Image ImageImage Image

Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,087
And1: 13,021
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#741 » by dice » Mon Jan 4, 2021 3:32 am

nomorezorro wrote:i think the clock management at the end of the second was to prevent the packers from getting the ball back before the half

i'm sure it was. but when you're more scared to give it back to your opponent at their own 10 yard line w/ a minute and a half left than you are eager to score yourself w/ the ball at midfield...
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
User avatar
Susan
RealGM
Posts: 21,518
And1: 7,899
Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Location: jackfinn & Scott May appreciation society
     

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#742 » by Susan » Mon Jan 4, 2021 3:51 am

nomorezorro wrote:they succeeded over the past three seasons largely on the strength of their defense, a unit that is no longer impressive. they were buoyed this season by incredible luck and a soft schedule (they beat one team with a winning record! they only made the playoffs because the playoffs got expanded by a slot and the nfc was unusually weak!)

pace doesn't have to be terrible at everything to merit replacing. he's been bad at some big things, one of which is finding a qb. the bears still need to find a qb. i don't know why you would trust ryan pace to get that done


Who built that defense?

You trust Pace because it's an extremely difficult task and despite Trubisky's mediocrity, the Bears have been able to make the playoffs 2/3 years and they're not tied to him long-term. There's going to be a TON of options this offseason, both with rookie QBs (most of of them are going to be busts) and older established QBs will be on the market (Stafford, Ryan, Jimmy G).

Name me a GM that's been *good* at finding a QB. You can't, because it's a freaking mess. You have to manage that mess (unless you get lucky and land one) and find a way to make the playoffs.
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,229
And1: 10,326
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#743 » by nomorezorro » Mon Jan 4, 2021 4:36 am

1. pace built that defense. then he failed to sustain it to the level necessary to carry the crappy offense he built!

2. they wouldn't have made the playoffs if it wasn't arbitrarily expanded this year!!!

3. i think a gm whose major qb acquisitions have been signing mike glennon, trading up to #2 for trubisky and trading for nick foles should not be trusted to make another big qb decision, especially when that gm has been an all-around failure in identifying good offensive talent. why would you not aspire for more?
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
User avatar
Kurt Heimlich
Head Coach
Posts: 6,932
And1: 5,564
Joined: Jun 26, 2001

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#744 » by Kurt Heimlich » Mon Jan 4, 2021 4:39 am

Susan wrote:
nomorezorro wrote:they succeeded over the past three seasons largely on the strength of their defense, a unit that is no longer impressive. they were buoyed this season by incredible luck and a soft schedule (they beat one team with a winning record! they only made the playoffs because the playoffs got expanded by a slot and the nfc was unusually weak!)

pace doesn't have to be terrible at everything to merit replacing. he's been bad at some big things, one of which is finding a qb. the bears still need to find a qb. i don't know why you would trust ryan pace to get that done


Who built that defense?

You trust Pace because it's an extremely difficult task and despite Trubisky's mediocrity, the Bears have been able to make the playoffs 2/3 years and they're not tied to him long-term. There's going to be a TON of options this offseason, both with rookie QBs (most of of them are going to be busts) and older established QBs will be on the market (Stafford, Ryan, Jimmy G).

Name me a GM that's been *good* at finding a QB. You can't, because it's a freaking mess. You have to manage that mess (unless you get lucky and land one) and find a way to make the playoffs.


Andy Reid and Bill freaking Obrien both traded up to get "their" QB in 2017 just like Pace did. It depends on how you want to frame it I suppose. But Pace absolutely botched his moment. And he needs to be held accountable. (let alone discussing the Kevin White, Leonard Floyd Adam Shaheen type brutal picks in his debacle tenure as GM).
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,229
And1: 10,326
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#745 » by nomorezorro » Mon Jan 4, 2021 4:40 am

also i don't know why the john fox years shouldn't be factored into the evaluation of pace? even if pace didn't have full decision making on the coaching hire, the team still stunk
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,229
And1: 10,326
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#746 » by nomorezorro » Mon Jan 4, 2021 4:44 am

i guess if i thought "it's literally impossible to be good at evaluating QBs" i would be more agnostic about whether or not pace should return
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,045
And1: 37,356
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#747 » by fleet » Mon Jan 4, 2021 5:09 am

The way it ends up imo is that there's a good chance that backing into the playoffs was enough for Pace to keep his job by McCaskey standards. They never wanted to let him go until the city shouting in unison made it almost a mandate after the losing streak. They were looking for this excuse. And the old lady likes him, so that's about it. And don't tell me she won't have a say. She won't have to have official input.
Jeffster81
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,344
And1: 1,966
Joined: May 24, 2007
Location: Bazinga
       

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#748 » by Jeffster81 » Mon Jan 4, 2021 5:17 am

fleet wrote:The way it ends up imo is that there's a good chance that backing into the playoffs was enough for Pace to keep his job by McCaskey standards. They never wanted to let him go until the city shouting in unison made it almost a mandate after the losing streak. They were looking for this excuse. And the old lady likes him, so that's about it. And don't tell me she won't have a say. She won't have to have official input.


And the Bears will continue to ride the train of mediocrity and constantly being swept by the Packers. IDK how much more 30 point losses I can take before I complete check out on the Bulls (though I do enjoy the win tonight) but the Bears, barring an exciting playoff run, and I'm probably going to check out on the Bears season next year. Too much BS from the Bears to keep me interested.
User avatar
Kurt Heimlich
Head Coach
Posts: 6,932
And1: 5,564
Joined: Jun 26, 2001

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#749 » by Kurt Heimlich » Mon Jan 4, 2021 5:56 am

Epic tank by Doug Pederson and the Eagles tonight. Can sympathize with Giants fans anger. Its amazing watching an old professional human like Pederson think he can bold face lie his way into convincing people that this wasn't a blatant tank job. A fitting end for such an absolute dumpster fire of a division I suppose.
User avatar
Susan
RealGM
Posts: 21,518
And1: 7,899
Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Location: jackfinn & Scott May appreciation society
     

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#750 » by Susan » Mon Jan 4, 2021 1:26 pm

nomorezorro wrote:also i don't know why the john fox years shouldn't be factored into the evaluation of pace? even if pace didn't have full decision making on the coaching hire, the team still stunk


Do you remember the cap situation, how devoid of young talent that team was, how bad the team culture was and how old the team was when Pace took over?

The Emery era was pretty bad (outside of drafting Alshon, Fuller and Long) and the Cutler contract was freshly signed. Forte was 30, Marshall wore out his welcome, Bennett wore out his welcome and the defense was the worst in the NFL.

It's like Philly right now, that rebuild is going to take a minute and it's going to be pretty painful because they're 75M over the cap and Wentz is a dumpster fire in Philly now. https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/2021/
User avatar
Susan
RealGM
Posts: 21,518
And1: 7,899
Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Location: jackfinn & Scott May appreciation society
     

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#751 » by Susan » Mon Jan 4, 2021 1:55 pm

Kurt Heimlich wrote:
Susan wrote:
nomorezorro wrote:they succeeded over the past three seasons largely on the strength of their defense, a unit that is no longer impressive. they were buoyed this season by incredible luck and a soft schedule (they beat one team with a winning record! they only made the playoffs because the playoffs got expanded by a slot and the nfc was unusually weak!)

pace doesn't have to be terrible at everything to merit replacing. he's been bad at some big things, one of which is finding a qb. the bears still need to find a qb. i don't know why you would trust ryan pace to get that done


Who built that defense?

You trust Pace because it's an extremely difficult task and despite Trubisky's mediocrity, the Bears have been able to make the playoffs 2/3 years and they're not tied to him long-term. There's going to be a TON of options this offseason, both with rookie QBs (most of of them are going to be busts) and older established QBs will be on the market (Stafford, Ryan, Jimmy G).

Name me a GM that's been *good* at finding a QB. You can't, because it's a freaking mess. You have to manage that mess (unless you get lucky and land one) and find a way to make the playoffs.


Andy Reid and Bill freaking Obrien both traded up to get "their" QB in 2017 just like Pace did. It depends on how you want to frame it I suppose. But Pace absolutely botched his moment. And he needs to be held accountable. (let alone discussing the Kevin White, Leonard Floyd Adam Shaheen type brutal picks in his debacle tenure as GM).


If Mahomes and Watson were so obvious, they would have been drafted by either the NIners (who needed a QB at the time), the Jets (who had Bryce Petty/Josh McKown), the Bengals (who had an aging Andy Dalton and drafted John Ross instead). If Rodgers were so obvious, he wouldn't have been picked in the 20s with Alex Smith picked 1st overall.

It's not just the QB - it's the situation that you're bringing them up in.

Greg Roman knows how to scheme for a running QB and they've got the horses to run a run heavy offense along with a certifiable deep threat in Hollywod Brown + Mark Andrews. Without all that, Lamar would struggle.
Mahomes has a great offensive mind along bringing him along with some freakish weapons in Hill + Kelce.
Watson had the best WR in football to start.
Darnold had zero weapons and a moron head coach and now he's about to be thrown to the trash heap.
Rosen and Haskins got let go how quickly again?
Goff and Wentz have MASSIVE contracts and are not in that superstar tier, they're going to be anchors bringing their franchises down for a minute.
Mariota and Winston are perfect examples why it's OK to miss on an early QB, you just don't let yourself fall in love with those flawed players and do the painful thing and let them walk. Now those franchises are in the playoffs with vet QBs and the QBs who got drafted are backups.
CBS7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,572
And1: 4,202
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: Dallas

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#752 » by CBS7 » Mon Jan 4, 2021 2:05 pm

Retain everyone (but still maybe draft a QB) if we win a playoff game.
Don't retain anyone if we don't.
achimho
Junior
Posts: 284
And1: 344
Joined: Apr 14, 2012
   

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#753 » by achimho » Mon Jan 4, 2021 2:27 pm

I liked Pace overall, I think he did a lot of good things. He does not take many risks though and I think that's because he wants to be safe more than he wants to win it all.
That's why he ends up signing one or two guys per year to bad contracts, like Sims, Burton, Skrine, Graham (lots of TEs...), Cohen
Or he trades for Nick Foles.
Until a year ago I was pretty happy with the way he build the Bears, it was just unfortunate his two biggest mistakes were the two most important positions on the team: QB and Coach.

Last offseasons moves made me think he's trying to Jeff Fisher his way into a 7-9 season and keep the job though and he lost me there...
To be fair I think some of those signings, trades and drafts are because Pace knows his seat is very warm right now.
CBS7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,572
And1: 4,202
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: Dallas

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#754 » by CBS7 » Mon Jan 4, 2021 2:30 pm

Are Jaylen and Skrine on track to be back next week?
User avatar
molepharmer
Head Coach
Posts: 6,791
And1: 1,278
Joined: Feb 27, 2002

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#755 » by molepharmer » Mon Jan 4, 2021 2:52 pm

CBS7 wrote:Are Jaylen and Skrine on track to be back next week?

I don't know. But there's also Massie, Roquan and Mooney which are unknowns. Kmet looked like he took a pretty good hit to his right arm/shoulder area.

Looks like Bears / Saints game is on Sunday. So Kamara can play assuming he gets through the week asymptomatic.

Have some really good early games Sat and Sun; noon starts for Colts/Buffalo and Tenn/Ravens.
TGibson (1/28/17); "..."a 4 or 5 on a scale of 1 to 10 for drama"...What's the worst? "...yelling matches with Thibs, everybody is just going crazy and I'm just sitting there...like, 'Don't call my name please..."
ATRAIN53
Head Coach
Posts: 7,461
And1: 2,562
Joined: Dec 14, 2007
Location: Chicago

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#756 » by ATRAIN53 » Mon Jan 4, 2021 5:23 pm

It's such a joke we actually made the playoffs that they put our playoff game on Nickelodeon!

Read on Twitter



This should be the best weekend of NFL playoff football ever - but playoff football without fans is LAME
Fans are what make NFL playoff football the best sport.

I'm glad they finished the season but I'm having a hard time getting psyched to see empty stadiums this weekend for what should be the ultimate few weekend of being an NFL fan.

I just hope we trade for Darnold or some other project and dump Trubisky.
User avatar
chicagoballer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,698
And1: 210
Joined: Nov 22, 2004

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#757 » by chicagoballer » Tue Jan 5, 2021 5:14 am

Hypothetically, let’s say trubisky gets injured in the second half, in a close game. Foles comes in and carries us to victory.

Dare I say we could be in for some foles magic? :lol:
bullsnewdynasty
RealGM
Posts: 23,666
And1: 2,552
Joined: Sep 11, 2009

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#758 » by bullsnewdynasty » Tue Jan 5, 2021 5:38 am

Susan wrote:If Mahomes and Watson were so obvious, they would have been drafted by either the NIners (who needed a QB at the time), the Jets (who had Bryce Petty/Josh McKown), the Bengals (who had an aging Andy Dalton and drafted John Ross instead). If Rodgers were so obvious, he wouldn't have been picked in the 20s with Alex Smith picked 1st overall.

It's not just the QB - it's the situation that you're bringing them up in.

Greg Roman knows how to scheme for a running QB and they've got the horses to run a run heavy offense along with a certifiable deep threat in Hollywod Brown + Mark Andrews. Without all that, Lamar would struggle.
Mahomes has a great offensive mind along bringing him along with some freakish weapons in Hill + Kelce.
Watson had the best WR in football to start.
Darnold had zero weapons and a moron head coach and now he's about to be thrown to the trash heap.
Rosen and Haskins got let go how quickly again?
Goff and Wentz have MASSIVE contracts and are not in that superstar tier, they're going to be anchors bringing their franchises down for a minute.
Mariota and Winston are perfect examples why it's OK to miss on an early QB, you just don't let yourself fall in love with those flawed players and do the painful thing and let them walk. Now those franchises are in the playoffs with vet QBs and the QBs who got drafted are backups.


Trubisky has plenty of weapons, far more than most of the QBs on your list including Watson who led the league in passing.

Turning the ball over and making poor decisions also has very little to do with the weapons you have. Hence why Haskins is out of the NFL and Darnold will be a backup very soon.
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,045
And1: 37,356
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#759 » by fleet » Tue Jan 5, 2021 7:07 am

Brad Biggs on Bears/Pace:

Rumors have circulated in the last week that the Bears could target Kansas City Chiefs director of football operations Mike Borgonzi. This is speculation, but I heard this from two unrelated sources in the last few days, and with the Chiefs earning the No. 1 seed in the AFC playoffs, Borgonzi wouldn’t be available to be hired away until the season is complete for the defending Super Bowl champions.

Does that mean it’s Borgonzi or no one else? Absolutely not. But that’s a name that was churning in the rumor mill the past few days, and a quick hiring cycle this week by teams already looking for new a GM would not remove him from play. Obviously, there are many other people in consideration for GM jobs who are attached to playoff teams, but Borgonzi is the name I heard, and if the Bears would consider hiring a new GM to work with their current coach, he’s someone who could come in and have a preestablished relationship with Nagy.


https://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/bears/ct-cb-chicago-bears-10-thoughts-brad-biggs-week-17-20210104-bjrn7bu3gnc37oftexoli43pf4-story.html
User avatar
Susan
RealGM
Posts: 21,518
And1: 7,899
Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Location: jackfinn & Scott May appreciation society
     

Re: Bears 2019/20; George McCaskey is on the clock 

Post#760 » by Susan » Tue Jan 5, 2021 2:23 pm

bullsnewdynasty wrote:
Susan wrote:If Mahomes and Watson were so obvious, they would have been drafted by either the NIners (who needed a QB at the time), the Jets (who had Bryce Petty/Josh McKown), the Bengals (who had an aging Andy Dalton and drafted John Ross instead). If Rodgers were so obvious, he wouldn't have been picked in the 20s with Alex Smith picked 1st overall.

It's not just the QB - it's the situation that you're bringing them up in.

Greg Roman knows how to scheme for a running QB and they've got the horses to run a run heavy offense along with a certifiable deep threat in Hollywod Brown + Mark Andrews. Without all that, Lamar would struggle.
Mahomes has a great offensive mind along bringing him along with some freakish weapons in Hill + Kelce.
Watson had the best WR in football to start.
Darnold had zero weapons and a moron head coach and now he's about to be thrown to the trash heap.
Rosen and Haskins got let go how quickly again?
Goff and Wentz have MASSIVE contracts and are not in that superstar tier, they're going to be anchors bringing their franchises down for a minute.
Mariota and Winston are perfect examples why it's OK to miss on an early QB, you just don't let yourself fall in love with those flawed players and do the painful thing and let them walk. Now those franchises are in the playoffs with vet QBs and the QBs who got drafted are backups.


Trubisky has plenty of weapons, far more than most of the QBs on your list including Watson who led the league in passing.

Turning the ball over and making poor decisions also has very little to do with the weapons you have. Hence why Haskins is out of the NFL and Darnold will be a backup very soon.


And Mitch ultimately didn't have what it takes to become a franchise QB but Mitch doesn't really turn the ball over that much.

But not really sure what your point is. My post was about how much of a crapshoot it is to find a QB and then after that how difficult it is to build a successful franchise. Houston got one and they're about to Detroit Lions poor Watson. To me, the best path is build a successful franchise (make the playoffs fairly often, draft young weapons, have a good defense, don't fire your coach every three years) and keep trying at the QB spot.

Return to Chicago Bulls