Zach Lavine thread 3.0
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, fleet, AshyLarrysDiaper, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 15,821
- And1: 7,485
- Joined: Jul 16, 2004
- Location: Oakland
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
I'm not worried. He was never meant to be our best, let alone only, perimeter playmaker. Pair him with real talent at the 3 and the efficiency will come back. Not to the level it was in the first two weeks of the season, but high enough to be a very solid second or third option.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
- GusFring
- Starter
- Posts: 2,129
- And1: 2,666
- Joined: Sep 08, 2018
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:I'm not worried. He was never meant to be our best, let alone only, perimeter playmaker. Pair him with real talent at the 3 and the efficiency will come back. Not to the level it was in the first two weeks of the season, but high enough to be a very solid second or third option.
But when will the bulls have a good 3.
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 15,821
- And1: 7,485
- Joined: Jul 16, 2004
- Location: Oakland
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
GusFring wrote:AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:I'm not worried. He was never meant to be our best, let alone only, perimeter playmaker. Pair him with real talent at the 3 and the efficiency will come back. Not to the level it was in the first two weeks of the season, but high enough to be a very solid second or third option.
But when will the bulls have a good 3.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
- GimmeDat
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 23,915
- And1: 16,880
- Joined: Sep 27, 2013
- Location: Australia
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
Bulls looked a lot better without Lavine tonight. Really freed up Blakeney and Parker to become the main options on offense.
Not taking a dig, just saying those stats we were discussing not long ago need to be taken with a grain of salt.
Not taking a dig, just saying those stats we were discussing not long ago need to be taken with a grain of salt.
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,095
- And1: 3,671
- Joined: May 14, 2001
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
GimmeDat wrote:Bulls looked a lot better without Lavine tonight. Really freed up Blakeney and Parker to become the main options on offense.
Not taking a dig, just saying those stats we were discussing not long ago need to be taken with a grain of salt.
First, I don't think anyone ever claimed the Bulls were better off without Zach. Second I'm not sure why disregarding the bulk of Zach's season (and career) based on one game makes much sense.
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,095
- And1: 3,671
- Joined: May 14, 2001
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:I'm not worried. He was never meant to be our best, let alone only, perimeter playmaker. Pair him with real talent at the 3 and the efficiency will come back. Not to the level it was in the first two weeks of the season, but high enough to be a very solid second or third option.
The problem is he doesn't do anything well except score and so if he's only a solid second or third level scorer, I'm not sure he's a worth that contract.
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
- kulaz3000
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 41,829
- And1: 23,820
- Joined: Oct 25, 2006
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
logical_art wrote:AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:I'm not worried. He was never meant to be our best, let alone only, perimeter playmaker. Pair him with real talent at the 3 and the efficiency will come back. Not to the level it was in the first two weeks of the season, but high enough to be a very solid second or third option.
The problem is he doesn't do anything well except score and so if he's only a solid second or third level scorer, I'm not sure he's a worth that contract.
For a player whose primary responsibility is to score, he rebounds and assists at a pretty strong clip for a shooting guard. Sure, he isn't a lock down defender, but he has improved slightly in that regard. Point being, he doesn't ONLY score, he does contribute in other areas.
Why so serious?
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,946
- And1: 3,512
- Joined: Mar 15, 2010
- Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
Zach's is becoming a solid player (++scorer, - defender)...he used to be a" scorer, ---defender".
He isn't good enough to make this (injured) scrub team better by himself...but he will look/play a lot better with Dunn and Lauri in the line-up, and if we had a starter level SF. I'm on the Porter bandwagon...he is overpaid, but he is a 25year old +3&D wing.
Dunn
Zach
Porter (Career 40.2% from 3)
Lauri (Career 36.2% from 3)
WCJr
Dunn needs to step his shooting game up...but his added (so-so) ball-handling and defense will help keep Zach from being doubled every play....especially with Lauri on the court as well. There would actually be room for Zach to operate.
He isn't good enough to make this (injured) scrub team better by himself...but he will look/play a lot better with Dunn and Lauri in the line-up, and if we had a starter level SF. I'm on the Porter bandwagon...he is overpaid, but he is a 25year old +3&D wing.
Dunn
Zach
Porter (Career 40.2% from 3)
Lauri (Career 36.2% from 3)
WCJr
Dunn needs to step his shooting game up...but his added (so-so) ball-handling and defense will help keep Zach from being doubled every play....especially with Lauri on the court as well. There would actually be room for Zach to operate.
Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,651
- And1: 1,798
- Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
Zach's shooting and confidence have been shaky over the past couple of games, but I like the fact that he has improved in many other facets of the game. His rebounding, assists and steals numbers are at career high, and so is his free-throw attempt, despite the fact that he has mostly rookies and G-Leaguers as teammates.
I would like to see him not let the officials get to his head due to non-calls when he goes to the rim. He is doing a lot of the ballhandling duties, due to Dunn being out, which can be tiring, but he will benefit from this experience in the end.
Not everyone is meant to be the number one option on a contender, and I am sensing it's not what LaVine is. He looks like a damn good second option or even a high-level third option which I am fine with, considering we got him in a package for a guy who himself is not a first-option on a contending team. It's reassuring to see Zach turning into a complete player.
I would like to see him not let the officials get to his head due to non-calls when he goes to the rim. He is doing a lot of the ballhandling duties, due to Dunn being out, which can be tiring, but he will benefit from this experience in the end.
Not everyone is meant to be the number one option on a contender, and I am sensing it's not what LaVine is. He looks like a damn good second option or even a high-level third option which I am fine with, considering we got him in a package for a guy who himself is not a first-option on a contending team. It's reassuring to see Zach turning into a complete player.
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,938
- And1: 7,004
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
Lauri won’t be a 1st option unless he gets a handle and can shoot and score off the dribble. He flashed that a little last year.
I think Zach can be a 1st option with better players around him. He can certainly get his own shot at any time. I see him as an Oladipo first option once Bulls are healthy and teams can’t cheat and double and triple him
I think Zach can be a 1st option with better players around him. He can certainly get his own shot at any time. I see him as an Oladipo first option once Bulls are healthy and teams can’t cheat and double and triple him
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,651
- And1: 1,798
- Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
Chi town wrote:Lauri won’t be a 1st option unless he gets a handle and can shoot and score off the dribble. He flashed that a little last year.
I think Zach can be a 1st option with better players around him. He can certainly get his own shot at any time. I see him as an Oladipo first option once Bulls are healthy and teams can’t cheat and double and triple him
I think Oladipo is first option by default, but not because he is an excellent player. This is why I will never take Indiana seriously. No disrespect to Oladipo, but the only way I can see Indiana taking that next step is by adding another talent of the same level as Oladipo or putting a better superstar next to him.
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
- Jcool0
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,476
- And1: 7,794
- Joined: Jul 12, 2014
- Location: Illinois
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
JimmyJammer wrote:Chi town wrote:Lauri won’t be a 1st option unless he gets a handle and can shoot and score off the dribble. He flashed that a little last year.
I think Zach can be a 1st option with better players around him. He can certainly get his own shot at any time. I see him as an Oladipo first option once Bulls are healthy and teams can’t cheat and double and triple him
I think Oladipo is first option by default, but not because he is an excellent player.This is why I will never take Indiana seriously. No disrespect to Oladipo, but the only way I can see Indiana taking that next step is by adding another talent of the same level as Oladipo or putting a better superstar next to him.
Wait you think a guy who averaged 23 points, 5.2 rebounds, 4.3 assists and 2.4 steals last year isn't an excellent player?
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,938
- And1: 7,004
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
Jcool0 wrote:JimmyJammer wrote:Chi town wrote:Lauri won’t be a 1st option unless he gets a handle and can shoot and score off the dribble. He flashed that a little last year.
I think Zach can be a 1st option with better players around him. He can certainly get his own shot at any time. I see him as an Oladipo first option once Bulls are healthy and teams can’t cheat and double and triple him
I think Oladipo is first option by default, but not because he is an excellent player.This is why I will never take Indiana seriously. No disrespect to Oladipo, but the only way I can see Indiana taking that next step is by adding another talent of the same level as Oladipo or putting a better superstar next to him.
Wait you think a guy who averaged 23 points, 5.2 rebounds, 4.3 assists and 2.4 steals last year isn't an excellent player?
I’d take Oladipo as a 1st option over most East teams 1st options. That includes Kyrie too. Dipo wins w D too.
I think Dipo is absolutely a 1st option. He just doesn’t have much help.
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
- johnnyvann840
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,207
- And1: 18,703
- Joined: Sep 04, 2010
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
Jcool0 wrote:JimmyJammer wrote:Chi town wrote:Lauri won’t be a 1st option unless he gets a handle and can shoot and score off the dribble. He flashed that a little last year.
I think Zach can be a 1st option with better players around him. He can certainly get his own shot at any time. I see him as an Oladipo first option once Bulls are healthy and teams can’t cheat and double and triple him
I think Oladipo is first option by default, but not because he is an excellent player.This is why I will never take Indiana seriously. No disrespect to Oladipo, but the only way I can see Indiana taking that next step is by adding another talent of the same level as Oladipo or putting a better superstar next to him.
Wait you think a guy who averaged 23 points, 5.2 rebounds, 4.3 assists and 2.4 steals last year isn't an excellent player?
Not only those numbers but his defense is top of the league for his position and not worst in the league, like Lavine. His basketball IQ is about a 140 compared to Lavines 95 as well. Oladipo is a player you are going to win with because he is great on both ends of the floor.
I am more than just a serious basketball fan. I am a life-long addict. I was addicted from birth. - Hunter S. Thompson
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,938
- And1: 7,004
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
Who are the best 1st options in the East???
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,468
- And1: 4,887
- Joined: Oct 12, 2006
- Location: California
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
I said last season on this board that when healthy, Zach is on the same level as Booker.
What do you guys think about that statement?
What do you guys think about that statement?
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,422
- And1: 10,789
- Joined: Jun 26, 2014
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
theGreatRC wrote:I said last season on this board that when healthy, Zach is on the same level as Booker.
What do you guys think about that statement?
It's true. Booker is better shooter and Zach is better finisher in the paint.
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,422
- And1: 10,789
- Joined: Jun 26, 2014
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
johnnyvann840 wrote:Jcool0 wrote:JimmyJammer wrote:
I think Oladipo is first option by default, but not because he is an excellent player.This is why I will never take Indiana seriously. No disrespect to Oladipo, but the only way I can see Indiana taking that next step is by adding another talent of the same level as Oladipo or putting a better superstar next to him.
Wait you think a guy who averaged 23 points, 5.2 rebounds, 4.3 assists and 2.4 steals last year isn't an excellent player?
Not only those numbers but his defense is top of the league for his position and not worst in the league, like Lavine. His basketball IQ is about a 140 compared to Lavines 95 as well. Oladipo is a player you are going to win with because he is great on both ends of the floor.
Yet he was considered a huge before last season. Zach is going to put up similar numbers this season yet you still don't trust him. Might as well stick to your guns that he sucks instead flip flopping. It's more entertaining that way...
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,274
- And1: 54
- Joined: Jun 11, 2008
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
theGreatRC wrote:I said last season on this board that when healthy, Zach is on the same level as Booker.
What do you guys think about that statement?
I think having either as your best player or main ballhandler doesn't bode well if you have championship aspirations. There needs to be a more reliable ball-handler next to them as I think a team's offense will run better.
In response to http://www.mediatakeout.com/2009/37659- ... ebook.html
TB#1 wrote:Its like a 21st Century Scarlet Letter.
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,990
- And1: 12,538
- Joined: Jun 30, 2003
- Location: chicago
Re: Zach Lavine thread 3.0
WindyCityBorn wrote:johnnyvann840 wrote:Jcool0 wrote:
Wait you think a guy who averaged 23 points, 5.2 rebounds, 4.3 assists and 2.4 steals last year isn't an excellent player?
Not only those numbers but his defense is top of the league for his position and not worst in the league, like Lavine. His basketball IQ is about a 140 compared to Lavines 95 as well. Oladipo is a player you are going to win with because he is great on both ends of the floor.
Yet he was considered a huge before last season. Zach is going to put up similar numbers this season yet you still don't trust him. Might as well stick to your guns that he sucks instead flip flopping. It's more entertaining that way...
he JUST said that oladipo plays both ends of the floor and zach doesn't. what exactly are you reading?
you did the same thing responding to something i posted in the way-too-early all-star thread. completely whiffed on what i was saying in a hyperventilating rush to defend the honor of zach lavine
the donald, always unpopular, did worse in EVERY state in 2020. and by a greater margin in red states! 50 independently-run elections, none of them rigged