Page 1 of 1
Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:18 pm
by League Circles
Just an FYI
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:26 pm
by weneeda2guard
"We like our core"
"We have a great relationship with tom"
"We have enough"
"We like our future"
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:34 pm
by ikeziskash
Oh this should be good. I hope he gets some tough and needed questions.
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:43 pm
by Mech Engineer
What...he is not busy making trades or fighting with Thibs on giving more minutes to Mirotic /McDermott?
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:47 pm
by BrotherDre
weneeda2guard wrote:"We like our core"
"We have a great relationship with tom"
"We have enough"
"We like our future"
This, he sounds like a broken record every interview.
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:49 pm
by unknownnewbie
was he on yet?
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:56 pm
by Payt10
Silvy is such a dumb ass. I struggled making it through that whole thing. Did he miss the memo about Ray Allen?
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:57 pm
by RedBulls23
I'll have to listen to it later on the podcast.
Edit: I will add though, listening to Gar is usually pointless. He never says anything worth while. Now Pax on the other hand is a good listen because he carries his heart on his sleeve.
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:00 am
by Payt10
Interesting tid bit at the end. Gar pays attention to +/- and "real plus minus".
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:03 am
by LOUDO
No trades. Loves the front line depth. Silvy asked about affalo and it sounded like that wasn't gonna happen.
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:30 am
by ikeziskash
Gar=gutless
Re: Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:31 am
by Mbrahv0528
LOUDO wrote:No trades. Loves the front line depth. Silvy asked about affalo and it sounded like that wasn't gonna happen.
That's not how our front office works. They would never tip their hand in an interview. This means absolutely nothing in the broader scheme of things.
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:34 am
by TyrusRose2425
LOUDO wrote:No trades. Loves the front line depth. Silvy asked about affalo and it sounded like that wasn't gonna happen.
Yeah don't see anything happening. I was told Taj is not on the market and I doubt we trade Dunleavy since he's a starter. Snell was more than likely gone but now he looks like an NBA player so I bet he sticks.
Re: Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:47 am
by Mbrahv0528
TyrusRose2425 wrote:LOUDO wrote:No trades. Loves the front line depth. Silvy asked about affalo and it sounded like that wasn't gonna happen.
Yeah don't see anything happening. I was told Taj is not on the market and I doubt we trade Dunleavy since he's a starter. Snell was more than likely gone but now he looks like an NBA player so I bet he sticks.
Snell was never going anywhere because he had negative value.
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:04 am
by kodo
UC is still selling out.
Bulls are making plenty of money.
He's done.
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:10 am
by Bulls_Fan
We have a huge hole on the perimeter and are not addressing it. Way to go front office. Usually teams that say they are championship contenders attempt to make a move to improve their roster.
This isn't anything different from any Paxson run front office. He can dump players in a trade but to make a trade to better the team when needed never happens.
Re: Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:55 am
by TyrusRose2425
Mbrahv0528 wrote:TyrusRose2425 wrote:LOUDO wrote:No trades. Loves the front line depth. Silvy asked about affalo and it sounded like that wasn't gonna happen.
Yeah don't see anything happening. I was told Taj is not on the market and I doubt we trade Dunleavy since he's a starter. Snell was more than likely gone but now he looks like an NBA player so I bet he sticks.
Snell was never going anywhere because he had negative value.
They had some deals they were seriously considering pulling the trigger on but put on hold because of McD and Dunleavy's injuries
Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:52 am
by keloms
LOUDO wrote:No trades. Loves the front line depth. Silvy asked about affalo and it sounded like that wasn't gonna happen.
LOUDO wrote:No trades. Loves the front line depth. Silvy asked about affalo and it sounded like that wasn't gonna happen.
LOUDO wrote:No trades. Loves the front line depth. Silvy asked about affalo and it sounded like that wasn't gonna happen.
LOUDO wrote:No trades. Loves the front line depth. Silvy asked about affalo and it sounded like that wasn't gonna happen.
LOUDO wrote:No trades. Loves the front line depth. Silvy asked about affalo and it sounded like that wasn't gonna happen.
If you've been a fan for more than 2-3 years and you didn't know this away, shame on you. This team is probably the most grounded and predictable in the league. Any moves being made are going to be picking someone up on the FA wire. They're not screwing with the cap situation until they know what Jimmy's number ends up being.
Re: Re: Gar on Waddle and Silvi at 530
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:57 am
by keloms
TyrusRose2425 wrote:Mbrahv0528 wrote:TyrusRose2425 wrote:Yeah don't see anything happening. I was told Taj is not on the market and I doubt we trade Dunleavy since he's a starter. Snell was more than likely gone but now he looks like an NBA player so I bet he sticks.
Snell was never going anywhere because he had negative value.
They had some deals they were seriously considering pulling the trigger on but put on hold because of McD and Dunleavy's injuries
Absolutely not. Gar Pax don't make rash moves. Barring injury, this roster was set until the deadline and the cheap contracts aren't up for discussion unless they're getting a major return for it.