Valentine signs QO; Dunn to ATL for 2/$10
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
- PaKii94
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,678
- And1: 6,711
- Joined: Aug 22, 2013
-
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
Huh I thought they'd try to retain shaq. Now idk what they are up to now.
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,408
- And1: 380
- Joined: Oct 02, 2005
- Location: avoiding the WIFE
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
I just noticed that Denzel Valentine and Otto Porter are both 27 years old. Who would have thought that ??
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
- Grodoboldo
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,739
- And1: 2,834
- Joined: Sep 26, 2010
- Location: Sao Paulo
-
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
@SeanGrandePBP: So, this might be worth a [googly eyes emoji] . Just saying. If you're someone into doing this particular emoji thing here, this wouldn't be a bad place to do it, is all. https://t.co/JN8DHnjZql
Absolutely no **** idea what this means.
TheFinishSniper wrote:He means Bulls dropping a guard (pun) and drafting one.
Maybe this?
Constantly underwhelmed by the Bulls.
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,226
- And1: 9,889
- Joined: Dec 04, 2001
-
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
Pax for Prez wrote:I just noticed that Denzel Valentine and Otto Porter are both 27 years old. Who would have thought that ??
No kidding, Denzel looks like he's 37 on the court.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 49
- And1: 13
- Joined: Jun 28, 2006
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
Maybe I’m reading too deep into it, but he seems to be suggesting a bulls-celts trade. He’s a Boston beat writer. Another Boston beat writer (verified) did an eye emoji too.
Boston has 14, bulls want Lewis. WCJ for 14? Bigger package for heyward?
Boston has 14, bulls want Lewis. WCJ for 14? Bigger package for heyward?
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
- ThreeMileAllan
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,579
- And1: 776
- Joined: Feb 07, 2002
- Location: San Diego via Chicago
-
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
Hmmmmmmmmmjkudia wrote:Maybe I’m reading too deep into it, but he seems to be suggesting a bulls-celts trade. He’s a Boston beat writer. Another Boston beat writer (verified) did an eye emoji too.
Boston has 14, bulls want Lewis. WCJ for 14? Bigger package for heyward?
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
On the Crawford/Rose bandwagon in 2002... 2009, 2011, 2012, 2017...
Finally in 2018! 16 year wait!

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,226
- And1: 9,889
- Joined: Dec 04, 2001
-
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
jkudia wrote:Maybe I’m reading too deep into it, but he seems to be suggesting a bulls-celts trade. He’s a Boston beat writer. Another Boston beat writer (verified) did an eye emoji too.
Boston has 14, bulls want Lewis. WCJ for 14? Bigger package for heyward?
A 7th pick in a strong draft who met expectations for a #14 in a terrible draft????????
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
- NecessaryEvil
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,227
- And1: 7,615
- Joined: Jun 12, 2014
-
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
jkudia wrote:Maybe I’m reading too deep into it, but he seems to be suggesting a bulls-celts trade. He’s a Boston beat writer. Another Boston beat writer (verified) did an eye emoji too.
Boston has 14, bulls want Lewis. WCJ for 14? Bigger package for heyward?
I’d do that deal in a heartbeat
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn
- LateNight
- Starter
- Posts: 2,308
- And1: 1,568
- Joined: Jan 14, 2019
-
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn
LateNight wrote:PaKii94 wrote:Archi/Shaq/Mokoka/___/Kornet
I've also heard that the league is planning to expand two-way contracts... If that is the case, I'm guessing they'd probably try to sign Makoka or others with one of those slots rather than using up a roster spot.
Well, they extended a QO to Mokoka so looks like you may be right and I’m wrong
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
- Repeat 3-peat
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,897
- And1: 15,413
- Joined: Nov 02, 2013
-
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,856
- And1: 8,954
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
NecessaryEvil wrote:jkudia wrote:Maybe I’m reading too deep into it, but he seems to be suggesting a bulls-celts trade. He’s a Boston beat writer. Another Boston beat writer (verified) did an eye emoji too.
Boston has 14, bulls want Lewis. WCJ for 14? Bigger package for heyward?
I’d do that deal in a heartbeat
Yeah, me too, and I like WC...actually though, I'd love Poku at 14. If we got him, I could live with the horrible, horrible pick of Deni at 4.

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn
- PaKii94
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,678
- And1: 6,711
- Joined: Aug 22, 2013
-
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn
LateNight wrote:LateNight wrote:PaKii94 wrote:Archi/Shaq/Mokoka/___/Kornet
I've also heard that the league is planning to expand two-way contracts... If that is the case, I'm guessing they'd probably try to sign Makoka or others with one of those slots rather than using up a roster spot.
Well, they extended a QO to Mokoka so looks like you may be right and I’m wrong
I thought makoka was on a 2 year deal and I was assuming shaq would be back so I was half wrong too
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,485
- And1: 5,005
- Joined: Feb 07, 2011
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
The bulls need the slots and the space. I understand them moving on from shaq and Dunn. We are clearly about to add a pg and with coby arci and whoever we take at 4th here its just no minutes here for them. And I'm sorry I appreciate defense like anyone but these guys defense wasn't adding to winning basketball. Especially down the stretch of games where you can practically leave these guys wide open cause they can't score.
"they taking rose kindness for a weakness"
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
-
- Junior
- Posts: 347
- And1: 220
- Joined: Sep 23, 2020
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
Pax for Prez wrote:I just noticed that Denzel Valentine and Otto Porter are both 27 years old. Who would have thought that ??
What?
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,786
- And1: 4,677
- Joined: Jul 13, 2010
- Location: BROOKLYN
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn
PaKii94 wrote:UnFadeable21 wrote:?s=21
Who are the available "experienced" PGs out there?
Jrue?
Rubio?
I'd love to somehow snag Jrue. That would be a get.
Don’t forget Westbrook, never know...
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,230
- And1: 1,224
- Joined: Feb 17, 2010
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
HomoSapien wrote:Seems like AK is signaling that he doesn't like one-dimensional point guards. At the end of the day, Dunn, Shaq, and Arci all shared a lot of similarities that made them redundant. I think we should expect a guard in this draft.
As long it's not Lamelo. My dream scenario would be trade #4 to Detroit for #7 and a future 1st, use #7 to draft Hayes or Haliburton.
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 37,227
- And1: 30,189
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn
Red8911 wrote:PaKii94 wrote:UnFadeable21 wrote:?s=21
Who are the available "experienced" PGs out there?
Jrue?
Rubio?
I'd love to somehow snag Jrue. That would be a get.
Don’t forget Westbrook, never know...
Jrue and Rubio are both off the table now (although I could see OKC moving Rubio again). I've felt that Elfrid Payton has been undervalued the last few years. I guess Rose and Conley are other options.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
-
- Senior
- Posts: 506
- And1: 504
- Joined: Dec 22, 2012
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
If we make a deal with the Celtics it's likely just sending one pic for several, isn't it? I certainly don't see us sending anyone of value for 14.
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,714
- And1: 1,055
- Joined: Jun 19, 2011
-
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
Red8911 wrote:PaKii94 wrote:UnFadeable21 wrote:?s=21
Who are the available "experienced" PGs out there?
Jrue?
Rubio?
I'd love to somehow snag Jrue. That would be a get.
Don’t forget Westbrook, never know...
Yeah, it is still in the back of my mind. Something like Westbrook for Porter, Felicio and a 2nd, but that's it. The contract is long so no FRP or anything like that.
Sent from somewhere you've never been.
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,434
- And1: 3,269
- Joined: Dec 31, 2013
Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either
Goodbye to all non-shooters. So sweet to be right.
Wendell is next (if they can find anyone who wants him, which isn't a given).
Wendell is next (if they can find anyone who wants him, which isn't a given).