DuckIII wrote:
Two points:
1. You really don't know what I'm talking about when I refer to those who want to merge Christian doctrines with the American legal system? That strikes me as disingenuous. Christian conservatives have pushed biblical justifications for a wide variety of laws regarding marriage (first mixed race, then same sex), social systems (Jim Crow south), abortion, religion in schools, and more. I think its pretty obvious. Some of these things are still planks in the GOP platform for crying out loud.
2. How is being Muslim an erosion of the foundation? That's kind of my point. The argument assumes that virtually all European Muslims want Sharia law to wholesale replace civil justice systems. Is there any data supporting the notion that a massive super-majority of European Muslims long for their nation's coversion into a theocratic state? That's what I'm asking. Because right now the argument I reacted to was basically "I'm Muslim, therefore I desperately want to live under Sharia law."
As an aside, the Nazis overhauled a secular legal system, with another secular legal system. Albeit a nightmarish one. Regardless, I never said it can't happen. I said that predicting it based merely on religious population statistics strikes me as completely meaningless and superficial. And I requested some deeper justification.
I had a whole big response typed up and lost it.... ah well.
I'll leave it at this.
1. Those folks aren't Christians. They're anything but. Anyone who leads with hate and whose motive is to either create division, inequality, or force someone to do/be different - are decidedly un-Christian.
2. I see very little redeeming qualities in the predominantly Islamic nations. It's not that the rank and file Muslim is bad - just their leaders. It doesn't take much for a minority to subjugate a majority if the majority do nothing. I'm pretty sure the average German citizen in 1940 wasn't all for the extermination of 6 million Jews. They did nothing to stop it though once the Nazis had consolidated power.
I see the same happening in Europe. I don't see how you can look at the past, say, 20 years of what has transpired in Europe, and say that the continent is a better place now, overall, than it was then. I'm not claiming that the huge influx of Muslims into Europe is solely to blame for the issues facing them. You can't exclude them as contributing factors either. Erosion of the foundation. I'm comfortable in stating that without the large influx of Muslims into Eruope, they wouldn't have the extent of the issues they have now. That's simply an opinion of mine without any way to prove (or disprove) it's validity.
You can state that the growth of the presence of Islam within a nation has little to no bearing on that nation ultimately becoming an Islamic state. That's your prerogative and opinion. I don't share your point of view. Over 2000 years of history tell me that as a nation becomes more predominantly Islamic, there is a greater likelihood of the suppression of human rights, the implementation of Sharia law and just a general distancing between the haves and the have nots.