Image ImageImage Image

Bears 2023 thread V

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,255
And1: 37,473
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#761 » by fleet » Thu Nov 23, 2023 7:31 pm

Chi town wrote:
IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:I understand losing patience with Justin, i really do. I mean as a Bulls fan I’m done with Pat.

But some of our comments are going to look very foolish if we end up with something worse than Fields especially if Fields goes elsewhere and gets his weaknesses fixed and all talents unlocked.


Play to win. Can’t try to lead from fear.

Pick the best QB and move fwd. if that Fields than do it.

I always said Poles should evaluate Stroud, Young, Richardson, Fields and Levis, and choose one. He may have done just that. Would he make another ranked choice in ‘24? He has an incredibly unlikely chance to try again
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,808
And1: 9,267
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#762 » by Chi town » Thu Nov 23, 2023 7:32 pm

Almost Retired wrote:
IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:I understand losing patience with Justin, i really do. I mean as a Bulls fan I’m done with Pat.

But some of our comments are going to look very foolish if we end up with something worse than Fields especially if Fields goes elsewhere and gets his weaknesses fixed and all talents unlocked.


Poles is between a rock and a hard place. If he continues on with Fields and he never corrects his weaknesses...he'll get criticized. If trades him and he fulfills his potential elsewhere he'll be crucified. We are unlikely to pick this high again. And if we do then Poles will be gone by then.

There are so many directions we could go. If we take Harrison #1 then Arizona might trade down from #2. Then the 2nd and 3rd picks might take Caleb and Maye off the Board. Then we would probably trade down from #4. Pick up more draft capital and still be in a position to get Nix or McCarthy, a LT, or an elite Edge.

Or we could grab one of the top rated QBs with the #1 pick and trade down from our pick and get a very good receiver like Nabors or Odunze (my preference) plus additional picks. This is probably the safest route to take.

But putting the horse before the cart Poles has got to address the coaching situation first and foremost. I hope Harbaugh makes the jump. Then let him and Poles figure out the QB situation and the Draft. Harbaugh knows what he needs to win. He's done it before. Several times.


If Fields stays healthy we will have enough tape from him. I do believe Getsy is holding him back too. Fields isn’t good at the short fast passing game and he SUCKS at anticipating receivers open. IMO you have to move on from him due to those. His contract makes it even easier. Also don’t think his running will keep him on the field.

Harbaugh would move on from Fields asap IMO. He knows it’s a passing league.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,808
And1: 9,267
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#763 » by Chi town » Thu Nov 23, 2023 7:34 pm

fleet wrote:
Chi town wrote:
IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:I understand losing patience with Justin, i really do. I mean as a Bulls fan I’m done with Pat.

But some of our comments are going to look very foolish if we end up with something worse than Fields especially if Fields goes elsewhere and gets his weaknesses fixed and all talents unlocked.


Play to win. Can’t try to lead from fear.

Pick the best QB and move fwd. if that Fields than do it.

I always said Poles should evaluate Stroud, Young, Richardson, Fields and Levis, and choose one. He may have done just that. Would he make another ranked choice in ‘24? He has an incredibly unlikely chance to try again


He said he did. “Evaluated all QBs etc.”
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,255
And1: 37,473
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#764 » by fleet » Thu Nov 23, 2023 7:44 pm

Chi town wrote:
fleet wrote:
Chi town wrote:
Play to win. Can’t try to lead from fear.

Pick the best QB and move fwd. if that Fields than do it.

I always said Poles should evaluate Stroud, Young, Richardson, Fields and Levis, and choose one. He may have done just that. Would he make another ranked choice in ‘24? He has an incredibly unlikely chance to try again


He said he did. “Evaluated all QBs etc.”

If I had to guess it was:

Fields
Stroud
Richardson
Levis

Based on how Poles has made his aquisitions, I do not believe Young was even on the Bears board. Everything is always big athletes.
IliketheBullsNBearstoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,510
And1: 1,397
Joined: Sep 27, 2001
Location: Socal
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#765 » by IliketheBullsNBearstoo » Thu Nov 23, 2023 7:51 pm

Chi town wrote:
fleet wrote:
Chi town wrote:
Play to win. Can’t try to lead from fear.

Pick the best QB and move fwd. if that Fields than do it.

I always said Poles should evaluate Stroud, Young, Richardson, Fields and Levis, and choose one. He may have done just that. Would he make another ranked choice in ‘24? He has an incredibly unlikely chance to try again


He said he did. “Evaluated all QBs etc.”



His short passing game has improved a lot. His accuracy has been much better on the underneaths and the crossing routes. Same with his other weaknesses. We just need him to be consistent with it then we’ll trust him as fans.

Getsy is hard to figure out though. I mean I hate saying it but his offense reminds me of what Nagy was doing although he does at least run the ball out of the I a few times. And then its either he runs no rb screens or too many in a row. Defenses, just like with Nagy, usually know whats coming. And that might be Getsy being cocky and just trusting the design of the play more than he should. Not easy on any level of the offense when defenses know what you’re doing.
User avatar
CjayC
RealGM
Posts: 11,550
And1: 1,175
Joined: Mar 02, 2005
Location: Hoiball
   

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#766 » by CjayC » Thu Nov 23, 2023 8:08 pm

IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:
fleet wrote:Jordan Love is still looking good. The Packers may have a quarterback :banghead: Or the Detroit defense is more suspect than thought

Detroit continues to be a turnover walking



Jordan Love plays well vs Lions, they may have a qb. :banghead:

Justin Fields plays well vs Lions, trade value goes up. :nod:


One guy has started 32 games, the other 11 games. The leeway both are given shouldn't be the same. People aren't wrong to be frustrated with Justin's inconsistent play or being tired of JT on QB School repeating some of the same negatives he had of Justin back in Year 2, in week 10 of year 3.
IliketheBullsNBearstoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,510
And1: 1,397
Joined: Sep 27, 2001
Location: Socal
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#767 » by IliketheBullsNBearstoo » Thu Nov 23, 2023 8:15 pm

CjayC wrote:
IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:
fleet wrote:Jordan Love is still looking good. The Packers may have a quarterback :banghead: Or the Detroit defense is more suspect than thought

Detroit continues to be a turnover walking



Jordan Love plays well vs Lions, they may have a qb. :banghead:

Justin Fields plays well vs Lions, trade value goes up. :nod:


One guy has started 32 games, the other 11 games. The leeway both are given shouldn't be the same. People aren't wrong to be frustrated with Justin's inconsistent play or being tired of JT on QB School repeating some of the same negatives he had of Justin back in Year 2, in week 10 of year 3.


Not every player develops the same. Maybe it would have been better for Justin to sit and learn behind AR, who knows. I only care about what I see right now and if it took him a different route to get there doesn’t matter to me.

My very next post I said I understand losing patience with him. If he continues to play well I’ll be watching. If not then lets move on. And I could care less about what JT says. I form my own opinions.
User avatar
Michael Jackson
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 29,808
And1: 11,825
Joined: Jun 15, 2001

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#768 » by Michael Jackson » Thu Nov 23, 2023 9:37 pm

fleet wrote:
Chi town wrote:
fleet wrote:I always said Poles should evaluate Stroud, Young, Richardson, Fields and Levis, and choose one. He may have done just that. Would he make another ranked choice in ‘24? He has an incredibly unlikely chance to try again


He said he did. “Evaluated all QBs etc.”

If I had to guess it was:

Fields
Stroud
Richardson
Levis

Based on how Poles has made his aquisitions, I do not believe Young was even on the Bears board. Everything is always big athletes.



I agree with that. Makes me feel like Caleb is less likely IMHO. I bet in Poles mind Maye ranks higher but then again who knows. MHJ is an obvious no brainer kinda like Del Curry having a steph but that isn't even fair as MH was better than... Better than Jellybean Bryant compared to Kobe... Maybe the Griffey's are the best comparison in baseball or the Archie and Peyton? Once again that feels like the Curry thing. Anyway a healthy MHJ feels really no brainer as a choice and might not end up having the gravity as a QB does. Still with any of the top 4 this year and MHJ or hell even Field's the offense will look better. Just playing with Moore will make his transition easier and make an QB's job easier.
HearshotKDS
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,971
And1: 1,103
Joined: Apr 17, 2010
 

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#769 » by HearshotKDS » Fri Nov 24, 2023 2:17 am

Almost Retired wrote:But putting the horse before the cart Poles has got to address the coaching situation first and foremost. I hope Harbaugh makes the jump. Then let him and Poles figure out the QB situation and the Draft. Harbaugh knows what he needs to win. He's done it before. Several times.


While everyone has an opinion on what the Bears should do - ultimately this is the correct move. Pick your coaching staff and let them tell you the best QB for the system they will implement, dont make a decision on QB until you have cemented the coach. Doing the process assbackward (Letting the last GM pick a QB, and then figuring out which coaches ownership wanted, and then hiring a GM and forcing a short list of coaches on him) is how they got into this mess.
Hold That
RealGM
Posts: 12,526
And1: 851
Joined: Dec 07, 2001
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#770 » by Hold That » Fri Nov 24, 2023 3:21 pm

Michael Jackson wrote:
fleet wrote:
Chi town wrote:
He said he did. “Evaluated all QBs etc.”

If I had to guess it was:

Fields
Stroud
Richardson
Levis

Based on how Poles has made his aquisitions, I do not believe Young was even on the Bears board. Everything is always big athletes.



I agree with that. Makes me feel like Caleb is less likely IMHO. I bet in Poles mind Maye ranks higher but then again who knows. MHJ is an obvious no brainer kinda like Del Curry having a steph but that isn't even fair as MH was better than... Better than Jellybean Bryant compared to Kobe... Maybe the Griffey's are the best comparison in baseball or the Archie and Peyton? Once again that feels like the Curry thing. Anyway a healthy MHJ feels really no brainer as a choice and might not end up having the gravity as a QB does. Still with any of the top 4 this year and MHJ or hell even Field's the offense will look better. Just playing with Moore will make his transition easier and make an QB's job easier.



I agree about Marvin Harrison. I feel the Bears need to tell themselves that they walk out of that draft with MHJ at all cost. Whether they take a QB or not, MHJ is pivotal for Fields or any QB they take in the draft.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,808
And1: 9,267
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#771 » by Chi town » Fri Nov 24, 2023 4:06 pm

Hold That wrote:
Michael Jackson wrote:
fleet wrote:If I had to guess it was:

Fields
Stroud
Richardson
Levis

Based on how Poles has made his aquisitions, I do not believe Young was even on the Bears board. Everything is always big athletes.



I agree with that. Makes me feel like Caleb is less likely IMHO. I bet in Poles mind Maye ranks higher but then again who knows. MHJ is an obvious no brainer kinda like Del Curry having a steph but that isn't even fair as MH was better than... Better than Jellybean Bryant compared to Kobe... Maybe the Griffey's are the best comparison in baseball or the Archie and Peyton? Once again that feels like the Curry thing. Anyway a healthy MHJ feels really no brainer as a choice and might not end up having the gravity as a QB does. Still with any of the top 4 this year and MHJ or hell even Field's the offense will look better. Just playing with Moore will make his transition easier and make an QB's job easier.



I agree about Marvin Harrison. I feel the Bears need to tell themselves that they walk out of that draft with MHJ at all cost. Whether they take a QB or not, MHJ is pivotal for Fields or any QB they take in the draft.


MHJ or Bowers can def help as elite difference makers. The issue is having a QB and scheme to maximize them.

I’m out on JF1 because I don’t think he will ever anticipate which greatly reduces his ceiling and his running will keep him out injured a lot.

MHJ is out for the reason we will select a new QB with that first pick and no GM is going to take a QB later on and risk them not being there.

I think the best we can do from this draft is CW and Bowers. If Bowers is gone you take Latu at DE or trade back and get Udunze or Keon Coleman. Both elite as well. Sell Fields for a 2nd rounder and get Van Pran.
biggestbullsfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,791
And1: 2,299
Joined: Apr 28, 2004
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#772 » by biggestbullsfan » Fri Nov 24, 2023 5:08 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
ThisGuyFawkes
Analyst
Posts: 3,694
And1: 1,995
Joined: Jan 30, 2008
Location: Where the sugar cane grows taller than the God we once believed in
   

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#773 » by ThisGuyFawkes » Fri Nov 24, 2023 5:17 pm

biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


Do we still have waiver priority? He's gotta be like 28 or 29 years old if he was drafted in 2017 so I'm not sure if he'd fit in Poles long-term plan. And if he isn't in the long-term plan, it really doesn't make sense to bring him in for this year when we're not competing.
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,255
And1: 37,473
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#774 » by fleet » Fri Nov 24, 2023 7:09 pm

IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:
fleet wrote:Jordan Love is still looking good. The Packers may have a quarterback :banghead: Or the Detroit defense is more suspect than thought

Detroit continues to be a turnover walking



Jordan Love plays well vs Lions, they may have a qb. :banghead:

Justin Fields plays well vs Lions, trade value goes up. :nod:

after you bring it up, it becomes an opportunity for back to back comparison of how 2 different quarterbacks performed against the same defense on the road.

Love 22/32, 268 yards, 8.4 avg, 3 TD - 0 INT, 90.6 QBR. 125.4 RTG
Fields 16/23, 168 yards, 7.3 avg, 1 TD - 0 INT, 72.1 QBR, 106.2 RTG

If Love's trade value is important to think about in relation to the Fields trade discusion, that might be happening if the Packers had a top 3 pick.
IliketheBullsNBearstoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,510
And1: 1,397
Joined: Sep 27, 2001
Location: Socal
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#775 » by IliketheBullsNBearstoo » Fri Nov 24, 2023 8:20 pm

fleet wrote:
IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:
fleet wrote:Jordan Love is still looking good. The Packers may have a quarterback :banghead: Or the Detroit defense is more suspect than thought

Detroit continues to be a turnover walking



Jordan Love plays well vs Lions, they may have a qb. :banghead:

Justin Fields plays well vs Lions, trade value goes up. :nod:

after you bring it up, it becomes an opportunity for back to back comparison of how 2 different quarterbacks performed against the same defense on the road.

Love 22/32, 268 yards, 8.4 avg, 3 TD - 0 INT, 90.6 QBR. 125.4 RTG
Fields 16/23, 168 yards, 7.3 avg, 1 TD - 0 INT, 72.1 QBR, 106.2 RTG

If Love's trade value is important to think about in relation to the Fields trade discusion, that might be happening if the Packers had a top 3 pick.


Its not, that was not my point at all. Anyways I get it, you’re done with Fields and there’s nothing that he can do that will change your mind. I wasn’t making an argument I was just pointing out how silly us Bears fans are. :D
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,255
And1: 37,473
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#776 » by fleet » Fri Nov 24, 2023 8:29 pm

IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:
fleet wrote:
IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:

Jordan Love plays well vs Lions, they may have a qb. :banghead:

Justin Fields plays well vs Lions, trade value goes up. :nod:

after you bring it up, it becomes an opportunity for back to back comparison of how 2 different quarterbacks performed against the same defense on the road.

Love 22/32, 268 yards, 8.4 avg, 3 TD - 0 INT, 90.6 QBR. 125.4 RTG
Fields 16/23, 168 yards, 7.3 avg, 1 TD - 0 INT, 72.1 QBR, 106.2 RTG

If Love's trade value is important to think about in relation to the Fields trade discusion, that might be happening if the Packers had a top 3 pick.


Its not, that was not my point at all. Anyways I get it, you’re done with Fields and there’s nothing that he can do that will change your mind. I wasn’t making an argument I was just pointing out how silly us Bears fans are. :D

We're not silly, and there are plenty of NFL people in on the discussion

- the Bears have a top pick in a strong quarterback draft, while their own QB has been is inconsistent at best through 3 seasons.

- I will hold out hope that Fields will finally get it with his arm and eyes. I am out on his legs making him an attractive quarterback. Justin Fields ran 18 times against the Lions. That is completely unsustainable. Fields will be lucky to last to age 29 like Cam Newton by the time his body is shot.
panthermark
RealGM
Posts: 21,727
And1: 4,017
Joined: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
         

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#777 » by panthermark » Fri Nov 24, 2023 8:40 pm

If we want to point out Love, let us point out things around him.

2019 (Love was still in college) GM-Gutekunst, QB-Rodgers, HC-LaFleur, OC-Hackett, and another Offensive assistant was Stenavich
2020 (Love was drafted) QB-Rodgers, HC-LaFleur, OC-Hackett, and Stenavich
2021 - GM-Gutekunst, QB-Rodgers, HC-LaFleur, OC-Hackett, and another Offensive assistant was Stenavich
2022 - GM-Gutekunst, QB-Rodgers, HC-LaFleur, OC Stenavich
2023 - GM-Gutekunst, QB-Love, HC-LaFleur, OC Stenavich

Notice a trend?

The same GM and HC were already in place even before Love was drafted. Love has only known one GM and one HC, and has been in the NFL a year longer than Fields.
Two OC's in that entire time, with current OC (Stenavich) learning from the prior OC, and both of them were in GB prior to Love being drafted.....thus the same system.
Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....
IliketheBullsNBearstoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,510
And1: 1,397
Joined: Sep 27, 2001
Location: Socal
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#778 » by IliketheBullsNBearstoo » Fri Nov 24, 2023 8:43 pm

fleet wrote:
IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:
fleet wrote:after you bring it up, it becomes an opportunity for back to back comparison of how 2 different quarterbacks performed against the same defense on the road.

Love 22/32, 268 yards, 8.4 avg, 3 TD - 0 INT, 90.6 QBR. 125.4 RTG
Fields 16/23, 168 yards, 7.3 avg, 1 TD - 0 INT, 72.1 QBR, 106.2 RTG

If Love's trade value is important to think about in relation to the Fields trade discusion, that might be happening if the Packers had a top 3 pick.


Its not, that was not my point at all. Anyways I get it, you’re done with Fields and there’s nothing that he can do that will change your mind. I wasn’t making an argument I was just pointing out how silly us Bears fans are. :D

We're not silly, and there are plenty of NFL people in on the discussion

- the Bears have a top pick in a strong quarterback draft, while their own QB has been is inconsistent at best through 3 seasons.

- I will hold out hope that Fields will finally get it with his arm and eyes. I am out on his legs making him an attractive quarterback. Justin Fields ran 18 times against the Lions. That is completely unsustainable. Fields will be lucky to last to age 29 like Cam Newton by the time his body is shot.


Fields can throw he just needs to show more consistency with his timing. Hes not just a run first qb. Im not sold on him either but if he keeps playing well its hard for me to just ignore it and just mentally move on and start window shopping for something else.

If you just put this in perspective of the simplified version of what could happen. The Bears finally “develop” a qb and they decided to move onto another unknown. I mean that would be us. I dunno, seems silly to me.
IliketheBullsNBearstoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,510
And1: 1,397
Joined: Sep 27, 2001
Location: Socal
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#779 » by IliketheBullsNBearstoo » Fri Nov 24, 2023 8:44 pm

panthermark wrote:If we want to point out Love, let us point out things around him.

2019 (Love was still in college) GM-Gutekunst, QB-Rodgers, HC-LaFleur, OC-Hackett, and another Offensive assistant was Stenavich
2020 (Love was drafted) QB-Rodgers, HC-LaFleur, OC-Hackett, and Stenavich
2021 - GM-Gutekunst, QB-Rodgers, HC-LaFleur, OC-Hackett, and another Offensive assistant was Stenavich
2022 - GM-Gutekunst, QB-Rodgers, HC-LaFleur, OC Stenavich
2023 - GM-Gutekunst, QB-Love, HC-LaFleur, OC Stenavich

Notice a trend?

The same GM and HC were already in place even before Love was drafted. Love has only known one GM and one HC, and has been in the NFL a year longer than Fields.
Two OC's in that entire time, with current OC (Stenavich) learning from the prior OC, and both of them were in GB prior to Love being drafted.....thus the same system.


Thats a good point. Fields might have flourished in that situation.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,808
And1: 9,267
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#780 » by Chi town » Fri Nov 24, 2023 8:45 pm

fleet wrote:
IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:
fleet wrote:after you bring it up, it becomes an opportunity for back to back comparison of how 2 different quarterbacks performed against the same defense on the road.

Love 22/32, 268 yards, 8.4 avg, 3 TD - 0 INT, 90.6 QBR. 125.4 RTG
Fields 16/23, 168 yards, 7.3 avg, 1 TD - 0 INT, 72.1 QBR, 106.2 RTG

If Love's trade value is important to think about in relation to the Fields trade discusion, that might be happening if the Packers had a top 3 pick.


Its not, that was not my point at all. Anyways I get it, you’re done with Fields and there’s nothing that he can do that will change your mind. I wasn’t making an argument I was just pointing out how silly us Bears fans are. :D

We're not silly, and there are plenty of NFL people in on the discussion

- the Bears have a top pick in a strong quarterback draft, while their own QB has been is inconsistent at best through 3 seasons.

- I will hold out hope that Fields will finally get it with his arm and eyes. I am out on his legs making him an attractive quarterback. Justin Fields ran 18 times against the Lions. That is completely unsustainable. Fields will be lucky to last to age 29 like Cam Newton by the time his body is shot.


Exactly. He should have 5 designed runs a game. A couple runs from a broken pocket.

Return to Chicago Bulls