coldfish wrote:dougthonus wrote:coldfish wrote:If you want to get specific, our fatality and infection rate is closer to the H3N2 pandemic in the 60's than the 1918 pandemic. The Spanish Flu was actually much worse than what we are dealing with. So, 52 years.
Fair enough, I'm definitely not an infectious disease expert at all.Given that we have a much larger, more interconnected population its reasonable to project that this stuff is going to happen more, not less often.
To the extent things can get out from one country and get to another country, yes absolutely. In terms of their being viruses that are deadly, spread quickly, etc, I'm not sure that is true.Beyond that, people now have the idea of shutdowns in their mind. If a SARS epidemic happened again in 5 years, would we have global shutdowns? Some people would say yes. Going forward, I think we are going to be trigger happy and as such are going to be dealing with this a lot.
Will be interesting to see how this goes. I hope we don't get trigger happy here in the future though.
Certainly there is a risk that we will continue to have big problems unless we get better at dealing with medical challenges, infrastructure around how to deal with it etc...
Forgive the long rant here. I'm certainly no medical expert but I've read a wee bit about this.
There are a small handful of circulating coronaviruses. Each of them cause the common cold and full sterilizing immunity to them only last months. They circulate the globe in waves, taking turns with immunity to one conferring partial immunity to others. Scientists have tracked possibly all of them down to global pandemics. The last was OC43 which likely caused the Russian Flu pandemic of 1890. Symptoms from that are extremely similar to covid19.
Without a vaccine, the likely route for this pandemic is that everyone gets it a few times to the point where our adaptive immune system fights it off before it gets into our lungs or blood stream leaving it as a cold. Even with a vaccine, its very likely we never get rid of covid19. The short sterilizing immune time means this thing will always be able to bounce to new hosts until a large section of the population is susceptible.
I bring this up because coronaviruses live in bats and have evolved to be nasty due to bats' hyper aggressive immune system. There are over 200 separate coronaviruses in bats. Only 4 or 5 have jumped to humans . . . so far. dice brought up the wet markets above. We really need to globally cut down on bat handling. We are just asking for this kind of thing to happen regularly. covid19 is a goldilocks zone virus in that it infects easily, barely harms many but kills others. Who knows how many of those other coronaviruses would work the same.
Influenza is a completely different animal. There is a massive animal reservoir of it out there and it mutates quickly. Both birds and pigs can harbor. The huge concern is an antigenic shift where a pig or something gets infected with two separate influenza viruses at the same time and they cross merge forming a completely new virus. Again, animal handling is a big risk.
Regardless, I would not underestimate just how much risk we are in. There is some evidence that these jumps happen regularly but die out because it happens in isolated areas. As we become more connected, our risk goes up exponentially.
Now this part is true. I cringe when I hear "Wuhan virus", but wet markets do need to be curbed severely. They're a dangerous food market. I'll say that the whole global food industry in general is a dirty and nasty market, and unfortunately with all the money tied into it along with poor regulations in most countries, and a growing population that needs to be fed at cheaper prices, it's been a ticking time bomb. It'd be wise to prepare for an even worse scenario in the future.
But it's not like past US administrations ignored the potential of these outbreaks. The potential was always weighed heavily. It's absurd that in the midst of a global outbreak, the present administration ignored the magnitude of the outbreak.
