Image ImageImage Image

Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

Muzbar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,298
And1: 2,921
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#421 » by Muzbar » Sat Sep 4, 2021 9:13 am

BullChit wrote:
Muzbar wrote:
BullChit wrote:I was really hoping for a vet presence Luke Millsap but now that he is gone I'm really down for some young blood with defensive potential like Vando.

I really think this team needs a Taj Gibson type coming off the bench... somebody who will just out hustle our opponents and give a needed burst of defensive energy.

Haha you're such an Aussie!


Hahaha I honestly couldn't be arsed trying to type his full name...

Tis the Aussie way!
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. :kissmybutt:
User avatar
JohnnyKILLroy
RealGM
Posts: 12,475
And1: 4,662
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
Location: Fountain Valley- A nice place to live
       

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#422 » by JohnnyKILLroy » Sat Sep 4, 2021 9:25 am

Vonleh Alize Vanderbilt 2 of those 3 would be nice
What is happiness? It's a moment before you need more happiness.” — Don Draper
Muzbar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,298
And1: 2,921
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#423 » by Muzbar » Sat Sep 4, 2021 9:28 am

JohnnyKILLroy wrote:Vonleh Alize Vanderbilt 2 of those 3 would be nice

NoVo is my top choice followed by Vando.
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. :kissmybutt:
User avatar
BullChit
Head Coach
Posts: 6,934
And1: 3,888
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
 

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#424 » by BullChit » Sat Sep 4, 2021 9:50 am

Muzbar wrote:
JohnnyKILLroy wrote:Vonleh Alize Vanderbilt 2 of those 3 would be nice

NoVo is my top choice followed by Vando.


Haha on that same note but slightly O.T but Lonzo already has an "Aussiefied" name...
eMar arnell eRozen... The "D" stands for "Defence"
samwana
RealGM
Posts: 10,027
And1: 2,624
Joined: Jul 24, 2002
Location: Munich (Germany)
 

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#425 » by samwana » Sat Sep 4, 2021 10:39 am

Vando ist my fav out of the option we have, but he is rfa. Do we have anything so offer Minny?

RealGM mobile app
bulls_troy
General Manager
Posts: 8,676
And1: 270
Joined: Apr 09, 2002
 

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#426 » by bulls_troy » Sat Sep 4, 2021 11:30 am

BullChit wrote:
Muzbar wrote:
JohnnyKILLroy wrote:Vonleh Alize Vanderbilt 2 of those 3 would be nice

NoVo is my top choice followed by Vando.


Haha on that same note but slightly O.T but Lonzo already has an "Aussiefied" name...


Lonzy!
Twitter: @bulls_troy
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,499
And1: 9,246
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#427 » by sco » Sat Sep 4, 2021 1:10 pm

Scanning here ( https://www.spotrac.com/nba/free-agents/available/ ) I'm seeing the following guys of interest. Ideally I'd like one from each list. There's still a 2-way - wondering about Johnson or Pelle for that if nobody picks them up.

F/C's
Scott
Davis
Ennis
Patterson
Wilson
Giles
Hartenstein
Johnson
Vanderbilt
Vonleh
Ilyasova
Pelle
Bell
Cousins
Hollis-Jefferson

Guards
Moore
Bradley
Galloway
Teague
James
:clap:
Stratmaster
RealGM
Posts: 22,309
And1: 8,969
Joined: Oct 02, 2010
       

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#428 » by Stratmaster » Sat Sep 4, 2021 2:09 pm

MGB8 wrote:
Stratmaster wrote:
GoBlue72391 wrote:I agree that we need at least 1 true PF with size to combat bigger lineups to prevent getting bullied as we are very small and lacking frontcourt depth. I've said before, we're one injury or player underperforming away from being forced to play ultra-small ball at all times and that is less than ideal.

As for the average heights, I said as much myself that the 6'8" average is likely a result of half the PFs being shorter and the other half being taller. My main concern with that average though is who exactly was counted as a PF when they calculated that number? If guys like Crowder, Tucker, McDermott, etc. were counted as SFs rather than PFs then that's going to artificially inflate the average height for PFs, so the actual average height could actually be lower than the listed 6'8". It depends on if guys are counted as their natural positions or the positions they've most frequently played in recent years. Like Crowder is a natural SF but he's played more PF in recent years, so what position did they count him as?

It even says in the "notes" section of that article that the data was collected from Basketball-Reference and has a number of shortcomings, including:

- Players are assigned a single position per season. In reality, a lot of players play multiple positions every game. For example, some players start games as a shooting guard but take over point guard duties with a bench unit later

- Height and weight data is registered once per player. This means that the data has Shaq weighing exactly 325lbs every season, and we all know that that’s not true

Based off B-R, guys like Tucker, Crowder, and McDermott's positions are all listed as SF first and other positions second/third, so I assume that data counted those players, and others like them, as SFs rather than PFs when determining the average height for PF, leading to an average of 6'8" that probably isn't all that accurate. I'm of the opinion that they should be counted among the position they have most frequently played in a given season rather than counted among their natural position.
McDermott is 6'8" 225'. Bigger than Pwill. Crowder is 6'6" but is 234'. Even if they didn't include them, the average wouldn't have changed.

My understanding is BBREF list the player at the position they played the most minutes at. But we are talking past the point.

The Bulls do not have any quality player as big as the AVERAGE PF to play at the 4. And after PWill it ain't even close.

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app


McDermott is 6’6.25 without shoes. Pat is taller (and has a longer wingspan / better reach)
After checking 4 sites, including NBA.COM, every one lists him as either 6'7 or 6'8. All 4 of those same sites now list PWill as 6'7" and 215'.

He is bigger than PWill.

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 19,015
And1: 3,631
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#429 » by MGB8 » Sat Sep 4, 2021 2:31 pm

Stratmaster wrote:
MGB8 wrote:
Stratmaster wrote:McDermott is 6'8" 225'. Bigger than Pwill. Crowder is 6'6" but is 234'. Even if they didn't include them, the average wouldn't have changed.

My understanding is BBREF list the player at the position they played the most minutes at. But we are talking past the point.

The Bulls do not have any quality player as big as the AVERAGE PF to play at the 4. And after PWill it ain't even close.

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app


McDermott is 6’6.25 without shoes. Pat is taller (and has a longer wingspan / better reach)
After checking 4 sites, including NBA.COM, every one lists him as either 6'7 or 6'8. All 4 of those same sites now list PWill as 6'7" and 215'.

He is bigger than PWill.

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app


You have to look at pre-draft measurements. The rest is garbage. PWill is 6’7 barefoot, McDermott is 6’6.25
Stratmaster
RealGM
Posts: 22,309
And1: 8,969
Joined: Oct 02, 2010
       

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#430 » by Stratmaster » Sat Sep 4, 2021 3:33 pm

MGB8 wrote:
Stratmaster wrote:
MGB8 wrote:
McDermott is 6’6.25 without shoes. Pat is taller (and has a longer wingspan / better reach)
After checking 4 sites, including NBA.COM, every one lists him as either 6'7 or 6'8. All 4 of those same sites now list PWill as 6'7" and 215'.

He is bigger than PWill.

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app


You have to look at pre-draft measurements. The rest is garbage. PWill is 6’7 barefoot, McDermott is 6’6.25
No. I don't.

Pre-draft weights are useless for players who aren't rookies and heights (although it is less likely) can be also.

What source are you using for these pre-draft measurements? Why are the other sites garbage?

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 19,015
And1: 3,631
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#431 » by MGB8 » Sat Sep 4, 2021 3:44 pm

Weight changes, height almost always doesn’t. And if changed, much more likely for the younger at measurement Pat then the olde McDermott. Just google pre-draft measurements for the two. McDermott’s is easier to find.

The rest of the sites are “listed” heights, not “measured.”

Edit: having a hard time re-fining the Pat pre draft measurement. Did find a measurement from 2017 at 6’6 flat without shoes, 2 1/2 years before he was drafted…
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 19,015
And1: 3,631
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#432 » by MGB8 » Sat Sep 4, 2021 4:13 pm

Back to topic on hand, I want a combo of Hartenstein (true big) and DJ Wilson (combo forward).

Here’s another vid of Hartenstein - note the D:

Global Game
Junior
Posts: 434
And1: 70
Joined: Apr 29, 2014
     

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#433 » by Global Game » Sat Sep 4, 2021 4:36 pm

Cheick Diallo and EJ Onu are the best PF options left. (FG%, EFG%, TS%, FT%, rebounding, blocks)

Onu is quick enough and long enough (7' 8" wingspan) to recover/contest against perimeter players.





User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,438
And1: 30,512
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#434 » by HomoSapien » Sat Sep 4, 2021 5:25 pm





This guy's growing on me. Not a big leaper or shot blocker, but I love his activity level. He just has a knack for grabbing rebounds and that'll always make him useful.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 19,015
And1: 3,631
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#435 » by MGB8 » Sat Sep 4, 2021 5:29 pm

Back to the height discussion, did folks know that Thad Young’s pre-draft measured height without shoes was 6’5.75? Makes me call Pat into question more since he looked the same size as Thad, but also I think definitively ends the notion of whether a guy measuring around 6’6 without shoes is big enough to play the 4.
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 19,015
And1: 3,631
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#436 » by MGB8 » Sat Sep 4, 2021 5:42 pm

HomoSapien wrote:



This guy's growing on me. Not a big leaper or shot blocker, but I love his activity level. He just has a knack for grabbing rebounds and that'll always make him useful.


I think I would prefer DJ Wilson over him, because Wilson has flashed more shooting from range, but it’s close. Alize Johnson has a similar profile to Brandon Clarke… minus the shooting range… But in Johnson’s defense, he may have upside in his shooting. At the same time, he’s already 25 so maybe not. but so is Wilson (though Wilson has shown a lot more shooting).
Pax for Prez
Starter
Posts: 2,408
And1: 380
Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Location: avoiding the WIFE

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#437 » by Pax for Prez » Sat Sep 4, 2021 7:51 pm

After the Nets trading of Jordan to Detroit, the Nets are sitting on 16 guaranteed contracts. Most teams have full rosters. The Bulls can accept players in their Trade Exemption helping the Nets save on their tax bill.

How about C Nicolas Claxton and a future 2nd rd pick from the Nets for draft rights to Jon Diebler ?

Thoughts ??
Risk Addict
Analyst
Posts: 3,086
And1: 244
Joined: Mar 19, 2003
Location: Assembly Hall

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#438 » by Risk Addict » Sat Sep 4, 2021 7:59 pm

Alize highlight reel was one block and then all scoring. If that’s how he plays he doesn’t fit our need. We have plenty of scorers
User avatar
Electric Slim
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 14,886
And1: 1,223
Joined: Nov 03, 2001
Location: La-La Land

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#439 » by Electric Slim » Sat Sep 4, 2021 8:06 pm

Risk Addict wrote:Alize highlight reel was one block and then all scoring. If that’s how he plays he doesn’t fit our need. We have plenty of scorers


Not off the bench
drosestruts wrote:Shades of Joe Alexander and Chase Budinger and Rondae Hollis-Jefferson and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist

I remain wholly unimpressed by Matas and would be very upset not only if we trade up fo him, but if we even draft him at 11
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,172
And1: 37,426
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bulls Remaining Roster Spot Discussion 

Post#440 » by fleet » Sat Sep 4, 2021 8:12 pm

Electric Slim wrote:
Risk Addict wrote:Alize highlight reel was one block and then all scoring. If that’s how he plays he doesn’t fit our need. We have plenty of scorers


Not off the bench

This is simply a thought exercise response, but eventually Coby at least will be there. Gotta believe the Bulls will value establishment of a defense identity as much as possible to get the ball rolling early. The bench roster thinking looks like wings that can attack full court when they get behind especially

Return to Chicago Bulls