gardenofsound wrote:If we stay at 6 (or even drop to 7) I think we will end up with Bamba.
Pax clearly wants a wing, and has a huge crush on Robin Lopez. If MPJ is there he will be taken before Bamba. Guarantee it.
Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet
gardenofsound wrote:If we stay at 6 (or even drop to 7) I think we will end up with Bamba.
Payt10 wrote:I totally forgot this was going on. We won the tiebreaker??
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Alcatraz17 wrote:
Fair point...but...
I dont think Lauri NEEDS the ball...Mikal doesn't need the ball IMO...and we wouldn't know who #6 would be?
Dunn and LaVine are more ball needy that not...so I guess #6 pick would tip it one way or another.
Valid concern though.
tunit213 wrote:gardenofsound wrote:If we stay at 6 (or even drop to 7) I think we will end up with Bamba.
Pax clearly wants a wing, and has a huge crush on Robin Lopez. If MPJ is there he will be taken before Bamba. Guarantee it.
League Circles wrote:Awesome! So we have #6 unless someone jumps us (including the kings)!
tunit213 wrote:gardenofsound wrote:If we stay at 6 (or even drop to 7) I think we will end up with Bamba.
Pax clearly wants a wing, and has a huge crush on Robin Lopez. If MPJ is there he will be taken before Bamba. Guarantee it.
Dominater wrote:Im uneasy about that 1 in 3 chance of getting leapfrogged.
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
Lauri_Bird wrote:BEER ON ME!
Senor Frogs
Address:
Woodes Rodgers Walk, Nassau, Isla Nueva Providencia
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
HomoSapien wrote:I wonder if we'd be able to trade into the top 4 if we dangled 6/7, Denzel, and the 22nd pick.
Lana Del Rey wrote:http://www.tankathon.com/pick_odds
Statistically speaking, the Bulls have:
* 5.3% chance of #1
* 6.0% chance of #2
* 7.0% chance of #3
* 44.0% chance of #6
* 33.1% chance of #7
* 4.5% chance of #8
* 0.1% chance of #9
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
donaldtrump_00 wrote:HomoSapien wrote:I wonder if we'd be able to trade into the top 4 if we dangled 6/7, Denzel, and the 22nd pick.
I got news for bulls fans. We probably shouldn't have to trade denzel to move up. Just let the magic take trae young which I clearly see them taking. If Im right were really the 5th selection. Were not drafting young period so him being off before we pick opens up more of a chance at either porter, bamba, bagley. So if everything plays out were still picking top 5. Even with mikal bridges being on paxsons radar I doubt we pass on those 3. Even with bridges I'm happy. I personally think he's a top pick and could turn out better then all of the preferred picks.
fleet wrote:Lana Del Rey wrote:http://www.tankathon.com/pick_odds
Statistically speaking, the Bulls have:
* 5.3% chance of #1
* 6.0% chance of #2
* 7.0% chance of #3
* 44.0% chance of #6
* 33.1% chance of #7
* 4.5% chance of #8
* 0.1% chance of #9
When you put it like that....
44% only. What is our chance of finishing 6 or higher?
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
fleet wrote:So, generally like 62% chance of 6 or higher, 38% chance 7 or lower?
MalagaBulls wrote:For sh**s and giggles we should ask DRose to represent the team at the lottery drawing. That would be wierd based on history.