dougthonus wrote:MGB8 wrote:dougthonus wrote:I think the only problem with DeRozan was not that we paid him, but the draft capital we tied up to acquire him. The pick has decent protection, but the way it is protected makes it difficult for us to trade other picks for a really long time. The mechanics of the deal lessened our future trade flexibility considerably.
I bet if we offered the Spurs the Portland pick for the Bulls own pick back (far enough into the season that it seemed super likely it would convey), they would jump at that. So if we want that flexibility back, I think that is easily getable.
That's an interesting idea, I could definitely scenarios where that would make sense for both sides given that the Spurs aren't gaining flexibility with our loss of flexibility. We'd probably give up some value to gain that flexibility back.
Net present value… the nearer pick has greater vale, everything else being equal.