DanTown8587 wrote:I always find it funny when people care so much about current production and skills instead of trying to make reasonable projections to what players will be in 2-4 years from now. It's why it's so strange to me that people care so much that Garland didn't play in college this year and the concern isn't about his future health but simply "well he didn't play". Or "oh man this guys video is bad". To me, the issue with a guy who has really bad tape (i.e a guy like Cam Reddish) isn't that he's bad now; rather, the issue is do you perceive his lack of production as being poor skills (fixable), poor athleticism (much harder), or simply poor feel (almost never changes). And if it was bad, how do you fix it?
Based on this, why is Coby White viewed negatively?
+ Premium shooting ability
+ Size for position
+ Above average speed
+ Respectable defense
+ Respectable athlete (at least)
+ Plays well with pace
+ Surprisingly a good finisher at the rim (67%)
+ 19 years old
+ Higher WS, BPM than Reddish & Little
Downside:
- Length
- Shot creation
- Playmaking
- Not an elite athlete
- Handle is high at times
- Doesn't get to the line a ton (5.2/P40)
White's biggest issues seem to be skill related rather than lacking the athleticism or feel for the position. Meanwhile, Reddish and Little both seem to lack feel, intangibles and basketball IQ.
I feel like I'd be fine with White as the pick and we're underrating him some.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk