :)
User avatar
Benedict Miller
General Manager
Posts: 9,656
And1: 2,082
Joined: Mar 11, 2002
Location: FLY St.
     

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#52 » by Benedict Miller » Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:49 pm

Dresden wrote:My whole point about the NCAA is that ever since high school players started going directly to the ncaa in significant numbers, and then the one and done era, it's become much easier for young players to thrive because there aren't as many upper classman as there used to be in say, Michael Jordan's era and before. Back then, in was common for players to stay 4 years- in fact it was even unusual when MJ left after his junior year. So a guy like Ayton would be going up against players like Embiid (who would be in his senior year, if I"m not mistaken). Bill Walton, as great as he was in college, played until his eligibility ran out.

Now, the only guys playing their senior years in college are guys who have almost no chance of making the nba. And if you're even a junior, you're either a late bloomer, or also not going to the nba. So the talent pool was just much larger and deeper prior to about 1995 or so (I can't remember exactly when underclassmen starting leaving colleges to go pro in droves).


And Ayton has been more productive than guys who are All Star centers in today's game, who also played in the one n done era.
User avatar
Axolotl
Starter
Posts: 2,349
And1: 2,282
Joined: Feb 05, 2018
Location: The Vasty Deep

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#53 » by Axolotl » Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:51 pm

biggestbullsfan wrote:With a fully healthy team and not shutting guys down, we will be too good to tank. Other teams are active, we are more just playing. Unless we make active decisions, we will climb the ranks more and more.


I agree completely. I'm expecting to see Cam Payne getting minutes as 2nd unit PG, Vonleh as PF/C, Felicio clocking C-time - just as the FO said.

Starters will keep us competitive, then the bench takes over to lose.
From the basketball's perspective, travel is a nice pause from being pounded to the floor.
bearadonisdna
RealGM
Posts: 19,757
And1: 5,394
Joined: Jul 07, 2012

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#54 » by bearadonisdna » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:15 pm

Im all for keeping both picks.
If we draft big first(Ayton,Bagley,Bamba) then we draft mikal bridges with the later pick.

If we draft perimeter star first (Porter, Doncic) then we draft Wendell Carter with our later pick.

Both of these picks should be starter material and if we draft top 5 we should be looking to draft a HOFer.

The value of having a starter level player on a rookie contract is very valuable to me. Their value pays off if they can even just be servicable rotation guys.

Bulls have had roster issues by not having servicable 3rd or 4th big or wings. (Even in their competive days,”Thibs”)
Moosegary
Sophomore
Posts: 171
And1: 82
Joined: Jan 22, 2018

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#55 » by Moosegary » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:35 pm

bearadonisdna wrote:Im all for keeping both picks.
If we draft big first(Ayton,Bagley,Bamba) then we draft mikal bridges with the later pick.

If we draft perimeter star first (Porter, Doncic) then we draft Wendell Carter with our later pick.

Both of these picks should be starter material and if we draft top 5 we should be looking to draft a HOFer.

The value of having a starter level player on a rookie contract is very valuable to me. Their value pays off if they can even just be servicable rotation guys.

Bulls have had roster issues by not having servicable 3rd or 4th big or wings. (Even in their competive days,”Thibs”)



Can’t see this playing out. Even if we tank enough that we draft Ayton, Bagley, Porter or Doncic (might need to get lucky in the lotto for this to happen) there is no way Bridges or Carter will be available with your 2nd pick. Both are going top 10.
bearadonisdna
RealGM
Posts: 19,757
And1: 5,394
Joined: Jul 07, 2012

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#56 » by bearadonisdna » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:39 pm

Moosegary wrote:
bearadonisdna wrote:Im all for keeping both picks.
If we draft big first(Ayton,Bagley,Bamba) then we draft mikal bridges with the later pick.

If we draft perimeter star first (Porter, Doncic) then we draft Wendell Carter with our later pick.

Both of these picks should be starter material and if we draft top 5 we should be looking to draft a HOFer.

The value of having a starter level player on a rookie contract is very valuable to me. Their value pays off if they can even just be servicable rotation guys.

Bulls have had roster issues by not having servicable 3rd or 4th big or wings. (Even in their competive days,”Thibs”)



Can’t see this playing out. Even if we tank enough that we draft Ayton, Bagley, Porter or Doncic (might need to get lucky in the lotto for this to happen) there is no way Bridges or Carter will be available with your 2nd pick. Both are going top 10.


Yes you are probably right. If not top ten then they probably wont be there at #12( NO’s projected pick).
Davell
Junior
Posts: 458
And1: 242
Joined: Feb 24, 2017
     

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#57 » by Davell » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:40 pm

biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


Well i hope the non tankers are happy.


LaVine not playing back to backs can factor into this. Especially if they cherrypick which game of the 2 that he sits.

Feb 26-27 @ Brooklyn, @Charlotte

March 23-24 Milwaukee, @Detroit

March 29-30 @Miami, @Orlando

April 6-7 @Boston, Brooklyn

Sit LaVine in the first game for the first two back to backs, then the 2nd game in the last 2 seems like the play here. But, I guess Milwaukee at home, versus at Detroit isn't huge either way.

My honest guess is 7-18 the rest of the year. With Phoenix, Orlando, Atlanta, Sacramento, and Memphis finishing with under 27 wins. Dallas, Brooklyn, and New York wind up with 28 or more.
bearadonisdna
RealGM
Posts: 19,757
And1: 5,394
Joined: Jul 07, 2012

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#58 » by bearadonisdna » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:44 pm

Davell wrote:
biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


Well i hope the non tankers are happy.


LaVine not playing back to backs can factor into this. Especially if they cherrypick which game of the 2 that he sits.

Feb 26-27 @ Brooklyn, @Charlotte

March 23-24 Milwaukee, @Detroit

March 29-30 @Miami, @Orlando

April 6-7 @Boston, Brooklyn

Sit LaVine in the first game for the first two back to backs, then the 2nd game in the last 2 seems like the play here. But, I guess Milwaukee at home, versus at Detroit isn't huge either way.

My honest guess is 7-18 the rest of the year. With Phoenix, Orlando, Atlanta, Sacramento, and Memphis finishing with under 27 wins. Dallas, Brooklyn, and New York wind up with 28 or more.


7 wins would be crippling unless they are on the back end of the bulls ALREADY securing the worst record.
Honestly my desired outcome is 0-25. Bulls are 2 games up from the worst record.
Even one win can drastically effect their ping pong ball totals.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,132
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#59 » by WindyCityBorn » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:49 pm

lostikka_FIN wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
DroseReturnChi wrote:
I am just curious why these Euro players all have terrible body conditioning from Mitotic to Doncic?
I guess they only care about honing their skills and teamwork they dont even take care of themselves carefully despite being a pro.
This is why there are these stereotypes on Euros which clearly affected LM's stock although he played for Arizona.
That said, I am confident of drafting Euro bigs since guys like Jokic have proven in the big stage but wings should be taken with more caution. Guys like Rubio and Gallinari arent most encouraging product from the Euro region and how better is Doncic as a prospect compared to them is the big question. There's just not enough data to compare since he's not playing for NCAA but I wish he went against Young and Sexton and see how he performs.


Doncic is a SF so he wouldn't be going against those guys head to head. He might run the team, but I don't see him doing it at PG.


Doncic is a guard.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


6'8" 240 is a SF in the NBA. If he comes to Bulls somehow he will be at SF because Dunn and LaVine will be at PG and SG.
bearadonisdna
RealGM
Posts: 19,757
And1: 5,394
Joined: Jul 07, 2012

Re: 2018 Draft Thread #6 

Post#60 » by bearadonisdna » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:51 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
lostikka_FIN wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
Doncic is a SF so he wouldn't be going against those guys head to head. He might run the team, but I don't see him doing it at PG.


Doncic is a guard.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


6'8" 240 is a SF in the NBA. If he comes to Bulls somehow he will be at SF because Dunn and LaVine will be at PG and SG.


Ha, 240 is almost like a center in the nba.

Return to Chicago Bulls