MAQ wrote:Everyone seems to have missed the "last year" portion of nomorezero's post.
Not sure how. What part of this offense seemed miles ahead of last year?
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, fleet, AshyLarrysDiaper, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson
MAQ wrote:Everyone seems to have missed the "last year" portion of nomorezero's post.
dougthonus wrote:MAQ wrote:Everyone seems to have missed the "last year" portion of nomorezero's post.
Not sure how. What part of this offense seemed miles ahead of last year?
GYBE wrote:I don't think my behaviour changes at all when I'm drunk. But when I'm wasted, my girlfriend becomes a real klutz. She starts walking into doors and falling down stairs. Weird.
MAQ wrote:[gfycat][/gfycat]dougthonus wrote:MAQ wrote:Everyone seems to have missed the "last year" portion of nomorezero's post.
Not sure how. What part of this offense seemed miles ahead of last year?
I believe the praise is for last year. not last night in comparison to last yeat.
dougthonus wrote:Chi town wrote:Yes Nagy was by far the biggest problem lastnight. Way too conservative early. His offensive guys not ready and play... sloppy. Montgomery needed the ball. That kid can play.
I don't see Nagy as being the biggest problem. They looked outclassed by the Packers defense. They stacked the box and either the WRs couldn't create separation to get open or Trubisky just couldn't find them, because they took away the running game and scramble and there was little left.
Michael Jackson wrote:There is an advantage LaFluer has too in the fact that no one has any tape to game plan against him. They had tape to plan against Nagy. If this was week 6 it would be even more damning. Mind you I am not defending Nagy because he did not do a good job but more any other sport I think gameplans in football make a difference.
Chi town wrote:Stacked the box? Packers played a dime the whole game with an average of 5.8 DBs on the field the whole game.
Nagy didn't commit to the run game or Montgomery or Cohen. He failed. He owned it too. He took all the blame.
Nikola wrote:Very disheartening loss. If the coaching staff really has this little faith in trubisky this whole team is screwed. The defense is ready now but the offense looks like it needs rebuilt from the ground up. Terrible.
Packers cornerback Tramon Williams wrote:“We knew if we could get Mitchell Trubisky to play quarterback we could win,”
sco wrote:My take:
1) The "no starters" in preseason kept guys healthy, but at the expense of additional rust. Not sure what is better. Those penalties were a killer.
2) Green Bay defense is better than advertised. Rodgers is hard to keep down.
3) Bears defense did a decent job, but GB O-line did just enough
4) Trubisky needs to get rid of ball quicker...tried to keep plays alive too long. Maybe we lack receivers who can get more separation.
5) Cohen looked very ordinary
bearadonisdna wrote:You force a young player into a qb duel with Aaron Rodgers it’s their best chance to win.
As far as weapons , in theory the bears are dangerous, but Gabriel, Miller aren’t exactly striking fear into hearts of opponents. They are average players most games.
Up until his interception Trubisky’s numbers weren’t that bad, to give him most of the blame.
Yeah it was getting clear he wasn’t making all his reads, and let’s be honest, the Protection wasn’t great.
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.