Image ImageImage Image

OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins

Moderators: HomoSapien, GimmeDat, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, RedBulls23, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN

Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,550
And1: 6,769
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#441 » by Dresden » Thu May 6, 2021 7:34 pm

TheJordanRule wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
Jeffster81 wrote:Oh come on. Do you honestly believe that Brady would have won that Super Bowl with any other team other than an absolutely LOADED TB team? No, he would not have. Tom NEEDED the absolute perfect situation to be successful and he found it in Tampa. Yeah he won a title without BB but he needed the perfection sitation to make it work.


The loaded team that went 7-9 the previous season with the primary change being Tom Brady at QB? Yes, I think Tom Brady probably could have won the super bowl with other teams. Would he have won it with every team? No, of course not, but at his age, WAY past his prime, to even win won with _any_ team is eyepopping. TB was a good fit, because they generally had good skill players, but this wasn't KD joining the 73 win Warriors by any stretch.

NFL cannot really have a "GOAT" of the sport because there are too many varibles to take into account. Being a great player in the NFL more so than any other sport, takes a tremendous amount of luck and opportunity. It's why I cannot call Brady or anybody the "GOAT" of the NFL.


That can certainly be your opinion, but QB so obviously moves the needle more than every other position in the NFL by such a massive amount that it is pretty obvious the GOAT NFL player is a QB, and it's also pretty obvious that Tom Brady is that player. I don't even like Tom Brady and have rooted against him his whole career, but this is about as open and shut a case as Jordan in the NBA, maybe even more so.


Tom Brady is someone I've always rooted against, including last year so there is no pro-Brady bias coming from me by any stretch of the imagination. But what we watched last year was undeniable all-time greatness. During the Belichek era, we were always told that Tom was winning because of the conservative game plan. That Tom's arm was alright or above average but certainly not elite. That New England's coaching, and running game, and defense elevated Tom. Then, at an age when most NFL QBs are not only put to pasture but have BEEN in the pasture for half a decade, Tom went out and proved that no, HE was the one who had been elevating THEM. Tom was asked to air it out on almost every play with a brand new playbook and offensive philosophy that was the polar opposite of anything the Patriots had dreamt up. There were huge stretches when Tampa completely abandoned the running game. And in this crazy offense that kept going deep, with brand new teammates at almost every major position, Tom kicked major ass on his way to winning an unprecedented 7th Super Bowl. No NFL franchise has ever won seven chips. Brady has. Let that sink in. I wanted Tom to fade. He was too corny and clumsy in interviews, he bagged one of the hottest chicks ever, and after about four years I got sick of bandwagon NFL fans screaming about him every five seconds. But Tom's greatness is undeniable at this point. He had next to no time to prepare for the season with his new team. He was too freaking old. He chose a bottom rung team that its own fans called the "Suckaneers". And within a few months Brady imposed his will on that roster, finding the greatness in them. It's unreal. About as unreal as the offseason that the Bucs have had, with Brady convincing every impact player to return for one more season. Whether Brady wins another chip or not, NOBODY has ever played the game at his level, and based on the seven Super Bowl rings alone, it'll be a hundred years before we find another one that does.


the Bears actually have 8 "chips". The Packers have 11 or 12.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,550
And1: 6,769
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#442 » by Dresden » Thu May 6, 2021 7:35 pm

2018C3 wrote:If Fields does start day one, I won't be upset. Its just not how I would have started the season. Like someone mentioned above, Id like to see how the line performs first in real games, and if necessary make adjustments to help protect the new QB before he becomes the starter.

My only fear is if the Bears start dropping games early, the media pressure on Fields could be a lot for him to handle. Some people in Chicago have become upset with Pace and Nagy. If things get messy early Fields could be grouped in with the frustration towards them.

If Dalton or Fields starts, and the team goes on a role. There is really nothing to complain about.

If Dalton starts and is just average or fails, pulling him and starting Fields will allow him to come in with less pressure and lower expectations. I think this is a better plan, and a more safe bet against protecting his confidence for the long run.

________________________________________________________________________

Another concern I have, and am not sure how it will effect performance or if its even valid. But I will put it out there anyways. Fields recently became a vegan. I have read that meats more easily provide some missing nutrients then a plant based diet.

I don't want upset any Vegans here, but it is something I thought about. I do not know how much is based on science.

A quick search "vegan and neurological disorders" and "vegan and epilepsy" pulled these quotes up on the first page in a google search.

"Vegetarians can have Vitamin B12 deficiency and are more prone to developing neuropsychiatric and neurological problems".

"On the one hand, recent concern about the nutritional gaps in plant-based diets has led to a number of alarming headlines, including a warning that they can stunt brain development and cause to a person's nervous system.Jan 28, 2020"

Given his condition. I'm not sure if switching to a vegan diet is the best choice for him, but who knows it might be great and help. At least he is making active efforts to stay healthy, and now will have the advice from some of the best nutritionists in the world.


That's rubbish about veganism making his epilepsy worse. Many pro athletes who have gone vegan claim they recover quicker after workouts and have more stamina.
User avatar
dougthonus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,148
And1: 19,250
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#443 » by dougthonus » Thu May 6, 2021 8:05 pm

Dresden wrote:the Bears actually have 8 "chips". The Packers have 11 or 12.


Yeah, it is more accurate to say superbowls than championships. The Superbowl is on a whole different level given the number of teams competing. The league peaked at 16 teams prior to the superbowl and was fewer for most of those years. I'd imagine if you count those original teams, there are a bunch with tons of championships just because there had to be.
User avatar
TheJordanRule
Analyst
Posts: 3,167
And1: 1,467
Joined: Jan 27, 2014

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#444 » by TheJordanRule » Thu May 6, 2021 8:40 pm

dougthonus wrote:
Dresden wrote:the Bears actually have 8 "chips". The Packers have 11 or 12.


Yeah, it is more accurate to say superbowls than championships. The Superbowl is on a whole different level given the number of teams competing. The league peaked at 16 teams prior to the superbowl and was fewer for most of those years. I'd imagine if you count those original teams, there are a bunch with tons of championships just because there had to be.


I'd like to think that I would have looked it up and found the technicality, but maybe I wouldn't have. Sure seems like you have an agenda here Dresden. I hope Tom Brady didn't steal your girl or something.
User avatar
Michael Jackson
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 29,815
And1: 11,829
Joined: Jun 15, 2001

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#445 » by Michael Jackson » Thu May 6, 2021 8:54 pm

Dresden wrote:
2018C3 wrote:If Fields does start day one, I won't be upset. Its just not how I would have started the season. Like someone mentioned above, Id like to see how the line performs first in real games, and if necessary make adjustments to help protect the new QB before he becomes the starter.

My only fear is if the Bears start dropping games early, the media pressure on Fields could be a lot for him to handle. Some people in Chicago have become upset with Pace and Nagy. If things get messy early Fields could be grouped in with the frustration towards them.

If Dalton or Fields starts, and the team goes on a role. There is really nothing to complain about.

If Dalton starts and is just average or fails, pulling him and starting Fields will allow him to come in with less pressure and lower expectations. I think this is a better plan, and a more safe bet against protecting his confidence for the long run.

________________________________________________________________________

Another concern I have, and am not sure how it will effect performance or if its even valid. But I will put it out there anyways. Fields recently became a vegan. I have read that meats more easily provide some missing nutrients then a plant based diet.

I don't want upset any Vegans here, but it is something I thought about. I do not know how much is based on science.

A quick search "vegan and neurological disorders" and "vegan and epilepsy" pulled these quotes up on the first page in a google search.

"Vegetarians can have Vitamin B12 deficiency and are more prone to developing neuropsychiatric and neurological problems".

"On the one hand, recent concern about the nutritional gaps in plant-based diets has led to a number of alarming headlines, including a warning that they can stunt brain development and cause to a person's nervous system.Jan 28, 2020"

Given his condition. I'm not sure if switching to a vegan diet is the best choice for him, but who knows it might be great and help. At least he is making active efforts to stay healthy, and now will have the advice from some of the best nutritionists in the world.


That's rubbish about veganism making his epilepsy worse. Many pro athletes who have gone vegan claim they recover quicker after workouts and have more stamina.


He isn't just some guy, he will have a nutritionist and doctors to work on that for him. Sure vegans can have negative effects, if they stop eating lean protein and just eat skittles, but that is not the case here
2018C3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 809
And1: 539
Joined: Jul 14, 2018
   

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#446 » by 2018C3 » Thu May 6, 2021 9:11 pm

Michael Jackson wrote:
He isn't just some guy, he will have a nutritionist and doctors to work on that for him. Sure vegans can have negative effects, if they stop eating lean protein and just eat skittles, but that is not the case here


Yes, I understand that's the case with nutritionists. The only reason I took notice is that one of my past dogs used to have epilepsy seizures, and it always was very unnerving to see. It would be more difficult to see a human experience one.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,550
And1: 6,769
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#447 » by Dresden » Thu May 6, 2021 11:14 pm

dougthonus wrote:
Dresden wrote:the Bears actually have 8 "chips". The Packers have 11 or 12.


Yeah, it is more accurate to say superbowls than championships. The Superbowl is on a whole different level given the number of teams competing. The league peaked at 16 teams prior to the superbowl and was fewer for most of those years. I'd imagine if you count those original teams, there are a bunch with tons of championships just because there had to be.


It's strange that distinction is made in football but not in other sports. the Celtics have won 16 or whatever titles, but hardly anyone adds to that "but 11 of those happened when there were only 8 teams in the league". Or in baseball- the Yankees won all those titles back when there were fewer teams, and baseball was still segregated, but that's hardly ever qualified either. Yet in football, it only counts if you've won since 1967 or whatever.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,550
And1: 6,769
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#448 » by Dresden » Thu May 6, 2021 11:16 pm

TheJordanRule wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
Dresden wrote:the Bears actually have 8 "chips". The Packers have 11 or 12.


Yeah, it is more accurate to say superbowls than championships. The Superbowl is on a whole different level given the number of teams competing. The league peaked at 16 teams prior to the superbowl and was fewer for most of those years. I'd imagine if you count those original teams, there are a bunch with tons of championships just because there had to be.


I'd like to think that I would have looked it up and found the technicality, but maybe I wouldn't have. Sure seems like you have an agenda here Dresden. I hope Tom Brady didn't steal your girl or something.


Why is it an agenda to point out that the Bears have 8 NFL championships? As far as Brady/Belichick, I don't like either of them, but probably dislike Belichick and the whole "Patriots' Way" more. But you have to give credit where credit is due.
NZB2323
RealGM
Posts: 14,692
And1: 11,301
Joined: Aug 02, 2008

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#449 » by NZB2323 » Thu May 6, 2021 11:40 pm

2018C3 wrote:If Fields does start day one, I won't be upset. Its just not how I would have started the season. Like someone mentioned above, Id like to see how the line performs first in real games, and if necessary make adjustments to help protect the new QB before he becomes the starter.

My only fear is if the Bears start dropping games early, the media pressure on Fields could be a lot for him to handle. Some people in Chicago have become upset with Pace and Nagy. If things get messy early Fields could be grouped in with the frustration towards them.

If Dalton or Fields starts, and the team goes on a role. There is really nothing to complain about.

If Dalton starts and is just average or fails, pulling him and starting Fields will allow him to come in with less pressure and lower expectations. I think this is a better plan, and a more safe bet against protecting his confidence for the long run.

________________________________________________________________________

Another concern I have, and am not sure how it will effect performance or if its even valid. But I will put it out there anyways. Fields recently became a vegan. I have read that meats more easily provide some missing nutrients then a plant based diet.

I don't want upset any Vegans here, but it is something I thought about. I do not know how much is based on science.

A quick search "vegan and neurological disorders" and "vegan and epilepsy" pulled these quotes up on the first page in a google search.

"Vegetarians can have Vitamin B12 deficiency and are more prone to developing neuropsychiatric and neurological problems".

"On the one hand, recent concern about the nutritional gaps in plant-based diets has led to a number of alarming headlines, including a warning that they can stunt brain development and cause to a person's nervous system.Jan 28, 2020"

Given his condition. I'm not sure if switching to a vegan diet is the best choice for him, but who knows it might be great and help. At least he is making active efforts to stay healthy, and now will have the advice from some of the best nutritionists in the world.


Tom Brady became Vegan in 2014, Chris Paul has been Vegan since 2019, and Nate Diaz has been a Vegan since he was 18. A Vegan diet is the healthiest diet.



If you want to watch the whole documentary it's on YouTube.
User avatar
Michael Jackson
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 29,815
And1: 11,829
Joined: Jun 15, 2001

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#450 » by Michael Jackson » Thu May 6, 2021 11:54 pm

2018C3 wrote:
Michael Jackson wrote:
He isn't just some guy, he will have a nutritionist and doctors to work on that for him. Sure vegans can have negative effects, if they stop eating lean protein and just eat skittles, but that is not the case here


Yes, I understand that's the case with nutritionists. The only reason I took notice is that one of my past dogs used to have epilepsy seizures, and it always was very unnerving to see. It would be more difficult to see a human experience one.



My dog did too was your dog on phenobarbital?
2018C3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 809
And1: 539
Joined: Jul 14, 2018
   

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#451 » by 2018C3 » Fri May 7, 2021 1:14 am

[quote="NZB2323"

Tom Brady became Vegan in 2014, Chris Paul has been Vegan since 2019, and Nate Diaz has been a Vegan since he was 18. A Vegan diet is the healthiest diet.



If you want to watch the whole documentary it's on YouTube.[/quote]

FYI, Brady is not Vegan, He eats a 80% vegan diet. But still eats meat and animal products. I believe a higher percentage of plant based products is good. Humans are omnivores that benefit from a predominate plant based diet.

We still need nutrients that are more easily found in animal products to thrive, unless they are supplemented with very careful planned diets, and highly processed alternatives.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,550
And1: 6,769
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#452 » by Dresden » Fri May 7, 2021 1:49 am

2018C3 wrote:[quote="NZB2323"

Tom Brady became Vegan in 2014, Chris Paul has been Vegan since 2019, and Nate Diaz has been a Vegan since he was 18. A Vegan diet is the healthiest diet.



If you want to watch the whole documentary it's on YouTube.


FYI, Brady is not Vegan, He eats a 80% vegan diet. But still eats meat and animal products. I believe a higher percentage of plant based products is good. Humans are omnivores that benefit from a predominate plant based diet.

We still need nutrients that are more easily found in animal products to thrive, unless they are supplemented with very careful planned diets, and highly processed alternatives.[/quote]

As far as I know, the only nutrient vegans have trouble getting enough of is B12, and that can be easily overcome with a simple supplement, or through eating various fortified foods.
dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,203
And1: 13,063
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#453 » by dice » Fri May 7, 2021 2:21 am

dougthonus wrote:
dice wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:That's a case of correlation and not causation.

exactly. there's really no way of knowing whether they guy who starts from day 1 and succeeds did so because he got the early exposure or because he was GOOD ENOUGH to handle the early exposure and learn/grow. every case is different


The historical opinion has just as little evidence to support it. Maybe the QB position is just so different, but what other position in the NFL do you think would learn better by watching rather than doing? You have something like 6-7 months to look at game film and and other stuff, what more watching do you think is truly beneficial here? Especially since not starting you also won't get full reps with the 1st time offense and actually develop chemistry with guys you will play with?

The idea that it is better to start your QB from day one is a far more logical conclusion than he will be better and more prepared and less likely to fail if he waits longer and doesn't play at all. His skills are far more likely to get rusty by sitting rather than improve. I can't imagine any athletic activity that you have practiced for over a decade is going to get better by taking a year off and watching someone else do it. The whole concept is absurd on the surface. The only reason anyone buys into it at all is that it is conventional wisdom.

the 4 greatest QBs of this generation all sat part or all of their rookie year: brady, brees, rodgers, mahomes. it certainly didn't HURT their careers. whether it HELPED is obviously up for debate. but i think there have certainly been examples of players getting thrown into the fire and having it damage them. derek carr, mentioned previously, springs immediately to mind. holding a clipboard on the sidelines in support of a veteran QB has some value. but again, case-by-case basis. depends on the learning curve
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,203
And1: 13,063
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#454 » by dice » Fri May 7, 2021 2:28 am

Dresden wrote:
2018C3 wrote:[quote="NZB2323"

Tom Brady became Vegan in 2014, Chris Paul has been Vegan since 2019, and Nate Diaz has been a Vegan since he was 18. A Vegan diet is the healthiest diet.



If you want to watch the whole documentary it's on YouTube.


FYI, Brady is not Vegan, He eats a 80% vegan diet. But still eats meat and animal products. I believe a higher percentage of plant based products is good. Humans are omnivores that benefit from a predominate plant based diet.

We still need nutrients that are more easily found in animal products to thrive, unless they are supplemented with very careful planned diets, and highly processed alternatives.


As far as I know, the only nutrient vegans have trouble getting enough of is B12, and that can be easily overcome with a simple supplement, or through eating various fortified foods.[/quote]
i mean, there are vegan MMA fighters. B12 and protein are potential issues for vegans, particularly if attempting to build a lot of muscle mass. so the "careful planned" diet thing is probably indeed necessary in many cases
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
2018C3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 809
And1: 539
Joined: Jul 14, 2018
   

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#455 » by 2018C3 » Fri May 7, 2021 4:13 am

I did not want this to be a thing, and thought twice before I even mentioned it because I do believe supplements are viable alternatives for people who wish to be vegans.

A diet that is typical recommended by doctors for people who have epilepsy is the ketogenic diet which is high in fats. A standard ketogenic diet typically contains 70% fat, 20% protein, and 10% carbs. I was not sure if a vegan diet has these attributes.

I just thought Id say it now, then wait until later if he ever decides to change his diet for nutritional needs, and then later say, "I once thought this may be a issue, but did not say anything at the time".

Hopefully he never finds a need to change, and it works for him.

I congratulate him for taking his health seriously, and doing what he believes is best for him to succeed. I wish him all the success in his new diet. I first hope it benefits his health as a person, and secondly we also see positive results for the Bears.

I'm sure a lot of athletes diets are not as disciplined, and never really take it to another level where they try to fully optimize their own performance with specific diets.

My now past Grandmothers pastors wife was once Antoine Walker's personal chef. From what I heard through him, not her, Antoine Walker did not always eat the meals she cooked, and would often bring fast food home. We sat at the same table after my grandmothers funeral.
User avatar
dougthonus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,148
And1: 19,250
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#456 » by dougthonus » Fri May 7, 2021 11:03 am

Dresden wrote:It's strange that distinction is made in football but not in other sports. the Celtics have won 16 or whatever titles, but hardly anyone adds to that "but 11 of those happened when there were only 8 teams in the league". Or in baseball- the Yankees won all those titles back when there were fewer teams, and baseball was still segregated, but that's hardly ever qualified either. Yet in football, it only counts if you've won since 1967 or whatever.


It is probably unique to football because they renamed the event when they had the merger. That didn't happen in other leagues. It wasn't the baseball championship and then became the World Series later or anything.

In terms of looking at the titles, people do bring those things up though that you mentioned when valuing those titles, but there is no quick easy way to say "modern era titles" that people know exactly what you mean. When would the modern era start for the NBA or MLB? For football, it's easy, you just say superbowls.
User avatar
dougthonus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,148
And1: 19,250
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#457 » by dougthonus » Fri May 7, 2021 11:24 am

dice wrote:the 4 greatest QBs of this generation all sat part or all of their rookie year: brady, brees, rodgers, mahomes. it certainly didn't HURT their careers. whether it HELPED is obviously up for debate. but i think there have certainly been examples of players getting thrown into the fire and having it damage them. derek carr, mentioned previously, springs immediately to mind. holding a clipboard on the sidelines in support of a veteran QB has some value. but again, case-by-case basis. depends on the learning curve


Here's the list of guys I could find who started week 1:

Successful QBs:
Peyton Manning
Carson Wentz
Matthew Stafford
DeShaun Watson
Kyler Murray
Cam Newton
Dak Prescott
Matt Ryan
Russell Wilson
Andrew Luck

Maybe in the middle:
Andy Dalton
Derek Carr
Ryan Tannehill

Unsuccessful QBs starting week 1:
Robert Griffin 3
Marcus Mariotta
Sam Braford
Jameis Winston
*Sam Darnold - maybe still has a chance still
Mark Sanchez
Brandon Weeden
EJ Manual
Geno Smith

It's hard for me to look at those results and say starting week 1 hurts you. That seems about the normal success rate of a QB, if not better. I don't think starting week 1 will make a bad QB become a good QB just like I don't think waiting on a guy will make a bad QB turn into a good QB. I think starting week 1 will accelerate how fast someone becomes a good QB by getting the lumps out of the way earlier.
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,430
And1: 11,443
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#458 » by TheSuzerain » Fri May 7, 2021 11:46 am

The only way I can see starting early as a problem is if the line is a disaster.

That can get your guy literally injured (Burrow) or mess with their head/internal clock (David Carr).

But short of that (and the Bears line should be decent), it's fine.

I think this convo is mostly meaningless though. Start him or not. I don't think it affects the long term trajectory. Trubisky failed because he's a dud. He's never looked to me like a talent that was never harnessed or something. Let's hope Fields isn't a dud.
User avatar
dougthonus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,148
And1: 19,250
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#459 » by dougthonus » Fri May 7, 2021 11:59 am

TheSuzerain wrote:The only way I can see starting early as a problem is if the line is a disaster.

That can get your guy literally injured (Burrow) or mess with their head/internal clock (David Carr).

But short of that (and the Bears line should be decent), it's fine.

I think this convo is mostly meaningless though. Start him or not. I don't think it affects the long term trajectory. Trubisky failed because he's a dud. He's never looked to me like a talent that was never harnessed or something. Let's hope Fields isn't a dud.


I agree it isn't likely to impact long term trajectory. IMO, if you start him week 1 vs week 8, you just got him wherever he is going to go 2-4 games faster. You obviously still get something out of being on the bench and learning, but I think you get more from playing. So it isn't 100% loss to wait, but you do get a bit further a head with more experience.

In the grand scheme of things though, this doesn't matter all that much though. If he's a bust, no one will care that he started or sat for X weeks, same if he is a stud.
Stratmaster
RealGM
Posts: 22,550
And1: 9,092
Joined: Oct 02, 2010
       

Re: OT: Bears Talk - Justin Fields era begins 

Post#460 » by Stratmaster » Fri May 7, 2021 5:56 pm

I look at it pretty simply. If Fields performs the best in training camp (including understanding of the offense) and preseason he should start. If not, he shouldn't.

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app

Return to Chicago Bulls