pwrshft99 wrote:IMHO, a lot of posters don't get the league right now. A single star by himself isn't winning a title. We have one superstar with decent role players but we don't have any game changers. Guys that can get a decent shot on their own, draw a foul and get the line during an offensive drought.
It doesn't matter how .any decent guys you surround your star player with. The NBA especially is a game where the stars get special treatment. DRose started to finally earn that respect but he is just one guy to Miami's 3. I love Deng and Noah but not like the FO does. Something has to change. The Pistons got lucky, you can't count on that business model succeeding repeadtly in this game.
All in all the FO wants to compete for a title as long as it is profitable... That's as plain as it can be put
Dallas did it two years ago. One star, Dirk Nowitski, surrounded by above average role players like Kidd, Chandler, Marion, Terry. Before that, Miami. Shaq was clearly on the decline and hardly still a "star" but they did have a star in D Wade. And before that the Pistons. And before that, the Spurs. Tim Duncan was a "star" but Parker and Ginobili were not yet established in the league, yet it all fell in place for them. The current Miami team is really the exception to the rule, and with the new CBA, they will be the last. Even so, look at the Knicks and Lakers this year. They have "Super Teams", but they're not that super. Look at the Lakers team that brought on Karl Malone and Gary Payton. No Championship and bust. Super teams are not the future of the NBA. I agree that the current Bulls roster, even with a Healthy D Rose, probably can't win a Championship. But there's only so many Lebrons and Durants to go around. I challenge anybody to name me one player that the Bulls could legitimately trade for that would make you say, "Now we're a Championship condender!".