gobullschi wrote:WYO wrote:There is an r/nba post about Drummond being the most inefficient high usage player in the NBA. I hope some of the people in this thread see it. The language in the video is a little nsfw so I won't share it here, but Drummond would be an awful addition unless the Cavs give up multiple picks to take on their trash.
It’s because he’s been on awful teams his whole career (seriously look at the rosters he’s been on) and acts like a number 1-2 offensive option, when he should be a 3-4.
You don’t sign Drummond to score 20 PPG. You sign him because he gives you extra possessions with his league leading rebounding. He also sets some devastating screens.
You also trade for Drummond if you can get him cheap (which if they are considering a buyout, should be the case), because he's a needle-moving center talent on both ends.
He's had an about 56% TS for the last several years, had a nice stretch where he was top 15 or so in fouls drawn, and an insane natural rebounder and strong defensive presence.
He's not perfect - but no one is trading prime Lebron. What he would do is add traits that the Bulls are missing, fit with the timeframe, fit with the scheme, and really open things up for LaVine and others because of the threat that he presents.
IMO, if you have a chance to get him for cheap (i.e., Otto + guys we aren't keeping and maybe a 2nd - you do it.