Chi town wrote:I could see Huerter for Issac.
Magic need shooting really bad.
I like that trade for us. I like Huerter a lot, but Isaac would be a big difference maker for us and they are heavy at the 4/5 and we are heavy at the 2.
Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man
Chi town wrote:I could see Huerter for Issac.
Magic need shooting really bad.
Chi town wrote:I could see Huerter for Issac.
Magic need shooting really bad.
WindyCityBorn wrote:Chi town wrote:I could see Huerter for Issac.
Magic need shooting really bad.
Isaac is an injury prone bust.
sco wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:So I'm the only one who thinks Sabonis could be great at PF with an athletic defensive center? He's shot 37%, 38%, and 41% from 3 the last three years, seems like great three point range to me. Especially if that center is not a strong rebounder. There are a few good defensive centers that are poor rebounders, like Jaren Jackson and Brook Lopez. Our team last year probably could have won 41 games. Don't see how the team wouldn't be way better with say Sabonis/Smith, Maluach, Ware, Reid, Turner, Gafford, etc at PF/Center vs Williams/Vucevic.
The Bulls need at least two players to contend. All these projections of where we'll be with one trade are not really fair. Does anybody here think we're one player away? Even if it was Giannis, after all we'd have to give up?
You must subscribe to the saying "Don't let perfect be the enemy of good." While you're right, Sabonis' defensive woes could be hidden at PF next to a good defensive C. The "But" is that despite decent 3pt %'s Sabonis' value is his acting as your offensive hub and his camping out in the paint for rebounds. If we are rolling with a Giddey led offense (and doubly-so, if we're keeping Coby), we really need EVERYBODY else in the starting line-up be a very good defender. Also, adding a non-defending player at PF, bumps Giddey down to the other guard spot and takes away our chance to add a POA defender.
Infinity2152 wrote:So I'm the only one who thinks Sabonis could be great at PF with an athletic defensive center? He's shot 37%, 38%, and 41% from 3 the last three years, seems like great three point range to me. Especially if that center is not a strong rebounder. There are a few good defensive centers that are poor rebounders, like Jaren Jackson and Brook Lopez. Our team last year probably could have won 41 games. Don't see how the team wouldn't be way better with say Sabonis/Smith, Maluach, Ware, Reid, Turner, Gafford, etc at PF/Center vs Williams/Vucevic.
The Bulls need at least two players to contend. All these projections of where we'll be with one trade are not really fair. Does anybody here think we're one player away? Even if it was Giannis, after all we'd have to give up?
sco wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:State of the Union address: It's time to pick a lane. Our main two pieces right now are Giddey and Matas. A great 3 starters with depth should be a great team. Our best trade pieces are Coby, Vuc, Collins, Huerter.
We can either trade up: Combine players, picks to add the best third player we can
Or trade down: Trade Coby and Vucevic and get picks and role players.
Trading Coby and Vucevic immediately takes us out of any potential superstar trade, imo. We have to think about that when we're talking about trading them for guys like Kuminga or Anthony Black or even Naz Reid. I've been talking up ome of these mid trades, but thinking I want Desmond Bane/Markannen level at least before I move Coby. I'd hold him till the deadline if I had to, opportunities could come up.
We need high end talent. I see people rejecting even the idea of Sabonis. He'd be considered a far more valuable player than almost any of the trade ideas I've seen. Just play him at PF, great rebounder, solid shooter, active player. He's 29, great. Vuc will be gone, if a 29 yr old vet is the oldest guy on the team, glad to have him. He's an elite NBA talent. He'll make $43 mill next yr. $46.7 mill in 2026. Think I just heard SGA will be eligible for an extension that summer with $76 mill AAV. He keeps getting compared to Vucevic, he's like 20 lbs lighter, he'd be much more effective at PF with a defensive center. And he's a good fit on paper with Matas as a forward pairing.
I agree that our best move right now is to trade Coby plus other assets for someone who is better than Coby. I think Bane is the best remotely feasible option out there that I've heard. I get your point, but I don't see us getting Lauri.
Muzbar wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:So I'm the only one who thinks Sabonis could be great at PF with an athletic defensive center? He's shot 37%, 38%, and 41% from 3 the last three years, seems like great three point range to me. Especially if that center is not a strong rebounder. There are a few good defensive centers that are poor rebounders, like Jaren Jackson and Brook Lopez. Our team last year probably could have won 41 games. Don't see how the team wouldn't be way better with say Sabonis/Smith, Maluach, Ware, Reid, Turner, Gafford, etc at PF/Center vs Williams/Vucevic.
The Bulls need at least two players to contend. All these projections of where we'll be with one trade are not really fair. Does anybody here think we're one player away? Even if it was Giannis, after all we'd have to give up?
Did the Pacers not already do this with Turner/Sabonis? They then broke it up as it wasn't really working and made the Haliburton trade.
Infinity2152 wrote:Muzbar wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:So I'm the only one who thinks Sabonis could be great at PF with an athletic defensive center? He's shot 37%, 38%, and 41% from 3 the last three years, seems like great three point range to me. Especially if that center is not a strong rebounder. There are a few good defensive centers that are poor rebounders, like Jaren Jackson and Brook Lopez. Our team last year probably could have won 41 games. Don't see how the team wouldn't be way better with say Sabonis/Smith, Maluach, Ware, Reid, Turner, Gafford, etc at PF/Center vs Williams/Vucevic.
The Bulls need at least two players to contend. All these projections of where we'll be with one trade are not really fair. Does anybody here think we're one player away? Even if it was Giannis, after all we'd have to give up?
Did the Pacers not already do this with Turner/Sabonis? They then broke it up as it wasn't really working and made the Haliburton trade.
He was an All-Star with the Pacers. He and Turner worked well, rest of the team was weak. 2020 Pacers featured Oladipo, Brogdon, TJ Warren, Sabonis, Turner, Justin Holiday, Aaron Holiday, Jeremy Lamb, Doug McDermott. Turner played 47 games, and they sucked. He was traded the next season. Wouldn't say Sabonis not being good enough or not fitting is the reason he was traded. How great would he have to be to make that team a contender? They got a top 15 player for him, then replaced him with an All Star PF while retaining Turner, sure they're doing better now, lol.
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
Muzbar wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:Muzbar wrote:Did the Pacers not already do this with Turner/Sabonis? They then broke it up as it wasn't really working and made the Haliburton trade.
He was an All-Star with the Pacers. He and Turner worked well, rest of the team was weak. 2020 Pacers featured Oladipo, Brogdon, TJ Warren, Sabonis, Turner, Justin Holiday, Aaron Holiday, Jeremy Lamb, Doug McDermott. Turner played 47 games, and they sucked. He was traded the next season. Wouldn't say Sabonis not being good enough or not fitting is the reason he was traded. How great would he have to be to make that team a contender? They got a top 15 player for him, then replaced him with an All Star PF while retaining Turner, sure they're doing better now, lol.
They traded Sabonis because they were looking to trade either him or Turner because they didn't really work together, Sabonis was and is better at C, he'd get cooked defensively at PF seeing as most 'PFs' are actually SFs just playing the PF spot.
Playing next to someone like Mikal Bridges or OG Anunoby would probably be better for Sabonis.
nomorezorro wrote:recent basketball events have got me real thirsty for a stretch 5 with size....what would it take to get jay huff from the grizzlies
boozapalooza wrote:nomorezorro wrote:recent basketball events have got me real thirsty for a stretch 5 with size....what would it take to get jay huff from the grizzlies
We gotta be thinking bigger than Jay Huff my guy
This is a new level of thirst. Severe dehydration
Chi town wrote:I will stop watching if we trade for Sabonis
Infinity2152 wrote:boozapalooza wrote:nomorezorro wrote:recent basketball events have got me real thirsty for a stretch 5 with size....what would it take to get jay huff from the grizzlies
We gotta be thinking bigger than Jay Huff my guy
This is a new level of thirst. Severe dehydration
Lmao! Comment of the day. Have to agree, we have like one roster spot, three centers and haven't even started free agency or hit the draft. Huff is some low hanging fruit.
GuardianEnzo wrote:sco wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:State of the Union address: It's time to pick a lane. Our main two pieces right now are Giddey and Matas. A great 3 starters with depth should be a great team. Our best trade pieces are Coby, Vuc, Collins, Huerter.
We can either trade up: Combine players, picks to add the best third player we can
Or trade down: Trade Coby and Vucevic and get picks and role players.
Trading Coby and Vucevic immediately takes us out of any potential superstar trade, imo. We have to think about that when we're talking about trading them for guys like Kuminga or Anthony Black or even Naz Reid. I've been talking up ome of these mid trades, but thinking I want Desmond Bane/Markannen level at least before I move Coby. I'd hold him till the deadline if I had to, opportunities could come up.
We need high end talent. I see people rejecting even the idea of Sabonis. He'd be considered a far more valuable player than almost any of the trade ideas I've seen. Just play him at PF, great rebounder, solid shooter, active player. He's 29, great. Vuc will be gone, if a 29 yr old vet is the oldest guy on the team, glad to have him. He's an elite NBA talent. He'll make $43 mill next yr. $46.7 mill in 2026. Think I just heard SGA will be eligible for an extension that summer with $76 mill AAV. He keeps getting compared to Vucevic, he's like 20 lbs lighter, he'd be much more effective at PF with a defensive center. And he's a good fit on paper with Matas as a forward pairing.
I agree that our best move right now is to trade Coby plus other assets for someone who is better than Coby. I think Bane is the best remotely feasible option out there that I've heard. I get your point, but I don't see us getting Lauri.
I think Bane is a guy who could take that Brunson step, be a true superstar on a team where he was the alpha. Not sure how realistic a target he is but even if he doesn’t level up to superstar, he’s already an elite player. And he could level up.
Besides, he was born in the darkness. Molded by it.
sco wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:boozapalooza wrote:
We gotta be thinking bigger than Jay Huff my guy
This is a new level of thirst. Severe dehydration
Lmao! Comment of the day. Have to agree, we have like one roster spot, three centers and haven't even started free agency or hit the draft. Huff is some low hanging fruit.
Not sure what's serious on Huff, but I've always liked that dude.
Infinity2152 wrote:Muzbar wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:
He was an All-Star with the Pacers. He and Turner worked well, rest of the team was weak. 2020 Pacers featured Oladipo, Brogdon, TJ Warren, Sabonis, Turner, Justin Holiday, Aaron Holiday, Jeremy Lamb, Doug McDermott. Turner played 47 games, and they sucked. He was traded the next season. Wouldn't say Sabonis not being good enough or not fitting is the reason he was traded. How great would he have to be to make that team a contender? They got a top 15 player for him, then replaced him with an All Star PF while retaining Turner, sure they're doing better now, lol.
They traded Sabonis because they were looking to trade either him or Turner because they didn't really work together, Sabonis was and is better at C, he'd get cooked defensively at PF seeing as most 'PFs' are actually SFs just playing the PF spot.
Playing next to someone like Mikal Bridges or OG Anunoby would probably be better for Sabonis.
How about this? He played for the Pacers 4 full years. Turner's played there 10 years. The two years Turner has been in DPOY running have both been next to Sabonis. Turner averages less than 7 rbs/gm. Sabonis's 12+ rebounds/gm certainly paired well with that. He's been a 2 times AllStar at PF, versus once at center. Don't know why anybody would think he's better at center when his main weakness is rim protection. And small forwards guarding him would get killed on the other end.
There are a lot of big PF's, that same logic applies to Porzingas, Jaren Jackson, Tobias Harris, Chet Holmgren, John Collins, Aaron Gordon, Zion is 260+, KAT, Julius Randle, Banchero and Siakam are both big. Evan Mobley. Durant is 7 ft. Lebron is 250 lbs. Most of the winning teams actually play big PF's, or guys who play both PF and center. What are you viewing Matas defensive prospects as? I'm hoping for a plus defense SF like Bridges. Also want a plus defender at SG for POA defense and defensive center for back end defense. OKC lost last year with a small lineup and signed Hartenstein so they could play a 7 foot player at PF. Working great for them, and their small ball lineup was killing it. Cooper Flagg is the number 1 draft pick.
For me right now, it's talent over fit. We have only have two players to worry about fit with, and Matas looks to fit most all types. Sabonis is an All Star talent without the headaches most of the others would come with like Zion or Ja, the trade packages mentioned don't gut the team, and at 29 is a great age to be a vet and still be very effective over the length of his contract. He's proven himself, and his contract isn't outlandish for what he brings. It's around Zach's contract. He's not a number 1, but would be a great number 2. We get Giddey at $25 mill, think we could build a damn good team around Giddey at $25 mill, Sabonis at $42 mill, Matas at $5.5, our 2025 rookie at about $4 mill, and a 2026 rookie.
burlydee wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:Muzbar wrote:They traded Sabonis because they were looking to trade either him or Turner because they didn't really work together, Sabonis was and is better at C, he'd get cooked defensively at PF seeing as most 'PFs' are actually SFs just playing the PF spot.
Playing next to someone like Mikal Bridges or OG Anunoby would probably be better for Sabonis.
How about this? He played for the Pacers 4 full years. Turner's played there 10 years. The two years Turner has been in DPOY running have both been next to Sabonis. Turner averages less than 7 rbs/gm. Sabonis's 12+ rebounds/gm certainly paired well with that. He's been a 2 times AllStar at PF, versus once at center. Don't know why anybody would think he's better at center when his main weakness is rim protection. And small forwards guarding him would get killed on the other end.
There are a lot of big PF's, that same logic applies to Porzingas, Jaren Jackson, Tobias Harris, Chet Holmgren, John Collins, Aaron Gordon, Zion is 260+, KAT, Julius Randle, Banchero and Siakam are both big. Evan Mobley. Durant is 7 ft. Lebron is 250 lbs. Most of the winning teams actually play big PF's, or guys who play both PF and center. What are you viewing Matas defensive prospects as? I'm hoping for a plus defense SF like Bridges. Also want a plus defender at SG for POA defense and defensive center for back end defense. OKC lost last year with a small lineup and signed Hartenstein so they could play a 7 foot player at PF. Working great for them, and their small ball lineup was killing it. Cooper Flagg is the number 1 draft pick.
For me right now, it's talent over fit. We have only have two players to worry about fit with, and Matas looks to fit most all types. Sabonis is an All Star talent without the headaches most of the others would come with like Zion or Ja, the trade packages mentioned don't gut the team, and at 29 is a great age to be a vet and still be very effective over the length of his contract. He's proven himself, and his contract isn't outlandish for what he brings. It's around Zach's contract. He's not a number 1, but would be a great number 2. We get Giddey at $25 mill, think we could build a damn good team around Giddey at $25 mill, Sabonis at $42 mill, Matas at $5.5, our 2025 rookie at about $4 mill, and a 2026 rookie.
You make the best case possible for Sabonis. Its criminal they haven't paired him with a 5. I still don't want him bc i think he makes too much but this is the best argument I've seen.