dougthonus wrote:Fl_Flash wrote:Plus, a great amount of their assets - especially liquid assets - are tied up in non-taxable vehicles such as Treasure Bonds and State and local bonds. The interest rates aren't great, but the benefit is the interest is tax free. If I happen to have 100 mil laying around, I'm putting it state and local bonds at around 5% (or so) interest. That's 5 mil a year, tax free. Might be tough to eke out a living, but I'd try. Real estate, tangible properly like boats and expensive cars, precious metals, stocks - all sorts of places I can put my excess to work for me. All managed from within the Trust.
I'm not sure where you think you're getting a fully tax exempt bond at 5% interest rate, but that hasn't been available in the last decade that I'm aware of. Also doubt many billionaires are investing that much in tax exempt bonds because you can make so much more money in equity. Bonds are typically used for people arbitraging rates like banks or insurance companies or for people trying to lower portfolio risk as they age.
It's just an example dougie. I'm looking right now, Municipal 10yr (A\A) bond yield is 5%. I also put (or so) in there also. I believe I also stated there's lots of other places to put your money.
Point was that those other two were going back and forth over why the rich do (or don't) live in a high income state. The main point was that they really aren't that concerned with the taxation rate of any given state. They're much more concerned with avoiding inheritance\estate taxes.






















