Image ImageImage Image

Shams: Lonzo for Okoro

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,712
And1: 6,955
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#541 » by GoBlue72391 » Thu Jul 10, 2025 4:01 pm

League Circles wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
DuckIII wrote:
Good think we didn't draft him with a high lottery pick then.


No we just traded for a bad player. But hey if that's the type you want you are getting your wish.

I mean, he's a good defender and above league average efficiency scorer, including being a competent 3 point shooter. How on earth is that a "bad" player?

You could theoretically say the same about Pat. How on earth is Pat a "bad" player?
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,559
And1: 10,047
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#542 » by League Circles » Thu Jul 10, 2025 4:14 pm

GoBlue72391 wrote:
League Circles wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
No we just traded for a bad player. But hey if that's the type you want you are getting your wish.

I mean, he's a good defender and above league average efficiency scorer, including being a competent 3 point shooter. How on earth is that a "bad" player?

You could theoretically say the same about Pat. How on earth is Pat a "bad" player?

And someone could answer "because he shot WAY below league average scoring efficiency".

Can't say that about Okoro. Good efficiency 4 years straight. If Patrick can revert back to decent overall efficiency especially from 3 point range, I probably won't call him a "bad" player.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
yifsuibfe1
Rookie
Posts: 1,220
And1: 754
Joined: Jun 24, 2012

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#543 » by yifsuibfe1 » Wed Jul 16, 2025 1:29 pm

https://bsky.app/profile/keithsmithnba.bsky.social/post/3lu2lf6qfu22r

Due to an injury protection clause in Lonzo Ball's contact, the Chicago Bulls had to use a portion of their TPE for Zach LaVine to acquire Isaac Okoro.

The Cleveland Cavaliers created a full TPE of $11M for Isaac Okoro on the outgoing salary side.
drosestruts
General Manager
Posts: 9,163
And1: 4,281
Joined: Apr 05, 2012
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#544 » by drosestruts » Wed Jul 16, 2025 2:13 pm

yifsuibfe1 wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/keithsmithnba.bsky.social/post/3lu2lf6qfu22r

Due to an injury protection clause in Lonzo Ball's contact, the Chicago Bulls had to use a portion of their TPE for Zach LaVine to acquire Isaac Okoro.

The Cleveland Cavaliers created a full TPE of $11M for Isaac Okoro on the outgoing salary side.


Does this mean we re-set the clock on complaining about never using our trade exceptions?
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,341
And1: 9,176
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#545 » by sco » Thu Jul 17, 2025 12:45 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
kodo wrote:Pretty much every argument for why Okoro is a bad trade could be applied to LA Caruso when we got him. A good defender, can't score (6 ppg), will not develop into a star, excellent impact metrics. Caruso was actually far worse on offense (54% TS) compared to Okoro (59% TS). Caruso was not a star defender when we got him didn't make any all-defensive teams.

It's a very similar move to outbidding LAL for AC, and cap adjusted it's about the same dollar amount. Just because you make the same bet twice doesn't mean we'll get the same results, but the methodology is the same.


Alex Caruso was one of the best defensive guards in his last year in LA and you could make the argument he was one of the best defenders overall. He wasnt going to make an All Defensive team playing 15-20 mpg in LA. Its why he didn't make the team this year with OKC playing 20 MPG. Not sure why you need to knock Caruso to prop up Okoro.

I will say this about both Caruso and Ball, neither guy is durable enough to play more than around 20MPG and expect to remain healthy for the season. Not sure Okoro will be much different, but there's a decent chance he can be a 30mpg very good defender, and IMO, 10 more minutes of great defense has value.
:clap:
User avatar
DASMACKDOWN
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 30,148
And1: 15,415
Joined: Nov 01, 2001
Location: Cookin' with Derrick Rose

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#546 » by DASMACKDOWN » Thu Jul 17, 2025 1:10 pm

drosestruts wrote:
yifsuibfe1 wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/keithsmithnba.bsky.social/post/3lu2lf6qfu22r

Due to an injury protection clause in Lonzo Ball's contact, the Chicago Bulls had to use a portion of their TPE for Zach LaVine to acquire Isaac Okoro.

The Cleveland Cavaliers created a full TPE of $11M for Isaac Okoro on the outgoing salary side.


Does this mean we re-set the clock on complaining about never using our trade exceptions?


Yes and someone has already talked about it.

Basically its just click bait now and people just want to complain about every single thing with this front office. People make it sound like we have ever used our TPE over the years. I bet they cant find one.

I've been here long enough to know, we did nothing with Kyle Korver TPE. Did nothing with Luol Deng TPE. We did nothing with Lonzo Ball's injury exemption. And I knew we would do nothing with Zach's TPE. So this is nothing new. No reason to try and drum up more hate on the matter.
drosestruts
General Manager
Posts: 9,163
And1: 4,281
Joined: Apr 05, 2012
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#547 » by drosestruts » Mon Jul 21, 2025 8:48 pm

While not a stat sheet stuffer or a guy you'll find awesome highlight reels of on Youtube, Okoro is a +/- darling.

2024-25: +14 when on the court
2023-24: +3.6 when on the court
2022-23: +6.1 when on the court
2021-22: +3.6 on the court
2020-21: -9 (so not every year eh?)

in years 2-5 his team was always better with him on the floor than off.

Hopeful he can bring a similar impact here. I don't think he's going to magically turn into a high-volume sniper or something.

But if he can keep this same trend of winning his minutes on the court, that will be a plus to me.
Bulliever2020
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,345
And1: 2,600
Joined: Jul 13, 2018
       

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#548 » by Bulliever2020 » Mon Jul 21, 2025 8:57 pm

I predict Okoro will be next season's Huerter. A guy who people don't expect much from but due to being given more opportunity and playing in a system that they fit very well in will become much more productive. I also expect him to put in a ton of work this summer and come into this year with a chip on his shoulder ready to show what he can do in a new environment.
PlayinTourney4Lyfe
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,808
And1: 18,876
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#549 » by dougthonus » Tue Jul 22, 2025 12:17 pm

drosestruts wrote:While not a stat sheet stuffer or a guy you'll find awesome highlight reels of on Youtube, Okoro is a +/- darling.

2024-25: +14 when on the court
2023-24: +3.6 when on the court
2022-23: +6.1 when on the court
2021-22: +3.6 on the court
2020-21: -9 (so not every year eh?)

in years 2-5 his team was always better with him on the floor than off.

Hopeful he can bring a similar impact here. I don't think he's going to magically turn into a high-volume sniper or something.

But if he can keep this same trend of winning his minutes on the court, that will be a plus to me.


Sort of interesting that you would describe Caruso in this way quite a bit too. Great defender, high +/- guy, but not much on the offensive end. I don't think Okoro is quite Caruso on defense and likely not as much of a team defensive orchestrator, but a lot of the same traits of high value that isn't as obvious seem like they might be there.

His offense will probably look more interesting next to Giddey in a super uptempo system as well, as he's a really good finisher / transition player.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,289
And1: 9,280
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#550 » by Jcool0 » Tue Jul 22, 2025 12:27 pm

drosestruts wrote:While not a stat sheet stuffer or a guy you'll find awesome highlight reels of on Youtube, Okoro is a +/- darling.

2024-25: +14 when on the court
2023-24: +3.6 when on the court
2022-23: +6.1 when on the court
2021-22: +3.6 on the court
2020-21: -9 (so not every year eh?)

in years 2-5 his team was always better with him on the floor than off.

Hopeful he can bring a similar impact here. I don't think he's going to magically turn into a high-volume sniper or something.

But if he can keep this same trend of winning his minutes on the court, that will be a plus to me.



FWIW 10 players on Cleveland with over 1000 minutes have a plus on court rating last season, with the lowest being Max Strus at +8.9. Bulls are a worse team i don't know if that impact is going to translate. Bulls had 2 positive on court players last year play 1000+ minutes, LaVine at +1 and Phillips at +1.9. Lonzo Ball was a +6.5 in 777 minutes. Kevin Huerter was a +9.5 in 26 games. Zach Collins was +4.4 in 26 games. Surprising Tre Jones had a -4.9 in his 18 games.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,808
And1: 18,876
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#551 » by dougthonus » Tue Jul 22, 2025 12:30 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
drosestruts wrote:While not a stat sheet stuffer or a guy you'll find awesome highlight reels of on Youtube, Okoro is a +/- darling.

2024-25: +14 when on the court
2023-24: +3.6 when on the court
2022-23: +6.1 when on the court
2021-22: +3.6 on the court
2020-21: -9 (so not every year eh?)

in years 2-5 his team was always better with him on the floor than off.

Hopeful he can bring a similar impact here. I don't think he's going to magically turn into a high-volume sniper or something.

But if he can keep this same trend of winning his minutes on the court, that will be a plus to me.



FWIW 10 players on Cleveland with over 1000 minutes have a plus on court rating last season, with the lowest being Max Strus at +8.9. Bulls are a worse team i don't know if that impact is going to translate. Bulls had 2 positive on court players last year play 1000+ minutes, LaVine at +1 and Phillips at +1.9. Lonzo Ball was a +6.5 in 777 minutes. Kevin Huerter was a +9.5 in 26 games. Zach Collins was +4.4 in 26 games. Surprising Tre Jones had a -4.9 in his 18 games.


Not that I'm a believer in +/- as a huge metric, but his net +/- is also positive which should filter out some of the noise of just being on a good team. Especially since he played less than half the minutes which would work against him last year.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,289
And1: 9,280
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#552 » by Jcool0 » Tue Jul 22, 2025 12:52 pm

dougthonus wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
drosestruts wrote:While not a stat sheet stuffer or a guy you'll find awesome highlight reels of on Youtube, Okoro is a +/- darling.

2024-25: +14 when on the court
2023-24: +3.6 when on the court
2022-23: +6.1 when on the court
2021-22: +3.6 on the court
2020-21: -9 (so not every year eh?)

in years 2-5 his team was always better with him on the floor than off.

Hopeful he can bring a similar impact here. I don't think he's going to magically turn into a high-volume sniper or something.

But if he can keep this same trend of winning his minutes on the court, that will be a plus to me.



FWIW 10 players on Cleveland with over 1000 minutes have a plus on court rating last season, with the lowest being Max Strus at +8.9. Bulls are a worse team i don't know if that impact is going to translate. Bulls had 2 positive on court players last year play 1000+ minutes, LaVine at +1 and Phillips at +1.9. Lonzo Ball was a +6.5 in 777 minutes. Kevin Huerter was a +9.5 in 26 games. Zach Collins was +4.4 in 26 games. Surprising Tre Jones had a -4.9 in his 18 games.


Not that I'm a believer in +/- as a huge metric, but his net +/- is also positive which should filter out some of the noise of just being on a good team. Especially since he played less than half the minutes which would work against him last year.


Not saying he is going to be a big negative for Chicago. But if he was really as valuable as those numbers suggest he wouldn't of been a player with no market this offseason. Someone like Alex Caruso can put up what are seemingly low end stats... But can also be the different for the right team between winning it all or not. That is not what the Bulls are getting in Okoro.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,386
And1: 9,082
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#553 » by Chi town » Tue Jul 22, 2025 12:57 pm

Okoro’s injuries have def hurt him. He was shooting 50% from 3 on low volume before his injury last year. If he can stay healthy he will have an impact.

Everyone will have to earn their mins this year and we have so much depth (Terry Phillips aren’t good but they are depth) and versatility that guards and wings will be competing for mins as Billy loves his 3 guard lineups.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,808
And1: 18,876
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#554 » by dougthonus » Tue Jul 22, 2025 1:04 pm

Jcool0 wrote:Not saying he is going to be a big negative for Chicago. But if he was really as valuable as those numbers suggest he wouldn't of been a player with no market this offseason. Someone like Alex Caruso can put up what are seemingly low end stats... But can also be the different for the right team between winning it all or not. That is not what the Bulls are getting in Okoro.


That's probably true.

However, the Lakers declined to match our offer on Caruso, or even give him less money (he was willing to stay there for less than us, I believe he was quoted as saying the Lakers were only offering him half what we were). So at the time we got Caruso, the same statement could have been made about him. This isn't to say we will definitely catch lightening in a bottle with a defensive guy a second time around though, just that the situation was pretty similar when we got AC.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,341
And1: 9,176
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#555 » by sco » Tue Jul 22, 2025 1:07 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:

FWIW 10 players on Cleveland with over 1000 minutes have a plus on court rating last season, with the lowest being Max Strus at +8.9. Bulls are a worse team i don't know if that impact is going to translate. Bulls had 2 positive on court players last year play 1000+ minutes, LaVine at +1 and Phillips at +1.9. Lonzo Ball was a +6.5 in 777 minutes. Kevin Huerter was a +9.5 in 26 games. Zach Collins was +4.4 in 26 games. Surprising Tre Jones had a -4.9 in his 18 games.


Not that I'm a believer in +/- as a huge metric, but his net +/- is also positive which should filter out some of the noise of just being on a good team. Especially since he played less than half the minutes which would work against him last year.


Not saying he is going to be a big negative for Chicago. But if he was really as valuable as those numbers suggest he wouldn't of been a player with no market this offseason. Someone like Alex Caruso can put up what are seemingly low end stats... But can also be the different for the right team between winning it all or not. That is not what the Bulls are getting in Okoro.

Chi town wrote:Okoro’s injuries have def hurt him. He was shooting 50% from 3 on low volume before his injury last year. If he can stay healthy he will have an impact.

Everyone will have to earn their mins this year and we have so much depth (Terry Phillips aren’t good but they are depth) and versatility that guards and wings will be competing for mins as Billy loves his 3 guard lineups.

I think his play last year was jointly due to injuries (which seem to be statistically more common in good defenders) and the fact that CLE traded for Hunter who played a similar role.

I think our success next season will be heavily tied to our rotation. Adding a good POA defender (or two) to the mix, coupled with adding rim protection to the starting lineup ( :prayer: ) will give our new core their best chance to succeed on both ends. I'm not saying that best case we're a 50 win team, but I could see a 10 win difference by optimizing our rotation with a better balance.
:clap:
drosestruts
General Manager
Posts: 9,163
And1: 4,281
Joined: Apr 05, 2012
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#556 » by drosestruts » Tue Jul 22, 2025 2:01 pm

I don't really get the "no market" comments

Okoro was traded on June 28th.

The finals ended June 22nd

Free Agency started June 30th

The draft was June 25th


This isn't some guy who was shopped for months and months and months who Cleveland couldn't unload.

I'm also not sure what relevance comments like that have. Do they matter? You win games on the court, Okroo wins his minutes on the court.

Hopefully, that continues here.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,289
And1: 9,280
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#557 » by Jcool0 » Tue Jul 22, 2025 2:59 pm

sco wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
Not that I'm a believer in +/- as a huge metric, but his net +/- is also positive which should filter out some of the noise of just being on a good team. Especially since he played less than half the minutes which would work against him last year.


Not saying he is going to be a big negative for Chicago. But if he was really as valuable as those numbers suggest he wouldn't of been a player with no market this offseason. Someone like Alex Caruso can put up what are seemingly low end stats... But can also be the different for the right team between winning it all or not. That is not what the Bulls are getting in Okoro.

Chi town wrote:Okoro’s injuries have def hurt him. He was shooting 50% from 3 on low volume before his injury last year. If he can stay healthy he will have an impact.

Everyone will have to earn their mins this year and we have so much depth (Terry Phillips aren’t good but they are depth) and versatility that guards and wings will be competing for mins as Billy loves his 3 guard lineups.

I think his play last year was jointly due to injuries (which seem to be statistically more common in good defenders) and the fact that CLE traded for Hunter who played a similar role.

I think our success next season will be heavily tied to our rotation. Adding a good POA defender (or two) to the mix, coupled with adding rim protection to the starting lineup ( :prayer: ) will give our new core their best chance to succeed on both ends. I'm not saying that best case we're a 50 win team, but I could see a 10 win difference by optimizing our rotation with a better balance.


Not sure what him being hurt does when he was shooting 2.3 3PA in 2023, 3.1 3PA per game in 2024 and 2.7 3PA per game last year. Him shooting better isnt going to do much when the volume is so low. FWIW i don't think he is a good defender. Positive one sure. But again this isn't a Caruso situation.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,289
And1: 9,280
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#558 » by Jcool0 » Tue Jul 22, 2025 3:03 pm

drosestruts wrote:I don't really get the "no market" comments

Okoro was traded on June 28th.

The finals ended June 22nd

Free Agency started June 30th

The draft was June 25th


This isn't some guy who was shopped for months and months and months who Cleveland couldn't unload.

I'm also not sure what relevance comments like that have. Do they matter? You win games on the court, Okroo wins his minutes on the court.

Hopefully, that continues here.


Chris Fedor: From everything that I'm told they're having a hard time finding anybody that has legitimate interest in Isaac Okoro, unless Isaac also comes with some kind of sweetener from the Cavs. Some kinds of assets attached to his contract because I think there are teams out there that are looking at Isaac and they're saying like ‘We'd be doing you a favor by taking on his contract, so make it worth our time to do that, make it worthwhile for us to do that. Give us future second round picks, go find a first round pick somehow that you can trade to us along with Isaac Okoro then we'll help you out.’
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,289
And1: 9,280
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#559 » by Jcool0 » Tue Jul 22, 2025 3:05 pm

dougthonus wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:Not saying he is going to be a big negative for Chicago. But if he was really as valuable as those numbers suggest he wouldn't of been a player with no market this offseason. Someone like Alex Caruso can put up what are seemingly low end stats... But can also be the different for the right team between winning it all or not. That is not what the Bulls are getting in Okoro.


That's probably true.

However, the Lakers declined to match our offer on Caruso, or even give him less money (he was willing to stay there for less than us, I believe he was quoted as saying the Lakers were only offering him half what we were). So at the time we got Caruso, the same statement could have been made about him. This isn't to say we will definitely catch lightening in a bottle with a defensive guy a second time around though, just that the situation was pretty similar when we got AC.


Lakers are a unique team always looking for star players and will undervalue the guys that are actually helping to win titles in an attempt to keep everything open to get that star guy.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,559
And1: 10,047
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#560 » by League Circles » Tue Jul 22, 2025 3:08 pm

drosestruts wrote:I don't really get the "no market" comments

Okoro was traded on June 28th.

The finals ended June 22nd

Free Agency started June 30th

The draft was June 25th


This isn't some guy who was shopped for months and months and months who Cleveland couldn't unload.

I'm also not sure what relevance comments like that have. Do they matter? You win games on the court, Okroo wins his minutes on the court.

Hopefully, that continues here.


Yeah, this was clearly a targeted, desired move by the Bulls and there's no reason to think Okoro was unwanted.

Lonzo Ball is quite a good player when he plays. It's a nice one for one trade. Bulls get the younger, more durable, better finishing Okoro, while Cleveland gets the better play maker, somewhat better defender (excellent vs just good I guess for Okoro?), less durable, older guy. Both have intriguing but unreliable/unproven three point shooting histories. The Bulls obviously extended Ball with an eye on trading him, which was a nice move. I think Okoro is the ideal realistic archetype to complement Giddey and Coby. I say realistic because of course you'd want the guy to shoot like Steph Curry but I'm talking archetype for an obtainable non-star. Okoro is nearly exactly what I wanted at the 2 spot this summer. Hopefully he can guard the 1-3 positions as needed. It's one of the first signs that AK might have some sense of chemistry needs after all. That might have been his biggest general weakness (as opposed to specific bad moves like the Vuc trade) so far.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear

Return to Chicago Bulls