You need to raise your standards for journalism. Come on -- honestly? 1 of your 2 links , the Townhall site, is
INFERRING that Chelsea caused so much stress to a lady (that neither of us have ever heard of before) that she want to commit suicide. And I quote, here's the direct email quoted from the site:
Late last night, laura graham called me as she couldn't reach my brother >>> or her shrink. She was on staten island in her car parked a few feet from >>> the waters edge with her foot on the gas pedal and the car in park. She >>> called me to tell me the stress of all of this office crap with wjc and cvc >>> as well as that of her family had driven her to the edge and she couldn't >>> take it anymore. I spent a while on the phone with her preventing her from >>> doing that, as I have a few times in the past few months, and was able to >>> reach roger and her shrinkAnd therefore, we conclude that Hillary is the most corrupt politician in America.
This is what I mean. I've gone through countless amounts of these, and the "corruption" claim is as applicable as it is to anybody in public office. It's as concrete as saying that America's hiding aliens on Mars. The business insider article goes on to say that there's no actual evidence/trail of the money from Qatar, it's simply inferred from the emails. For all we know it's a fund from a company loosely tied with another international company that donates.
Or maybe you're right. Hillary is Bin Ladin 2.0 after all. Because that sounds so plausible. Hillary tries to be nice on the outside, so she must be a reptilian on the inside. Meanwhile, Trump is a **** on the outside, so he must be a good guy on the inside. Even though he's openly ****ed up every business he ever ran and simply made money off crooked side deals and exploitation and his daddy's money that got him started to begin with.
And I quote from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/16/us/politics/wikileaks-bill-clinton-foundation.html?_r=0In April 2012, representatives from Qatar were apparently hoping to get “five minutes” with former President Bill Clinton while in New York to present him with a $1 million check for his foundation as a birthday gift from the previous year.
While it is unclear whether that meeting ever took place, the offer, mentioned in one of thousands of hacked Clinton campaign emails released by WikiLeaks last week, was an example of the complex ethical issues the Clinton Foundation faced in managing relationships with foreign governments when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. It also raised questions about whether the foundation had fully followed procedures it had voluntarily agreed to in order to avoid those very issues.
The foundation’s ties to foreign governments and financiers have long been fodder for Mrs. Clinton’s critics — chief among them Donald J. Trump — who contend that foreigners used donations to the foundation to curry favor with the Clintons while Mrs. Clinton was the country’s top diplomat.
Emails released this year from Mrs. Clinton’s time at the State Department showed that foundation donors sought and in some cases obtained meetings with department officials. None showed that Mrs. Clinton made decisions based on contributions to the foundation, and the Clinton campaign has said she never did.Between the amount of crappy blogging online, the senseless paranoia, and the racism -- it's been really hard talking to neocon/libertarians/conservatives the last 25 years of my life. It's madness really. Stop listening to Fox News, stop believing whatever article pops up on Google, and start investigating your sources. I recommend diversifying as much as possible, even other countries (BBC, RT, Al Jazeera). You get everybody's bias and outlook, and can compare what's objective and what's not. The funny thing is the Russian news happens to be more accurate than Fox and all the neo-con think tanks.
