Image ImageImage Image

Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 6,677
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#401 » by Dresden » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:08 pm

patryk7754 wrote:
Dresden wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:He stuck with Wilson because Wilson was QB1 and fields was QB2. Tomlin was very consistent about that since the start of training camp. And even outside the qb situation he’s stated more than once that players don’t loose their jobs to injury. Same way cutler didn’t loose his job to Mccown when he probably should have.

Sure, if fields played like a top 5 qb he probably would have kept the job but he was far from bad. Good actually.
He was better than average in Chicago with piss poor coaching.


I would bet Fields doesn't remain the starter for the Jets for the whole season. Unless they're tanking.

I’d take that bet. He finished the second half of his last season here playing really well. Played better than really well with a winning record with the Steelers. And if anyone has a good idea about what fields can do, I would think the guy who coached against him for a few years would.


I saw enough of Fields in his 3 years here. So frustrating watching him hold onto the ball forever, then take off running time after time. I don't think he's a winning QB, unless you have a really good defense and just want to run the ball a lot and try to win games where neither team breaks 20 points.
Betta Bulleavit
General Manager
Posts: 7,762
And1: 2,876
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
       

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#402 » by Betta Bulleavit » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:10 pm

Dresden wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:
Dresden wrote:
I don't buy that. I think he stuck with Wilson because he was able to put up more points.

He stuck with Wilson because Wilson was QB1 and fields was QB2. Tomlin was very consistent about that since the start of training camp. And even outside the qb situation he’s stated more than once that players don’t loose their jobs to injury. Same way cutler didn’t loose his job to Mccown when he probably should have.

Sure, if fields played like a top 5 qb he probably would have kept the job but he was far from bad. Good actually.
He was better than average in Chicago with piss poor coaching.


I would bet Fields doesn't remain the starter for the Jets for the whole season. Unless they're tanking.

You don’t pay 20M a year for a guy that you plan on benching. Fields wasn’t “great” in the six games that he played for the Steelers. But he was decent/good and led them to a 4-2 mark, which is an indicator that his arrow is still very much pointing up. Remember, the guy we fired the day after Thanksgiving is the same guy that Fields spent his last two seasons here playing under. The same line that we’re overhauling….yeah.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 6,677
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#403 » by Dresden » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:21 pm

Betta Bulleavit wrote:
Dresden wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:He stuck with Wilson because Wilson was QB1 and fields was QB2. Tomlin was very consistent about that since the start of training camp. And even outside the qb situation he’s stated more than once that players don’t loose their jobs to injury. Same way cutler didn’t loose his job to Mccown when he probably should have.

Sure, if fields played like a top 5 qb he probably would have kept the job but he was far from bad. Good actually.
He was better than average in Chicago with piss poor coaching.


I would bet Fields doesn't remain the starter for the Jets for the whole season. Unless they're tanking.

You don’t pay 20M a year for a guy that you plan on benching. Fields wasn’t “great” in the six games that he played for the Steelers. But he was decent/good and led them to a 4-2 mark, which is an indicator that his arrow is still very much pointing up. Remember, the guy we fired the day after Thanksgiving is the same guy that Fields spent his last two seasons here playing under. The same line that we’re overhauling….yeah.


Well, my hunch is that playing for a better coach, with a better off. line isn't going to make all that much difference, and the same flaws he had while he was here will eventually lead to his benching in NY. But we'll see.
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,197
And1: 10,295
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#404 » by nomorezorro » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:22 pm

it's a free message board and all but i truly cannot imagine caring to argue about justin fields in the year 2025
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 69,998
And1: 37,303
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#405 » by fleet » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:29 pm

NZB2323 wrote:
fleet wrote:I’m feeling like from what I am reading, the Jarret signing is an overpay when it comes down to projection of what he’s bringing at his age. I don’t quite get it. Hopefully it’s not a contract the Bears need to dump in a year or 2


The cap goes up every year and lots of teams have cap space, so I’m fine with an overpay. The criticism of Bears ownership over the years has been they’re cheap. Let’s spend the cap space we have and build the lines.

Welp, this is the cost of Zacch Pickens flaming out.
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#406 » by TheSuzerain » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:35 pm

Like the OL signings.

Less crazy about the middle class DL signings. Would have preferred a splash there if we're spending.

Would still go Edge at 10 probably. Or Graham if he somehow slips.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 6,677
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#407 » by Dresden » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:41 pm

TheSuzerain wrote:Like the OL signings.

Less crazy about the middle class DL signings. Would have preferred a splash there if we're spending.

Would still go Edge at 10 probably. Or Graham if he somehow slips.


I could see Edge at 10, but more likely in the second. Should be some decent guys there, and then you could possibly take a LT at 10, or Jeanty.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 6,677
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#408 » by Dresden » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:43 pm

Wouldn't be shocked to a few guys get cut now that they've taken on all this salary.
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#409 » by TheSuzerain » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:45 pm

Dresden wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:Like the OL signings.

Less crazy about the middle class DL signings. Would have preferred a splash there if we're spending.

Would still go Edge at 10 probably. Or Graham if he somehow slips.


I could see Edge at 10, but more likely in the second. Should be some decent guys there, and then you could possibly take a LT at 10, or Jeanty.

There's no LTs worth the #10 seemingly.

And there should be a great HB prospects in the 2nd as well (Henderson, Hampton, etc.).

Edge is just super expensive to fill. Would go for one if you like them (e.g. Mykel Williams, Shemar Stewart).

CB also a premium position but seems like people are cooling on Will Johnson?
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,197
And1: 10,295
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#410 » by nomorezorro » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:49 pm

i'm cool with basically anything at 10 at this point. basically just want us to come away with a couple of the day 2 OL/DL guys that i'm a fan of and i should be happy with our draft
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
biggestbullsfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,733
And1: 2,277
Joined: Apr 28, 2004
     

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#411 » by biggestbullsfan » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:49 pm

Read on Twitter


Glad he got paid but was really hoping he would be our DE 3/4
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,291
And1: 9,281
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#412 » by Jcool0 » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:49 pm

nomorezorro wrote:it's a free message board and all but i truly cannot imagine caring to argue about justin fields in the year 2025


Image
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 6,677
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#413 » by Dresden » Mon Mar 10, 2025 10:37 pm

Charvarious Ward got 3/60. Yikes!

And Josh Sweat got 4/76. Don't know how well that will look a year from now.
patryk7754
General Manager
Posts: 8,937
And1: 1,550
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#414 » by patryk7754 » Mon Mar 10, 2025 10:48 pm

Now that it’s clear the bears are not doing a youth movement and are in win now mode, I’m heavily in favor in bringing back Allen. Restructure how ever much money you need to make it happen. He may have dropped off in talent (just slightly) but his experience and having as much consistency as possible will be very beneficial to Williams. Now if his number is 20 plus, let him walk. But, for 15m, I’m bringing him back
User avatar
JohnnyKILLroy
RealGM
Posts: 12,458
And1: 4,649
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
Location: Fountain Valley- A nice place to live
       

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#415 » by JohnnyKILLroy » Mon Mar 10, 2025 11:12 pm

patryk7754 wrote:Now that it’s clear the bears are not doing a youth movement and are in win now mode, I’m heavily in favor in bringing back Allen. Restructure how ever much money you need to make it happen. He may have dropped off in talent (just slightly) but his experience and having as much consistency as possible will be very beneficial to Williams. Now if his number is 20 plus, let him walk. But, for 15m, I’m bringing him back


You think old man Keenan Allen at 15 million is an all in win now move? Hes old and he’s unnecessary. New offense will look fine without him we’re not going to miss him on that end of the ball. When you factor in cost and the role he should have it would be grossly overpaying for a not very good 4/5/6 option
What is happiness? It's a moment before you need more happiness.” — Don Draper
Betta Bulleavit
General Manager
Posts: 7,762
And1: 2,876
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
       

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#416 » by Betta Bulleavit » Mon Mar 10, 2025 11:35 pm

JohnnyKILLroy wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:Now that it’s clear the bears are not doing a youth movement and are in win now mode, I’m heavily in favor in bringing back Allen. Restructure how ever much money you need to make it happen. He may have dropped off in talent (just slightly) but his experience and having as much consistency as possible will be very beneficial to Williams. Now if his number is 20 plus, let him walk. But, for 15m, I’m bringing him back


You think old man Keenan Allen at 15 million is an all in win now move? Hes old and he’s unnecessary. New offense will look fine without him we’re not going to miss him on that end of the ball. When you factor in cost and the role he should have it would be grossly overpaying for a not very good 4/5/6 option

You think Allen is going to command 15M? I mean, I’ve been all wrong about player values so far. But I didn’t see him getting more than 10 from anyone. But based on what you’re saying, even that may be too much for your taste??
NZB2323
RealGM
Posts: 14,434
And1: 10,976
Joined: Aug 02, 2008

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#417 » by NZB2323 » Mon Mar 10, 2025 11:40 pm

TheSuzerain wrote:
Dresden wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:Like the OL signings.

Less crazy about the middle class DL signings. Would have preferred a splash there if we're spending.

Would still go Edge at 10 probably. Or Graham if he somehow slips.


I could see Edge at 10, but more likely in the second. Should be some decent guys there, and then you could possibly take a LT at 10, or Jeanty.

There's no LTs worth the #10 seemingly.

And there should be a great HB prospects in the 2nd as well (Henderson, Hampton, etc.).

Edge is just super expensive to fill. Would go for one if you like them (e.g. Mykel Williams, Shemar Stewart).

CB also a premium position but seems like people are cooling on Will Johnson?


If Will Campbell falls to 10 I think we should take him. He may have short arms, but he’s 6’6”, 320, and played great in college.
User avatar
JohnnyKILLroy
RealGM
Posts: 12,458
And1: 4,649
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
Location: Fountain Valley- A nice place to live
       

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#418 » by JohnnyKILLroy » Mon Mar 10, 2025 11:43 pm

Betta Bulleavit wrote:
JohnnyKILLroy wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:Now that it’s clear the bears are not doing a youth movement and are in win now mode, I’m heavily in favor in bringing back Allen. Restructure how ever much money you need to make it happen. He may have dropped off in talent (just slightly) but his experience and having as much consistency as possible will be very beneficial to Williams. Now if his number is 20 plus, let him walk. But, for 15m, I’m bringing him back


You think old man Keenan Allen at 15 million is an all in win now move? Hes old and he’s unnecessary. New offense will look fine without him we’re not going to miss him on that end of the ball. When you factor in cost and the role he should have it would be grossly overpaying for a not very good 4/5/6 option

You think Allen is going to command 15M? I mean, I’ve been all wrong about player values so far. But I didn’t see him getting more than 10 from anyone. But based on what you’re saying, even that may be too much for your taste??


Yeah I’m not a fan of him coming back at all, especially when cheaper and younger should be the goal.
What is happiness? It's a moment before you need more happiness.” — Don Draper
User avatar
JohnnyKILLroy
RealGM
Posts: 12,458
And1: 4,649
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
Location: Fountain Valley- A nice place to live
       

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#419 » by JohnnyKILLroy » Mon Mar 10, 2025 11:55 pm

This free agency shouldn’t be a win now scenario if anything it puts more pressure on the draft to sustain all this long term. Poles has to value his draft picks even more now. We should always be trading down acquiring more chances at it. The draft should still be about the trenches those first 4 picks definitely. Poles and Johnson are going older with the roster and now Poles has to hedge his bets with some more kids and keep the pipeline going. Poles hasn’t drafted as well as I’d like but he hasn’t been bad either. I hope he’s learned his lesson and considers the trenches far from finished and that’s where we focus in the draft. Say no to the Jeantys of the world. Show some **** patience for Christ’s sake. People here that want to go all in now did they forgot about our other wheeler dealer GM in Pace? It’s like that never happened and people want to be impulsive about it .
What is happiness? It's a moment before you need more happiness.” — Don Draper
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 6,677
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 11.0: Free Agency, College Pro days, Draft & beyond 

Post#420 » by Dresden » Tue Mar 11, 2025 12:32 am

JohnnyKILLroy wrote:This free agency shouldn’t be a win now scenario if anything it puts more pressure on the draft to sustain all this long term. Poles has to value his draft picks even more now. We should always be trading down acquiring more chances at it. The draft should still be about the trenches those first 4 picks definitely. Poles and Johnson are going older with the roster and now Poles has to hedge his bets with some more kids and keep the pipeline going. Poles hasn’t drafted as well as I’d like but he hasn’t been bad either. I hope he’s learned his lesson and considers the trenches far from finished and that’s where we focus in the draft. Say no to the Jeantys of the world. Show some **** patience for Christ’s sake. People here that want to go all in now did they forgot about our other wheeler dealer GM in Pace? It’s like that never happened and people want to be impulsive about it .


The problem is we just spent a lot of money on Swift that we can't get rid of. If it weren't for that, I'd be all in on Jeanty right now. From what people say, backs like him don't come around very often. He could get you 1200-1400 yards on the ground, and 3-400 in the air. that's more than a WR will get you. It's tempting to take him, but since we already have Swift, it would be a bit redundant, although as everyone points out, Johnson likes having two running backs.

Return to Chicago Bulls