MrFortune3 wrote:Leslie Forman wrote:TheStig wrote:This is an unfair criticism. He put assets together for Kyrie. I understand why he didn't trade his war chest for a rental of Kawhi or PG. AD's people told him he'd walk. Would he have been a better GM if he had Kawhi for a year but no Brown?
You're being way to critical. He's got two young 2 way all stars. Had Kemba worked out, they'd be serious contenders. Stevens doesn't need to rebuild the team. He just needs to get that missing piece.
Seriously, it's ridiculous. He got Kyrie Irving and Gordon Hayward for next to nothing and still had Horford, Tatum, Brown, and Smart. That's incredible. How the hell is a GM supposed to predict THAT happening to Gordon Hayward, or Kyrie becoming that lady who keeps telling you about how essential oils will change your life?
Too many people simply judge the result, and not the play.
Not really unfair though. He pulled off one of the greatest asset acquisitions in NBA history and for the most part squandered it.
He was far too focused on trying to win every damn trade instead of making his team better overall.
People judge the result because given the positioning that the Celtics had over raking the Nets over the coals, the expectation was at least 1 title.
While he did manage to end up with Tatum and Brown as the 2 primary core pieces of the Celtics for the next 10+ years if healthy.
That's why I am not the biggest fan of just gathering a ton of assets and trying to form them into a massive war chest, at some point you have to turn that chest of assets into tangible championship level players.
I mean he did have a roster of Kyrie, Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Hortford, Morris, Bynes. Not his fault Kyrie is flakey and Hayward broke. They did make 3 ECFs in the last 5 years.
You're acting like they sat around with just Tatum and Brown and a bunch of picks. He signed Hayward, Hortford and Kemba as big time FA's. Traded for Kyrie, IT, Fournier and made a ton of good picks.
This isn't GarPax. They traded and signed for stars.