Chi wrote:Not sure why he wouldn't be in the competition with Dunn and Grant...
I think he has as much if not way more potential than both of them...
kris dunn is going to be a superstar
Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet
Chi wrote:Not sure why he wouldn't be in the competition with Dunn and Grant...
I think he has as much if not way more potential than both of them...
sco wrote:I feel like this is my fantasy basketball team. You know how when you don't draft a good guy at one position, you end-up picking-up a bunch of "potential" guys, hoping that one of them pans-out. It is likely we don't have a good PG on the roster. I'm all for try-out everyone we can find until someone sticks.
Chi wrote:Not sure why he wouldn't be in the competition with Dunn and Grant...
I think he has as much if not way more potential than both of them...
Jcool0 wrote:aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?
If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Evil_Headband wrote:Chi wrote:Not sure why he wouldn't be in the competition with Dunn and Grant...
I think he has as much if not way more potential than both of them...
I don't know much about Felder other than what I've read today. However, the fact that he was dumped by the Cavs and Hawks with seemingly little interest from other teams tells us about his value around the league. I'm not sure if your comment was more anti-Dunn/Grant or pro-Felder, but it seems likely Felder won't be a long-term piece.
HomoSapien wrote:Good move. I predict that Felder will be better than Dunn.
donaldtrump_00 wrote:Chi wrote:Not sure why he wouldn't be in the competition with Dunn and Grant...
I think he has as much if not way more potential than both of them...
kris dunn is going to be a superstar
Jcool0 wrote:aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?
If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.
PrimzyBulls81 wrote:I think actually Felder was Hoiberg's pick and he might be solid for us...
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
Chi wrote:Little interest? He was signed the day he became a FA.
Hangtime84 wrote:I just hope Chicago can get him on a cheap 4 year deal
Evil_Headband wrote:Chi wrote:Little interest? He was signed the day he became a FA.
What I meant by that is he is so little valued around the league that no team was willing to give an asset (even cash) for him to the Cavs or Hawks. Of course, that doesn't mean he won't be good, I just have low expectations.