Image ImageImage Image

LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2

Moderators: HomoSapien, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, RedBulls23

User avatar
LoveDaBoo
RealGM
Posts: 17,096
And1: 1,984
Joined: Jun 12, 2009
     

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#941 » by LoveDaBoo » Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:57 am

weneeda2guard wrote:there is only 1 thing i care about in the boozer vs aldridge debate

who better helps us get past miami

all those other numbers are useless. for the record though, there is not a gm on the planet, not in china, argentina nowhere, that will attempt to explain how boozer is better than aldridge. that will only happen here in bulls fans land


its simple for me. heat single covered boozer and he disappears.

if miami single covers aldridge, flat out torture down low. he will eat bosh, birdman and whoever else down there food.

dont get it twisted, i understand that if boozer wanted to it can be the same for him. problem is half the time he does not want to. for whatever reason.

Yeah, but we're not talking about swapping them 1 for 1. I think everyone'd agree that LMA would be much better in Boozer's role. But LMA will cost us other players, and the difference may not be great enough to make up for the losses.
kingkirk
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 80,406
And1: 23,765
Joined: Jan 24, 2004
 

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#942 » by kingkirk » Sat Jun 29, 2013 4:04 am

Before i get crucified for being a defender of the FO or for loving our own plays too much, or possibly not wanting to upgrade talent, this is why we're not doing this deal.

Right now, we're quite close to a title. With a healthy Rose, we're a top 5-6 team in this league, and i would expect us to be the 2nd team out East behind Miami.

Right now, as it stands, we have very good players at every single position we have, with each guy having more than capable skills.

Rose, Butler, Deng, Boozer & Noah is a terrific starting 5. Its balanced, has strong defense and has a proven formula (minus Butler, who will only enhance it).

Trading for Aldridge, whilst we already have a capable, though much maligned PF, doesn't make sense when you make a complete whole at the center spot.

Boozer has his issues, but we have no capable back up at center to insert into the starting lineup, and nor did we draft one.

If we were moving a weaknesses from one postion to another i.e. PF to C, then i could see the case for trading Noah, but right now, and for the first time in Rose's career, we have no weak spot in the starting lineup like we have previously with either Bogans or Rip going through the 2 spot.

Making the PF spot that bit stronger (whilst also committing a lot more $ already invested to it), doesn't make sense when you make a giant whole at the center spot, a position which is huge in our success, which is heavily based on rebounding and defense.

There is an opportunity cost in trading for Aldridge, and that's the part i have an issue with.
User avatar
LoveDaBoo
RealGM
Posts: 17,096
And1: 1,984
Joined: Jun 12, 2009
     

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#943 » by LoveDaBoo » Sat Jun 29, 2013 4:09 am

KingCuban wrote:Before i get crucified for being a defender of the FO or for loving our own plays too much, or possibly not wanting to upgrade talent, this is why we're not doing this deal.

Right now, we're quite close to a title. With a healthy Rose, we're a top 5-6 team in this league, and i would expect us to be the 2nd team out East behind Miami.

Right now, as it stands, we have very good players at every single position we have, with each guy having more than capable skills.

Rose, Butler, Deng, Boozer & Noah is a terrific starting 5. Its balanced, has strong defense and has a proven formula (minus Butler, who will only enhance it).

Trading for Aldridge, whilst we already have a capable, though much maligned PF, doesn't make sense when you make a complete whole at the center spot.

Boozer has his issues, but we have no capable back up at center to insert into the starting lineup, and nor did we draft one.

If we were moving a weaknesses from one postion to another i.e. PF to C, then i could see the case for trading Noah, but right now, and for the first time in Rose's career, we have no weak spot in the starting lineup like we have previously with either Bogans or Rip going through the 2 spot.

Making the PF spot that bit stronger (whilst also committing a lot more $ already invested to it), doesn't make sense when you make a giant whole at the center spot, a position which is huge in our success, which is heavily based on rebounding and defense.

There is an opportunity cost in trading for Aldridge, and that's the part i have an issue with.

TL:DR -We should be a very good team, and balanced across the 5 positions; upgrading one position isn't worth creating a hole at another.
User avatar
LawSon18
Junior
Posts: 415
And1: 101
Joined: Dec 30, 2010

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#944 » by LawSon18 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 4:09 am

Red Larrivee wrote:
Leto wrote:Aldridge is marginally better than Boozer and a little younger.


Come on yall.


I love my team but our fans are ridiculous. Jesus.
User avatar
jc23
RealGM
Posts: 27,532
And1: 12,289
Joined: May 31, 2010
Location: 1901 W.Madsion St
     

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#945 » by jc23 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 4:10 am

The guy on the Portland board with the sources seems to think this is a legit thing. In the end i see Aldridge getting traded but not to Chicago. I wonder if its not even about playing for the Bulls, but he is using us as a destination to shake things up (i mean its happened before).
"Showing off is the fool's idea of glory"

-Bruce Lee
User avatar
RedBulls23
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 38,338
And1: 21,318
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#946 » by RedBulls23 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 4:19 am

jc23 wrote:The guy on the Portland board with the sources seems to think this is a legit thing. In the end i see Aldridge getting traded but not to Chicago. I wonder if its not even about playing for the Bulls, but he is using us as a destination to shake things up (i mean its happened before).

What that Aldridge wants to be traded or that Portland won't do it for less than Noah?
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
Ralphb07
RealGM
Posts: 27,042
And1: 5,965
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Location: Palm Bay, FL

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#947 » by Ralphb07 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:20 am

TB is legit and overall pretty cool. The Portland bored is lucky to have him. We've been going back and forth the past few days with what we're hearing and it's cool because we are hearing the same exact things, but at the same time I am getting what the Blazers are thinking and he is getting what the Bulls are thinking.

This thing is far from over
User avatar
RedBulls23
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 38,338
And1: 21,318
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#948 » by RedBulls23 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:23 am

Ralphb07 wrote:TB is legit and overall pretty cool. The Portland bored is lucky to have him. We've been going back and forth the past few days with what we're hearing and it's cool because we are hearing the same exact things, but at the same time I am getting what the Blazers are thinking and he is getting what the Bulls are thinking.

This thing is far from over

Thanks Ralph.

So in your opinion do you see a deal getting done without us having to give up Noah and Jimmy?
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
Ralphb07
RealGM
Posts: 27,042
And1: 5,965
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Location: Palm Bay, FL

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#949 » by Ralphb07 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:32 am

Red-Bulls83 wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:TB is legit and overall pretty cool. The Portland bored is lucky to have him. We've been going back and forth the past few days with what we're hearing and it's cool because we are hearing the same exact things, but at the same time I am getting what the Blazers are thinking and he is getting what the Bulls are thinking.

This thing is far from over

Thanks Ralph.

So in your opinion do you see a deal getting done without us having to give up Noah and Jimmy?


The Bulls IMO won't do Noah and Jimmy for LMA and Portland even knows Noah and Charlotte pick isn't going. The Bulls don't want to do Noah straight up for him, so they aren't going to add anything.

I know he wants Chicago but there are other teams as well. In the end, we never seem to get a deal like this done, so I wouldn't get my hopes up. How many times as Bulls fans have we been burned, way too many.

I see us getting outbid by another team. That is not off of any information, just my personal opinion.
red222
RealGM
Posts: 11,513
And1: 2,293
Joined: Feb 08, 2009
       

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#950 » by red222 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:36 am

Ralphb07 wrote:
Red-Bulls83 wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:TB is legit and overall pretty cool. The Portland bored is lucky to have him. We've been going back and forth the past few days with what we're hearing and it's cool because we are hearing the same exact things, but at the same time I am getting what the Blazers are thinking and he is getting what the Bulls are thinking.

This thing is far from over

Thanks Ralph.

So in your opinion do you see a deal getting done without us having to give up Noah and Jimmy?


The Bulls IMO won't do Noah and Jimmy for LMA and Portland even knows Noah and Charlotte pick isn't going. The Bulls don't want to do Noah straight up for him, so they aren't going to add anything.

I know he wants Chicago but there are other teams as well. In the end, we never seem to get a deal like this done, so I wouldn't get my hopes up. How many times as Bulls fans have we been burned, way too many.

I see us getting outbid by another team. That is not off of any information, just my personal opinion.
A tradition like no other :lol:
User avatar
RedBulls23
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 38,338
And1: 21,318
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#951 » by RedBulls23 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:41 am

Ralphb07 wrote:
The Bulls IMO won't do Noah and Jimmy for LMA and Portland even knows Noah and Charlotte pick isn't going. The Bulls don't want to do Noah straight up for him, so they aren't going to add anything.

I know he wants Chicago but there are other teams as well. In the end, we never seem to get a deal like this done, so I wouldn't get my hopes up. How many times as Bulls fans have we been burned, way too many.

I see us getting outbid by another team. That is not off of any information, just my personal opinion.

Sigh...yeah I had a feeling you were going to say that.

Though it's hard not to get caught up in the rumors. :D
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
User avatar
OldSchoolNoBull
General Manager
Posts: 9,108
And1: 4,506
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Ohio
 

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#952 » by OldSchoolNoBull » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:48 am

Ralphb07 wrote:
Red-Bulls83 wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:TB is legit and overall pretty cool. The Portland bored is lucky to have him. We've been going back and forth the past few days with what we're hearing and it's cool because we are hearing the same exact things, but at the same time I am getting what the Blazers are thinking and he is getting what the Bulls are thinking.

This thing is far from over

Thanks Ralph.

So in your opinion do you see a deal getting done without us having to give up Noah and Jimmy?


The Bulls IMO won't do Noah and Jimmy for LMA and Portland even knows Noah and Charlotte pick isn't going. The Bulls don't want to do Noah straight up for him, so they aren't going to add anything.

I know he wants Chicago but there are other teams as well. In the end, we never seem to get a deal like this done, so I wouldn't get my hopes up. How many times as Bulls fans have we been burned, way too many.

I see us getting outbid by another team. That is not off of any information, just my personal opinion.


Yeah, but all those other times, none of those players ever had Chicago at the top of the list.
red222
RealGM
Posts: 11,513
And1: 2,293
Joined: Feb 08, 2009
       

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#953 » by red222 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:52 am

Lets stay positive the flexibility for 2018 is the key :lol:
Polynice4Pippen
RealGM
Posts: 46,674
And1: 13,180
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Planet Earth. With more questions than answers.
     

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#954 » by Polynice4Pippen » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:55 am

Ralphb07 wrote:
Red-Bulls83 wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:TB is legit and overall pretty cool. The Portland bored is lucky to have him. We've been going back and forth the past few days with what we're hearing and it's cool because we are hearing the same exact things, but at the same time I am getting what the Blazers are thinking and he is getting what the Bulls are thinking.

This thing is far from over

Thanks Ralph.

So in your opinion do you see a deal getting done without us having to give up Noah and Jimmy?


The Bulls IMO won't do Noah and Jimmy for LMA and Portland even knows Noah and Charlotte pick isn't going. The Bulls don't want to do Noah straight up for him, so they aren't going to add anything.

I know he wants Chicago but there are other teams as well. In the end, we never seem to get a deal like this done, so I wouldn't get my hopes up. How many times as Bulls fans have we been burned, way too many.

I see us getting outbid by another team. That is not off of any information, just my personal opinion.


Great stuff as usual, Ralph. I definitely wouldn't include Noah in a trade for Aldridge. But I'd have no problem with Butler being on the board (we'd hopefully just extend Deng) or the Charlotte pick. Maybe the Charlotte pick is the "final offer" so to speak that Gar/Pax are holding onto as long as possible. I agree with them about keeping Noah out of the trade. You roll out a core of Rose/Aldridge/Noah with either Deng or Butler at SF, then find a SG after amnestying Boozer and you can win a title. At least they're continuing to talk.
Jerry Reinsdorf; the undisputed king of allowing his GM's to run amok with unchecked power and ego. :king:
ryan44
Analyst
Posts: 3,146
And1: 985
Joined: Dec 29, 2010
   

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#955 » by ryan44 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 6:00 am

red222 wrote:Lets stay positive the flexibility for 2018 is the key :lol:

Only if flexibility in 2018 doesn't compromise the plan for 2024.
User avatar
Jimmy Forums
Veteran
Posts: 2,833
And1: 970
Joined: Jun 07, 2012
Location: Midwest
     

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#956 » by Jimmy Forums » Sat Jun 29, 2013 6:03 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8SuKkiJye4[/youtube]
red222
RealGM
Posts: 11,513
And1: 2,293
Joined: Feb 08, 2009
       

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#957 » by red222 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 6:24 am

ryan44 wrote:
red222 wrote:Lets stay positive the flexibility for 2018 is the key :lol:

Only if flexibility in 2018 doesn't compromise the plan for 2024.

:lol: People may say this post may sound like moaning and groaning, as a bulls fan I have no right to complain because we haven't had it as hard as other teams. To those people that have that thought **** you. It has been 15 years since we have won anything and every year we get sold a bill of goods that they are trying to win a title. The words character, teamwork, more than enough to quote Mr. Thibs, and flexibility are said ad nauseam yet we can never seem to get over the hump. By the time we actually find the right deal our window will have closed either due to Rose leaving or the competition in both conferences being significantly better. So I ask when will their words match their actions???

The perfect comparison to this front office is a guy that says they can fight the best fighter in their weight class but chickens out like a bitch. They write checks their ass can't cash.


Flexibility watch 2018

/End Rant
User avatar
Saphir
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,251
And1: 129
Joined: Nov 28, 2012

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#958 » by Saphir » Sat Jun 29, 2013 6:37 am

Ralphb07 wrote:The Bulls IMO won't do Noah and Jimmy for LMA and Portland even knows Noah and Charlotte pick isn't going. The Bulls don't want to do Noah straight up for him, so they aren't going to add anything.

I know he wants Chicago but there are other teams as well. In the end, we never seem to get a deal like this done, so I wouldn't get my hopes up. How many times as Bulls fans have we been burned, way too many.

I see us getting outbid by another team. That is not off of any information, just my personal opinion.


As mentioned before, Noah for Aldridge is essentially a lateral move. In a vacuum, I wouldn't do it. Primarily because a Boozer/Aldridge frontcourt is a complete disaster waiting to happen.

If you're going to trade Noah, you have to find a way to trade Boozer for a solid frontcourt partner for Aldridge. And then you have to wonder if its any better than Boozer/Noah, which is trickier than you may think.
"And if Rose comes back and is 80% of himself, the Bulls become a pain in the ass" -Zach Lowe

Still rooting for wins, but losses aren't the worst thing in the world. Perhaps the optimal strategy is hoping the Blackhawks are on at the same time.
User avatar
pylb
General Manager
Posts: 8,191
And1: 3,695
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
Location: Paris
 

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#959 » by pylb » Sat Jun 29, 2013 6:51 am

Aldridge wants to play PF next to a Center so he won't be playing next to Carlos anyway.
User avatar
OldSchoolNoBull
General Manager
Posts: 9,108
And1: 4,506
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Ohio
 

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#960 » by OldSchoolNoBull » Sat Jun 29, 2013 6:59 am

Yeah, I don't think the FO has any intention of LMA and Boozer playing together. If we get LMA, Boozer is either amnestied or traded.

Return to Chicago Bulls