Image ImageImage Image

Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

BIG Game
Rookie
Posts: 1,160
And1: 272
Joined: May 08, 2011

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#681 » by BIG Game » Tue Dec 3, 2013 4:06 pm

If he keeps this up or something close I'd like to keep Deng. Or at the very least negotiate with him, I'm thinking 12mil for 3 years. Hopefully we could move Boozer to a desperate team this trade deadline, for a young player/disgruntled player.
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,344
And1: 6,614
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#682 » by GoBlue72391 » Tue Dec 3, 2013 4:16 pm

Ice the knees wrote:
GoBlue72391 wrote:
Ice the knees wrote:playing heavy minutes is a great deal of Deng's value. If Deng was a 32 minute a game player, he wouldn't be too valuable. He needs those minutes to produce.

That's absurd. Why would he only play 32 MPG? 36 MPG is the norm for quality starters, and his Per 36 numbers are very good.

To say Deng is only good because he plays a ton of minutes is just selling him short.


I know. He's not good because he plays a ton of minutes. But it is his greatest attribute

If you say so...
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,180
And1: 9,859
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#683 » by League Circles » Tue Dec 3, 2013 4:21 pm

If Deng continues to clearly separate himself further and further from Boozer as the season goes on, I'll bet that the Bulls agree to an extension with Deng right before the trade deadline. I think Boozer's relatively strong playoff performance, contract status and showing up in great shape had them thinking they'd go with him over Deng next year, but now that he's cooled off as usual and Deng is straight lighting it up, I think they'll revert to what was probably once the default plan - amnesty Boozer, resign Deng, bring Mirotic on the MLE and bring in a BAE player and a rookie or two to replace guys like Nazr, Murphy, James, maybe Kirk.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,344
And1: 6,614
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#684 » by GoBlue72391 » Tue Dec 3, 2013 4:22 pm

Ice the knees wrote:Deng has never been great. He's a good role player. It's a 5 game stretch, not 16

Role player is the most misused term in all of basketball. Deng is not and never has been a role player. A role player is a player with one skill, like Kyle Korver or Ronnie Brewer. They fill the role of shooting specialist and defensive stopper, respectively. What "role" is Deng playing? All of them (scoring, defense, rebouding), so he's not a role player.

5 game stretch? Check his stats for the past 10 games, or better yet check his stats through all 16 games so far this year.
User avatar
Mech Engineer
RealGM
Posts: 16,802
And1: 4,804
Joined: Apr 10, 2012
Location: NW Suburbs

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#685 » by Mech Engineer » Tue Dec 3, 2013 4:26 pm

The one thing I don't like is running Deng as the 1st option with Rose being out. It is not helping him or the Bulls. No team will run him as the 1st option in the future or is it helping the Bulls to develop anyone else. I would rather run the 4th quarter plays through Noah, Taj or Snell who all can develop confidence in their offensive games. Thibs did run a play for Noah yesterday and that should help.
Ice the knees
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 618
Joined: Sep 19, 2012

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#686 » by Ice the knees » Tue Dec 3, 2013 4:35 pm

GoBlue72391 wrote:
Ice the knees wrote:Deng has never been great. He's a good role player. It's a 5 game stretch, not 16

Role player is the most misused term in all of basketball. Deng is not and never has been a role player. A role player is a player with one skill, like Kyle Korver or Ronnie Brewer. They fill the role of shooting specialist and defensive stopper, respectively. What "role" is Deng playing? All of them (scoring, defense, rebouding), so he's not a role player.

5 game stretch? Check his stats for the past 10 games, or better yet check his stats through all 16 games so far this year.


8pt 5 reb
5pt 9 reb
11pt 5reb

Only posting it because it means as much as Deng's current run.

Deng is not as bad as those numbers and not as good as his current stretch.

But when rose goes down deng is inconsistent. He's a role player
User avatar
Rerisen
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 105,369
And1: 25,052
Joined: Nov 23, 2003

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#687 » by Rerisen » Tue Dec 3, 2013 4:39 pm

Mech Engineer wrote:The one thing I don't like is running Deng as the 1st option with Rose being out. It is not helping him or the Bulls. No team will run him as the 1st option in the future or is it helping the Bulls to develop anyone else. I would rather run the 4th quarter plays through Noah, Taj or Snell who all can develop confidence in their offensive games. Thibs did run a play for Noah yesterday and that should help.


Well its helping the tank at least. Because last night was pretty much 'best case outcome' of Deng playing like a #1, and we still lost. Most nights he'll perform the role far worse.
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,344
And1: 6,614
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#688 » by GoBlue72391 » Tue Dec 3, 2013 4:39 pm

Ice the knees wrote:
GoBlue72391 wrote:
Ice the knees wrote:Deng has never been great. He's a good role player. It's a 5 game stretch, not 16

Role player is the most misused term in all of basketball. Deng is not and never has been a role player. A role player is a player with one skill, like Kyle Korver or Ronnie Brewer. They fill the role of shooting specialist and defensive stopper, respectively. What "role" is Deng playing? All of them (scoring, defense, rebouding), so he's not a role player.

5 game stretch? Check his stats for the past 10 games, or better yet check his stats through all 16 games so far this year.


8pt 5 reb
5pt 9 reb
11pt 5reb

Only posting it because it means as much as Deng's current run.

Deng is not as bad as those numbers and not as good as his current stretch.

But when rose goes down deng is inconsistent. He's a role player

3 bad games mean just as much as the 13 good ones? Okay then...

He's not a role player. You don't know what role player means.
Ice Man
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 26,843
And1: 15,888
Joined: Apr 19, 2011

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#689 » by Ice Man » Tue Dec 3, 2013 4:49 pm

Gar Paxdorf wrote:I think Boozer's relatively strong playoff performance, contract status and showing up in great shape had them thinking they'd go with him over Deng next year.


Relatively only to low expectations. His 2013 playoffs PER was worse than any regular-season PER he has ever posted, and barely above his 2011 playoffs. It's not as if he was particularly good last spring. Just not outright bad.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,180
And1: 9,859
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#690 » by League Circles » Tue Dec 3, 2013 4:57 pm

Ice Man wrote:
Gar Paxdorf wrote:I think Boozer's relatively strong playoff performance, contract status and showing up in great shape had them thinking they'd go with him over Deng next year.


Relatively only to low expectations. His 2013 playoffs PER was worse than any regular-season PER he has ever posted, and barely above his 2011 playoffs. It's not as if he was particularly good last spring. Just not outright bad.


Agreed. I think it was probably just refreshing for the FO to see him have quite a few good playoff games against both Brooklyn and Miami. The overall numbers were brought down by the bad games he had also. Previously, he was mostly just all bad for us in the playoffs IIRC.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
Ice the knees
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 618
Joined: Sep 19, 2012

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#691 » by Ice the knees » Tue Dec 3, 2013 4:58 pm

GoBlue72391 wrote:
Ice the knees wrote:
GoBlue72391 wrote:Role player is the most misused term in all of basketball. Deng is not and never has been a role player. A role player is a player with one skill, like Kyle Korver or Ronnie Brewer. They fill the role of shooting specialist and defensive stopper, respectively. What "role" is Deng playing? All of them (scoring, defense, rebouding), so he's not a role player.

5 game stretch? Check his stats for the past 10 games, or better yet check his stats through all 16 games so far this year.


8pt 5 reb
5pt 9 reb
11pt 5reb

Only posting it because it means as much as Deng's current run.

Deng is not as bad as those numbers and not as good as his current stretch.

But when rose goes down deng is inconsistent. He's a role player

3 bad games mean just as much as the 13 good ones? Okay then...

He's not a role player. You don't know what role player means.


Neither star line means anything. It's the in between that counts. He is what he is.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
dice
RealGM
Posts: 43,919
And1: 12,934
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#692 » by dice » Tue Dec 3, 2013 5:09 pm

WestCost BBC wrote:If he keeps this up or something close I'd like to keep Deng. Or at the very least negotiate with him, I'm thinking 12mil for 3 years

that would be reasonable from our perspective

let's not be short-sighted. lu will be 29 when the new deal goes into effect. an old 29. he will be on the downside of his career at the BEGINNING of the deal. plus, if signing him ends up meaning coming to terms with butler on an extension becomes problematic, we're looking at an unmitigated disaster
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
sco
RealGM
Posts: 26,656
And1: 8,850
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#693 » by sco » Tue Dec 3, 2013 5:21 pm

Here's my take:

Deng can be the 3rd best offensive player on a championship team. The 2 questions are...

1) Can we pay him like a 3rd option guy? Now how much that is, is debatable, but $12-14M seems like 2nd option territory. If not, you're stuck with a guy that isn't worth his contract in a CBA world that is much harder to trade bad contracts.

2) If we do sign him, how do we get our new 2nd option (optimistically saying that Rose will return to form)? Is it Mirotic or the draft? Both unknowns.
:clap:
kuly1990
Veteran
Posts: 2,610
And1: 466
Joined: Sep 19, 2010
 

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#694 » by kuly1990 » Tue Dec 3, 2013 7:48 pm

yeah, when he plays for his contract, his shoots go in, when he has safe contract for few years, he intentionally misses them...
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#695 » by DanTown8587 » Tue Dec 3, 2013 7:52 pm

Ice the knees wrote:Neither star line means anything. It's the in between that counts. He is what he is.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk


People will look a long time until they find a better fit or player at SF than Luol Deng.
...
Ice the knees
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 618
Joined: Sep 19, 2012

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#696 » by Ice the knees » Tue Dec 3, 2013 7:55 pm

DanTown8587 wrote:
Ice the knees wrote:Neither star line means anything. It's the in between that counts. He is what he is.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk


People will look a long time until they find a better fit or player at SF than Luol Deng.


Jimmy Butler is a sf
IvgenyIAS
Senior
Posts: 513
And1: 115
Joined: Nov 01, 2010

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#697 » by IvgenyIAS » Tue Dec 3, 2013 8:05 pm

Ice the knees wrote:
DanTown8587 wrote:
Ice the knees wrote:Neither star line means anything. It's the in between that counts. He is what he is.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk


People will look a long time until they find a better fit or player at SF than Luol Deng.


Jimmy Butler is a sf


Well, I don't know about fit but he's certainly isn't better than Deng at this point of his career.
Ice the knees
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 618
Joined: Sep 19, 2012

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#698 » by Ice the knees » Tue Dec 3, 2013 8:09 pm

IvgenyIAS wrote:
Ice the knees wrote:
DanTown8587 wrote:
People will look a long time until they find a better fit or player at SF than Luol Deng.


Jimmy Butler is a sf


Well, I don't know about fit but he's certainly isn't better than Deng at this point of his career.


I agree but he's cheap and has potential. I'm just saying. We have a sf on the roster that is starter quality to replace Deng
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#699 » by DanTown8587 » Tue Dec 3, 2013 8:10 pm

Ice the knees wrote:
DanTown8587 wrote:
Ice the knees wrote:Neither star line means anything. It's the in between that counts. He is what he is.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk


People will look a long time until they find a better fit or player at SF than Luol Deng.


Jimmy Butler is a sf


Jimmy Butler has scored 20+ 5 times EVER.

Luol Deng has scored 20+ in his last five games.

There's no debating who is better Deng or Butler. You can argue that Deng costing a lot more than Butler is huge, but Deng is the legit better player. Deng is giving you decent efficiency on high volume along with great defense.
...
kingkirk
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 80,406
And1: 23,765
Joined: Jan 24, 2004
 

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#700 » by kingkirk » Tue Dec 3, 2013 8:19 pm

Ice the knees wrote:I agree with you. But at the same time playing heavy minutes is a great deal of Deng's value. If Deng was a 32 minute a game player, he wouldn't be too valuable. He needs those minutes to produce.


Perhaps his numbers would be similar if he was more fresh rather than having periods where he plays 17-19 consecutive minutes in a game.

No other coach in the league does this to their best player.

Return to Chicago Bulls