Trade Thread

Jcool0 · Post #401 » by **Jcool0** » Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:47 pm

Read on Twitter

Jcool0 · Post #402 » by **Jcool0** » Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:59 pm

Read on Twitter

Mech Engineer · Post #403 » by **Mech Engineer** » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:12 pm

sco wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:

Read on Twitter

Is Wade a star?

Acts, talks, gets paid like one but doesn't play like one.

Mech Engineer · Post #404 » by **Mech Engineer** » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:14 pm

If Boston has to sign Hayward, they have to let go of some young guys. Hope the Bulls use their roster spots to take some of those guys.

Jordans_Rose · Post #405 » by **Jordans_Rose** » Sat Jul 1, 2017 2:50 am

Wow! Paul George to OKC?! Did not see that coming.

rtblues · Post #406 » by **rtblues** » Sat Jul 1, 2017 11:11 am

Well, there's a worse trade than the Butler trade. Wow, seriously Indiana? Pffft, they got WORKED!

DroseReturnChi · Post #407 » by **DroseReturnChi** » Sun Jul 2, 2017 2:40 am

rtblues wrote:Well, there's a worse trade than the Butler trade. Wow, seriously Indiana? Pffft, they got WORKED!

Yeah Bulls totally ra*** that trade. Lol at people giving F when Cousins and George all got far worse values despite being better players.

Just_Bullz · Post #408 » by **Just_Bullz** » Sun Jul 2, 2017 2:56 am

rtblues wrote:Well, there's a worse trade than the Butler trade. Wow, seriously Indiana? Pffft, they got WORKED!

OKC got it for a bag of chips which sucks as Pacers will be fellow tankers.

WindyCityBorn · Post #409 » by **WindyCityBorn** » Mon Jul 3, 2017 12:36 am

DroseReturnChi wrote:
rtblues wrote:Well, there's a worse trade than the Butler trade. Wow, seriously Indiana? Pffft, they got WORKED!

Yeah Bulls totally ra*** that trade. Lol at people giving F when Cousins and George all got far worse values despite being better players.

George is not a better player than Butler. He might be more talented, but Butler has been better than him the last two seasons. Same goes for Cousins.

Leor_77 · Post #410 » by **Leor_77** » Mon Jul 3, 2017 1:13 am

Lakers fan here...Looks like we're talking to Rondo about a one year deal. A lot of Lakers fans are getting worried. Can you confirm if he was good, bad or ok for you guys?

sco · Post #411 » by **sco** » Mon Jul 3, 2017 1:40 am

Leor_77 wrote:Lakers fan here...Looks like we're talking to Rondo about a one year deal. A lot of Lakers fans are getting worried. Can you confirm if he was good, bad or ok for you guys?

He's a mixed bag...see here: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1586315

Post #412 » by **GimmeDat** » Mon Jul 3, 2017 1:57 am

Read on Twitter

I think the pick has some protections as well, but still, not the biggest contract to take. Bulls should look in to anything like this.

TheSuzerain · Post #413 » by **TheSuzerain** » Mon Jul 3, 2017 2:42 am

Leor_77 wrote:Lakers fan here...Looks like we're talking to Rondo about a one year deal. A lot of Lakers fans are getting worried. Can you confirm if he was good, bad or ok for you guys?

He was bad for us.

Lonzo will take care of the culture for you guys. Stay away from Rondo.

nomorezorro · Post #414 » by **nomorezorro** » Mon Jul 3, 2017 2:42 am

yeah, came to post about how we should be all over that. we can even use aldrich as our backup center if we find a suitor for lopez!

Post #415 » by **RedBulls23** » Mon Jul 3, 2017 3:10 am

GimmeDat wrote:

Read on Twitter

I think the pick has some protections as well, but still, not the biggest contract to take. Bulls should look in to anything like this.

Agreed. Trade for Aldrich and get that first. Then trade Roll for a late 1st or couple of 2nds.

Dan Z · Post #416 » by **Dan Z** » Mon Jul 3, 2017 3:14 am

GimmeDat wrote:

Read on Twitter

I think the pick has some protections as well, but still, not the biggest contract to take. Bulls should look in to anything like this.

I agree with that too. Aldrich would only be here for one year and the pick helps us for the future.

ArizonaBullsFan · Post #417 » by **ArizonaBullsFan** » Mon Jul 3, 2017 8:39 am

The OKC pick is only lottery-protected, so the Bulls would almost certainly get it in 2018.

Aldrich's 2018-19 salary is only guaranteed for $2.1 million, if this is at all true the Bulls should be all over it.

SimonFish · Post #418 » by **SimonFish** » Mon Jul 3, 2017 9:35 am

Per WT:

Denver will need to unload salary such as Kenneth Faried and Darrell Arthur now that they've come to an agreement with Paul Millsap.

Would love to take on Faried's contract along with incentives.

Post #419 » by **GimmeDat** » Mon Jul 3, 2017 12:13 pm

SimonFish wrote:Per WT:

Denver will need to unload salary such as Kenneth Faried and Darrell Arthur now that they've come to an agreement with Paul Millsap.

Would love to take on Faried's contract along with incentives.

I think it makes sense for Denver to go all-in right now, another great suitor to take on salary from.

Beans · Post #420 » by **Beans** » Mon Jul 3, 2017 6:13 pm

Absorbing contracts is a key decision now that core roster is set (ex Wade, Lopez, Niko, Joffrey). Heard Denver may be shedding contracts (Darrel Arthur, Faraid)) to sign George Hill. Not sure how likely that is, but just as a what if, what would a reasonable deal for both look like. Arthur owed $7m TY and next.

Which are workable both ways:
1) absorb Arthur: we get a small asset, an expiring next year, a vet, covers Center, still tanking.
2) absorb Arthur & get their 1st, they get choice(s) of Holiday, Grant, Payne.
3) absorb Arthur & and a few others (Hibbert) & get their first
4) absorb Arthur, switch our Second (will be near a 1st) for their 1st

What scenarios for Fariad would work (much more complex)? What would work for both Fariad & Arthur?